Ok, so Naruto comes out and IGN says...
"Simply put, Clash of Ninja Revolution is Wii's best fighting game, and with no worthy contenders on the horizon"
Ok but the Wii already had one of the best fighters on ANY console at launch with Dragon Ball Z 2 where IGN said...
"One of the best anime brawlers around. Period."
and...
"Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 2 is one of the most entertaining and fierce anime fighters around."
Mind you that they're talking about a launch title for the Wii and the sequel is coming out this holiday season. That version will boast more players and online play. So what's up with IGN saying "no worthy contenders on the horizon"?
Now Naruto scored .1 higher the Dragon Ball Z and yes, I understand that the reviews for games change every single year because there's different factors. But when this title beats out DBZ by .1 and there's a title coming that gives the player more content and online play how does anyone justify that this is it for fighters for the year.
I'm not a fan of either series but DBZ is a solid fighter that was pretty amazing to be pulled off so well at the Wii launch. Now it and it's sequel are written off?
Log in to comment