[QUOTE="elbert_b_23"][QUOTE="meetroid8"] I beat it in 13 hours, about 45 min of backtracking. I have no idea how he beat the game that quickly and the backtracking is such a small segment of the game that its barely noticeable.Amvis
yeah but everyone believes the lies of ignI do not log in very ofen, and at that I do not post very often. However, your comments and many others comments have compelled me to offer up my opinion. You and many others speak of IGN as though it were the Whore of Bablyon. Why is that? True, they gave Fragile Dreams a 6.7, but they clearly stated their reasons for it. The reasons were simply too short, lots of back tracking, and there is no lock on system. That does not sound like a lie or some sort of slander to me. I do not discredit an entire website of its reviews because they publish reviews I do not agree with. If that were the case I would not listen to any game reviewer. I wonder what Gamespot will give this game?
Anyways, thanks to the review I do not have to waste $50 of my hard earned money because these days I can hardly afford that.
People always rip on IGN, GS or any other reviewer that would give a Wii game a low score, truth is many Wii games do deserve the low scores they get, hence many sites give them low scores and then all the players go straight into denial and blast the site.
However when a site like IGN gives a wii game like the conduit an 8.5 (a truely bias score) you'll see everyone agreeing and praising the review and putting it in thread titles and parading it about, but then someone like GS will give it a 6.5 and then all the hate switches to GS and how much they hate the wii ect ect.
Its a back in forth between sites, who ever rates the highest always wins, and the funny thing is, from what I hear IGN (out of all the other critics including Nintendo Power) rated this game the highest, yet, their still getting blasted for wii bias, oh well I guess nintendo has a wii bias as well. ;)
Log in to comment