A Generation Behind

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Smasher24
Smasher24

132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#1 Smasher24
Member since 2006 • 132 Posts

^Wii Tiger Woods 07^

^PS2 Tiger Woods 07^

Avatar image for gotdangit
gotdangit

8151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 gotdangit
Member since 2005 • 8151 Posts
How is the wii behind because of graphics?!
Avatar image for kidrock17xp
kidrock17xp

2966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 kidrock17xp
Member since 2004 • 2966 Posts
How is the wii behind because of graphics?!gotdangit
people tend to base "next gen" classification by what a system can do iin terms of graphics
Avatar image for cam2009
cam2009

1397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 cam2009
Member since 2005 • 1397 Posts
you do realize that the Gamecube was much more powerful than the PS2 and could produce much better graphics? And that the Wii is more powerful than the Gamecube?
Avatar image for SmashBrosLegend
SmashBrosLegend

11344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 SmashBrosLegend
Member since 2006 • 11344 Posts
Wii specs: 729mhz CPU 243mhz GPU 88MB DDR3 RAM +3MB Texture memory @700mhz Ps2 specs: 294mhz CPU 147mhz GPU 32MiB RAM It's not even a question. Wii is more capable.
Avatar image for thisguy51
thisguy51

5319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 thisguy51
Member since 2006 • 5319 Posts
[QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]Wii specs: 729mhz CPU 243mhz GPU 88MB DDR3 RAM +3MB Texture memory @700mhz Ps2 specs: 294mhz CPU 147mhz GPU 32MiB RAM It's not even a question. Wii is more capable.

he's got it
Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36045 Posts
Sigh.. The GC was more powerful than a PS2. The Wii is more powerful than a GC. Worst.. bloody.. poll.. ever.
Avatar image for kidrock17xp
kidrock17xp

2966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 kidrock17xp
Member since 2004 • 2966 Posts
[QUOTE="SmashBrosLegend"]Wii specs: 729mhz CPU 243mhz GPU 88MB DDR3 RAM +3MB Texture memory @700mhz Ps2 specs: 294mhz CPU 147mhz GPU 32MiB RAM It's not even a question. Wii is more capable.

how was the gamecube compared to the ps2?
Avatar image for kidrock17xp
kidrock17xp

2966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kidrock17xp
Member since 2004 • 2966 Posts
Sigh.. The GC was more powerful than a PS2. The Wii is more powerful than a GC. Worst.. bloody.. poll.. ever.Litchie
people just get confuse because a developer doesn't push the limits of a system all the time. Not every game looked as good as RE4 on the gamecube so naturally not every Wii game will look as good as whatever game comes out that is equilivant
Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#10 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36045 Posts
[QUOTE="Litchie"]Sigh.. The GC was more powerful than a PS2. The Wii is more powerful than a GC. Worst.. bloody.. poll.. ever.kidrock17xp
people just get confuse because a developer doesn't push the limits of a system all the time. Not every game looked as good as RE4 on the gamecube so naturally not every Wii game will look as good as whatever game comes out that is equilivant

Everyone should know by now that the graphics of Resident Evil 4, or Metroid Prime 2 couldn't be handled by a freaking PS2. Why the hell would Nintendo make a new console that is weaker than their previous one? People get confused? I'd say people are stupid.
Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
Well you can tell how Wii's textures are far superior from that shot.
Avatar image for kidrock17xp
kidrock17xp

2966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 kidrock17xp
Member since 2004 • 2966 Posts
[QUOTE="kidrock17xp"][QUOTE="Litchie"]Sigh.. The GC was more powerful than a PS2. The Wii is more powerful than a GC. Worst.. bloody.. poll.. ever.Litchie
people just get confuse because a developer doesn't push the limits of a system all the time. Not every game looked as good as RE4 on the gamecube so naturally not every Wii game will look as good as whatever game comes out that is equilivant

Everyone should know by now that the graphics of Resident Evil 4, or Metroid Prime 2 couldn't be handled by a freaking PS2. Why the hell would Nintendo make a new console that is weaker than their previous one? People get confused? I'd say people are stupid.

I wouldn't say stupid. You can't exactly say a person is stupid if they simply don't know something, I mean you could yes, but to me it wouldn't make sense.
Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#13 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36045 Posts
[QUOTE="Litchie"][QUOTE="kidrock17xp"][QUOTE="Litchie"]Sigh.. The GC was more powerful than a PS2. The Wii is more powerful than a GC. Worst.. bloody.. poll.. ever.kidrock17xp
people just get confuse because a developer doesn't push the limits of a system all the time. Not every game looked as good as RE4 on the gamecube so naturally not every Wii game will look as good as whatever game comes out that is equilivant

Everyone should know by now that the graphics of Resident Evil 4, or Metroid Prime 2 couldn't be handled by a freaking PS2. Why the hell would Nintendo make a new console that is weaker than their previous one? People get confused? I'd say people are stupid.

I wouldn't say stupid. You can't exactly say a person is stupid if they simply don't know something, I mean you could yes, but to me it wouldn't make sense.

I just think that it's extremely obvious that Nintendo didn't make the Wii weaker than a GC. If you can't figure this out by yourself, I'd say you aren't just very uninformed, but also pretty stupid.
Avatar image for kidrock17xp
kidrock17xp

2966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 kidrock17xp
Member since 2004 • 2966 Posts
[QUOTE="kidrock17xp"][QUOTE="Litchie"][QUOTE="kidrock17xp"][QUOTE="Litchie"]Sigh.. The GC was more powerful than a PS2. The Wii is more powerful than a GC. Worst.. bloody.. poll.. ever.Litchie
people just get confuse because a developer doesn't push the limits of a system all the time. Not every game looked as good as RE4 on the gamecube so naturally not every Wii game will look as good as whatever game comes out that is equilivant

Everyone should know by now that the graphics of Resident Evil 4, or Metroid Prime 2 couldn't be handled by a freaking PS2. Why the hell would Nintendo make a new console that is weaker than their previous one? People get confused? I'd say people are stupid.

I wouldn't say stupid. You can't exactly say a person is stupid if they simply don't know something, I mean you could yes, but to me it wouldn't make sense.

I just think that it's extremely obvious that Nintendo didn't make the Wii weaker than a GC. If you can't figure this out by yourself, I'd say you aren't just very uninformed, but also pretty stupid.

haha true I can see where you are coming from. I guess a lot of people just feel the wii is so last gen since it doesn't have the hd that the other 2 systems do, even though most people don't have hd tvs, hell I don't even have a tv that supports 480p
Avatar image for gzmask
gzmask

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 gzmask
Member since 2005 • 138 Posts
what i see here is wii got better shader effects, and worser resolutions. resolution is set in software only(sometimes in the firmware also, but updatable), and shader effect is almost completely generated by the hardware circuits in the GPU these days, so as long as the GPU shader of the wii doesn't suck, I am fine. 
Avatar image for Jason0110
Jason0110

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Jason0110
Member since 2007 • 47 Posts
The answer is obviously the Wii.
Avatar image for UltimateGogeta
UltimateGogeta

658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 UltimateGogeta
Member since 2005 • 658 Posts
the Wii has better graphics than PS2 its just that most of the 3rd party developers on the Wii suck
Avatar image for WR_Platinum
WR_Platinum

4685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 WR_Platinum
Member since 2003 • 4685 Posts
This should be locked.
Avatar image for medhopeful
medhopeful

351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 medhopeful
Member since 2006 • 351 Posts
[QUOTE="Litchie"][QUOTE="kidrock17xp"][QUOTE="Litchie"]Sigh.. The GC was more powerful than a PS2. The Wii is more powerful than a GC. Worst.. bloody.. poll.. ever.kidrock17xp
people just get confuse because a developer doesn't push the limits of a system all the time. Not every game looked as good as RE4 on the gamecube so naturally not every Wii game will look as good as whatever game comes out that is equilivant

Everyone should know by now that the graphics of Resident Evil 4, or Metroid Prime 2 couldn't be handled by a freaking PS2. Why the hell would Nintendo make a new console that is weaker than their previous one? People get confused? I'd say people are stupid.

I wouldn't say stupid. You can't exactly say a person is stupid if they simply don't know something, I mean you could yes, but to me it wouldn't make sense.

Yeah, I can assume that the Wii is better than the GC. However, I didn't know that GC was better than ps2 until this poll. So that doesn't really make me stupid. Anyways, I don't know why people gripe about the Wii graphics; if you get the digital cables and have a good tv the graphics are more than satisfactory.
Avatar image for decepticondevil
decepticondevil

3607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 decepticondevil
Member since 2003 • 3607 Posts
Only thing that looks better in the PS2 shot is that the brightness is turned up. Everything else looks better in the Wii pic. TC owned himself.
Avatar image for ArkansasBoy91
ArkansasBoy91

2430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 67

User Lists: 0

#21 ArkansasBoy91
Member since 2006 • 2430 Posts
DA**** dude, Wii is for GAMEPLAY not LAME GRAPHICS!!!
Avatar image for JackSherbak
JackSherbak

318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 JackSherbak
Member since 2005 • 318 Posts
DA**** dude, Wii is for GAMEPLAY not LAME GRAPHICS!!!ArkansasBoy91
I agree! now they should bring some frikin' games out so we can see this gameplay in action, as of yet we have had 2 tech demos, a gimiky party game, a half decent driving game and a rake load of 3rd party tripe! Im starting to get disspointed! and thats not a good sign!