This topic is locked from further discussion.
MGS 3
Big dissapointment. Bad gameplay, bad storyline, bad graphics, it didn't even have one good thing about it.
MGS would be my favorite game series if it wasn't for that big piece of trash called MGS 3. MGS 1 and 2 were awesome. My 2 favorite games :D
MGS 3
Big dissapointment. Bad gameplay, bad storyline, bad graphics, it didn't even have one good thing about it.
CSI_Mac_Taylor
I don't know why you don't like that game, but I believe the reasons you've cited makes the game one of the best in the PS2.
LOTR the 3rd age.... I didn't know a rpg could be this linear, repetive, lack of contents, and overrated... until I played it.
I'm surprised nobody said Big Rigs.hiphops_savior
Very few gamers have actually played this game. I'm pretty sure that you need to play a game to honestly justify it being the worst game ever to you.
Plus, that's just predictable.
As for me, the worst game I've ever played would have to be Robot wars for the GBA. I mean, all you do is watch your character spin, and press a to go forward once he spins to the direction you want. Then press b for a single attack.
Horrible.
MGS 3
Big dissapointment. Bad gameplay, bad storyline, bad graphics, it didn't even have one good thing about it.
MGS would be my favorite game series if it wasn't for that big piece of trash called MGS 3. MGS 1 and 2 were awesome. My 2 favorite games :D
CSI_Mac_Taylor
I'd have to say the new Sonic the Headgehog for 1 reason. 7 minute load screens every 30 seconds. Apollo5000
That is horrible to have to wait for a game to load. I think I would trade that game in the day I got it if I ever wanted to play which would be a flat out no. To put a gamer through that long of a load time is just horrible. That game gets a fail.
[QUOTE="Apollo5000"]I'd have to say the new Sonic the Headgehog for 1 reason. 7 minute load screens every 30 seconds. project-exile
That is horrible to have to wait for a game to load. I think I would trade that game in the day I got it if I ever wanted to play which would be a flat out no. To put a gamer through that long of a load time is just horrible. That game gets a fail.
I'd bump that fail up to an epic fail...
I remember playing Nintendo 64 at my cousin's house when I was young and noticing he owned a copy of Superman 64. I was so tempted to put him out of his misery by throwing the thing out the window. shaunmcYeah, I never played it but I heard its like Gamespot's official worst game.
I saw a four-part series on YouTube on the worst game, IMO, ever, and it was on the NES.
It was a 52-game collection.
It was released in 1991, and cost $200.
Most of the games didn't work well, or didn't start at all.
The games that did work would put E.T. to shame, with a particular focus on the game "Non Human."
The game's name was Action 52, and it looks so much worse than E.T.
Superman 64 was the worst game I ever played, I do not think any other game out there could suck as much as Superman 64 did.RenegadePatriotThen get ready for pure gaming hell with Action 52 for the NES.
Superman 64 without question. Just a completely horrendous game.
Man are you wrong. MGS 3 was great and had a fantastic memerable storyline. It was just as good as MGS 1 and 2.MGS 3
Big dissapointment. Bad gameplay, bad storyline, bad graphics, it didn't even have one good thing about it.
MGS would be my favorite game series if it wasn't for that big piece of trash called MGS 3. MGS 1 and 2 were awesome. My 2 favorite games :D
CSI_Mac_Taylor
It irritates me when people say Metal Gear Solid X or something like that. Either you haven't played many games or you're just hating. Because you don't like the style doesn't make it a bad game at all.
Bad games are just... bad.
Flat out worst game I've ever had the misfortune of owning was State of Emergency. I think it was the annoying screaming, nonsensical plot, and almost utterly unplayable camera angles that not only made me become bored with it quickly, but my 8 year old cousin.
Just because Rockstar was involved with it, doesn't mean it's as good as Grand Theft Auto.
Big Rigs wasn't a finished product, so it's excused. Action 52 only had like 2 guys working on it, so it's excused. Superman 64 was, however, a finished product with a whole team of developers. That in itself makes it inexcusable.CerussiteYou're kidding me, right? Nothing can excuse the piece of crap that game was. IT WAS $200. IN 1991. WHO THE HECK THOUGHT THAT GAME WAS A GOOD IDEA???
[QUOTE="Cerussite"]Big Rigs wasn't a finished product, so it's excused. Action 52 only had like 2 guys working on it, so it's excused. Superman 64 was, however, a finished product with a whole team of developers. That in itself makes it inexcusable.Fireball2500You're kidding me, right? Nothing can excuse the piece of crap that game was. IT WAS $200. IN 1991. WHO THE HECK THOUGHT THAT GAME WAS A GOOD IDEA???Hey, I didn't buy it.
EDIT: Actually, more than two people worked on Action 52. The game I was thinking of was Cassette 50, an equally ****y game that I recommend you not play.
[QUOTE="hiphops_savior"]I'm surprised nobody said Big Rigs.four_of_clubs
Very few gamers have actually played this game. I'm pretty sure that you need to play a game to honestly justify it being the worst game ever to you.
Plus, that's just predictable.
As for me, the worst game I've ever played would have to be Robot wars for the GBA. I mean, all you do is watch your character spin, and press a to go forward once he spins to the direction you want. Then press b for a single attack.
Horrible.
If I had that game, I would be honestly scared to install it because it may have viruses...lol
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment