Gamespot against Nintendo

  To me it seems that Gamespot is against Nintendo because they give crummy ratings to great games such as Zelda.  Other game sites rate it in mid to upper 9s, Gamespot 8.8.  Other games that I have I give big scores to, they give horrible scores to.  Am I right or just to much of a  Nintendo fan boy?

Gamespot reviewers=Not real gamers.

Their opinions on lots of games on most of the systems are crap. In my opinion Gears of War did not deserve a 9.6. The game had no real replay value in it.

no i talked to one of the gamespot people and they said its just in the catagories they rate stuff some sony and m$ games get bad scores its just cause the first 5 months of the systems launch is pretty much ports and games running on gamecube enigne

 wait till 08 to start judging if smg and mp3 and ssbb get under 9.5 wii got a problem with them then

8.8 is crummy? :|

Also, realize this, they have a different opinion than you and me. Not everyone will think like you. nd plus, some of the crap that's on the wii deserve those scores *coughubisoftports*

BTW, play the game yourself and make your own judgement. Gamespot is not against nintendo. 

no i talked to one of the gamespot people and they said its just in the catagories they rate stuff some sony and m$ games get bad scores its just cause the first 5 months of the systems launch is pretty much ports and games running on gamecube enigne

wait till 08 to start judging if smg and mp3 and ssbb get under 9.5 wii got a problem with them then

merch

First off: Run on sentences= bad

Second, no, we will not have a problem because their review will not differienciate you buying or enjoying the game, now will it? 

Gamespot reviewers=Not real gamers.

 

Their opinions on lots of games on most of the systems are crap. In my opinion Gears of War did not deserve a 9.6. The game had no real replay value in it.

Hippostrike

There's the thing. That's YOUR opinion. 

[QUOTE="merch"]

no i talked to one of the gamespot people and they said its just in the catagories they rate stuff some sony and m$ games get bad scores its just cause the first 5 months of the systems launch is pretty much ports and games running on gamecube enigne

wait till 08 to start judging if smg and mp3 and ssbb get under 9.5 wii got a problem with them then

Sonick54

First off: Run on sentences= bad

Second, no, we will not have a problem because their review will not differienciate you buying or enjoying the game, now will it? 

[QUOTE="Sonick54"][QUOTE="merch"]

no i talked to one of the gamespot people and they said its just in the catagories they rate stuff some sony and m$ games get bad scores its just cause the first 5 months of the systems launch is pretty much ports and games running on gamecube enigne

wait till 08 to start judging if smg and mp3 and ssbb get under 9.5 wii got a problem with them then

merch

First off: Run on sentences= bad

Second, no, we will not have a problem because their review will not differienciate you buying or enjoying the game, now will it?

Either way, i think people would enjoy reading your sentense a lot better if it were typed with consistancy :wink: 

it really shouldnt matter to u what they give the gamefluffers623

I second that.   I also want to add that just because you (thread starter) like a game, it doesn't mean it is perfect or flawless or deserving of a perfect score.  I don't like Halo, should I start a thread saying that GS is biased because I think Halo sucks so it must be fact? 

I will also point out that reviews often have these things under the score called "words."  If you follow the "words" it goes into greater detail of what the reviewer liked or didn't like and why.  You can then read that and make up your own mind on whether or not you will like the game.

We live in a sad world where people think everything either sucks or is awesome.  There is no middle ground or layers of quality anymore. 

To me it seems that Gamespot is against Nintendo because they give crummy ratings to great games such as Zelda. Other game sites rate it in mid to upper 9s, Gamespot 8.8. Other games that I have I give big scores to, they give horrible scores to. Am I right or just to much of a Nintendo fan boy?

min22

You're too much of a fanboy.

Reviews, at the end of the day, are OPINIONS.  Everybody is going to have a different take on what a game deserves as a score.  For me, I agree with Gamespot's review of Zelda:TP, but at the same time, I have no problem with people thinking it deserves more.

[QUOTE="fluffers623"]it really shouldnt matter to u what they give the gameZIMdoom

I second that. I also want to add that just because you (thread starter) like a game, it doesn't mean it is perfect or flawless or deserving of a perfect score. I don't like Halo, should I start a thread saying that GS is biased because I think Halo sucks so it must be fact?

I will also point out that reviews often have these things under the score called "words." If you follow the "words" it goes into greater detail of what the reviewer liked or didn't like and why. You can then read that and make up your own mind on whether or not you will like the game.

We live in a sad world where people think everything either sucks or is awesome. There is no middle ground or layers of quality anymore.

*claps* I commend you man :) 

[QUOTE="fluffers623"]it really shouldnt matter to u what they give the gameZIMdoom

I second that. I also want to add that just because you (thread starter) like a game, it doesn't mean it is perfect or flawless or deserving of a perfect score. I don't like Halo, should I start a thread saying that GS is biased because I think Halo sucks so it must be fact?

I will also point out that reviews often have these things under the score called "words." If you follow the "words" it goes into greater detail of what the reviewer liked or didn't like and why. You can then read that and make up your own mind on whether or not you will like the game.

We live in a sad world where people think everything either sucks or is awesome. There is no middle ground or layers of quality anymore.

The problem with people today is that they DON"T READ.  They see a score and come up with their own conclusion. 

[QUOTE="ZIMdoom"]

[QUOTE="fluffers623"]it really shouldnt matter to u what they give the gameDarkMagik9

I second that. I also want to add that just because you (thread starter) like a game, it doesn't mean it is perfect or flawless or deserving of a perfect score. I don't like Halo, should I start a thread saying that GS is biased because I think Halo sucks so it must be fact?

I will also point out that reviews often have these things under the score called "words." If you follow the "words" it goes into greater detail of what the reviewer liked or didn't like and why. You can then read that and make up your own mind on whether or not you will like the game.

We live in a sad world where people think everything either sucks or is awesome. There is no middle ground or layers of quality anymore.

The problem with people today is that they DON"T READ.  They see a score and come up with their own conclusion. 

I think they read...they just read the forums instead of the reviews.  Then they see fanboys bashing a game because it didn't score 11 and instead of enjoying the game they go cry.

Gamespot reviewers=Not real gamers.

Their opinions on lots of games on most of the systems are crap. In my opinion Gears of War did not deserve a 9.6. The game had no real replay value in it.

Hippostrike