Gamespot's reviews wii version of Black Ops: 9.0

  • 77 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#1 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/callofduty7workingtitle/review.html

The Good

  • Thrilling variety throughout campaign
  • Fractured story creates an intriguing atmosphere
  • New multiplayer currency system is invigorating
  • Combat Training lets anyone enjoy multiplayer excitement
  • Cl assic Controller and voice chat support.

The Bad

  • Short campaign
  • Online connectivity issues.

Written Review above (sorry if doesn't work). And yes, Black Ops scored a 9.0

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#2 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

Wow this is like super mega old man. I think I saw this like almost 3 hours ago :|

You should feel ashamed as a topic creator

[spoiler] :P [/spoiler]

The score seems a little high, but oh well. I haven't played it.

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#3 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36048 Posts
I'm pretty sure it didn't deserve that..
Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#4 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

A 9?

Wow, That makes Black Ops the Highest Rated Call of Duty game on the Wii....Wow.

The Wii got a 9.

Avatar image for Pixel-Perfect
Pixel-Perfect

5778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 Pixel-Perfect
Member since 2009 • 5778 Posts

That's surprising. In fact, just the fact that Gamespot is one of the first to get around to reviewing it is surprising.

I probably won't be getting it but it's always nice to see the Wii get a quality game.

Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#6 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts

after giving fallout new vegas 7.5 , the GS reviews lost some amount of credibility for me

Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#7 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts

after giving fallout new vegas 7.5 , the GS reviews lost some amount of credibility for me

AmnesiaHaze
which were done by different reviewers, black ops and new vegas
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#8 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Wow this is like super mega old man. I think I saw this like almost 3 hours ago :|

You should feel ashamed as a topic creator

The score seems a little high, but oh well. I haven't played it.

AmayaPapaya

Score seems a little high.. but you NEVER played it? I guess the jokes on you. :P

Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts
[QUOTE="wiifan001"][QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"]

after giving fallout new vegas 7.5 , the GS reviews lost some amount of credibility for me

which were done by different reviewers, black ops and new vegas

even that doesnt change the fact that that review/score was approved by gamespot
Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#10 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

that dont suprise me , and wii has been on such a good roll lately ,

wii officaly is console of the year

Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#11 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts

wii officaly is console of the year

mariokart64fan

Yeah, and every year since 2006

Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

ugh:? , i dont know what to say...

did they just do it because it isnt exclusive so it dosent matter? Im really confused how this game could get a 9.0..

Avatar image for intro94
intro94

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 intro94
Member since 2006 • 2623 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/wii/action/callofduty7workingtitle/review.html

The Good

  • Thrilling variety throughout campaign
  • Fractured story creates an intriguing atmosphere
  • New multiplayer currency system is invigorating
  • Combat Training lets anyone enjoy multiplayer excitement
  • Cl assic Controller and voice chat support.

The Bad

  • Short campaign
  • Online connectivity issues.

Written Review above (sorry if doesn't work). And yes, Black Ops scored a 9.0

wiifan001
im surprised people is surprised.i called this months ago.Seriously,2 years getting 8ths in a row and a better version comes and you expect a 7 because?...geez.
Avatar image for intro94
intro94

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 intro94
Member since 2006 • 2623 Posts

ugh:? , i dont know what to say...

did they just do it because it isnt exclusive so it dosent matter? Im really confused how this game could get a 9.0..

Half-Way
because it offers the more robust online service AND online stability in terms of options ANY wii game has gotten in its history?They scored it high because is one of wiis finest for the average non hater logical reasonable human being.Its also by far the most complete wii mp online game. 1st party games included of course.I mean DOH!
Avatar image for super600
super600

33158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33158 Posts

Finally the wii gets an AAA game even though I don't like COD. I hope we get an AAAE very soon.

Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

[QUOTE="Half-Way"]

ugh:? , i dont know what to say...

did they just do it because it isnt exclusive so it dosent matter? Im really confused how this game could get a 9.0..

intro94

because it offers the more robust online service AND online stability in terms of options ANY wii game has gotten in its history?They scored it high because is one of wiis finest for the average non hater logical reasonable human being.Its also by far the most complete wii mp online game. 1st party games included of course.I mean DOH!

I honestly dont see this game being better then Mario Kart or Monster Hunter Tri...

