This is a psx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSX_%28DVR%29
The PSX was a PS2 and DVR never released outside of Japan. So why do so many people insist on calling the PS1 PSX?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
This is a psx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSX_%28DVR%29
The PSX was a PS2 and DVR never released outside of Japan. So why do so many people insist on calling the PS1 PSX?
PSX was the codename for the original PS and was widely used back then. So some people still use that.
They don't insist on anything, psx is just what people referred to it as when it launched. Saturn, PSX, N64. PSone didn't exist, at least the name, until the god ugly.....
They don't insist on anything, psx is just what people referred to it as when it launched. Saturn, PSX, N64. PSone didn't exist, at least the name, until the god ugly.....
Heirren
really? I thought the PSOne was qutie a decent looking system.
or at least there are certainly uglier systems out there (the US SNES being one)
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
They don't insist on anything, psx is just what people referred to it as when it launched. Saturn, PSX, N64. PSone didn't exist, at least the name, until the god ugly.....
Darkman2007
really? I thought the PSOne was qutie a decent looking system.
or at least there are certainly uglier systems out there (the US SNES being one)
The US snes is one of my favorites, actually.
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"]
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
They don't insist on anything, psx is just what people referred to it as when it launched. Saturn, PSX, N64. PSone didn't exist, at least the name, until the god ugly.....
Heirren
really? I thought the PSOne was qutie a decent looking system.
or at least there are certainly uglier systems out there (the US SNES being one)
The US snes is one of my favorites, actually.
guess you like overly boxy designs.[QUOTE="Heirren"][QUOTE="Darkman2007"]
really? I thought the PSOne was qutie a decent looking system.
or at least there are certainly uglier systems out there (the US SNES being one)
Darkman2007
The US snes is one of my favorites, actually.
guess you like overly boxy designs.That doesn't mean it is poorly designed. Good use of shape, imo. Plus, I like the original psx design, which is very derivative of the US snes--just a more circular version, which goes along with the introduction of the disc based format(and yes I'm aware it wasn't the first disc based system, but it really did bring it to the limelight.)
guess you like overly boxy designs.[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Heirren"]
The US snes is one of my favorites, actually.
Heirren
That doesn't mean it is poorly designed. Good use of shape, imo. Plus, I like the original psx design, which is very derivative of the US snes--just a more circular version, which goes along with the introduction of the disc based format(and yes I'm aware it wasn't the first disc based system, but it really did bring it to the limelight.)
if you had to ask me what my favourite looking systems would be, it would be the original grey PS1 and the grey Japanese Saturn (althoug the western black Saturn is very nice as well)[QUOTE="Darkman2007"] original grey PS1Heirren
Which really does resemble the US snes.
I can't see the resemblence , if anything ,its more like the JPN/PAL SNES
though if youre judging by colour scheme its closer to the JP Saturn
despite it looking odd in this pic, its actually a slightly darker grey than the PS1
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"] original grey PS1Darkman2007
Which really does resemble the US snes.
I can't see the resemblence , if anything ,its more like the JPN/PAL SNES
though if youre judging by colour scheme its closer to the JP Saturn
despite it looking odd in this pic, its actually a slightly darker grey than the PS1
No way! C'mon man, the psx resembles the US snes VERY much so. It's undeniable!
I do like the Saturn design, btw. Original Genesis and Dreamcast were nice too.
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"]
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
Which really does resemble the US snes.
Heirren
I can't see the resemblence , if anything ,its more like the JPN/PAL SNES
though if youre judging by colour scheme its closer to the JP Saturn
despite it looking odd in this pic, its actually a slightly darker grey than the PS1
No way! C'mon man, the psx resembles the US snes VERY much so. It's undeniable!
I do like the Saturn design, btw. Original Genesis and Dreamcast were nice too.
we will have to agree to disagree then , I really can't see any resemblence.
as for the DC, it looks nice though it suffers from the same issue the SNES does, the plastic has a tendency to yellow .
the white Saturn also had that probelm , but to a lesser extent (seems to be the type of plastic they used)
Maybe as early as when the playstation was still the SNES Play-Station CD. Nintendo had just thrown Sony to the curb. Sony then continued work on the then secret PSX project. Then on December 3rd 1994. The rest is history.
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"] original grey PS1Darkman2007
Which really does resemble the US snes.
