link
doesnt look to bad me thinks :O
This topic is locked from further discussion.
What angers me the most is that they are releasing it now, they should of done this in 2007, releasing it similtaneously with the other versions.
We should be getting Modern Warfare 2, not this. Is there a problem with making a exclusive COD game for Wii?
What angers me the most is that they are releasing it now, they should of done this in 2007, releasing it similtaneously with the other versions.
We should be getting Modern Warfare 2, not this. Is there a problem with making a exclusive COD game for Wii?
snover2009
thats what ive been thinking since the announcement to
apparently it is. ts too hard for them to make an exclusive engine for the Wii. And after putting COD4 engine on Wii, its hard for them to put MW2 on Wii. This industry is a joke sometimes.What angers me the most is that they are releasing it now, they should of done this in 2007, releasing it similtaneously with the other versions.
We should be getting Modern Warfare 2, not this. Is there a problem with making a exclusive COD game for Wii?
snover2009
As I said in numerous threads on this. Gameplay matters most. I'm not saying make a graphically bad game, I'm saying gameplay matters more than graphics.nintendoboy16We've already seen games that look great for the platform - Games like Super Mario Galaxy and Metroid Prime 3 - Something like this, that looks like an EARLY PS2 title is totally unacceptable and just further proves this is a money grab by 'huge and ugly monster' Activision.
[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]As I said in numerous threads on this. Gameplay matters most. I'm not saying make a graphically bad game, I'm saying gameplay matters more than graphics.Sonick54too bad gameplay will be inferior to the other 2 versions before it anyway. >___> Unless if the controls suck, why will that matter?
[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]As I said in numerous threads on this. Gameplay matters most. I'm not saying make a graphically bad game, I'm saying gameplay matters more than graphics.Sonick54too bad gameplay will be inferior to the other 2 versions before it anyway. >___> Why are you assuming this? to begin with, with the use of the wiimote is easy to have a enhanced experience, nor a lowered one. I don't see your point at all as there are already several shooters working even online, as many gamers consider that so important
[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]As I said in numerous threads on this. Gameplay matters most. I'm not saying make a graphically bad game, I'm saying gameplay matters more than graphics.HaziqonfireWe've already seen games that look great for the platform - Games like Super Mario Galaxy and Metroid Prime 3 - Something like this, that looks like an EARLY PS2 title is totally unacceptable and just further proves this is a money grab by 'huge and ugly monster' Activision. I wasn't talking on the graphics importance, I was talking on how gameplay is more important. Sure, shove Mario Galaxy's graphics in my face, but graphics don't matter as much as gameplay does.
wasn't talking on the graphics importance, I was talking on how gameplay is more important. Sure, shove Mario Galaxy's graphics in my face, but graphics don't matter as much as gameplay does.nintendoboy16
Thats true, they don't matter that much - but there is a certain standard that visuals have to live up to every generation - This just looks bad for what we've already seen done on the Wii.
And in terms of gameplay, if it works well fine - but besides that if they don't have key gameplay features like the other platforms, it'll be worse. I doubt the online will be as enjoyable as it was on the other platforms.
And as for controls - you might say the Wiimote is better but in the end its a preference thing. Most people have come to the point where they are comfortable with a Wiimote, Keyboard/Mouse or Analog set up, so they can play with any set up with ease. Its just up to them as to what they 'prefer'
[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"] wasn't talking on the graphics importance, I was talking on how gameplay is more important. Sure, shove Mario Galaxy's graphics in my face, but graphics don't matter as much as gameplay does.
Thats true, they don't matter that much - but there is a certain standard that visuals have to live up to every generation - This just looks bad for what we've already seen done on the Wii.
And in terms of gameplay, if it works well fine - but besides that if they don't have key gameplay features like the other platforms, it'll be worse. I doubt the online will be as enjoyable as it was on the other platforms.
And as for controls - you might say the Wiimote is better but in the end its a preference thing. Most people have come to the point where they are comfortable with a Wiimote, Keyboard/Mouse or Analog set up, so they can play with any set up with ease. Its just up to them as to what they 'prefer'
I actually do think that it's a preferance thing for controls. I played shooters with a mouse and keyboard, analog, and Wii mote. So it depends on the person.[QUOTE="Sonick54"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]As I said in numerous threads on this. Gameplay matters most. I'm not saying make a graphically bad game, I'm saying gameplay matters more than graphics.enrique_marrodztoo bad gameplay will be inferior to the other 2 versions before it anyway. >___> Why are you assuming this? to begin with, with the use of the wiimote is easy to have a enhanced experience, nor a lowered one. I don't see your point at all as there are already several shooters working even online, as many gamers consider that so important I'd honestly rather take a good online system than wiimote controls. I'm really not gonna hold my breath for them to explain how online will work. It's not as if the analog controls were terrible on the other consoles either as well. like hazi said, it's a matter of preference at this point. Pointing at the screen with the wiimote won't suddenly make me enjoy this port more than it's 360 counterpart. .
They look fine to me. They will probably look better in motion.
Everyone in system wars thought they were terrible, but that's what system wars is. A ton of Wii bashers. Lmao.
They look fine to me. They will probably look better in motion.
Everyone in system wars thought they were terrible, but that's what system wars is. A ton of Wii bashers. Lmao.
awssk8er716
Even Wii fans are bashing this one, it's not asystem warsthing. MW actually makes The Conduit look good. It's pathetic.
A port of a sup-par game that already came out on the other systems 2 years ago.
How awful it looks(and will most likely be) is not surprising.
I definitely agree with the sentiment that the game should have been released in 2007 but honestly to get this game on the Wii with the superior controller even now I'm very excited for. I can't friggin wait and the screens have me super excited still so bring it on! If the online is as good or better than World at War's then this will keep me busy for ages!
uh...
a gamecube cod game is arguably better looking, I wouldn't buy this guys.
MasterC5
I lol'd. jeez this is so true what is wrong with a company spending more than 2 months on a game thats already been delayed by nearly 3 years. When I first heard of this i was immediately excited but now it looks like an obvious money grab.
Way to look at the bright side.I would assume it runs at 60 fps based on the quality of those screens.
psn8214
I would assume it runs at 60 fps based on the quality of those screens.
:lol: They better make it 60fps i mean this looks worse than world at war, i mean look at the textures!!!! u say this looks worse then World at War Wii? World at War WIi sucks.[QUOTE="awssk8er716"]
They look fine to me. They will probably look better in motion.
Everyone in system wars thought they were terrible, but that's what system wars is. A ton of Wii bashers. Lmao.
TaMuK711
Even Wii fans are bashing this one, it's not asystem warsthing. MW actually makes The Conduit look good. It's pathetic.
What kinda argument is that, the only game that exceeds the Conduit in visuals is Mario Galaxy.
[QUOTE="TaMuK711"]
[QUOTE="awssk8er716"]
They look fine to me. They will probably look better in motion.
Everyone in system wars thought they were terrible, but that's what system wars is. A ton of Wii bashers. Lmao.
snover2009
Even Wii fans are bashing this one, it's not asystem warsthing. MW actually makes The Conduit look good. It's pathetic.
What kinda argument is that, the only game that exceeds the Conduit in visuals is Mario Galaxy.
LOL, right :lol:
The problem is if games like this find critical success and games like Madworld and De Blob and No More Heroes continue to fail, what message does that send? Supporting a game that was supposedly impossible on the Wii 2 years after is going to do nothing to make the current 3rd party situation any better.(Not to PG for you gamespot right?)I definitely agree with the sentiment that the game should have been released in 2007 but honestly to get this game on the Wii with the superior controller even now I'm very excited for. I can't friggin wait and the screens have me super excited still so bring it on! If the online is as good or better than World at War's then this will keep me busy for ages!
Darth-Samus
[QUOTE="TaMuK711"][QUOTE="snover2009"]
What kinda argument is that, the only game that exceeds the Conduit in visuals is Mario Galaxy.
FPS1337
LOL, right :lol:
If you say the conduit has bad visuals then ur an idiot. The one thing every review I saw including gamespot's said the conduit's visual were great. I have all three systems and it compares to halo 3's visuals.The Conduit has good techincal properties, but it is by no means good visually. Graphics are about a lot more than just how much shiney you can fit into a screen, design and art count for a LOT.
So no, I'm not an idiot, I just don't have blinders on.
[QUOTE="TaMuK711"][QUOTE="snover2009"]
What kinda argument is that, the only game that exceeds the Conduit in visuals is Mario Galaxy.
FPS1337
LOL, right :lol:
If you say the conduit has bad visuals then ur an idiot. The one thing every review I saw including gamespot's said the conduit's visual were great. I have all three systems and it compares to halo 3's visuals.You saw that youtube video with the horrible halo 3 shots didn't you?
[QUOTE="FPS1337"][QUOTE="TaMuK711"]
LOL, right :lol:
If you say the conduit has bad visuals then ur an idiot. The one thing every review I saw including gamespot's said the conduit's visual were great. I have all three systems and it compares to halo 3's visuals.You saw that youtube video with the horrible halo 3 shots didn't you?
no I own halo 3 and conduit. lol good try though.[QUOTE="TaMuK711"][QUOTE="snover2009"]
What kinda argument is that, the only game that exceeds the Conduit in visuals is Mario Galaxy.
FPS1337
LOL, right :lol:
If you say the conduit has bad visuals then ur an idiot. The one thing every review I saw including gamespot's said the conduit's visual were great. GS bashed The Conduit in the artistic department, enought to earn it the Busted Graphics, Artistic emblem. If you are gonna troll and insult people, at least make it look less obvious, jeez.:?Also, this game looks fairly rough, so far...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment