Fragile Dreams GS Review

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/fragilesayonaratsukinohaikyo/review.html

Finally a GS review. I'm reading it right now.

EDIT: 7.0. good score.

Avatar image for Cruse34
Cruse34

4468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 Cruse34
Member since 2009 • 4468 Posts

Not bad it got worse other places

Avatar image for Pdiddy105
Pdiddy105

4577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Pdiddy105
Member since 2007 • 4577 Posts

this game could have been a lot better. There are a ton of annoying little things that really hurt it.

Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#5 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
GS gave it a higher score than almost every other source?? Blasphemy!
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

Fragile Dreams: Farewell Ruins of the Moon has its share of faults, but they are far eclipsed by what it does right.GabuEx Review

I C WAT U DID THEIR.

:P

seriously now... so the story is compelling enough to "eclipse" the bad combat? might actually check the game then.

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

GS gave it a higher score than almost every other source?? Blasphemy!GamerForca

Yeah I'm surprised that they did like the game over some other sources. Even higher then IGN.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#8 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[quote="GabuEx Review"]Fragile Dreams: Farewell Ruins of the Moon has its share of faults, but they are far eclipsed by what it does right.BrunoBRS

I C WAT U DID THEIR.

:P

seriously now... so the story is compelling enough to "eclipse" the bad combat? might actually check the game then.

Honestly, that was actually completely unintentional on my part. :P

Well, as I said in my review, if the premise of the story interests you, then I would recommend it. It's told very well, for what it is. If it doesn't, however, then the gameplay isn't going to cover for it. This is really one of those games where review scores are pretty much useless. Those who want what it offers will like it; those who do not will not.

Avatar image for Kenny789
Kenny789

10434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#9 Kenny789
Member since 2006 • 10434 Posts
Where is the Gamespot bias now?! :P
Avatar image for elbert_b_23
elbert_b_23

8247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 elbert_b_23
Member since 2003 • 8247 Posts
its great score but i agree more with nintendolifes 8.0 but hell i am glad to see something over a 6.5 not that 6.5 is a really tobad
Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

Where is the Gamespot bias now?! :PKenny789

The Fire Emblem review.

Avatar image for Regent192
Regent192

6789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Regent192
Member since 2009 • 6789 Posts

that was unexpected

nice score

Avatar image for JohnnyDanger87
JohnnyDanger87

315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 JohnnyDanger87
Member since 2009 • 315 Posts

I'll pick this title up eventually, I got the soundtrack off Itunes a few days ago which was suprisingly good as well. I now just feel compelled to get it at some point in the near future.

Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

.....um 7.0, rly? wow GS what happened? OK guys GS isnt biased anymore :P

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#15 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

I'll pick this title up eventually, I got the soundtrack off Itunes a few days ago which was suprisingly good as well. I now just feel compelled to get it at some point in the near future.

JohnnyDanger87

Yeah, the soundtrack of the game is definitely a huge strong point in the game, understated as it is. The final boss music in the game was probably one of the best final boss tunes I've ever heard in a video game.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

Nice review.

I would have bought this game even if it got a 5.0 though as this has been one of my most anticipated Wii games for the last two years.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#17 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

.....um 7.0, rly? wow GS what happened? OK guys GS isnt biased anymore :P

painguy1
until the next review of a controversial game :P
Avatar image for Rod90
Rod90

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Rod90
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts

[QUOTE="Kenny789"]Where is the Gamespot bias now?! :PLordQuorthon

The Fire Emblem review.

The Castlevania Judgment review.
Avatar image for yokofox33
yokofox33

30775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#19 yokofox33
Member since 2004 • 30775 Posts

Fairly solid score. I'll be picking this game up in the future. Have been wanting it for awhile now, but I just have so many games in my backlog right now that it's better to wait for a price drop. Still looking forward to playing it though. The game has intrigued me ever since I saw the trailer for it.

Avatar image for elbert_b_23
elbert_b_23

8247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 elbert_b_23
Member since 2003 • 8247 Posts
[QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

[QUOTE="Kenny789"]Where is the Gamespot bias now?! :PRod90

The Fire Emblem review.

The Castlevania Judgment review.

or rune factory oh what nevermind even after a year they never done a review for the game
Avatar image for RandomFrenchMan
RandomFrenchMan

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 RandomFrenchMan
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Well ,Gamespot's review just confirmed what I thought while playing it. A pleasant game with a great universe ,ambiance and story ,that unfortunately suffer of a basic gameplay that make it annoying to anyone who doesn't like the background. A game that is worth playing but not for anyone though.
Avatar image for SteveTabernacle
SteveTabernacle

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#22 SteveTabernacle
Member since 2010 • 2584 Posts
GS gave it a higher score than almost every other source?? Blasphemy!GamerForca
Buh buh buh but..... teh GS always rates Wii games lower!!!!1 My Wii bias!!11! NOEZ! Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
Avatar image for pierst179
pierst179

10805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 258

User Lists: 0

#23 pierst179
Member since 2006 • 10805 Posts

That was surprisingly positive. :shock:

Avatar image for kenakuma
kenakuma

3462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 kenakuma
Member since 2007 • 3462 Posts

Lol at all the people that have been shouting GS bias!

Of course NOW they agree with GS but if heaven forbid GS reviews a wii game poorly its teh BIAZ!!!!11!!!!1

Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#25 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts

[QUOTE="Kenny789"]Where is the Gamespot bias now?! :PLordQuorthon

The Fire Emblem review.

I really just think they chose the wrong person for that review. The primary complaint of that entire review was "it's soooo hard" when most FE fans agree it was one of the easiest in the series.
Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

I really just think they chose the wrong person for that review. The primary complaint of that entire review was "it's soooo hard" when most FE fans agree it was one of the easiest in the series.GamerForca

Don't forget the lack of Mii integration. You gotta have those Miis.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#27 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="GamerForca"]I really just think they chose the wrong person for that review. The primary complaint of that entire review was "it's soooo hard" when most FE fans agree it was one of the easiest in the series.LordQuorthon

Don't forget the lack of Mii integration. You gotta have those Miis.

and the lack of waggle. because, you know, turn based strategy games have so much space for waggle commands.
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18268 Posts
of course its bias...this is clear and blatant favouritsim....GS are way to forgiving on the wii front. thats right..GS cant win :P. nah seriously....i think i will get this game at some point. it seems like a bit of a marmite game but i think its worth a punt.
Avatar image for deactivated-5967f36c08c33
deactivated-5967f36c08c33

15614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-5967f36c08c33
Member since 2006 • 15614 Posts

[QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

[QUOTE="GamerForca"]I really just think they chose the wrong person for that review. The primary complaint of that entire review was "it's soooo hard" when most FE fans agree it was one of the easiest in the series.BrunoBRS

Don't forget the lack of Mii integration. You gotta have those Miis.

and the lack of waggle. because, you know, turn based strategy games have so much space for waggle commands.

It's one thing to criticise a review. It's another thing to lie about what a review said; the Radiant Dawn review said nothing about "the lack of waggle."

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#31 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

Don't forget the lack of Mii integration. You gotta have those Miis.

VGobbsesser

and the lack of waggle. because, you know, turn based strategy games have so much space for waggle commands.

It's one thing to criticise a review. It's another thing to lie about what a review said; the Radiant Dawn review said nothing about "the lack of waggle."

"Despite being a Wii game, (Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn) doesn't make any attempt to use any of the system's strengths, such as Mii support, online support, or motion controls and pointing, even though the advantages of such integration should be plainly obvious." (emph. added)

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/rpg/fireemblem/review.html?tag=result;score;2

Avatar image for deactivated-5967f36c08c33
deactivated-5967f36c08c33

15614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-5967f36c08c33
Member since 2006 • 15614 Posts

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] and the lack of waggle. because, you know, turn based strategy games have so much space for waggle commands.GabuEx

It's one thing to criticise a review. It's another thing to lie about what a review said; the Radiant Dawn review said nothing about "the lack of waggle."

"Despite being a Wii game, (Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn) doesn't make any attempt to use any of the system's strengths, such as Mii support, online support, or motion controls and pointing, even though the advantages of such integration should be plainly obvious." (emph. added)

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/rpg/fireemblem/review.html?tag=result;score;2

Motion controls and waggle are not the same thing. Waggle is a motion control, but not all motion controls are waggle. BrunoBRS mentioned waggle, which is not a factual part of the review.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#33 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]

It's one thing to criticise a review. It's another thing to lie about what a review said; the Radiant Dawn review said nothing about "the lack of waggle."

VGobbsesser

"Despite being a Wii game, (Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn) doesn't make any attempt to use any of the system's strengths, such as Mii support, online support, or motion controls and pointing, even though the advantages of such integration should be plainly obvious." (emph. added)

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/rpg/fireemblem/review.html?tag=result;score;2

Motion controls and waggle are not the same thing. Waggle is a motion control, but not all motion controls are waggle.

I've seen people equate the two terms, and even if not, waggle was clearly the most common sort of motion control at the time of the writing of that review.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18268 Posts

[QUOTE="osan0"]it seems like a bit of a marmite game but i think its worth a punt.Sancroff

Wikipedia to the rescue. I guess "marmite" refers to the marketing slogan "Love it or hate it." Am I right? Learn something new every day. Thanks!

yup. over in england (i think they used to sell it in ireland..but i havent seen it in a long time. i havent been looking for it either though)..its like a jam you put on sandwiches. ive never tasted it myself but ive seen some people swear by it...marmite and cheese sandwich. others absolutely despise it. this was before marmites marketing team realised what has happening and played on it in their adds. i dont know if its sold anywhere else either.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
Another disappointing Wii game :( Reminds me of Madworld, good presentation and atmosphere but short and gameplay not too hot....

Lol at all the people that have been shouting GS bias!

Of course NOW they agree with GS but if heaven forbid GS reviews a wii game poorly its teh BIAZ!!!!11!!!!1

kenakuma
Haha just wait for the Conduit 2 to get a 6.5, while IGN gives it a 9.3, (nearly) everyone here will go utterly balistic :P
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#36 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]

It's one thing to criticise a review. It's another thing to lie about what a review said; the Radiant Dawn review said nothing about "the lack of waggle."

VGobbsesser

"Despite being a Wii game, (Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn) doesn't make any attempt to use any of the system's strengths, such as Mii support, online support, or motion controls and pointing, even though the advantages of such integration should be plainly obvious." (emph. added)

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/rpg/fireemblem/review.html?tag=result;score;2

Motion controls and waggle are not the same thing. Waggle is a motion control, but not all motion controls are waggle. BrunoBRS mentioned waggle, which is not a factual part of the review.

first, just call me bruno :P second, i meant "motion controls" when i said waggle. call me wrong, but as fas as i know, waggle is basically what was available back then, so i just called them both the same thing.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#37 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Another disappointing Wii game :(locopatho

Nothing disappointing about it for me. Was exactly what I both expected and wanted when I first heard about the game.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"]Another disappointing Wii game :(GabuEx

Nothing disappointing about it for me. Was exactly what I both expected and wanted when I first heard about the game.

O right, cool. Would you not have wanted a longer game though?
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#39 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"]Another disappointing Wii game :(locopatho

Nothing disappointing about it for me. Was exactly what I both expected and wanted when I first heard about the game.

O right, cool. Would you not have wanted a longer game though?

I had put 20+ hours into the game by the time I finished it. I don't know where reviewers were getting the 6-7 hour figure from; they must have been blazing through the game as fast as they could go or something.

Avatar image for Rod90
Rod90

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 Rod90
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts
[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Nothing disappointing about it for me. Was exactly what I both expected and wanted when I first heard about the game.

O right, cool. Would you not have wanted a longer game though?

I had put 20+ hours into the game by the time I finished it. I don't know where reviewers were getting the 6-7 hour figure from; they must have been blazing through the game as fast as they could go or something.

Good to hear that. I'm definetly going for this game.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="GabuEx"]

Nothing disappointing about it for me. Was exactly what I both expected and wanted when I first heard about the game.

GabuEx

O right, cool. Would you not have wanted a longer game though?

I had put 20+ hours into the game by the time I finished it. I don't know where reviewers were getting the 6-7 hour figure from; they must have been blazing through the game as fast as they could go or something.

O really? That's good to hear, I just assumed 6/7 was correct cos more than one review said so. I guess it's on my "buy when 20 or less" list :)
Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#43 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

Overall I want this game but I think I'll get it later after Metroid Other M during the summer since their are a lot of other Wii games I want to get too.

Avatar image for Legolas_Katarn
Legolas_Katarn

15556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 1

#44 Legolas_Katarn
Member since 2003 • 15556 Posts

I never looked into the game much but I did get a copy of the soundtrack while at Gamestop, good music.

[QUOTE="LordQuorthon"]

[QUOTE="GamerForca"]I really just think they chose the wrong person for that review. The primary complaint of that entire review was "it's soooo hard" when most FE fans agree it was one of the easiest in the series.BrunoBRS

Don't forget the lack of Mii integration. You gotta have those Miis.

and the lack of waggle. because, you know, turn based strategy games have so much space for waggle commands.

And the complaint about how they were captured at the end of one level and then the next scene just jumps to them being in jail for some reason

That was one of the worst reviews I've ever read

Avatar image for ShuichiChamp24
ShuichiChamp24

5014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 ShuichiChamp24
Member since 2009 • 5014 Posts

Eh, won't complain about the score. I for one would give it an 8 or something. So far my only complain is pretty much the fighting too. A lock on or something of the sort would really help.