Avatar image for intro94
intro94

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 intro94
Member since 2006 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="intro94"][QUOTE="Half-Way"]

ugh:? , i dont know what to say...

did they just do it because it isnt exclusive so it dosent matter? Im really confused how this game could get a 9.0..

Half-Way

because it offers the more robust online service AND online stability in terms of options ANY wii game has gotten in its history?They scored it high because is one of wiis finest for the average non hater logical reasonable human being.Its also by far the most complete wii mp online game. 1st party games included of course.I mean DOH!

I honestly dont see this game being better then Mario Kart or Monster Hunter Tri...

i got both mario kart and monster hunter tri as well. They are ranked based on their genres.For the wii competitive shooters, nothing comes close. Is the best of its class. mario kart is great, but for some reason reviewers held some grudge against it for having bikes or what not.Im not claiming that MKart deserved the score it got, but reviewers all over the place(metacritics) didnt like, perhaps the balance between karts and characters(funky seriously) and that hurt its score. MH3 is great but takes maybe a bit too long to get to like an has some online nuances like very poor voice chat.And COD unlike MH3 and certainly Mario kart, provides future dlc,patches for bugs and exploits(volcano map in MKart is a game breaking bug),and better sound quality(try talking in MH3).
Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

[QUOTE="Half-Way"]

[QUOTE="intro94"] because it offers the more robust online service AND online stability in terms of options ANY wii game has gotten in its history?They scored it high because is one of wiis finest for the average non hater logical reasonable human being.Its also by far the most complete wii mp online game. 1st party games included of course.I mean DOH!intro94

I honestly dont see this game being better then Mario Kart or Monster Hunter Tri...

i got both mario kart and monster hunter tri as well. They are ranked based on their genres.For the wii competitive shooters, nothing comes close. Is the best of its class. mario kart is great, but for some reason reviewers held some grudge against it for having bikes or what not.Im not claiming that MKart deserved the score it got, but reviewers all over the place(metacritics) didnt like, perhaps the balance between karts and characters(funky seriously) and that hurt its score. MH3 is great but takes maybe a bit too long to get to like an has some online nuances like very poor voice chat.And COD unlike MH3 and certainly Mario kart, provides future dlc,patches for bugs and exploits(volcano map in MKart is a game breaking bug),and better sound quality(try talking in MH3).

well il wait and see, what really matters is the quality of the online play ect. /no lagg , no bugs.

I know that Black ops is probably the best wii online shooter, but im gona have to wait and see if its the best overall online experience.

It needs to beat Mario kart, MH3 and TvcC

and it still isnt clear which of the following is better; black ops vs goldeneye vs conduit 2 (when it comes out)

even if i personally didnt hype any of them.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
Confused. Why the same score as the other versions when it lacks 4 player split screen and has online connectivity problems? [QUOTE="mariokart64fan"]

that dont suprise me , and wii has been on such a good roll lately ,

wii officaly is console of the year

I don't think a single AAA game makes console of the year...
Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

Confused. Why the same score as the other versions when it lacks 4 player split screen and has online connectivity problems? [QUOTE="mariokart64fan"]

that dont suprise me , and wii has been on such a good roll lately ,

wii officaly is console of the year

locopatho

I don't think a single AAA game makes console of the year...

thats exactly what i was thinking :S

-

aside from the fact that the controls are better, dose the wii version have anything that the other versions dont?

Avatar image for Wii4Fun
Wii4Fun

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Wii4Fun
Member since 2008 • 1472 Posts

A 9?! After reading the IGN review, which gave it a 7.5, i was expecting around the same score by GS.

Well, this is surprising.

Avatar image for Lord_Nas3k
Lord_Nas3k

1492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Lord_Nas3k
Member since 2006 • 1492 Posts

[QUOTE="wiifan001"][QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"]

after giving fallout new vegas 7.5 , the GS reviews lost some amount of credibility for me

AmnesiaHaze

which were done by different reviewers, black ops and new vegas

even that doesnt change the fact that that review/score was approved by gamespot

Because it doesn't agree with your opinion?

Black Ops Wii looks pretty good. Although, I'll probably just get the 360 version.

Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#23 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts

[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"][QUOTE="wiifan001"] which were done by different reviewers, black ops and new vegasLord_Nas3k

even that doesnt change the fact that that review/score was approved by gamespot

Because it doesn't agree with your opinion?

Black Ops Wii looks pretty good. Although, I'll probably just get the 360 version.

exactly , not sure how many hours the reviewer put into the game before writing the new vegas 7.5 review but after 60 hours myself i can proclaim that NV is the best game ive played this year , after that review i dont trust any review here anymore , i cannot comment the black ops score as i dont own the game it may deserve the score it got , im at the point of deciding wheter to get black ops
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#24 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
It's pretty good on the Wii, very comparable to the HD counterparts. The only online issue's I've had so far are being disconnected randomly, which happened twice. The online is really addictive and when compared to Goldeneye, the MP stands out more, however the SP stands out more in Goldeneye. Either way, both games are excellent Wii FPS titles. I was surprised too that Black Ops was well done on the WIi, considering I was against Modern Warfare: Reflex Edition.
Avatar image for pierst179
pierst179

10805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 258

User Lists: 0

#25 pierst179
Member since 2006 • 10805 Posts

The Wii is having an amazing year, and there are still a couple of great games left to come out. My wallet is going to suffer.

Avatar image for Kenny789
Kenny789

10434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#26 Kenny789
Member since 2006 • 10434 Posts
I'm surprised with the reactions of some people. Wii forums have always been "*insert game here* got 8.5 and not AAA?! Teh Gamespot is bias!" and now that the Wii gets an AAA game, despite being multiplat, people are actually complaining it's a little high. Was Goldeneye supposed to be better? Cause I never saw how it could beat Black Ops.
Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

I'm surprised with the reactions of some people. Wii forums have always been "*insert game here* got 8.5 and not AAA?! Teh Gamespot is bias!" and now that the Wii gets an AAA game, despite being multiplat, people are actually complaining it's a little high. Was Goldeneye supposed to be better? Cause I never saw how it could beat Black Ops.Kenny789

well i guess some people are just skeptics :P

Avatar image for riou7
riou7

10842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#28 riou7  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 10842 Posts

Wow.. just wow

Another great scores. A good sign for Wii

Avatar image for psychobrew
psychobrew

8888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 psychobrew
Member since 2008 • 8888 Posts
I don't agree with the review at all. The campaign so far has been terrible. Not nearly as good as Goldeneye. The story is pretty bad too. It plays out like a bad B movie that tries to act like an A movie. I also hate the scene that plays over and over again whenever you go to the main CoD menu. Multiplayer does seem pretty cool so far.
Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#30 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

the 9 is mocking the wii..

it goes with that wii has lower standards thing... its slightly less than the hD versions so ot should of got less.

the only reason i would give it a 9 is the controls..but i doubt the reviewer cared about that.

but.. a 9.0 for the wii! yes lol

Avatar image for Kenny789
Kenny789

10434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#31 Kenny789
Member since 2006 • 10434 Posts

[QUOTE="Kenny789"]I'm surprised with the reactions of some people. Wii forums have always been "*insert game here* got 8.5 and not AAA?! Teh Gamespot is bias!" and now that the Wii gets an AAA game, despite being multiplat, people are actually complaining it's a little high. Was Goldeneye supposed to be better? Cause I never saw how it could beat Black Ops.Half-Way

well i guess some people are just skeptics :P

It gets to a point where it's laughable and somewhat facepalm worthy and just a little bit sad. If a game gets 8.5, Gamespot hates the Wii! Game gets 7.0 - 8.0, Gamespot didn't play it enough! Game gets a 9.0, Gamespot rated it too high! I'm just calling it as I see it :? After seeing what both games have to offer, I'm going to have to pick Black Ops over Goldeneye so I'll see for myself if it's worthy of the score. I'm interested in Goldeneye as well for the Single Player but that game will have to wait.

Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

[QUOTE="Half-Way"]

[QUOTE="Kenny789"]I'm surprised with the reactions of some people. Wii forums have always been "*insert game here* got 8.5 and not AAA?! Teh Gamespot is bias!" and now that the Wii gets an AAA game, despite being multiplat, people are actually complaining it's a little high. Was Goldeneye supposed to be better? Cause I never saw how it could beat Black Ops.Kenny789

well i guess some people are just skeptics :P

It gets to a point where it's laughable and somewhat facepalm worthy and just a little bit sad. If a game gets 8.5, Gamespot hates the Wii! Game gets 7.0 - 8.0, Gamespot didn't play it enough! Game gets a 9.0, Gamespot rated it too high! I'm just calling it as I see it :? After seeing what both games have to offer, I'm going to have to pick Black Ops over Goldeneye so I'll see for myself if it's worthy of the score. I'm interested in Goldeneye as well for the Single Player but that game will have to wait.