I can't see the resemblence , if anything ,its more like the JPN/PAL SNES
though if youre judging by colour scheme its closer to the JP Saturn
despite it looking odd in this pic, its actually a slightly darker grey than the PS1
Not at all. Look at the US snes, extend the sides by just a bit, and put a round thing in the center of the unit. Aesthetically it is very similar, shape/space wise.
I think you have the question backwards. It should read "When did people start calling the PSX the PS1?"
PSX was the codename used for the Playstation at first. A few websites (yeah, they existed back then, lol) and gaming magazines started using the name and it caught on. So much so that there was even a monthly magazine called PSX that focused on Playstation only. Now this was a different magazine than the Official U.S. Playstation Magazine that came with demo discs and was fully endorsed by Sony.
People didn't even start calling Playstation PS1 until PS2 came out, simply to differentiate between the two since most of us called PS1 by the name Playstation back in the day.
I think you have the question backwards. It should read "When did people start calling the PSX the PS1?"
PSX was the codename used for the Playstation at first. A few websites (yeah, they existed back then, lol) and gaming magazines started using the name and it caught on. So much so that there was even a monthly magazine called PSX that focused on Playstation only. Now this was a different magazine than the Official U.S. Playstation Magazine that came with demo discs and was fully endorsed by Sony.
People didn't even start calling Playstation PS1 until PS2 came out, simply to differentiate between the two since most of us called PS1 by the name Playstation back in the day.
Emerald_Warrior
Hmm...wasn't it PS(M)? Or was there another one with 'X' as well?
[QUOTE="Emerald_Warrior"]
I think you have the question backwards. It should read "When did people start calling the PSX the PS1?"
PSX was the codename used for the Playstation at first. A few websites (yeah, they existed back then, lol) and gaming magazines started using the name and it caught on. So much so that there was even a monthly magazine called PSX that focused on Playstation only. Now this was a different magazine than the Official U.S. Playstation Magazine that came with demo discs and was fully endorsed by Sony.
People didn't even start calling Playstation PS1 until PS2 came out, simply to differentiate between the two since most of us called PS1 by the name Playstation back in the day.
Heirren
Hmm...wasn't it PS(M)? Or was there another one with 'X' as well?
PSX:
And note the date: August/September 1996.
PSX has never been a official designation of the PS1 and is nothing more than slang, regardless of whether it was its code name or not. People don't call dreamcast Katana or the gamecube dolphin. It was called the PlayStation back than and PS1 now to differentiate itself from the other PlayStation's.
PSX has never been a official designation of the PS1 and is nothing more than slang, regardless of whether it was its code name or not. People don't call dreamcast Katana or the gamecube dolphin. It was called the PlayStation back than and PS1 now to differentiate itself from the other PlayStation's.
lordoftheleft
Actually even publications called it the PSX back then. Besides, the "real" PSX never left Japan so it's a little irrelevant.
lol snes model 2 is not boxey just so you know also that was the style back then you had the old tube tvs , well the snes goes well with it ,
so ya back then we didnt care for flashy things, and i still dont
lol snes model 2 is not boxey just so you know also that was the style back then you had the old tube tvs , well the snes goes well with it ,
so ya back then we didnt care for flashy things, and i still dont
mariokart64fan
What? People didn't care about flashy things then? ROFL! Just because technology has moved ahead and things seem flashier nowadays, doesn't mean the same wasn't true then. It's just that the technology wasn't as good then as it is now. People had surround sound systems, people had big-screen TVs, and SNESs costed $150, which with the rate inflation is about even with consoles today. And if people didn't like flashy, then why did the Neo Geo do as well as it did? A $600 system that stayed alive for an astonishing 14 years.
[QUOTE="mariokart64fan"]
lol snes model 2 is not boxey just so you know also that was the style back then you had the old tube tvs , well the snes goes well with it ,
so ya back then we didnt care for flashy things, and i still dont
Emerald_Warrior
What? People didn't care about flashy things then? ROFL! Just because technology has moved ahead and things seem flashier nowadays, doesn't mean the same wasn't true then. It's just that the technology wasn't as good then as it is now. People had surround sound systems, people had big-screen TVs, and SNESs costed $150, which with the rate inflation is about even with consoles today. And if people didn't like flashy, then why did the Neo Geo do as well as it did? A $600 system that stayed alive for an astonishing 14 years.
