Who ACTUALLY PLAYED Virtual Boy?

  • 59 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#1 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

This is just a question for all the people saying they think the Virtual Boy was terrible...

How many of you actually played the system? Because for a lot of people who are watching reviews and such, the games look terrible because it's so flat (as you need 2 lenses to get the 3d effects).

If you've never played and are basing your opinion on what you've seen on youtube or the like, trust me the games are nowhere near as bad as they look. But who here has actually played it, and may even have enjoyed their time with it?

Avatar image for SirSpudly
SirSpudly

4045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 SirSpudly
Member since 2006 • 4045 Posts

I played it at a Target several times, playing Wario Clash, Virtual Tennis, and a bit of Nester's Funky Bowling.

The system itself seemed ok, it was bolted down and gave me a bit of a cramp in my neck from stopping down to level with it. The games were also ok, a little slow and awkward to play without seeing the buttons. So I would have to either stop the game and look down or fumble my hands around until i hit the button that worked.

But every time I pulled out to leave, I felt a bit light headed. Not unusual for me at the time (old graphics and excitement seem to do that to me) but still enough to know that it wasn't worth owning when I already had a 64 and Game Boy.

Avatar image for PersonNinja
PersonNinja

405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 PersonNinja
Member since 2008 • 405 Posts
Haven't played it and really don't want to.
Avatar image for Talldude80
Talldude80

6321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#4 Talldude80
Member since 2003 • 6321 Posts

played it at the store a couple times, found it unbearingly horrible. hence why i never bought one and probably never will (unless i see one for $5)

Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts
Got it in the closet over there, along with 8 games.
Avatar image for dog_dirt
dog_dirt

2813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 dog_dirt
Member since 2009 • 2813 Posts

i don't need to smell dog **** to know its dog ****

Avatar image for Gohansephiroth
Gohansephiroth

9871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 Gohansephiroth
Member since 2005 • 9871 Posts

My cousin has one and I've played it a number of times, its not great but its not that terrible either, its just not a whole lot of fun.

Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#8 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts
I owned one for a while...Could only play for about 10 minutes max. Kinda wish I still had it for the kitsch-value alone...
Avatar image for BL4CKV4LOR
BL4CKV4LOR

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 BL4CKV4LOR
Member since 2009 • 49 Posts

I have one and yeah, it does suck.

Mario's Tennis is the only game I have and it's awful.

Why does the controller have 2 D-pads?

Dude.

Why do you think there are less than like 25 games for the thing?

Because it just sucks.

I'm a huge N fanboy too. I play my NES every day.

Virtual Boy just sucks..

Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

The Angry Video Game Nerd played it lol if you guys haven't played this crap check out his video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyVAp0tOk5Afaustotaveras

Haha I've seen it. But he actually says some of the games aren't even that bad. In fact he says Wario Land is "damn good". But James is hilarious, great. If you liked that go to http://www,cinemassacre.com

He has everything there. Including reviews of other consoles such as the Jaguar, 32x, Sega CD, Intellivision etc.

Avatar image for PersonNinja
PersonNinja

405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 PersonNinja
Member since 2008 • 405 Posts

[QUOTE="faustotaveras"]The Angry Video Game Nerd played it lol if you guys haven't played this crap check out his video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyVAp0tOk5Asonic_spark

Haha I've seen it. But he actually says some of the games aren't even that bad. In fact he says Wario Land is "damn good". But James is hilarious, great. If you liked that go to http://www,cinemassacre.com

He has everything there. Including reviews of other consoles such as the Jaguar, 32x, Sega CD, Intellivision etc.

His console and hardware reviews are the best.
Avatar image for mfp16
mfp16

4551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 mfp16
Member since 2006 • 4551 Posts
It's funny that you bring this up. I owned a virtual boy and quite a few games around it's release in the US. This of course was before the internet had evolved to a more social form. I loved my virtual boy and I played it constantly. Then when I finally starting using the internet for the sort of things we use today I discovered all this hate for the product. That surprised me quite a bit, it had some problems of course but it didn't deserve the reputation that evolved.
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

Got it in the closet over there, along with 8 games.MAILER_DAEMON

Wow, so you own over 33% of the library? Nice.

Anyway, I played the VB a few times as a kid when my local blockbuster had it up on display. I thought it sucked back then because it only had one color, used vector graphics, and made me a bit sick (although to be fair I was also straining to get my head up to the thing since I was still a little kid at the time).

Avatar image for meekgeekquinn
meekgeekquinn

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 meekgeekquinn
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I played the system at a friend's house as a child. I remember it looking like crap and giving me an intense migraine. Overall not a pleasant experience, I don't know why anybody would want to play one now.
Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#16 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"]Got it in the closet over there, along with 8 games.gameguy6700

Wow, so you own over 33% of the library? Nice.

Anyway, I played the VB a few times as a kid when my local blockbuster had it up on display. I thought it sucked back then because it only had one color, used vector graphics, and made me a bit sick (although to be fair I was also straining to get my head up to the thing since I was still a little kid at the time).

That's over half of the North American Library

Hey Mailer Daemon, do you have "Space Invaders Virtual Collection"?

Avatar image for m0zart
m0zart

11580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#17 m0zart
Member since 2003 • 11580 Posts

I played the Virtual Boy and loved it. I especially loved Galactic Pinball, which is hands down my favorite video pinball game of all time, and of course I had a lot of fun playing Wario Land for the VB. That is by far my favorite Wario Land game.

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

I played it a bit when I was moving my cousin to his new house. He had one in the back of his closet. I played for a bit, then we beat it with a sledgehammer.

Avatar image for Sparticus247
Sparticus247

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Sparticus247
Member since 2005 • 2368 Posts

I played the Virtual Boy and loved it. I especially loved Galactic Pinball, which is hands down my favorite video pinball game of all time, and of course I had a lot of fun playing Wario Land for the VB. That is by far my favorite Wario Land game.

m0zart

haha, those were my favorite 2 titles as well. I loved the sevret Samus Cameo that you could earn by breaking the bumpers.

Avatar image for zelda450
zelda450

664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#20 zelda450
Member since 2006 • 664 Posts

I did, and I loved it. As a matter of fact, my dad bought me one of these bad boys when I graduated from high school:

vbkiosk

'Tis one of my most prized possessions :)

Avatar image for Samslayer
Samslayer

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 0

#21 Samslayer
Member since 2005 • 1852 Posts

Owned one, and really didn't like it. Just using the system made me physically sore for some reason, just because I was constantly hunched over while I was playing it, haha. It was a good try by nintendo to be innovative, but for me the technology just didn't catch up to the idea!

Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#22 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts
I never got that eye irritation and headaches that people make fun of it for. I had a great time with it, and I didn't need even need to rest my eyes. The system had to tell me to do it.
Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"]

[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"]Got it in the closet over there, along with 8 games.sonic_spark

Wow, so you own over 33% of the library? Nice.

Anyway, I played the VB a few times as a kid when my local blockbuster had it up on display. I thought it sucked back then because it only had one color, used vector graphics, and made me a bit sick (although to be fair I was also straining to get my head up to the thing since I was still a little kid at the time).

That's over half of the North American Library

Hey Mailer Daemon, do you have "Space Invaders Virtual Collection"?

Nope... I've got these. Five of them I got for my 13th birthday, since stores were selling games for $5 at most. Virtual Boy Wario Land was a great platformer by all standards, but I think I put more time into Teleroboxer and Panic Bomber than anything else.
Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

[QUOTE="sonic_spark"]

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"]

Wow, so you own over 33% of the library? Nice.

Anyway, I played the VB a few times as a kid when my local blockbuster had it up on display. I thought it sucked back then because it only had one color, used vector graphics, and made me a bit sick (although to be fair I was also straining to get my head up to the thing since I was still a little kid at the time).

MAILER_DAEMON

That's over half of the North American Library

Hey Mailer Daemon, do you have "Space Invaders Virtual Collection"?

Nope... I've got these. Five of them I got for my 13th birthday, since stores were selling games for $5 at most. Virtual Boy Wario Land was a great platformer by all standards, but I think I put more time into Teleroboxer and Panic Bomber than anything else.

I've actually only played (way back when) Mario Clash, Red Alarm, Mario Tennis and 3d Tetris. What did you think of Teleroboxer?

I just bought a Virtual Boy on ebay (cannot wait till it gets here) which will be the first time I've played it since I used to rent the console (yes I said rent) since 1995, 15 years..and I bought Mario Tennis and Red Alarm. I am getting Teleroboxer (which I have not played) but there's no reviews for it. What were your thoughts?

Avatar image for DraugenCP
DraugenCP

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#25 DraugenCP
Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

I've played it, yeah. It was a funny novelty, but pretty forgettable when looking at the gameplay. And yes, the stories about it giving you headaches are entirely true. Playing this thing for longer than 15 minutes just can't be healthy.

Avatar image for buddog22
buddog22

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 buddog22
Member since 2010 • 35 Posts
I played it at the state fair when just before they released it and it killed my eyes and gave me a headache. I thought the games were "alright", but you can't enjoy something that kills you head like that.
Avatar image for DeafNYCPlayer
DeafNYCPlayer

2314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 DeafNYCPlayer
Member since 2004 • 2314 Posts
I played Red Alarm at EB store in Rochester, NY. It was good.
Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#28 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

There's one somewhere back home; probably in my oldest brother's closet.

We had 4 games on it I think, and while the games we had weren't that bad, my neck would get soar after playing a game for a little while due to bending over to look through the screen.

Can't say I miss the system.

Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#29 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts
I played it over at a friends place. Played Mario Tennis and some other Mario game, don't remember what it was called. Anyway, I played it for like 3 hours straight and was seeing spots, and had a headache for a good while. I had fun but the after effects were not pleasant -_-
Avatar image for billyd5301
billyd5301

1572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#30 billyd5301
Member since 2008 • 1572 Posts
It's not perfect, and it has it's issues but the people who actually own it and some games know that it's not that bad and actually has some really fun games for it. Childish losers (yeah i said it) like the angry video game nerd give it and some other stuff bad names which is why you get posts like: "i don't need to smell dog **** to know its dog ****" Then the people who can't afford or are too naive to actually get a Virtual Boy post on here about how terrible it is, having never touched on in real life.
Avatar image for Emerald_Warrior
Emerald_Warrior

6581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#31 Emerald_Warrior
Member since 2008 • 6581 Posts

This is just a question for all the people saying they think the Virtual Boy was terrible...

How many of you actually played the system? Because for a lot of people who are watching reviews and such, the games look terrible because it's so flat (as you need 2 lenses to get the 3d effects).

If you've never played and are basing your opinion on what you've seen on youtube or the like, trust me the games are nowhere near as bad as they look. But who here has actually played it, and may even have enjoyed their time with it?

sonic_spark
Are you sure you actually played the Virtual Boy? Because it was indeed horrible. It had only black and red for colors. The constant stream of red made your vision a little off for like 20 minutes after playing. And the thing gave you headaches. How much fun is a Wario induced headache? None, that's how much. And most of the games were horrible to play on top of it! The simplicity of the gameplay was almost as simple as 70s video games. And the graphics were laughable. Sure it was 3D, 3D in the sense that there was depth perception to the games. But the figures in the game were flat characters and objects set in a 3D field. Add to all that, the physical system itself is an oddly shaped monstrosity of plastic that if you didn't know better you'd think was the latest sculpture at some trendy San Francisco art museum. The library is the smallest library of any system (not couting the early Pong systems, Magnavox Odyssey, and Fairchild Channel F of course), which really is just icing on the crap cake that is Virtual Boy. It's so bad, that every Virtual Boy should be burned and erased from humanity's collective memory. -Nate-
Avatar image for billyd5301
billyd5301

1572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#32 billyd5301
Member since 2008 • 1572 Posts

The original Game Boy had how many colors? 2. Gray and Puke Green. It was small and sometimes hard to distinguish objects while playing. That can also induce headaches. The graphics were also laughable.

"The simplicity of the gameplay was almost as simple as 70s video games". This is an outright lie. Yes there were simple games. The same can be said for Gameboy PS1, PS2, PS3, and almost every system out there. Every game for Virtual Boy is not simplistic.

The same style of games were also available for GB, GBA, NES, and SNES. The 3D fields were how all 3D effects worked in that day. It wasn't made at the same time of Avatar. It looks odd because of what it is and what it has to do to make the 3D effect work. The library is small because it didn't sell well and some people were having bad effects from prolonged play. It's not the best system out there and I can respect an opinion, but these are really invalid statements about it.

Avatar image for Emerald_Warrior
Emerald_Warrior

6581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#33 Emerald_Warrior
Member since 2008 • 6581 Posts

The original Game Boy had how many colors? 2. Gray and Puke Green. It was small and sometimes hard to distinguish objects while playing. That can also induce headaches. The graphics were also laughable.

"The simplicity of the gameplay was almost as simple as 70s video games". This is an outright lie. Yes there were simple games. The same can be said for Gameboy PS1, PS2, PS3, and almost every system out there. Every game for Virtual Boy is not simplistic.

The same style of games were also available for GB, GBA, NES, and SNES. The 3D fields were how all 3D effects worked in that day. It wasn't made at the same time of Avatar. It looks odd because of what it is and what it has to do to make the 3D effect work. The library is small because it didn't sell well and some people were having bad effects from prolonged play. It's not the best system out there and I can respect an opinion, but these are really invalid statements about it.

billyd5301
1. Yeah, the original Gameboy did have crappy 2-tone colors, that's why I prefer my GBA or Sega Game Gear over the Gameboy Classic. But we aren't talking about Gameboy, we're talking about Virtual Boy. And my Gameboy has never given me a headache. 2. No, it's not an outright lie that the games were simple. There is not one game on the Virtual Boy that has the depth of say Final Fantasy, Legend of Zelda, or Super Mario World. They were simple games that should have had more depth and gameplay put into them for the time it came out. 3. And no, 3D games at this time were not made that way. Virtual Boy came out at the same time as Sega Saturn, PS1, and N64; all of which had true 3D graphics. 4. Agreed. The library is small because bad effects of prolonged play. That just supports my original post. The worst part of it all is the headaches and the weird vision you got for a little bit after playing it. No video game should induce physical side-effects, and the fact that it does makes it a complete and utter failure. -Nate-
Avatar image for DealRogers
DealRogers

4589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 DealRogers
Member since 2005 • 4589 Posts

I did and I enjoyed it for a while.

Avatar image for billyd5301
billyd5301

1572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#35 billyd5301
Member since 2008 • 1572 Posts

[QUOTE="billyd5301"]

The original Game Boy had how many colors? 2. Gray and Puke Green. It was small and sometimes hard to distinguish objects while playing. That can also induce headaches. The graphics were also laughable.

"The simplicity of the gameplay was almost as simple as 70s video games". This is an outright lie. Yes there were simple games. The same can be said for Gameboy PS1, PS2, PS3, and almost every system out there. Every game for Virtual Boy is not simplistic.

The same style of games were also available for GB, GBA, NES, and SNES. The 3D fields were how all 3D effects worked in that day. It wasn't made at the same time of Avatar. It looks odd because of what it is and what it has to do to make the 3D effect work. The library is small because it didn't sell well and some people were having bad effects from prolonged play. It's not the best system out there and I can respect an opinion, but these are really invalid statements about it.

Emerald_Warrior

1. Yeah, the original Gameboy did have crappy 2-tone colors, that's why I prefer my GBA or Sega Game Gear over the Gameboy Classic. But we aren't talking about Gameboy, we're talking about Virtual Boy. And my Gameboy has never given me a headache. 2. No, it's not an outright lie that the games were simple. There is not one game on the Virtual Boy that has the depth of say Final Fantasy, Legend of Zelda, or Super Mario World. They were simple games that should have had more depth and gameplay put into them for the time it came out. 3. And no, 3D games at this time were not made that way. Virtual Boy came out at the same time as Sega Saturn, PS1, and N64; all of which had true 3D graphics. 4. Agreed. The library is small because bad effects of prolonged play. That just supports my original post. The worst part of it all is the headaches and the weird vision you got for a little bit after playing it. No video game should induce physical side-effects, and the fact that it does makes it a complete and utter failure. -Nate-


So, you are going to take 3 of the most impressive games from SNES and say that it didn't compare? The Virtual Boy was not intended to be, and didn't end up being a home console system. "Nintendo pushed the Virtual Boy to market so that it could focus development resources on the Nintendo 64" - Wikipedia The games on virtual boy in no way play or look as simplistic as a 70's video game.

Hm yeah, exactly the same? Virtual Boy and Game Boy are just as comparable to what you are comparing it against. It's not a home console, yet not a handheld system which I am sure helped lead to it's demise. 3D effect absolutely did work like this. The Master System glasses worked this way, so did the glasses you would get for the Superbowl and other tv shows. And I have experienced headaches from extending play times with the Game Boy Advanced SP. It's called eye strain.

Avatar image for Emerald_Warrior
Emerald_Warrior

6581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#36 Emerald_Warrior
Member since 2008 • 6581 Posts
I never said the graphics were simple (although I did say they weren't true 3D), I said the gameplay was simple. Nothing was in-depth, character driven, story driven, or innovative. There are high end-graphical versions of Pong out there, but in the end, it's still just Pong. The same applies to Virtual Boy. You don't like my Mario, Zelda, and Final Fantasy comparisons? Then let's compare it to some other popular games of the day: Doom, Twisted Metal, Tomb Raider, Diablo, Resident Evil, 007 Goldeneye, Tony Hawk's Pro Skater. Come on, Virtual Boy games just doesn't compare to other game of in it's own era. You can like Virtual Boy all you want, everyone's entitled to their own tastes, but that doesn't mean it wasn't a failure. The proof is in the pudding: It's sales were dysmal, it's critic reviews were seething, developers hardly made any games for it, and most gamers either forgot about it or don't care about it. -Nate-
Avatar image for billyd5301
billyd5301

1572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#37 billyd5301
Member since 2008 • 1572 Posts

Lol, once again Wikipedia is your friend. In your first post you compared it to SNES games. Here you go and compare it to N64. Certainly not it's era. It was released 2 years before the N64. And once again, it was not intended to be home console. Here is that quote once more...

"Nintendo pushed the Virtual Boy to market so that it could focus development resources on the Nintendo 64"

Was it a bad idea? Probably. It's the only system I can think of that isn't portable or isn't a home console. Possibly the Sega Nomad could be thrown in here since it ate through batteries so fast, but it didn't sell well either. I am not the biggest Virtual Boy supporter out there but you seem to have trouble understanding that it is not a home console designed to compete with games like Resident Evil. It follows the same simplistic path that Game Boy games took in those days with slightly better graphics and a 3D gimmick. Pong in the 70s had 0 usable buttons. Those games mainly use paddle controllers. The Virtual Boy has A, B, L, R, and 2 D-pads. Granted every Virtual Boy game does not take advantage of every button, but some do.

Teleroboxer has a user review of 7.0, Wario Land 8.3, Mario Clash 7.6, and Mario Tennis 7.7. Apparently the people who actually own the system and the games for it don't believe every game for it is terrible.

Avatar image for Emerald_Warrior
Emerald_Warrior

6581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#38 Emerald_Warrior
Member since 2008 • 6581 Posts
I compared it SNES games on purpose, to point out the fact that they were simple games. Even the last generation was was better for in-depth games. You keep arguing other points and dancing around the subject that I'm pointing out. Simple gameplay. Great, Virtual Boy fans like the system. Obviously not enough, though. And great, some guy said that he liked the games, obviously not enough. No way you're gonna convince me that a system that induces headaches and blurred vision is a good system. That's a complete failure in my book. And sales reflect that. -Nate-
Avatar image for billyd5301
billyd5301

1572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#39 billyd5301
Member since 2008 • 1572 Posts

I am really not dancing around anything. You said the gameplay was that of a 70's pong game. If you have ever played a 70's pong maching you know that as far as video games go they are the crudest thing in existance. The Virtual Boy games in no way are reminiscent of a 70's pong game. I think the fact of 4 buttons and 2 d-pads being greater than 0 buttons completely shows that's not true at all. The games are quite worthy of the era that they were released in. I don't know if Mario Tennis has been released on the Wii but I know it was on the Game Cube, and it is still just bouncing a ball back and fourth. New Super Mario Brothers still has you going around platforming just as you do on the Virtual Boy anyway, so in every respect that arguement is invalid as to the game selection.

You should support yourcomparison with something more than "You have to turn it on", "It connects to a TV", or "You have to move around the screen" because in those cases my Xbox 360 is similar to a 70's pong machine. Pong has no level progression, pong has no characters or character depth, Virtual Boy does have these.

Obviously not enough for what? You are rabbidly running down a 15 year old video game system like it's somehow relevant? I like the SNES and Game Boy Advanced a lot more than the Virtual Boy. A lot of people do. It sold way more systems. Does it matter? Are they going to start making games for those again? Just like all classic systems/consoles, I enjoy it and the games I have for it. I don't really care that you don't consider it a good system. I only care that like I said earlier you are stating a lot of your opinions as facts. Facts that can easily be proved false by doing any research on the system.

Avatar image for Emerald_Warrior
Emerald_Warrior

6581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#40 Emerald_Warrior
Member since 2008 • 6581 Posts
That's because it is a fact. You may have all the love in the world for the system, but the FACT is the system failed. Low sales, bad critical reviews, and only 14 games were released for it. How is that not a failure? IT FAILED, GET OVER IT! -Nate-
Avatar image for billyd5301
billyd5301

1572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#41 billyd5301
Member since 2008 • 1572 Posts
Lol you should go read some comic books and calm down. It's not good to get so excited on a video game forum. A. I never said the system didn't fail. I said that you make false claims towards the reality of the system and would mislead people that have never played it on falsehoods like comparing something like Teleroboxer to Pong. B. I do not begin to understand your crusade against the Virtual Boy since you have recently posted rantings in multiple threads about it. Aren't you the one who should be getting over it? I just wonder if the one of the Virtual Boy's colors was green if you wouldn't own the entire 14 game library?
Avatar image for Emerald_Warrior
Emerald_Warrior

6581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#42 Emerald_Warrior
Member since 2008 • 6581 Posts
I said it sucked, and I still say it sucks. There was never any crusade. I posted in this thread, that was clearly marked as a Virtual Boy thread, and in one other thread that is about the worst gimmicks in gaming history, because it truly is one of the worst. No it is the absolute, hands down, without a shadow of a doubt THE worst gimmick in gaming history. And I mislead no one. The Virtual Boy's gameplay value doesn't stand up to PS1, Saturn, N64, SNES, Genesis, Gameboy, or any other system mentioned in this thread. Obviously you think they do, though, so let's leave it at that. I never mentioned Pong, but since you did: sure, I don't think the Virtual Boy's gameplay is much more in-depth than even Pong. The system is that worthless. More worthless than even the Sega 32x. The Sega 32x is like a PS3 Elite in comparison. If Nintendo ever re-released this thing, the evil unleashed would cause the zombie apocalypse and mankind would fall. -Nate-
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

Virtual Boy was pretty sweet actually. Teleroboxer was better than the new Punch-Out game. It was more bad timing than anything else. The Virtual Boy arrived when the number one thing on peoples minds was 3D graphics. Oddly enough, while lacking in the polygon area, the VB was the only system that offered a real 3D effect. I think the games look better now, especially if you are comparing them to low resolution games optimised for crt televisions.

The system had some really good games. It's too bad it wasn't utilized. Baby steps--Nintendo understands this concept, which is why they are an innovator in the industry. Really, imagine if the VB was supported. By today there could be a full color VB type unit with fleshed out graphics, 3d sound, and be as light as a pair of eye glasses.

Avatar image for zelda450
zelda450

664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 zelda450
Member since 2006 • 664 Posts

Just to throw in my 2 cents, I think alot of people approach the VB in the wrong way. They always view it as what it wasn't rather than what it is. Now, that would be a perfectly legitimate arguement when the system was brand new, as it probably didn't live up to a lot of peoples expectations.

15 years later however, I think it makes alot more sense to just take the VB for what it is: a relatively cheap system with more good games than bad released for it. Sure none of them may be incredibly in-depth, but most of them have a great pick up and play quality to them, and most importantly, are alot of fun. Instead of trying to compare the games to other epic blockbuster titles of the era, it makes alot more sense to me to just enjoy the games and the Virtual Boy for what they are :)

Avatar image for billyd5301
billyd5301

1572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#47 billyd5301
Member since 2008 • 1572 Posts

A. Learn to take a joke.

B. "Virtual Boy's gameplay value doesn't stand up to PS1, Saturn, N64, SNES, Genesis, Gameboy, or any other system mentioned in this thread". You non-stop compare it to home console systems.

Avatar image for Emerald_Warrior
Emerald_Warrior

6581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#48 Emerald_Warrior
Member since 2008 • 6581 Posts

A. Learn to take a joke.

B. "Virtual Boy's gameplay value doesn't stand up to PS1, Saturn, N64, SNES, Genesis, Gameboy, or any other system mentioned in this thread". You non-stop compare it to home console systems.

billyd5301
Maybe I did. But my point in the end is still that it sucks. And sucks it does. Like I said before, sales, critical reviews, and the number of game releases completely support the fact that most of the gaming public agreed with me too. But still, are we supposed to consider it on it's own and forget that all other systems out at the time or before it ever existed? Because that's ridiculous. It must be compared against it peers to be properly judged. -Nate-
Avatar image for Flame_Blade88
Flame_Blade88

39348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#49 Flame_Blade88
Member since 2005 • 39348 Posts
I played it back when it first came out, and yeah it's terrible.
Avatar image for billyd5301
billyd5301

1572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#50 billyd5301
Member since 2008 • 1572 Posts
I judge it as a classic system that has a few good games for it. I think the same way about the 32x, the Jaguar, the Lynx, and the Game Gear. I don't rate those against other things because they don't compare but there are a slim few games for each that are playable today. I don't even judge the SNES vs. Genesis or 360 vs. PS3 because there is no point. I never owned a Virtual Boy when it came out, and I feel bad for those who did because it took a dive so fast. I didn't own the others I first mentioned at the time they were relevant either. The only point I make is that there are a small handfull of games that can be played today. If you are one of the people that simply can not play it due to eye strain then I can understand that, but the user reviews of games like Wario, Teleroboxer, and such prove that is at least somewhat fun. I got mine in a pawn shop with 3 games for $30 in mint condition. Good deal for me and I am sure others would snatch it up fast if given the same oppertunity. By the logic you use I should throw those other systems in the dumpster too because they don't compare to their predecessors. Most people don't look at these classic systems as to what was "better". They are on the most part cheap and you get what you put in.