Call of Duty: World at War vs. The Conduit

Okay, about 6 or 7 months ago i posted that WaW is the best first person shooter on the Wii, some agreed others told me watch out for the conduit to blow away WaW. Now that it's been out for about a month, i'm just curious to see whats the verdict on probably the top first person shooters on wii. (I ALSO UNDERSTAND PEOPLE WILL PROBABLY WRITE RED STEEL 2 AND MEDAL OF HONOR AND RESIDENT EVIL.

But bottom line whats better everbody: The All Seeing Eye or Destroying the Reich!!!!!!!

im going to say conduit since it is a wii excusive but other than that they both great games

Having owned and returned both games because they were so bad, I can easily say that WaW was the less crappy of the two.

The Conduit BY FAR!!!

The visuals of the conduit are absolutely the better of the two. The single player campaign goes to Word at War as it was longer and IMO more fun. As for the weapons I like World at War better but this is only becase I enjoy realistic better.Both have their pros and cons when it comes to online but in my opinion I truly enjoy CoD online more then The Conduit. So overall I like Call of Duty 5 :)

The Conduit since you could use a shotgun and it would actually kill the opponent. :P

The Conduit since you could use a shotgun and it would actually kill the opponent. :P

Crazyguy105

I Terrorize in COD with the double barrel

The Conduit since you could use a shotgun and it would actually kill the opponent. :P

Crazyguy105

The Conduit. Funner online, better graphics, and better weapons.

The Conduit

Depends on what you're looking for. The class system in WaW multiplayer is great, but The Conduit has much better graphics and a better single player campaign (WaW would have been better if the skipped the scripted events). I think The Conduit has the edge.

Despite the lack of communication and less players, I actually favor WaW over The Conduit. It just seemed to bland.

WaW - Dumbed down version of an already bad game.

Conduit - Campaign is generic and kind of boring, but the controls are good and the multiplayer is decent.

I'm going with The Conduit on this one.

I think the bottom line depends on which has better multiplayer.

Looking into this, I must say that WaW is better. In The Conduit people are always jumping around all bugged out with lagg, and if it is ever smooth (hardly ever, I always bump into alteast 1 lagged out player per game) it's too much of a run and gun rather where WaW has atleast some ****and tactical ability. The maps are much better too, and it has a sniping system/head shot system that works.

Also, if someone is lagging in WaW, it doesn't (well, hardly ever) bug out and makes the player bounce around, rather, it makes your bullets make less contact with your enemy (i.e you have to shoot a lot more bullet than normal to kill them), so it's not that bad, atleast it doesn't affect every other player that has a good connection like in The Conduit, where it makes hitting the lagged player impossible.

I don't know how you could even think The Conduit has better multiplayer, I thought it was so obvious that WaW was better...

P.S I'm not against The Conduit, I don't believe I'm biased in any way, I looked forward to The Conduit more-so than WaW as it is an exclusive. I still enjoy the game. I just don't think it measures up next to WaW.

world at war kills the conduit in every regard. If you think not then you lose your credibility as a gamer.rgame1

Single player campaign easily goes to WaW. It isn't even that impressive a campaign mode, but easily beats out the Conduit's. That game has you go through the same locales each level and all you do is destroy the respawn hives whenever you come across them. There is no variety in that campaign. At least WaW had veichles and turrets you could use.

Multiplayer I'd have to give to the Conduit by a bare edge. WaW has a cool class system, but with the Conduit's good controls it can just be fun to play online.

Also, you need to be aware that if you plan on using WiiSpeak for the Conduit, you can only talk to people you already have on your friends list.

The Conduit, but WaW has an epic storyline especially the Russian campaignPices

Looking into this, I must say that WaW is better. In The Conduit people are always jumping around all bugged out with lagg, and if it is ever smooth (hardly ever, I always bump into alteast 1 lagged out player per game) it's too much of a run and gun rather where WaW has atleast some ****and tactical ability. The maps are much better too, and it has a sniping system/head shot system that works.

trugs26

Conduit has head shots too. And you can snipe and headshot someone with a burst of rifle fire. And I'm sure that any fps can be played run'n gun style or tactically.

world at war kills the conduit in every regard. If you think not then you lose your credibility as a gamer.rgame1

0_o are you serious??....you gotta be kidding me. The fact that The Conduit is being compaired a CoD games is amazing in and of itself. Tryench has a history of making awesome FPS games, where as this is HVS's first attempt in this genera. Your statement is idiotic.

I've never played WaW, but the only positive thing I would say (from what I've seen) is that the online is good.

It looks like gabage to me, and worse than most PS2 games.

Conduit is a blast, at least to me. Even with it sometimes lagging, you can still kill people that bounce around. I've done it numerous times.

[QUOTE="trugs26"]

Looking into this, I must say that WaW is better. In The Conduit people are always jumping around all bugged out with lagg, and if it is ever smooth (hardly ever, I always bump into alteast 1 lagged out player per game) it's too much of a run and gun rather where WaW has atleast some ****and tactical ability. The maps are much better too, and it has a sniping system/head shot system that works.

Chojuto

Conduit has head shots too. And you can snipe and headshot someone with a burst of rifle fire. And I'm sure that any fps can be played run'n gun style or tactically.

[QUOTE="Chojuto"]

[QUOTE="trugs26"]

Looking into this, I must say that WaW is better. In The Conduit people are always jumping around all bugged out with lagg, and if it is ever smooth (hardly ever, I always bump into alteast 1 lagged out player per game) it's too much of a run and gun rather where WaW has atleast some ****and tactical ability. The maps are much better too, and it has a sniping system/head shot system that works.

trugs26

Conduit has head shots too. And you can snipe and headshot someone with a burst of rifle fire. And I'm sure that any fps can be played run'n gun style or tactically.

Really? Because I find myself ducking for cover and hiding in The Conduit numerous times.

[QUOTE="trugs26"]

[QUOTE="Chojuto"]

Conduit has head shots too. And you can snipe and headshot someone with a burst of rifle fire. And I'm sure that any fps can be played run'n gun style or tactically.

Brawl578

Really? Because I find myself ducking for cover and hiding in The Conduit numerous times.

I would say The Conduit is better because of the multiplayer.

On a side note: COD 7 better be for the Wii. I'm talking to you, Treyarch!

Well so far i give it to the WaW, even though i've spent less time with the conduit, WaW i can't stop playing the multiplAYER and the russian parts of the campaign are the best parts. I love starting multi player levels and reznov starts off "FIGHT!!!,, MAME!!!!! KILL YOU, UNTIL THERE IS NO ONE LEFT!!!! That gets me going, lmao!!!!!!!!

I would say The Conduit is better because of the multiplayer.

On a side note: COD 7 better be for the Wii. I'm talking to you, Treyarch!

Vari3ty

CoD7? CoD5 hasn't even come out yet, woah, can you see the future?

[QUOTE="Vari3ty"]

I would say The Conduit is better because of the multiplayer.

On a side note: COD 7 better be for the Wii. I'm talking to you, Treyarch!

Lord_Nas3k

CoD7? CoD5 hasn't even come out yet, woah, can you see the future?