what?? the Neo Geo did well? certainly not, it did well in the arcades, but outside of that it was a relative obscurity. the reason it lasted 14 years was because SNK really just didn't make another arcade board, the Neo Geo was capable enough and had so much development put into it that SNK were able to push the Neo Geo to the limit and then some. people like flashy of course, but I think 600 dollars was a bit too much for most people at the tme (especially given the perception that video games are for children) but yes, anyone saying nobody cared about graphics or something similar has is wearing nostalgia glasses Im afraid.[QUOTE="Emerald_Warrior"][QUOTE="mariokart64fan"]
lol snes model 2 is not boxey just so you know also that was the style back then you had the old tube tvs , well the snes goes well with it ,
so ya back then we didnt care for flashy things, and i still dont
Darkman2007
What? People didn't care about flashy things then? ROFL! Just because technology has moved ahead and things seem flashier nowadays, doesn't mean the same wasn't true then. It's just that the technology wasn't as good then as it is now. People had surround sound systems, people had big-screen TVs, and SNESs costed $150, which with the rate inflation is about even with consoles today. And if people didn't like flashy, then why did the Neo Geo do as well as it did? A $600 system that stayed alive for an astonishing 14 years.
what?? the Neo Geo did well? certainly not, it did well in the arcades, but outside of that it was a relative obscurity. the reason it lasted 14 years was because SNK really just didn't make another arcade board, the Neo Geo was capable enough and had so much development put into it that SNK were able to push the Neo Geo to the limit and then some. people like flashy of course, but I think 600 dollars was a bit too much for most people at the tme (especially given the perception that video games are for children) but yes, anyone saying nobody cared about graphics or something similar has is wearing nostalgia glasses Im afraid.No doubt it didn't do as well as Sega Genesis or SNES. It's not even a comparison. But a console being alive for 14 years is an accomplishment no matter what. Especially compared to flash in the pans like Jaguar, CD-i, and 3DO.
what?? the Neo Geo did well? certainly not, it did well in the arcades, but outside of that it was a relative obscurity. the reason it lasted 14 years was because SNK really just didn't make another arcade board, the Neo Geo was capable enough and had so much development put into it that SNK were able to push the Neo Geo to the limit and then some. people like flashy of course, but I think 600 dollars was a bit too much for most people at the tme (especially given the perception that video games are for children) but yes, anyone saying nobody cared about graphics or something similar has is wearing nostalgia glasses Im afraid.[QUOTE="Darkman2007"][QUOTE="Emerald_Warrior"]
What? People didn't care about flashy things then? ROFL! Just because technology has moved ahead and things seem flashier nowadays, doesn't mean the same wasn't true then. It's just that the technology wasn't as good then as it is now. People had surround sound systems, people had big-screen TVs, and SNESs costed $150, which with the rate inflation is about even with consoles today. And if people didn't like flashy, then why did the Neo Geo do as well as it did? A $600 system that stayed alive for an astonishing 14 years.
Emerald_Warrior
No doubt it didn't do as well as Sega Genesis or SNES. It's not even a comparison. But a console being alive for 14 years is an accomplishment no matter what. Especially compared to flash in the pans like Jaguar, CD-i, and 3DO.
well as I said, the main reason it lasted so long was because SNK really didnt make another arcade board apart from the Hyper Neo Geo 64 , which flopped in the arcades. since the arcade and home units were the same (you can even play arcade carts in a home system with an adapter) , it was basically no work to make a home version (just add a few options really) I will give SNK credit for sticking with it to the bitter end though .i'm pretty sure magazines like Game informer called it (the Sony Playstation) PSX before the PS2 game out. because just calling it PS made no sense and calling it PS1 wouldnt make sense until there is PS2. Thats like calling a movie "Transformers 1" before there is even a 2nd movie announced. Then you have the competition for the playstation: N64, SAT, GEN, SNES, NES,..... see how each is 3 or 4 letters? adding an X to the end of stuff was cool back then, so PSX made sense.
edit: oh and the fact that the "PSx" never left japan really , so its not like MOST people would be confused about what you were talking about if you called a Playstation a psx.
[QUOTE="Heirren"]
[QUOTE="Darkman2007"] original grey PS1Darkman2007
Which really does resemble the US snes.
I can't see the resemblence , if anything ,its more like the JPN/PAL SNES
though if youre judging by colour scheme its closer to the JP Saturn
despite it looking odd in this pic, its actually a slightly darker grey than the PS1
I really want one of those japanese white Saturns! I have the second generation Saturns , with the round buttons instead of the thin oval ones.As far as the PSX and PS1, I thought it was released in Japan as the PSX, which over here it was the PS1? At least thats how I remember it. I don't recall anyone who was going to buy it when it released here calling it the PSX.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment