Who is your favourite gamespot reviewer?

I dont know all their names but Kevin is one of my favourites.

what is this gamespot you speak of.... well i dont know their names but i agree with that guy who reviewed kane and linch

ya kevin is really good at reviewing games so ya hes cool.

Kevin Vanord for sure. then Alex Navvaro(I think thats how you spell name) and tied with alex is Jeff Gerstman.

I lost respect for Jeff when he did the review of Kane and Lynch. I'm not defending the game, it just seemed like he was in a bad mood. They even had to censor some of his language. None the less, my favorite is Greg Kasavin.

Kevin Vanord is the best if you ask me, but thats mainly because he reviews most of the titles i am interested in

I see game..

I like Game...

I buy game...

I see no reviws.....

I see game..

I like Game...

I buy game...

I see no reviws.....

the-wayward

Kevin VanOrd for sure.

Jeff still does some great reviews on Giant Bomb, i still follow his stuff

'Greg Kasavin' always presented interesting video reviews due to the fact that he was passionate about gaming, Before leaving 'Gamespot' for deeper involvement indeveloping certain titles..

These days it seems reviews are either rushed, repeated or just simply written by individuals with no passion for the title they are trying to present to the audience..

Am I the only gamer who's sick of reviewers awarding games low gamescores simply due to the fact that the sequel is compared to the original ? (how ever old the original)

Personally I don't trust a word reviewers tell us on sites like this anymore, especially when certain reviewers openly admit titles like 'G.T 4' have problems/ flaws((BUT)) then later award it with 10 out of 10 !!!??? Which usually leads to gamers like myself questioning the actual review, which usually leads to further questions of trust, truth and possible corruption within the site !

Reviews that contain wrong facts don't help either !

lol

If your responsible for a review, at least finish the damn game ! We do !!

How many titles have you played which have made you think that the review was either a paid review ?

All of my favorites have left. They were jason and Alex.

'Greg Kasavin' always presented interesting video reviews due to the fact that he was passionate about gaming, Before leaving 'Gamespot' for deeper involvement indeveloping certain titles..

These days it seems reviews are either rushed, repeated or just simply written by individuals with no passion for the title they are trying to present to the audience..

Am I the only gamer who's sick of reviewers awarding games low gamescores simply due to the fact that the sequel is compared to the original ? (how ever old the original)

Personally I don't trust a word reviewers tell us on sites like this anymore, especially when certain reviewers openly admit titles like 'G.T 4' have problems/ flaws((BUT)) then later award it with 10 out of 10 !!!??? Which usually leads to gamers like myself questioning the actual review, which usually leads to further questions of trust, truth and possible corruption within the site !

Reviews that contain wrong facts don't help either !

lol

If your responsible for a review, at least finish the damn game ! We do !!

How many titles have you played which have made you think that the review was either a paid review ?

DecadesOfGaming

edit: greg kasavin was my favourite too. i wonder what he's up to?

i don't any of the reviewers

If your responsible for a review, at least finish the damn game ! We do !!

DecadesOfGaming

I disagree. Roughly 65% of the player reviews are one or two paragraphs, and only "10 to 20 hours" selected. You don't finish RPGs in 10 hours, for example.:)