It's because it got the same score as the other versions despite having no split screen mode, and apparently some online problems too. That's just confusing.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#33 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

I'm surprised with the reactions of some people. Wii forums have always been "*insert game here* got 8.5 and not AAA?! Teh Gamespot is bias!" and now that the Wii gets an AAA game, despite being multiplat, people are actually complaining it's a little high. Was Goldeneye supposed to be better? Cause I never saw how it could beat Black Ops.Kenny789

Goldeneye has a better single player campaign. Black Ops has better multiplayer.

Avatar image for Sik_kid_pk
Sik_kid_pk

549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Sik_kid_pk
Member since 2010 • 549 Posts
I'm surprised with the reactions of some people. Wii forums have always been "*insert game here* got 8.5 and not AAA?! Teh Gamespot is bias!" and now that the Wii gets an AAA game, despite being multiplat, people are actually complaining it's a little high. Was Goldeneye supposed to be better? Cause I never saw how it could beat Black Ops.Kenny789
I think people in this forum won't be happy until they see another Nintendo exclusive get AAA. People really need to stop complaining. I got the game on the Wii it's a great game and it seems like they reviewed the game this time for what it was on the Wii, and not dropping the score because of the 360/PS3 versions.
Avatar image for psychobrew
psychobrew

8888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 psychobrew
Member since 2008 • 8888 Posts

[QUOTE="Kenny789"]I'm surprised with the reactions of some people. Wii forums have always been "*insert game here* got 8.5 and not AAA?! Teh Gamespot is bias!" and now that the Wii gets an AAA game, despite being multiplat, people are actually complaining it's a little high. Was Goldeneye supposed to be better? Cause I never saw how it could beat Black Ops.Haziqonfire

Goldeneye has a better single player campaign. Black Ops has better multiplayer.

Agreed. The difference is so far I can't stand Black Ops campaign, but I enjoy Goldeneye's multiplayer. The choice comes down to poor campaign with great multiplayer, or great campaign with good multiplayer. I really like the humor in Goldeneye too (at least online).
Avatar image for JordanElek
JordanElek

18564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 JordanElek
Member since 2002 • 18564 Posts

I HATE reading Wii reviews. Here's why:

The Wii Remote and Nunchuk controls still work very well and are extensively customizable, but the addition of Classic Controller support opens up a whole new kind of precision. Instead of pointing your arm and wrist, a small flick of the thumb is all that you need to acquire a target.GS review
He's not doing it right. You DON'T aim with your entire arm. If you're holding your whole arm up and pointing at the screen, you're simply not doing it right. Or if you prefer, you're not doing it efficiently. He says all it takes with the cIassic controller is a flick of the thumb.... If you're using the Wii remote correctly, all it takes is a slight wrist movement, or, if you're really good, a slight shifting of the remote in your fingers.

At least Chris still acknowledges in the next sentence that skilled players can be good with either control scheme:

This option makes Black Ops more accessible to players who have experience with shooters on other consoles, and skilled players can still be very effective with their console-specific control scheme.GS review

But I guess that means he's not skilled at using the Wii remote, which I think is true of the vast majority of people who review Wii games....

Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

I HATE reading Wii reviews. Here's why: [QUOTE="GS review"]The Wii Remote and Nunchuk controls still work very well and are extensively customizable, but the addition of Classic Controller support opens up a whole new kind of precision. Instead of pointing your arm and wrist, a small flick of the thumb is all that you need to acquire a target.JordanElek

He's not doing it right. You DON'T aim with your entire arm. If you're holding your whole arm up and pointing at the screen, you're simply not doing it right. Or if you prefer, you're not doing it efficiently. He says all it takes with the cIassic controller is a flick of the thumb.... If you're using the Wii remote correctly, all it takes is a slight wrist movement, or, if you're really good, a slight shifting of the remote in your fingers.

At least Chris still acknowledges in the next sentence that skilled players can be good with either control scheme:

This option makes Black Ops more accessible to players who have experience with shooters on other consoles, and skilled players can still be very effective with their console-specific control scheme.GS review

But I guess that means he's not skilled at using the Wii remote, which I think is true of the vast majority of people who review Wii games....

yeah i reed the review. And at least for me this whole set up seems like a mockery tbh.

i have to agree with KBFloYd ;

"the 9 is mocking the wii..

it goes with that wii has lower standards thing... its slightly less than the hD versions so ot should of got less.

the only reason i would give it a 9 is the controls..but i doubt the reviewer cared about that.

but.. a 9.0 for the wii! yes lol"

even if its already known that the wii shooters arent exactly top tier when it comes to FPS across all systems.

Avatar image for elbert_b_23
elbert_b_23

8247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 elbert_b_23
Member since 2003 • 8247 Posts
i feel its a bit high the game to me is a solid 8.5
Avatar image for rcafan
rcafan

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 rcafan
Member since 2010 • 2025 Posts
I'm pretty sure it didn't deserve that..Litchie
this i believe tehy just gave same score as others
Avatar image for fmacraze
fmacraze

5658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 fmacraze
Member since 2007 • 5658 Posts
can i use a gamecube controller?
Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

Its going to be awhile before I try this because I just bought Goldeneye 5 days ago.So many games. too little time.

Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

I HATE reading Wii reviews. Here's why: [QUOTE="GS review"]The Wii Remote and Nunchuk controls still work very well and are extensively customizable, but the addition of Classic Controller support opens up a whole new kind of precision. Instead of pointing your arm and wrist, a small flick of the thumb is all that you need to acquire a target.JordanElek

He's not doing it right. You DON'T aim with your entire arm. If you're holding your whole arm up and pointing at the screen, you're simply not doing it right. Or if you prefer, you're not doing it efficiently. He says all it takes with the cIassic controller is a flick of the thumb.... If you're using the Wii remote correctly, all it takes is a slight wrist movement, or, if you're really good, a slight shifting of the remote in your fingers.

At least Chris still acknowledges in the next sentence that skilled players can be good with either control scheme:

This option makes Black Ops more accessible to players who have experience with shooters on other consoles, and skilled players can still be very effective with their console-specific control scheme.GS review

But I guess that means he's not skilled at using the Wii remote, which I think is true of the vast majority of people who review Wii games....

I totally agree. If you're using the wiimote for FPS like you use an arcade light gun then you probebly shouldn't be reviewing games for the Wii. Can't imagine how tired someone's armwould get playing like that.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#43 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

I HATE reading Wii reviews. Here's why: [QUOTE="GS review"]The Wii Remote and Nunchuk controls still work very well and are extensively customizable, but the addition of Classic Controller support opens up a whole new kind of precision. Instead of pointing your arm and wrist, a small flick of the thumb is all that you need to acquire a target.JordanElek

He's not doing it right. You DON'T aim with your entire arm. If you're holding your whole arm up and pointing at the screen, you're simply not doing it right. Or if you prefer, you're not doing it efficiently. He says all it takes with the cIassic controller is a flick of the thumb.... If you're using the Wii remote correctly, all it takes is a slight wrist movement, or, if you're really good, a slight shifting of the remote in your fingers.

At least Chris still acknowledges in the next sentence that skilled players can be good with either control scheme:

This option makes Black Ops more accessible to players who have experience with shooters on other consoles, and skilled players can still be very effective with their console-specific control scheme.GS review

But I guess that means he's not skilled at using the Wii remote, which I think is true of the vast majority of people who review Wii games....

i think he gives the wii its due credit on the quoted part. he mentions that the wiimote+nunchuk is fine and cIassic controller is a nice addition, and that people can choose whichever way they play better with. let the dual analog players suffer on online, they'll have to make the shift at some point :P
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#44 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

I totally agree. If you're using the wiimote for FPS like you use an arcade light gun then you probebly shouldn't be reviewing games for the Wii. Can't imagine how tired someone's armwould get playing like that.

DaBrainz

it's actually worse. people use both arms to hold arcade light guns, or at least they have the option to. not with the wiimote+nunchuk. i think FPS games need to come with a tutorial on how to play them properly :P

seriously, i know it's a bit awkward at first, but jeez, i ask my friends if they wanna play an FPS on the wii and they refuse because they get their arms tired...

