XXXXXX

22817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 22817 Posts

Which of these teams who need a new coach, would you wanna coach the most?

Arizona Cardinals :
Positives - High draft pick, Powerful young offense.
Negatives - Young QB, Horrible Defense.

Atlanta Falcons :
Positives - Great running game, Vick.
Negatives - Vick!, No Receivers, 22 overall defense.

Miami Dolphins :
Positives - Great Defense, Good WR/RB/TE.
Negatives - No QB, Great defense but very old.

Pittsburgh Steelers :
Positives - Great offense, set at WR,RB,QB. Good players on defense.
Negatives - No CBs, Replacing a great coach who retired rather than a coach who got fired = Pressure.

Oakland Raiders :
Positives - Great young defense, Number 1 overall pick.
Negatives - Horrible offense, Al Davis, Randy Moss, No QB at all.

18 years ago

12165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 12165 Posts

I think it's either the Cardinals or the Steelers. The Cards have a nice young team and are still only a few pieces away from competing. And the Steelers have most of the pieces in place, so it wouldn't be difficult for someone to step in. An added bonus is job security, as the Rooney's are willing to stick by a coach through tough years and let him get back on track.

18 years ago

21746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 CommanderShiro

Member since 2005 • 21746 Posts

I'd never take Oakland thats all I'm certain with. :|

18 years ago

detroitpistons0

12910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#4 detroitpistons0

Member since 2006 • 12910 Posts

isnt jerry porter also a negative on the raiders? anyways, i would want to coach the falcons, or, believe it or not, one of the teams i hate... the phins. I would want to restore the falcons defense and vick's passing game.

18 years ago

1818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 1818 Posts

I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.

18 years ago

bloody1f4knight

4922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 bloody1f4knight

Member since 2006 • 4922 Posts

I have to say Cardinals.

18 years ago

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 84 Posts

Yea, I'd also have to say the Cards. They've got great weapons on offense and their defense isn't really that bad. Combine that with their pretty high pick they have in the draft, it's a great job to walk into if you're a coach.

18 years ago

639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 thetallterror

Member since 2004 • 639 Posts

I'd go with the Steelers. You know that if you do decent there you have pretty good job security. Look at how long they keep their coaches. Chower was there for 15 years and Chuck Noll was there for 22 before him. Therefore, the next coach they get will only be their third coach since 1969.

18 years ago

12694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 67

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 12694 Posts

The Cardinals have the most potential, and they have a new stadium. They would be my choice.

18 years ago

639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 thetallterror

Member since 2004 • 639 Posts

I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.Greatwasabi

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

18 years ago

22817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 22817 Posts

[QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.thetallterror

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

18 years ago

639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#12 thetallterror

Member since 2004 • 639 Posts

[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.Espurs117

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

Karlos Dansby - OLB - 80 Tackles - 8 Sacks Adrian Wilson - SS - 82 Tackles - 5 Sacks - 4 int Bertrand Berry - DE - 23 Tackles - 6 Sacks

I'll give you Adrain Wilson, but the rest of those players are average to mediocre at best. The team does not even have one player with over 100 total tackles.

18 years ago

22817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 22817 Posts

[QUOTE="Espurs117"]
[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.thetallterror

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

Karlos Dansby - OLB - 80 Tackles - 8 Sacks Adrian Wilson - SS - 82 Tackles - 5 Sacks - 4 int Bertrand Berry - DE - 23 Tackles - 6 Sacks

I'll give you Adrain Wilson, but the rest of those players are average to mediocre at best. The team does not even have one player with over 100 total tackles.

You woudlnt take 8 sacks from a OLB? Oh btw Berry and Dansby were both injured. Dansby didnt play till like week 6 or something.

18 years ago

12694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 67

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 12694 Posts

[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Espurs117"]
[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.Espurs117

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

Karlos Dansby - OLB - 80 Tackles - 8 Sacks Adrian Wilson - SS - 82 Tackles - 5 Sacks - 4 int Bertrand Berry - DE - 23 Tackles - 6 Sacks

I'll give you Adrain Wilson, but the rest of those players are average to mediocre at best. The team does not even have one player with over 100 total tackles.

You woudlnt take 8 sacks from a OLB? Oh btw Berry and Dansby were both injured. Dansby didnt play till like week 6 or something.

Compare those players to the Packers "terrible" defense, and well... there is no comparison: A.J. Hawk - 119 tackles, 2.5 sacks Nick Barnett - 105 tackles Aaron Kampman - 89 tackles, 15.5 sacks Charles Woodson - 59 tackles, 8 interceptions Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila - 39 tackles, 6 sacks

18 years ago

22817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 22817 Posts

[QUOTE="Espurs117"][QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Espurs117"]
[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.bgres077

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

Karlos Dansby - OLB - 80 Tackles - 8 Sacks Adrian Wilson - SS - 82 Tackles - 5 Sacks - 4 int Bertrand Berry - DE - 23 Tackles - 6 Sacks

I'll give you Adrain Wilson, but the rest of those players are average to mediocre at best. The team does not even have one player with over 100 total tackles.

