A topic that has being argued so many times before, and yet no conclusion..

Hellow...

The timeline of zelda has being argued until almost fans are breathless... I have watch the clip that is one youtube, that from my point of view makes a lot of sense..

But when that was made Zelda TP and Zelda PH were yet to be release...

Zelda PH, can still stay where they put it...

But what about TP?? I have try to make a space for that one.. no luck.. my head is starting to hurt..

So to the fans... Where would you put Zelda TP in the timeline???

BTW: here is the part 2 of the clip I have mention (in case you want to refresh your memory... :P

So... Thoughts??

:)

Ok now... to explain some things:

The Legend of Zelda refers to an old Japanese tale or something. Including hero, princess and evil sorcerer.

As every "Legend of Zelda" follows the same pattern it is obvious that there is NO timeline or whatsoever at all. Each game of the series is a stand alone story but in a different setting.

And to be honest, I don't want a story- / timeline either.

Zelda: TP would fit in the hyrule B part. Ganon is destroyed and trying to gain full power via the Triforce of Power. Ganon Uses Zant to use twilight powers to bring him back till full power. ONce Zant finished with that Ganon returns to take control over hyrule via the Triforce of power. Farm Link defeats Ganon once again but its unclear what happens to him, although Zant is the one who gives the final blow, and maybe traps him in Twilight and when WW and PH takes place No hero was ever chosen to defeat Ganon and thus begins the story of Hyrule B. At least that is what i believe to be true, or maybe they they just screw with our head and made serval diffrent worlds of hyrule and none of them fit with each other except for true sequils like Mahors and PH and Zelda IIrevjjm

hmm.. that make a lot of sense... :) Thx

Wow at first that was confusing but for sure Tw would be in B becuase that is adult like the adult orcain of timewael_rajab

TP takes place 300 years after OoT. The fact that both characters are adults is meaningless, they're entirely different people.

Well i know i said something be fore but here is what wikipedia has to say about this. While if i beleive it or not is beyond me.

Chronology

The precise chronology of the Zelda universe is hotly debated among fans, although some fans do not feel the games are definitively connected. As the series progressed, and more games were released, the exact order of the games in an overall timeline became complex and heavily disputed.

In the instruction booklet for The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past it is revealed that this particular Link is an ancestor of the Link from the original NES games. Also the Nintendo 64 The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time does the same thing in relation to the SNES Link. Also, In The Legend Of Zelda: The Wind Waker it mentions that the flooded Hyrule is a result of "the hero" going on an adventure in another kingdom, possibly alluding to the child Link from Ocarina of Time's adventure in Termina in Majora's Mask. It is not known how much time has passed in Hyrule between each of these games.

In an interview conducted by Nintendo Dream with Eiji Aonuma in December 2006, he mentioned that there exists two different Zelda universes. The split in the timeline occurs during Ocarina of Time, when, at the end of the game, Link is sent back in time by Princess Zelda. Once returned to his original time, Link goes to see her again, and the result of this meeting is an alternate future in which the villain Ganondorf is arrested and tried by the ancient sages, which causes him to be banished to the Twilight Realm; Twilight Princess then occurs over one hundred years after the Ocarina of Time child Link's era. Meanwhile, The Wind Waker occurs in the "adult Link" timeline, hundreds of years after the adventure of the adult-Link in the future of Ocarina of Time and is directly followed by Phantom Hourglass.[2][3]