Avatar image for JuarN18
JuarN18

4981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 JuarN18
Member since 2007 • 4981 Posts

If the game is slightly better than goldeneye it deserves that score, and it looks that the onlineand zombie modes are good

Avatar image for psychobrew
psychobrew

8888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 psychobrew
Member since 2008 • 8888 Posts

[QUOTE="JordanElek"]

I HATE reading Wii reviews. Here's why: [QUOTE="GS review"] He's not doing it right. You DON'T aim with your entire arm. If you're holding your whole arm up and pointing at the screen, you're simply not doing it right. Or if you prefer, you're not doing it efficiently. He says all it takes with the cIassic controller is a flick of the thumb.... If you're using the Wii remote correctly, all it takes is a slight wrist movement, or, if you're really good, a slight shifting of the remote in your fingers.

At least Chris still acknowledges in the next sentence that skilled players can be good with either control scheme:

[QUOTE="GS review"]This option makes Black Ops more accessible to players who have experience with shooters on other consoles, and skilled players can still be very effective with their console-specific control scheme.BrunoBRS

But I guess that means he's not skilled at using the Wii remote, which I think is true of the vast majority of people who review Wii games....

i think he gives the wii its due credit on the quoted part. he mentions that the wiimote+nunchuk is fine and cIassic controller is a nice addition, and that people can choose whichever way they play better with. let the dual analog players suffer on online, they'll have to make the shift at some point :P

I haven't tried it yet, but it seems that dual analogers get cheap aim.

Avatar image for Tri-Enforcer
Tri-Enforcer

1899

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 Tri-Enforcer
Member since 2007 • 1899 Posts

[QUOTE="JordanElek"]

I HATE reading Wii reviews. Here's why: [QUOTE="GS review"] He's not doing it right. You DON'T aim with your entire arm. If you're holding your whole arm up and pointing at the screen, you're simply not doing it right. Or if you prefer, you're not doing it efficiently. He says all it takes with the cIassic controller is a flick of the thumb.... If you're using the Wii remote correctly, all it takes is a slight wrist movement, or, if you're really good, a slight shifting of the remote in your fingers.

At least Chris still acknowledges in the next sentence that skilled players can be good with either control scheme:

[QUOTE="GS review"]This option makes Black Ops more accessible to players who have experience with shooters on other consoles, and skilled players can still be very effective with their console-specific control scheme.BrunoBRS

But I guess that means he's not skilled at using the Wii remote, which I think is true of the vast majority of people who review Wii games....

i think he gives the wii its due credit on the quoted part. he mentions that the wiimote+nunchuk is fine and cIassic controller is a nice addition, and that people can choose whichever way they play better with. let the dual analog players suffer on online, they'll have to make the shift at some point :P

It would be nice if we could see everyone's controller set up online like we can in Mario Kart Wii. Then we will really know if the pointers are owning the analogers!

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

This game could get a 10 I would still not buy it over DCKR, Epic Mickey or KEY.

Avatar image for intro94
intro94

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 intro94
Member since 2006 • 2623 Posts
[QUOTE="locopatho"]Confused. Why the same score as the other versions when it lacks 4 player split screen and has online connectivity problems? [QUOTE="mariokart64fan"]

that dont suprise me , and wii has been on such a good roll lately ,

wii officaly is console of the year

I don't think a single AAA game makes console of the year...

It has minor connectivity problems that most players dont experience. 4 player split screen is not what Black Ops is about lets be honest. Is a nice bonus but not worth scoring based on that. And most reviewers will understand the wii has some limitations for split screen .Are they gonna downscore wii games because the system has less ram than PS3?.Read the reviewing criteria, its on gamespot.
Avatar image for intro94
intro94

2623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 intro94
Member since 2006 • 2623 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="JordanElek"]

But I guess that means he's not skilled at using the Wii remote, which I think is true of the vast majority of people who review Wii games....

psychobrew

i think he gives the wii its due credit on the quoted part. he mentions that the wiimote+nunchuk is fine and cIassic controller is a nice addition, and that people can choose whichever way they play better with. let the dual analog players suffer on online, they'll have to make the shift at some point :P

I haven't tried it yet, but it seems that dual analogers get cheap aim.

man thats pissing me off quite a bit. Almost as TC1 auto aim ala Metroid prime 3(ok its fine in prime since it has no MP but online???). But in GE and BO is like OMG you wanna play oldschool, ok we are gonna aim for you just look in the general direction.Im mean WTF(tested, cuz i got dual analog). IS DISGUSTING.Im sure i can get my dog to get kills that way.