First NSMBWii Review

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Captain_Lorelli
Captain_Lorelli

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Captain_Lorelli
Member since 2004 • 1078 Posts

96% From Official Nintendo Magazine.

http://www.gonintendo.com/

Avatar image for shoryuken_
shoryuken_

3420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 shoryuken_
Member since 2009 • 3420 Posts

Good score, would like to see scores like this from less bias sources though.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#3 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts
7.5 from gamespot confirmed! but really, thats a really good score, im hoping at least a 9 from GS
Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#4 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts

Grear score but they are a bit kind to Mario games in that magazine.

Avatar image for TaMuK711
TaMuK711

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TaMuK711
Member since 2009 • 3367 Posts

Great score, but not really a reliable way to gauge how non-Nintendo review sites will receive it.

Avatar image for Captain_Lorelli
Captain_Lorelli

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Captain_Lorelli
Member since 2004 • 1078 Posts

Great score, but not really a reliable way to gauge how non-Nintendo review sites will receive it.

TaMuK711

True, but Nintendo power gave OoT a 9.5 which is lower the its average. Its all random.

Avatar image for TaMuK711
TaMuK711

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TaMuK711
Member since 2009 • 3367 Posts

[QUOTE="TaMuK711"]

Great score, but not really a reliable way to gauge how non-Nintendo review sites will receive it.

Captain_Lorelli

True, but Nintendo power gave OoT a 9.5 which is lower the its average. Its all random.

There are many, many, MANY more examples of them rating games higher than the average.

Avatar image for Captain_Lorelli
Captain_Lorelli

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Captain_Lorelli
Member since 2004 • 1078 Posts

[QUOTE="Captain_Lorelli"]

[QUOTE="TaMuK711"]

Great score, but not really a reliable way to gauge how non-Nintendo review sites will receive it.

TaMuK711

True, but Nintendo power gave OoT a 9.5 which is lower the its average. Its all random.

There are many, many, MANY more examples of them rating games higher than the average.

I know that. But as long as it is done one time, theres a chance statistically that it will happen again. Theres other factors to consider. Alot of people love Mario and might rate this game high anyway. On the other side some people might be sick of mario and rate it lower. Theres no proof that a 96% is a biased review or an unbiased review until more reviews surface.

Avatar image for virus1000
virus1000

10187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 virus1000
Member since 2009 • 10187 Posts

Great score! I wonder how much Gamespot will rate it.

Avatar image for starwarsjunky
starwarsjunky

24765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 starwarsjunky
Member since 2009 • 24765 Posts
well even if its biased, that most likely means itll be at least a 9.0
Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#11 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts

Great score, hope it gets AAA here.

Avatar image for 90xGrad
90xGrad

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 90xGrad
Member since 2009 • 528 Posts

i'm going to buy it regardless of the review scores. the multiplayer alone is worth the purchase to me. it's going to be a blast.

Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#13 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
AA here.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
i wonder why anything that has "nintendo" is automatically considered biased. but it's a really good score, means they manage to do it at least as fun as four swords.
Avatar image for Captain_Lorelli
Captain_Lorelli

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Captain_Lorelli
Member since 2004 • 1078 Posts

I think it will get a 90% average.

Avatar image for Cruse34
Cruse34

4468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#16 Cruse34
Member since 2009 • 4468 Posts

Good score hope I get that on my math test tommorow:) 8.5 here I think

Avatar image for Emmenite7
Emmenite7

452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Emmenite7
Member since 2007 • 452 Posts
That's a pretty good score for a sidescroller with no online play that looks like a slightly prettier version of the DS game. In all seriousness, though, I'm pleased with the good score. I hope that more "neutral" sources will be as positive, even if I am a little bitter about the game's lack of ambition.
Avatar image for Captain_Lorelli
Captain_Lorelli

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Captain_Lorelli
Member since 2004 • 1078 Posts

That's a pretty good score for a sidescroller with no online play that looks like a slightly prettier version of the DS game. In all seriousness, though, I'm pleased with the good score. I hope that more "neutral" sources will be as positive, even if I am a little bitter about the game's lack of ambition. Emmenite7

Wheres the lack of ambition ?

Avatar image for Darth-Samus
Darth-Samus

3995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 Darth-Samus
Member since 2006 • 3995 Posts

GREAT! My hype for this game has slowly been built up and now I can't wait!

Really I think all the console-specific magazines (i.e; Nintendo Power, Official Xbox Magazine etc.) really aren't as biased as people give them grief for. I think they probably try hard to come off as NOT biased becaue they know people would assume that. I see legit reviews come quite often from those mags. I believe in them.

Avatar image for randomwiiplayer
randomwiiplayer

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 randomwiiplayer
Member since 2009 • 1804 Posts

GREAT! My hype for this game has slowly been built up and now I can't wait!

Really I think all the console-specific magazines (i.e; Nintendo Power, Official Xbox Magazine etc.) really aren't as biased as people give them grief for. I think they probably try hard to come off as NOT biased becaue they know people would assume that. I see legit reviews come quite often from those mags. I believe in them.

Darth-Samus

This.

Nintendo doesn't even make Nintendo Power anymore. Some other company does.

Avatar image for ScreamDream
ScreamDream

3953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 ScreamDream
Member since 2006 • 3953 Posts

That's a great score and another awesome Mario game.

Avatar image for pierst179
pierst179

10805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 258

User Lists: 0

#22 pierst179
Member since 2006 • 10805 Posts

Great score even though I don't see it getting many scores like that.

Avatar image for hashabnelah
hashabnelah

347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 hashabnelah
Member since 2009 • 347 Posts

Nintendo doesn't even make Nintendo Power anymore. Some other company does.

randomwiiplayer

The publisher of Nintendo Power is Future U.S., the American subsidiary of Future, the publisher of the U.K. gaming publication EDGE.

Avatar image for Wikipedian
Wikipedian

1100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 Wikipedian
Member since 2007 • 1100 Posts

Good score, It would be likely a 8.5 to 9.0 here. But I'm still puzzled. Why no online play? This could have been awesome

Avatar image for sman3579
sman3579

21174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#25 sman3579
Member since 2008 • 21174 Posts

Im sure other reviewers will give similar scores. This game is going to be awesome!

Avatar image for oxygenis4losers
oxygenis4losers

101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 oxygenis4losers
Member since 2007 • 101 Posts

Good score, It would be likely a 8.5 to 9.0 here. But I'm still puzzled. Why no online play? This could have been awesome

Wikipedian

The official word is that they wanted this to be a loungeroom experience. Frankly, I'm inclined to agree. To be fair, I'm not a massive fan of online games to begin with, but this is one game where I wouldn't find it fun unless my friends or family were in the room with me. I suppose I can understand some people's frustations over it though..

Avatar image for so_hai
so_hai

4385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#27 so_hai
Member since 2007 • 4385 Posts
Is there a direct link, or just that homepage one you didn't anchor?
Avatar image for DeeDeeDee-er
DeeDeeDee-er

1067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 DeeDeeDee-er
Member since 2006 • 1067 Posts

While I'm happy with the score OBVIOUSLY :P, I'll wait for the next review to come in. ONM's scores are absolutely ridiculous and anything with Mario in it tends to get a AAA rating. Mario & Sonic at the Winter Olympics Games got a 9.1 :lol:!

Avatar image for redfield_137
redfield_137

2269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 redfield_137
Member since 2005 • 2269 Posts

Yeh, it's guaranteed to be good. I mean, has there been a bad Mario platformer?

Avatar image for starwarsjunky
starwarsjunky

24765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 starwarsjunky
Member since 2009 • 24765 Posts

Yeh, it's guaranteed to be good. I mean, has there been a bad Mario platformer?

redfield_137
well the law of odds say there has to be a bad one eventually, right?
Avatar image for umcommon
umcommon

2503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 umcommon
Member since 2007 • 2503 Posts
Good stuff.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#32 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

Good score, It would be likely a 8.5 to 9.0 here. But I'm still puzzled. Why no online play? This could have been awesome

Wikipedian
why not a "play with CPU" option instead. same effect. the reason's the same wii sports has no online: playing against someone you cant even see or talk to is as fun as playing with the computer. the fun is in playing with your friends right next to you.
Avatar image for chris3116
chris3116

12174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 chris3116
Member since 2003 • 12174 Posts

I'm hyped.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

[QUOTE="Wikipedian"]

Good score, It would be likely a 8.5 to 9.0 here. But I'm still puzzled. Why no online play? This could have been awesome

BrunoBRS

why not a "play with CPU" option instead. same effect. the reason's the same wii sports has no online: playing against someone you cant even see or talk to is as fun as playing with the computer. the fun is in playing with your friends right next to you.



Ever heard of voice-chat?

To argue that playing with a friend online is the same thing as to play with the CPU is just as stupid as to argue that speaking on the phone is like talking to a wall.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#35 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="Wikipedian"]

Good score, It would be likely a 8.5 to 9.0 here. But I'm still puzzled. Why no online play? This could have been awesome

JLF1

why not a "play with CPU" option instead. same effect. the reason's the same wii sports has no online: playing against someone you cant even see or talk to is as fun as playing with the computer. the fun is in playing with your friends right next to you.



Ever heard of voice-chat?

To argue that playing with a friend online is the same thing as to play with the CPU is just as stupid as to argue that speaking on the phone is like talking to a wall.

i shouldnt even care about replying this, but whatever. so you're saying playing together with your friend, even though he's just a mute character, is just as fun as playing with a person right next to you?

not even MMORPGs (even with voice chat and even a camera, if you want) can beat local multiplayer in terms of multiplayer fun.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

i shouldnt even care about replying this, but whatever. so you're saying playing together with your friend, even though he's just a mute character, is just as fun as playing with a person right next to you?

not even MMORPGs (even with voice chat and even a camera, if you want) can beat local multiplayer in terms of multiplayer fun.

BrunoBRS

No I don't say that. I said online multiplayer with VOICE-CHAT didn't I?

All I'm saying is that playing online with a friend with voice-chat can be incredibly fun even if it offers a different experience than having your friends over to play with you.

I never compared online multiplayer to local multiplayer. You on the other hand said that playing online with a friend is basically the same as playing with the CPU.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#37 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]

i shouldnt even care about replying this, but whatever. so you're saying playing together with your friend, even though he's just a mute character, is just as fun as playing with a person right next to you?

not even MMORPGs (even with voice chat and even a camera, if you want) can beat local multiplayer in terms of multiplayer fun.

JLF1

No I don't say that. I said online multiplayer with VOICE-CHAT didn't I?

All I'm saying is that playing online with a friend with voice-chat can be incredibly fun even if it offers a different experience than having your friends over to play with you.

I never compared online multiplayer to local multiplayer. You on the other hand said that playing online with a friend is basically the same as playing with the CPU.

with no chat (and you know it wouldnt feature any kind of chat), on a 2D platformer, of course it is. with voice chat, it's more like chatting while playing alone. the physical interaction's still missing. besides, the time and resources spent on an online mode that the majority of the players wouldnt play (either because they cant or because they played and didnt find it funny, for the reasons stated above) just werent worth it.

Avatar image for Backbonesalsa
Backbonesalsa

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Backbonesalsa
Member since 2009 • 148 Posts
I'm really looking forward to this game. Just finished Mario Galaxy and this will keep me occupied with Marioness untill Galaxy 2 comes out. You know... when i think of it... if Nintendo had named this game "Super Mario bros 4" would'nt just that secure it tons of good scores and make the "casual" critics all yell in pure joy: "Nintendo is returning to it's proper self!!" Wow... there is a lot of power in a game's title....