WHO MISS A REAL, I MEAN REAL REAL NEXT GEN Graphic GAME, SPECIALLY IN GRAPHICS !

I have'nt seen any REAL NEXT GEN Games Yet on new consoles, whats wrong? We Just want NEXT GENs GRAPHIC GAMES, im speaking about consoles and exclisives, like before , not pc, i have 980ti SLi but this forum is about consoules excelusives like before:

EXCLUSIVES LIKE PS3 did WITH KILLZONE 2 before,OR Xbox 360 did WITH GEARS OF WAR,

NO problem if Games Run Under 60 fps or not 1080p (HELL, even 24 fps is enough) !

just need a Real next gen graphic game ( like difference beetween ps2 and ps3 , XBOX and X360,

games with graphics when we see them,be drop jaw like before, A REAL JUMP INTO NEXT GEN GRAPHIC

i mean see a new game and SAY: WOW, like KILLZONE 2, UNCHARTED 2, Gears Of WAR,Or game play like: LA Noire, AND....

i personally not see Yet, maybe the division be the first? ( ubisoft said they downgraded graphic of this game: so its not like we saw in E3. or maybe Uncharted 4? i dont know but they should make Real nextGen

Whats wrong with new Gen ?!!!? PLEASE SHARE IDEAS , Thanks

(Sorry 4 English)

Tablet APU's underclocked to meet power requirements is why you haven't seen anything impressive. The consoles were designed and made during a global recession/depression and the hardware reflects that. When the consoles released they were comparable to 2012 mid range pc hardware. It's now 2016. So the consoles are dated as shit in terms of performance. Hell there's still only a single console using modern DDR4 ram. If graphics at the cutting edge is something that you want then you need to game on pc not a console as consoles are just far too weak this generation to impress.

I think games like The Order: 1886 and Driveclub have some pretty huge graphical leaps from Last Generation, but you also need to remember that consoles this generation couldn't contain the raw power you desire due to price and reliability concerns -- if you're really looking to be blown away by visuals, PC is the way to go, always has been.

@ribstaylor1: i have a pc with gtx 980 ti sli but even on that i didnt see a game with real artistic graphic yet like i said maybe the division be the first !! i dont know

No The Division won't be.

The Witcher 3 ? That game is artistically stunning.

Bloodborne excels in it's artistic level design..

There's more but I'm pretty sure these two games are top in terms of visuals.

You haven't seen anything 'next gen' because we are in the current gen, the 'next gen' doesn't start until the next generation of consoles come out, duh!

@acp_45: i dont try witcher 3 yet , i was busy with MGS on pc and Rocket League on ps4, but i think it should be great i will try it soon on my pc, i hope it havent problems with sli

Anyway I think we have hit a wall in graphics jumps. I don't need any game to be photorealistic to be a fun and enjoyable game. I prefer a more diverse artistic presentation. Right now a lot of games looks the same because they try to be closer to reality.

Up until the end of PS2 days it was easy to differentiate who made/publish because they all had different artistic presentation. EA was always trying the realistic route, Capcom had its own style, same with Squaresoft, same with Nintendo etc.

Now you can barelly tel the difference between a game made by Ubisoft, EA or Activision

@Coco_pierrot: thats the poin. style is very important , i liked killzone unique style , or gears of war's , or mgs 2 and.. but like u said now cant tell the diffference, thats because they made a graphic engine for their games , but now all games use 2,3 same engine, and i dont want photorealistic to , but at least some games with a higher grade than ps3 or x360 , i think they can make it, but they dont because it will be very expensive for them , remmember gears of war cost as much as a big movie , or killzone, in any case i still do hope for games like the division ( if on a high end pc it really be like the trailers on E3) , im worry they downgrade for the consoles sake,

@acp_45: and i played witcher 3, and i liked the idea of nvidia hairwork , but yet it reminds me of skyrim. not a real jump. but it was satisfying. especially on 2k and 4k, wow. but i like they made a game good enough that we dont need 4k and it will be next gen enough on 1080p ;)

@arashfella: I think that they won't have a choice but to downgrade a little otherwise they would have to sacrifice frame rate ... which is already the case in some games. Bloodborne is beautiful and run at 30fps but in some situation it drops below 20fps because there is too much stuff going on, it never last long but still ... and it is the case for every other games ... the only games that runs at 60 fps on PS4 are remaster of PS3 games ...

If you are extensively about graphics, buy a pc.

I think there's a definite improvement. You think star wars battlefront would look that good on PS3? Try going back and playing arkham city after arkham knight, you'll see the difference between this gen and the last one.

I remember the first time I played Killzone Shadow Fall at PS4's launch, parts of the game really did look good - like backgrounds and stuff, some of the more cinematic things. But really, no game this gen has blown me away.

I think last gen was a pretty big leap over the PS2/Gamecube/XBOX era, in terms of graphics and online infrastructure. I feel like what this gen has done is basically make it so that you fill up 500 GB or 1 TB of space pretty fast with game installations, and given most games a dull and lifeless vast expanse to explore.

Witcher 3 gets my vote about this as well, no doubt. Definitely the best graphics in my opinion.

Syndicate and Unity offers some advanced visual aspects as well.

If it is an artistic view you are looking for, look no further than Bioshock Infinity or Dishonoured.

But if you want to play a game that is made with only the purpose of marketing its engine, try Ryse: Son of Rome.

Mad Max is surprisingly good in terms of graphics too.

And I think Far Cry Primal is promising, if they fix the low-res texture problems that the previous games had.

Did I say Witcher 3 already?

Hardware advances have stunted, unless some huge technological advances are made we won't see too much better games than we've already gotten. Don't hold your breath

@arashfella: Play the order 1866 and your graphic desires will be satisfied.

Sony and Microsoft wanted their consoles to be really really cheap and affordable for everyone . when Xbox 360 and PS3 came out they were as powerful as gaming PCs back then . but right now they are as powerful as a mid range gaming PC from 2013 . if Sony and Microsoft were making 600$ consoles with more power we could see more impressive graphics .

but not your gaming ones

@Macutchi: no dont even think about the order got 4.0 from GS

@arashfella: i have the game. it's atrocious. looks pretty though

anyway i hope sony and ms figure a way to improve their graphics (in their exlusives at least) and dont attention to framerate 30 40 is enough.