Are you excited for Red Steel 2?*Poll

Yeah, the first one wasn't that great.

Let's look at the benefits of that game though

1.)Interesting control scheme (flipping stuff for cover was great)

2.)Sword combat was an interesting addition (weak execution)

3.)The use of the Unreal 2.5 engine on the Wii (although the graphics weren't amazing).

4.)Multiplayer was interesting especially the cell phone thing. That was great.

Stuff like this that was mediocre in the first game was great in theory. I think that if Ubi really puts some effort into this, this will be a great shooter for the Wii.

yes but I want

1.fixed control scheme with controls like moh2 with gun gestures and stuff and better sword combat if possible 1:1

2. great graphics with variety in character models nice looking indoor/outdoor environments and great special f/x and make the maps big

3. way better voice overs keep the great music make the story way better

4.great online with no lag lots of maps, customization in the characters and voice chat (please) 32 players hopefully

5.and finally take your time with it dont rush I would like to see them give it to the graw team or rainbow six team but just make it as good as possible if they don't I know they could do A great job well, hopefully anyway

i hate half a**ed games, at that is exactly what the first red steel was!!!

i love ubi soft just not on this system!

Ubisoft still doesn't take the Wii seriously. 1st game was not all it was cracked up to be, and every other game they've made is trash, barring 1 well-scoring minigame fest. :/ (note: Ubi did not make No More Heroes, they published it. Suda deserves all credit for that game)

Their "apology" was obviously just PR and they still put trash dev teams on the Wii while saving the good stuff (RSV2) for other consoles.

Ubisoft still doesn't take the Wii seriously. 1st game was not all it was cracked up to be, and every other game they've made is trash, barring 1 well-scoring minigame fest. :/ (note: Ubi did not make No More Heroes, they published it. Suda deserves all credit for that game)

Their "apology" was obviously just PR and they still put trash dev teams on the Wii while saving the good stuff (RSV2) for other consoles.

metroidfood

Woot! R6V2 is going to own!

i hate half a**ed games, at that is exactly what the first red steel was!!!

i love ubi soft just not on this system!

kenakuma

It was only halfed done because they rushed it to be a launch game.

nope... ut i did not voted... the reason you give do not match...

I just i`m not intersted in the series.. I did not got the 1st and have not even digg anything about tis one... If it end up being great and I do not have any game to get (which I doubt) at the moment I guess i would take a look.. if not... meh...

woah! whats with all the negative redsteel comments? am i missing something here? i played this game back in december of 2006 and i thought it was brilliant. pretty much after enjoying the mutliplayer w/ friends and being blown away by the precision of wiimote aiming, i decided that im getting a wii. yep, it was this game that convinced me to get a wii. and redsteel was my first game too. my friends and i liked it back then, we still play it, and prolly will until the next best offline multiplayer shooter is released.

so yeah, im excited for redsteel 2 and hopeful that timesplitters 4 also makes its way onto the wii. as for the ppl that bash this game, too bad for u...but that means more copies for the rest of us!

I never finished the first one, so no, I'm not excited about the next one.

I don't understand why everyone's saying the Graphics were crappy, because they really weren't :

Despite the controls and graphics and everything else that it gets criticized for, my biggest problem with Red Steel was that it was boring...

But, I do see potential and am optimistic for the second one.

Just one thing Ubi, either provide a reason for the swordfighting, or get rid of it altogether...

Despite the controls and graphics and everything else that it gets criticized for, my biggest problem with Red Steel was that it was boring...

But, I do see potential and am optimistic for the second one.

Just one thing Ubi, either provide a reason for the swordfighting, or get rid of it altogether...

presto7640

That's another gripe of mine I had when I first picked up the game. Why, when I'm carrying a shotgun and an uzi, do I have to put down my best weapons to sword fight some generic thug? I mean, for actual boss fights, it's acceptable. To fit in with the story, they could goad your character, calling him a "cowardly gaijin" and throwing his "lack of honor" into it, or something. But to just put away your guns for some guy running around the corner with a katana...in real life, that's when you're reaching for your handgun, not putting it away!

See RS was cool because its concept was genious.

It "claimed" to have a balanced sword and gun fighting frenzy.

They should really work on this concept and make it so swords and guns can be used at anay time but the AI will basically force you to use the proper weapon. Have 1 : 1 control, I know they can do it. Improve the visuals for heavens sake. They would show us specific shots that looked amazing in early pics and then when they game came out it looked terrible. Controls need to be remapped not just motions but buttons. For the sniper they should improve upon the idea used in Moh where you turned the Wiimote to zoom but you need to hold a button to turn it first because it was a pain to hold the Wiimote in that position. Multiplayer needs to be huge online, leaderboards, tournaments, universal FCs, voice chat, loads of modes, and 16 players.

You want an AAA thqts how you do it.

i hope it has online gunfights and online/ 2 player swordfights i also hope it has better controls , better cutscenes and better graphicsjude11

if they really wanna be cool they could allow the sword and guns to be used at any time. That way its like using the Plasma sword in Halo where its only good if you are close to the person.

The second Ubisoft develops (DEVELOPS, not publish) a good game on the Wii, I will trust them.

So far they have only developed crap and their apalogies are empty promises, I don't get why anyway trusts them until they have proven themself.

[QUOTE="metroidfood"]

Ubisoft still doesn't take the Wii seriously. 1st game was not all it was cracked up to be, and every other game they've made is trash, barring 1 well-scoring minigame fest. :/ (note: Ubi did not make No More Heroes, they published it. Suda deserves all credit for that game)

Their "apology" was obviously just PR and they still put trash dev teams on the Wii while saving the good stuff (RSV2) for other consoles.

Sykoh

Woot! R6V2 is going to own!

Your sig owns

The funny thing about this is Ubioft has a gold mine on their hands. This is the most quick cash in series of the centuary and it hit platinum.

If they worked half as hard on this as they did AC they would of had even bigger turnouts.