The enemy still stands there no stylized moves were executed from the cpu, he just did a couple of the most basic slashes and that was it. The first Red Steel had this problem.
Damn, that LOOKS nice! Ubi Soft is not my favorite developer though, so I'll be wary until I get more concrete info on the gameplay.
Keep up the good posts SMR.;)
FFCYAN
Thank you. And it sure does LOOK nice. I would be devastated if it turned out to be fake or really bullshotty (Well not devastated, but a little upset lol)
Damn, that LOOKS nice! Ubi Soft is not my favorite developer though, so I'll be wary until I get more concrete info on the gameplay.
Keep up the good posts SMR.;)
SMR-Venom
Thank you. And it sure does LOOK nice. I would be devastated if it turned out to be fake or really bullshotty (Well not devastated, but a little upset lol)The video seems to be legit gameplay (the guy was swinging the Wiimote and aiming a gun). I hope there is no HUD so the game would have a more cinamatic experience to it (there was no HUD in the video). Either that or Ubi was making the game look better than it is at the moment. I wouldn't be suprised.:?
The marketing for Red Steel series is so effective. They show a guy getting all into the game and it looks like he is just having the time of his life. For the first game it was totally decieving, hopefully this flashy marketing will be matched by great quality for the sequel.
The trailer looks awesome, but almost a little too good to be true. I'll reserve judgment, but the trailer was excellent, it did exactly what trailers are supposed to. It caught my attention
BUT- I strongly doubt that's actual gameplay. As the trailer only shows the wiimote and screen at the same time for less than a second- so it's impossible to say.
It'd be really nice if this IS legit gameplay being shown here- but I'm pretty sure it isn't.
The resolution on that trailer is like 720p :| the wii can't render something like that real time. It looked nice but I can't really take this seriously until I read some previews................................................its Ubisoft after all.
I have a hard time believing that was gameplay, because those graphics were as smooth as borderlands.
MasterC5
I think some of it was gameplay and some was "cutscene," but all of it seems to use the game's actual graphics engine. The textures are too muddy and the jaggies are too pronounced for it to be fake or doctored or otherwise CG.
Nice trailer...
BUT- I strongly doubt that's actual gameplay. As the trailer only shows the wiimote and screen at the same time for less than a second- so it's impossible to say.
It'd be really nice if this IS legit gameplay being shown here- but I'm pretty sure it isn't.
More_Dakka
Of course the actor isn't actually playing, but somebody is during the action parts. Like I said, I think probably half of it is gameplay and the other is programmed cutscene. It's pretty easy to tell which is which... the gameplay is in first-person.
Regardless, I think the few seconds of sword waving at 1:00 are legit because they show off exactly how precise the 1:1 can be.
I have a hard time believing that was gameplay, because those graphics were as smooth as borderlands.
I think some of it was gameplay and some was "cutscene," but all of it seems to use the game's actual graphics engine. The textures are too muddy and the jaggies are too pronounced for it to be fake or doctored or otherwise CG. [QUOTE="More_Dakka"]
Nice trailer...
BUT- I strongly doubt that's actual gameplay. As the trailer only shows the wiimote and screen at the same time for less than a second- so it's impossible to say.
It'd be really nice if this IS legit gameplay being shown here- but I'm pretty sure it isn't.
Of course the actor isn't actually playing, but somebody is during the action parts. Like I said, I think probably half of it is gameplay and the other is programmed cutscene. It's pretty easy to tell which is which... the gameplay is in first-person.
Regardless, I think the few seconds of sword waving at 1:00 are legit because they show off exactly how precise the 1:1 can be.
[QUOTE="funsohng"]is that gameplay graphics? if it is, im hooked. yes they appear as ingame graphics most definitively.Damm ubisoft.the trailers of the original RS made me puke(so i didnt buy the first game-well i got last year and returned it for 15 bucks),but this is different...It actually looks good.
I'm digging the style of this one alot more than the first and I liked the first. The first had a good concept just poor execution, but I still had fun with it.
The resolution on that trailer is like 720p :| the wii can't render something like that real time. It looked nice but I can't really take this seriously until I read some previews................................................its Ubisoft after all.
ActicEdge
The graphic mainly look great because of the visualaestheticsof the game.