You woudlnt take 8 sacks from a OLB? Oh btw Berry and Dansby were both injured. Dansby didnt play till like week 6 or something.

Compare those players to the Packers "terrible" defense, and well... there is no comparison: A.J. Hawk - 119 tackles, 2.5 sacks Nick Barnett - 105 tackles Aaron Kampman - 89 tackles, 15.5 sacks Charles Woodson - 59 tackles, 8 interceptions Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila - 39 tackles, 6 sacks

What was the point of that? He said name some good players on the Cards, I did. So they must suck because there stats dont compare to the Packers?

18 years ago

639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#16 thetallterror

Member since 2004 • 639 Posts

[QUOTE="bgres077"][QUOTE="Espurs117"][QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Espurs117"]
[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.Espurs117

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

Karlos Dansby - OLB - 80 Tackles - 8 Sacks Adrian Wilson - SS - 82 Tackles - 5 Sacks - 4 int Bertrand Berry - DE - 23 Tackles - 6 Sacks

I'll give you Adrain Wilson, but the rest of those players are average to mediocre at best. The team does not even have one player with over 100 total tackles.

You woudlnt take 8 sacks from a OLB? Oh btw Berry and Dansby were both injured. Dansby didnt play till like week 6 or something.

Compare those players to the Packers "terrible" defense, and well... there is no comparison: A.J. Hawk - 119 tackles, 2.5 sacks Nick Barnett - 105 tackles Aaron Kampman - 89 tackles, 15.5 sacks Charles Woodson - 59 tackles, 8 interceptions Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila - 39 tackles, 6 sacks

What was the point of that? He said name some good players on the Cards, I did. So they must suck because there stats dont compare to the Packers?

I think the point is that a few good players do not make a defense good, which was the point I was trying to get across in the first place. He said he would take them for their good defense. So, in your opinion, is their defense good?

18 years ago

22817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 22817 Posts

[QUOTE="Espurs117"][QUOTE="bgres077"][QUOTE="Espurs117"][QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Espurs117"]
[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.thetallterror

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

Karlos Dansby - OLB - 80 Tackles - 8 Sacks Adrian Wilson - SS - 82 Tackles - 5 Sacks - 4 int Bertrand Berry - DE - 23 Tackles - 6 Sacks

I'll give you Adrain Wilson, but the rest of those players are average to mediocre at best. The team does not even have one player with over 100 total tackles.

You woudlnt take 8 sacks from a OLB? Oh btw Berry and Dansby were both injured. Dansby didnt play till like week 6 or something.

Compare those players to the Packers "terrible" defense, and well... there is no comparison: A.J. Hawk - 119 tackles, 2.5 sacks Nick Barnett - 105 tackles Aaron Kampman - 89 tackles, 15.5 sacks Charles Woodson - 59 tackles, 8 interceptions Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila - 39 tackles, 6 sacks

What was the point of that? He said name some good players on the Cards, I did. So they must suck because there stats dont compare to the Packers?

I think the point is that a few good players do not make a defense good, which was the point I was trying to get across in the first place. He said he would take them for their good defense. So, in your opinion, is their defense good?

Read the first post. I did say they have a bad defense, I was just naming some good players. 1 of which was a pro bowler this year.

18 years ago

19424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 19424 Posts

[QUOTE="Espurs117"]
[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.thetallterror

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

Karlos Dansby - OLB - 80 Tackles - 8 Sacks Adrian Wilson - SS - 82 Tackles - 5 Sacks - 4 int Bertrand Berry - DE - 23 Tackles - 6 Sacks

I'll give you Adrain Wilson, but the rest of those players are average to mediocre at best. The team does not even have one player with over 100 total tackles.

Dansby has been fighting through a toe injury thoughout the year, and didn't Berry miss some games too?

18 years ago

22817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 22817 Posts

[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Espurs117"]
[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.geaux321

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

Karlos Dansby - OLB - 80 Tackles - 8 Sacks Adrian Wilson - SS - 82 Tackles - 5 Sacks - 4 int Bertrand Berry - DE - 23 Tackles - 6 Sacks

I'll give you Adrain Wilson, but the rest of those players are average to mediocre at best. The team does not even have one player with over 100 total tackles.

Dansby has been fighting through a toe injury thoughout the year, and didn't Berry miss some games too?

Thats what im saying.

18 years ago

12694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 67

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 12694 Posts

[QUOTE="geaux321"][QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Espurs117"]
[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.Espurs117

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

Karlos Dansby - OLB - 80 Tackles - 8 Sacks Adrian Wilson - SS - 82 Tackles - 5 Sacks - 4 int Bertrand Berry - DE - 23 Tackles - 6 Sacks

I'll give you Adrain Wilson, but the rest of those players are average to mediocre at best. The team does not even have one player with over 100 total tackles.

Dansby has been fighting through a toe injury thoughout the year, and didn't Berry miss some games too?

Thats what im saying.

Sure they missed games, but the Cardinals defense is not good.

18 years ago

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 84 Posts

[QUOTE="Espurs117"][QUOTE="geaux321"][QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Espurs117"]
[QUOTE="thetallterror"][QUOTE="Greatwasabi"]I'd love to coach the Cardinals. Great offense, and pretty good players on defense.bgres077

Please name some of the "pretty good" players that they have on defense.

Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson, Bertrand Berry.

Karlos Dansby - OLB - 80 Tackles - 8 Sacks Adrian Wilson - SS - 82 Tackles - 5 Sacks - 4 int Bertrand Berry - DE - 23 Tackles - 6 Sacks

I'll give you Adrain Wilson, but the rest of those players are average to mediocre at best. The team does not even have one player with over 100 total tackles.

Dansby has been fighting through a toe injury thoughout the year, and didn't Berry miss some games too?

Thats what im saying.

Sure they missed games, but the Cardinals defense is not good.

No body said that the Cards defense is good, all the guy said was that the defense is "pretty good"

18 years ago

thetombradyhate

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#22 thetombradyhate

Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

I would say the Steelers, after a bad start they were really turning iton at the end of the year

18 years ago

dallas_cowboys3

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#23 dallas_cowboys3

Member since 2006 • 5549 Posts

I would say the Steelers, after a bad start they were really turning iton at the end of the yearthetombradyhate

Good point but I would still take Arizona because they have a very cool stadium and could have the next Manning, Wayne, Harrison trio in Leinart, Boldin, and Fitzgerald.

18 years ago

4593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Rvdecwthug1976

Member since 2005 • 4593 Posts

[QUOTE="thetombradyhate"]I would say the Steelers, after a bad start they were really turning iton at the end of the yeardallas_cowboys3

Good point but I would still take Arizona because they have a very cool stadium and could have the next Manning, Wayne, Harrison trio in Leinart, Boldin, and Fitzgerald.

Well that all sounds real nice, but Arizona is a loser almost every year, I must admit though that their coach Dennis Green lost his crediability a few years ago in Minnesota, when he would not stand up to Randy Moss and he got fired because of it

I would like to see what Arizona could do with a coach that has some crediability and if they do nothing with one, then they can never be regarded as a team that can ever be taken seriously

18 years ago

dallas_cowboys3

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#25 dallas_cowboys3

Member since 2006 • 5549 Posts

[QUOTE="dallas_cowboys3"][QUOTE="thetombradyhate"]I would say the Steelers, after a bad start they were really turning iton at the end of the yearRvdecwthug1976

Good point but I would still take Arizona because they have a very cool stadium and could have the next Manning, Wayne, Harrison trio in Leinart, Boldin, and Fitzgerald.

Well that all sounds real nice, but Arizona is a loser almost every year, I must admit though that their coach Dennis Green lost his crediability a few years ago in Minnesota, when he would not stand up to Randy Moss and he got fired because of it

I would like to see what Arizona could do with a coach that has some crediability and if they do nothing with one, then they can never be regarded as a team that can ever be taken seriously

Don't worry their time will come. They will be a dominant team one day...one day.

18 years ago

1102

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 1102 Posts

Which of these teams who need a new coach, would you wanna coach the most?
Arizona Cardinals :
Positives - High draft pick, Powerful young offense.
Negatives - Young QB, Horrible Defense.

Atlanta Falcons :
Positives - Great running game, Vick.
Negatives - Vick!, No Receivers, 22 overall defense.

Miami Dolphins :
Positives - Great Defense, Good WR/RB/TE.
Negatives - No QB, Great defense but very old.

Pittsburgh Steelers :
Positives - Great offense, set at WR,RB,QB. Good players on defense.
Negatives - No CBs, Replacing a great coach who retired rather than a coach who got fired = Pressure.

Oakland Raiders :
Positives - Great young defense, Number 1 overall pick.
Negatives - Horrible offense, Al Davis, Randy Moss, No QB at all.

Espurs117

I would say the Steelers and the Falcons second.

Lolz at the people who said Arizona Cardinals, They are curse for life no matter what they do lolz!!!

18 years ago

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 84 Posts

[QUOTE="Espurs117"]
Which of these teams who need a new coach, would you wanna coach the most?
Arizona Cardinals :
Positives - High draft pick, Powerful young offense.
Negatives - Young QB, Horrible Defense.

Atlanta Falcons :
Positives - Great running game, Vick.
Negatives - Vick!, No Receivers, 22 overall defense.

Miami Dolphins :
Positives - Great Defense, Good WR/RB/TE.
Negatives - No QB, Great defense but very old.

Pittsburgh Steelers :
Positives - Great offense, set at WR,RB,QB. Good players on defense.
Negatives - No CBs, Replacing a great coach who retired rather than a coach who got fired = Pressure.

Oakland Raiders :
Positives - Great young defense, Number 1 overall pick.
Negatives - Horrible offense, Al Davis, Randy Moss, No QB at all.

xyoojguy

I would say the Steelers and the Falcons second.

Lolz at the people who said Arizona Cardinals, They are curse for life no matter what they do lolz!!!

O yea, just like how the Red Sox are cursed to win another championship after trading Babe "lolz."

18 years ago

dallas_cowboys3

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 dallas_cowboys3

Member since 2006 • 5549 Posts

[QUOTE="Espurs117"]
Which of these teams who need a new coach, would you wanna coach the most?
Arizona Cardinals :
Positives - High draft pick, Powerful young offense.
Negatives - Young QB, Horrible Defense.

Atlanta Falcons :
Positives - Great running game, Vick.
Negatives - Vick!, No Receivers, 22 overall defense.

Miami Dolphins :
Positives - Great Defense, Good WR/RB/TE.
Negatives - No QB, Great defense but very old.

Pittsburgh Steelers :
Positives - Great offense, set at WR,RB,QB. Good players on defense.
Negatives - No CBs, Replacing a great coach who retired rather than a coach who got fired = Pressure.

Oakland Raiders :
Positives - Great young defense, Number 1 overall pick.
Negatives - Horrible offense, Al Davis, Randy Moss, No QB at all.

xyoojguy

I would say the Steelers and the Falcons second.

Lolz at the people who said Arizona Cardinals, They are curse for life no matter what they do lolz!!!

You must be cursed to believe that they are cursed.

18 years ago

detroitpistons0

12910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#29 detroitpistons0

Member since 2006 • 12910 Posts

Hah no one wants to coach the raiders :P

18 years ago

22817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 22817 Posts

Hah no one wants to coach the raiders :Pdetroitpistons0

Im thinking of applying, hey they cant do any worse right?

18 years ago

21746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 CommanderShiro

Member since 2005 • 21746 Posts

[QUOTE="detroitpistons0"]Hah no one wants to coach the raiders :PEspurs117

Im thinking of applying, hey they cant do any worse right?

I'd wait for the ancient Al Davis to die of choking on prunes first.

18 years ago

22817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 22817 Posts

[QUOTE="Espurs117"]
[QUOTE="detroitpistons0"]Hah no one wants to coach the raiders :PCommanderShiro

Im thinking of applying, hey they cant do any worse right?

I'd wait for the ancient Al Davis to die of choking on prunes first.

Nah he might like me, ill tell him how much voluntary work ive done with old people.

18 years ago

21746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 CommanderShiro

Member since 2005 • 21746 Posts

Al Davis is too senile to realize his age. :|

18 years ago

11377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 11377 Posts

i dont see the raiders job being a hot job because davis wont let you hire your own assistants. so basically the coach is on his own

18 years ago

536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Drunkenmasta

Member since 2005 • 536 Posts

Miami has to be the hottest job as of now.

18 years ago

645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 645 Posts

Miami has to be the hottest job as of now.Drunkenmasta

I have to disagree. I think it is Arizona they have a lot of young talent on that team. While Miami has had quarterback issues ever since marino left. They have a great defense but it is very old. Their offense is anemic and ronnie brown isnt a runningback that was worth the number 2 overall pick. The Dolphins really need to rebuild but the cardinals definetely have some upside.

18 years ago

3655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 3655 Posts

[QUOTE="Drunkenmasta"]Miami has to be the hottest job as of now.bulett6990

I have to disagree. I think it is Arizona they have a lot of young talent on that team. While Miami has had quarterback issues ever since marino left. They have a great defense but it is very old. Their offense is anemic and ronnie brown isnt a runningback that was worth the number 2 overall pick. The Dolphins really need to rebuild but the cardinals definetely have some upside.

Ronnie Brown is a very good back with the potential to be great, but we need a Good OL. OUr new HC should try to bring youth on Defense while improving our Offense

18 years ago

Jump to Top

Please Log In to post.

Use your keyboard!

ESC

Log in to comment