Which of these shooters will you be getting?

Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

MAG

Battlefield Bad Company 2

Borderlands

Probably none of them. Might get MW2 though, still undecided.

The only one that I am certain I will be picking up is Modern Warfare 2.

MW2.I already got my money set on it

As I loved the first Operation Flashpoint, I can't wait for its sequel.

All of them except Flashpoint.

MW2 when I find it cheap, Borderland first day its out. Bad Company 2 depends what sort of port it turns out to be. MAG FPS on a pad no thank you. Operation Flashpoint isnt for me.

modern warfare 2 all day for me...i'll only have the time to seriously play a few shooters the rest of the year and this will be one of them (halo 3 odst being the other but it wasn't listed)...

Border Land and Bad Company 2. I'll wait for a used copy or a price dropof MW2

MW2 definite

What? No Halo 3: ODST? Well I'm definitely getting that and Modern Warfare 2. I might check out Bad Company 2 and Borderlands as well.

Most likely getting MW 2, borderlands perhaps, but not on the list that i am getting is ODST

All of them but Bad Company 2. They fail at copying Modern Warfare.LiftedHeadshot

I don't see how they copied MW since Battlefield 2 made the series enter the whole Modern Era way before CoD ever did.

[QUOTE="LiftedHeadshot"]All of them but Bad Company 2. They fail at copying Modern Warfare.Raikoh_

I don't see how they copied MW since Battlefield 2 made the series enter the whole Modern Era way before CoD ever did.

Maybe Borderlands, basically - to sum it up succinctly - because I like Diablo II. Rare is the first person shooter that holds my interest though, so it's kind of up in the air. I don't care about any of those other games.

OFP:DR and MW2 are on my list

MW2 for me. I feel sorry for all the other games coming out at the same time.

MW2

MW2 no question

[QUOTE="Raikoh_"]

[QUOTE="LiftedHeadshot"]All of them but Bad Company 2. They fail at copying Modern Warfare.dakan45

I don't see how they copied MW since Battlefield 2 made the series enter the whole Modern Era way before CoD ever did.

No... No they did not. Have any of you guys actually played BF:BC? I mean really. They have NOTHING in common with each other aside from their modern setting.

Noe of them. I'm waiting for Uncharted 2, Crysis 2.

I don't have a ps3 or 360, but if I did I would pick up modern warfare 2 for sure.
That game is amazing

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="Raikoh_"]

I don't see how they copied MW since Battlefield 2 made the series enter the whole Modern Era way before CoD ever did.

Raikoh_

No... No they did not. Have any of you guys actually played BF:BC? I mean really. They have NOTHING in common with each other aside from their modern setting.

[QUOTE="Raikoh_"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"] they do copy modern warfare singleplayer however.dakan45

No... No they did not. Have any of you guys actually played BF:BC? I mean really. They have NOTHING in common with each other aside from their modern setting.

Once again, no. Please, go play the games and then come talk to me.

Well, I WOULD definitely buy Modern Warfare 2, but I found out that my friend is going to buy it, so I can lend it from him. The second pick after Modern Warfare 2 for me is going to be Borderlands.

MW2 and Borderlands.

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="Raikoh_"]

No... No they did not. Have any of you guys actually played BF:BC? I mean really. They have NOTHING in common with each other aside from their modern setting.

Raikoh_

Once again, no. Please, go play the games and then come talk to me.

[QUOTE="Raikoh_"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"] The singleplayer mode is basicly a copy of cod4.dakan45

Once again, no. Please, go play the games and then come talk to me.

I'm sorry that logic is just idiotic. Just because it doesn't play a certain way it MUST be a copy of another even though the two campaigns have NOTHING in common at all? Well now that doesn't make sense. By your logic, MW is just a copy of Halo since you play as one character who is practically silent throughout the entire game, has regenerating health and when you die you get a game over. Are we going to start saying Halo is just a copy of Goldeneye? If I understand correctly then, you're saying every FPS is just a copy of another just because of a very small similarity? Yeah, that doesn't make any sense at all.

Saying they copied MW because when you die, you get a game over is probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard. BC didn't have endlessly respawning enemies, or small linear maps, instead it had large open maps, a plethora of vehicles(some you could drive some you couldn't), no health regeneration and a humorous story. I know it's cool and all to try and say that one game is copying another, but it means nothing if you're just grasping at straws and trying to find the smallest similarities to argue about here.

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="Raikoh_"]

Once again, no. Please, go play the games and then come talk to me.

Raikoh_

I'm sorry that logic is just idiotic. Just because it doesn't play a certain way it MUST be a copy of another even though the two campaigns have NOTHING in common at all? Well now that doesn't make sense. By your logic, MW is just a copy of Halo since you play as one character who is practically silent throughout the entire game, has regenerating health and when you die you get a game over. Are we going to start saying Halo is just a copy of Goldeneye? If I understand correctly then, you're saying every FPS is just a copy of another just because of a very small similarity? Yeah, that doesn't make any sense at all.

Saying they copied MW because when you die, you get a game over is probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard. BC didn't have endlessly respawning enemies, or small linear maps, instead it had large open maps, a plethora of vehicles(some you could drive some you couldn't), no health regeneration and a humorous story. I know it's cool and all to try and say that one game is copying another, but it means nothing if you're just grasping at straws and trying to find the smallest similarities to argue about here.

Probably just Modern Warfare 2

Like everyone else, MW2 is what will be making a hole in my wallet.

100% chance of bad company 2

90% chance of modern warfare 2

60% chance of mag

50% chance of borderlands

30% chance of dragon rising

[QUOTE="Raikoh_"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"] It is the same idea basicly, bf never had singleplayer, the fact that they have bigger areas and vehicles and weapons dont have innaccuracy is a diffirent thing, Ever played Frontlines? The singleplayer has more vehicle usage and you are not alone if you die you can respawn and use gadgets or change class, also the story doesnt evolve around a squad of game characters but its about war and 2 diffirent armies. A battlefield game could have singleplayer that will be like that or Star wars battlefront, however they choose to make characters and add a diffirent story than doesnt focus on he conflict, plus they didnt allow you to use vehicles much and you have one character if he dies its game over because he is your main character, but in games like star wars battlefront your can respawn with a diffirent class in singleplayer campaign. Bad company singleplaye however is strict linear storytelling with a single character to control, many characters, no classes or respawns and not much vehicle usage, most of the combat is focused around using weapons and taking out TONS of infantry, very unlike BF series and very like cod 4 or halo. So its safe to say that bad company singleplay is a mix of copy of cod4 and halo.dakan45

I'm sorry that logic is just idiotic. Just because it doesn't play a certain way it MUST be a copy of another even though the two campaigns have NOTHING in common at all? Well now that doesn't make sense. By your logic, MW is just a copy of Halo since you play as one character who is practically silent throughout the entire game, has regenerating health and when you die you get a game over. Are we going to start saying Halo is just a copy of Goldeneye? If I understand correctly then, you're saying every FPS is just a copy of another just because of a very small similarity? Yeah, that doesn't make any sense at all.

Saying they copied MW because when you die, you get a game over is probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard. BC didn't have endlessly respawning enemies, or small linear maps, instead it had large open maps, a plethora of vehicles(some you could drive some you couldn't), no health regeneration and a humorous story. I know it's cool and all to try and say that one game is copying another, but it means nothing if you're just grasping at straws and trying to find the smallest similarities to argue about here.

It's not that I don't understand it, hence why I said your arguement is nothing by using such small similarities. You just honestly have no idea what you're trying to talk about. It's idiotic logic because you can't point a common element in a video game and say they used it to copy another. But, whatever you want to think, just right on thinking it.

I'll be gettin Left 4 Dead 2!

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="Raikoh_"]

I'm sorry that logic is just idiotic. Just because it doesn't play a certain way it MUST be a copy of another even though the two campaigns have NOTHING in common at all? Well now that doesn't make sense. By your logic, MW is just a copy of Halo since you play as one character who is practically silent throughout the entire game, has regenerating health and when you die you get a game over. Are we going to start saying Halo is just a copy of Goldeneye? If I understand correctly then, you're saying every FPS is just a copy of another just because of a very small similarity? Yeah, that doesn't make any sense at all.

Saying they copied MW because when you die, you get a game over is probably the stupidest thing I've ever heard. BC didn't have endlessly respawning enemies, or small linear maps, instead it had large open maps, a plethora of vehicles(some you could drive some you couldn't), no health regeneration and a humorous story. I know it's cool and all to try and say that one game is copying another, but it means nothing if you're just grasping at straws and trying to find the smallest similarities to argue about here.

Raikoh_

It's not that I don't understand it, hence why I said your arguement is nothing by using such small similarities. You just honestly have no idea what you're trying to talk about. It's idiotic logic because you can't point a common element in a video game and say they used it to copy another. But, whatever you want to think, just right on thinking it.

"Small similarities"

Ok thats why people said that infamous and prototype are so similar, because of small similaries, no game can be an 100% copy of each other, when people comparing bad comany with cod4 they compare them because they ARE similar in general and do not focus on details.

But you are the one who will NEVER understand why all those people compare them due to you logic

"You can point a common element

:shock: I think i did, if you cant see it, this discussion is over because you wont ever accept anything else apart from what you think.