The aesthetics really remind me of ico and sotc on the ps2
Its has hope, but ill say this lets not jump the gun on this one considering Ubi's track record on the Wiiblack_ice23
Well that trailer was obviously pre-rendered, so i guess we have yet to see actual "Gameplay" at all. Lets hope they don't screw this one up as bad as they have screwed everything else. :)
[QUOTE="black_ice23"]Its has hope, but ill say this lets not jump the gun on this one considering Ubi's track record on the Wiithegoldenpoo
Well that trailer was obviously pre-rendered, so i guess we have yet to see actual "Gameplay" at all. Lets hope they don't screw this one up as bad as they have screwed everything else. :) yeah for sure
Notice how at the bottom it has hidden in transparent letter "for internal use only", what do you think that means :?
Mike885
i guessing that has to do with the possiblity that this trailer wasn't supposed to be shown to the public yet. [link] http://wii.ign.com/articles/979/979641p1.html [/link]
who else likes it when he gets pushed back in real life?
While I doubt the game will look that good, I'm digging the direction this game is taking. If they can pull off WM+ (as in, make it responsive and use it effectively), Ubisoft will have a huge hit on their hands.
[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"][QUOTE="black_ice23"]Its has hope, but ill say this lets not jump the gun on this one considering Ubi's track record on the Wiiblack_ice23
Well that trailer was obviously pre-rendered, so i guess we have yet to see actual "Gameplay" at all. Lets hope they don't screw this one up as bad as they have screwed everything else. :) yeah for sure I think it's odd they would do this though, if they have made the GC's precision and fluidity unattainable then people will just end up disappointed and confused, that short clip looked great but i doubt they could pull something that fluid off for the final product. Red Steel 1 was a mess, this looks at least from that footage completely different. But what happens if the game turns out to have inherited some of it's namesakes flaws? Ubisoft is the king of doing just this :(
Notice how at the bottom it has hidden in transparent letter "for internal use only", what do you think that means :?
i guessing that has to do with the possiblity that this trailer wasn't supposed to be shown to the public yet. [link] http://wii.ign.com/articles/979/979641p1.html [/link]
who else likes it when he gets pushed back in real life?
I'm guessing intentionally leaked so Ubisoft can use "it was leaked" excuse when people complain the actual game doesn't look as good as it did in the trailer (like they did with the original).
[QUOTE="black_ice23"]Its has hope, but ill say this lets not jump the gun on this one considering Ubi's track record on the Wiithegoldenpoo
Well that trailer was obviously pre-rendered, so i guess we have yet to see actual "Gameplay" at all. Lets hope they don't screw this one up as bad as they have screwed everything else. :) why is it obvious, me and alot of people are trying to firgure out how real this was please explain how you know its pre-rendered. i looked like to me that some of it was gameplay but alot was cut-scene. either way im really hyped for this title now
[QUOTE="black_ice23"][QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"] Well that trailer was obviously pre-rendered, so i guess we have yet to see actual "Gameplay" at all. Lets hope they don't screw this one up as bad as they have screwed everything else. :)thegoldenpoo
yeah for sure I think it's odd they would do this though, if they have made the GC's precision and fluidity unattainable then people will just end up disappointed and confused, that short clip looked great but i doubt they could pull something that fluid off for the final product. Red Steel 1 was a mess, this looks at least from that footage completely different. But what happens if the game turns out to have inherited some of it's namesakes flaws? Ubisoft is the king of doing just this :( oh and btw sure this would be like the first game responsive wise if:it was 2006 with not developing time AND Motion Plus wasnt around..But is 2009, they had development time, Ubisoft president apologized for the crap RS was AND there IS motion plus.I dont think Ubisoft wants to apologize again.
[QUOTE="thegoldenpoo"][QUOTE="black_ice23"]Its has hope, but ill say this lets not jump the gun on this one considering Ubi's track record on the Wii07pops07
Well that trailer was obviously pre-rendered, so i guess we have yet to see actual "Gameplay" at all. Lets hope they don't screw this one up as bad as they have screwed everything else. :) why is it obvious, me and alot of people are trying to firgure out how real this was please explain how you know its pre-rendered. i looked like to me that some of it was gameplay but alot was cut-scene. either way im really hyped for this title now You can just tell, NO jaggies, It looked 360 standard TBH in some aspects. Wii games just can't look that good, and don't go saying "Well it could be that good" because none of the consoles have games with that much AA, the footage was pre-rendered, it's pretty easy to see that.
Log in to comment