Video.
It's looking much better than it was. I still don't care for the the cut scenes interupting the gameplay, but I think I'll get over it. I really like how it lets you play the game the way you want to and the graphics look pretty good.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Video.
It's looking much better than it was. I still don't care for the the cut scenes interupting the gameplay, but I think I'll get over it. I really like how it lets you play the game the way you want to and the graphics look pretty good.
It has lots of online stuff but the graphics don't look that great
LaytonsCat
Did you watch the video? They look pretty darn good for the Wii. Perfect? no. Still they are very nice and the game looks like a blast so far. Hopefully it turns out good.
The local multiplayer graphics don't look good. The single player looks fine. I don't know about the online.It has lots of online stuff but the graphics don't look that great
LaytonsCat
Anyone who says that those graphics look good either have bad eyesight or are lying to themselves. Seriously, take a good long look at the pictures and videos, the game look bad.
Don't take me too serious as I'm not an FPS expert nor fan, but I still choose Conduit 2 over this, and just for the flashy graphics. Again, gameplay-wise I can't judge at this moment and, maybe, Goldeneye will be the one fans had been expecting for so long Regardsenrique_marrodz
I think Conduit 2 looks great too, but I can't get it until February. There's more than enough room for both.
Anyone who says that those graphics look good either have bad eyesight or are lying to themselves. Seriously, take a good long look at the pictures and videos, the game look bad.
ImprovedMind
See this is exactly how I feel with Monster Hunter Tri. That game is pretty awful looking, yet everyone praises it. Metroid Prime 1 looks way better than it.
it does look good. i think you need to stick to pc or hd consoles if you got a problem with grapchis. you people complain and whine about everything yet when other fanboys put it out.... you don't do anything but say other things. i got 20/20 vision thank you very much. serious.... take a good look at the video.Anyone who says that those graphics look good either have bad eyesight or are lying to themselves. Seriously, take a good long look at the pictures and videos, the game look bad.
ImprovedMind
I like you....you are positive about everything! :POh....heck....yes. MAN this is looking good! I can't wait. Epic online matches to come.
Darth-Samus
In comparison to the usual Western 3rd-party garbage the Wii gets stuck with, Goldeneye really does look good. I'm expecting it to be a decent game, although certainly not game-of-the-year material.
There's nothing good about playing FPSs on dual analog and there is no stealth elements in CoD.nothing good about owning a wii.....get a ps3 and buy call of duty for gods sake the first goldeneye was **** and so iz this
rosk
nothing good about owning a wii.....get a ps3 and buy call of duty for gods sake the first goldeneye was **** and so iz this
rosk
CoD and Halo wouldn't exist if it was not for Goldeneye ;)
P.S. - Dual analog is inferior to motion controls
I am actually thinking this looks decent. Again, for a Wii game. I might have to pick this up after all.
Now..... some black ops footage would be nice
This doesn't look too bad but 3 things bother me: 1. This level looks really strait forward. If I remember the 64 version correctly, it was much more wide open. Definitely one of my favorite levels, so that kind of upsets me. But I guess I would be just as upset if it was kept the same. There's just no pleasing me! 2. At the end it looked like he accidentally melee attacked. Not a good sign. 3. Why are they speaking English!?!?Arc2012
1) Yeah I guess it might be a TAD more linear in some parts, but most of the levels in the original were not all that wide, just had different corridors and such. the snow levels were the only ones that were really open I would say.
2) I didn't watch the end, dont want to spoil it for me :P.
3) Haha I am just glad they speak and don't have text like in the 64 one. Besides everyone speaks english! :P lol sorta kidding ;). Not a big concern of mine.
I am actually thinking this looks decent. Again, for a Wii game. I might have to pick this up after all.
Now..... some black ops footage would be nice
redlightstudios
hell this games graphics look about as good as Black Ops on the PS3 and 360 :P. I personally think the graphics in those games are awful. Obviously that is a bit of an exageration, but I do find style and overall feel of the visuals more pleasing in GE Wii then Black Ops.
[QUOTE="redlightstudios"]
I am actually thinking this looks decent. Again, for a Wii game. I might have to pick this up after all.
Now..... some black ops footage would be nice
NaveedLife
hell this games graphics look about as good as Black Ops on the PS3 and 360 :P. I personally think the graphics in those games are awful. Obviously that is a bit of an exageration, but I do find style and overall feel of the visuals more pleasing in GE Wii then Black Ops.
I'm willing to bet that the visuals used in BO for Wii will be very similar to GE Wii. Same engine, same realistic style (or attempt). They'll look similar imo, just one being COD and one being Bond.
[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]
[QUOTE="redlightstudios"]
I am actually thinking this looks decent. Again, for a Wii game. I might have to pick this up after all.
Now..... some black ops footage would be nice
redlightstudios
hell this games graphics look about as good as Black Ops on the PS3 and 360 :P. I personally think the graphics in those games are awful. Obviously that is a bit of an exageration, but I do find style and overall feel of the visuals more pleasing in GE Wii then Black Ops.
I'm willing to bet that the visuals used in BO for Wii will be very similar to GE Wii. Same engine, same realistic style (or attempt). They'll look similar imo, just one being COD and one being Bond.
I was saying the PS3 and 360 graphics of BO are awful IMO and I don't like the style. But yeah that could be true :P.
[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]
[QUOTE="redlightstudios"]
I am actually thinking this looks decent. Again, for a Wii game. I might have to pick this up after all.
Now..... some black ops footage would be nice
redlightstudios
hell this games graphics look about as good as Black Ops on the PS3 and 360 :P. I personally think the graphics in those games are awful. Obviously that is a bit of an exageration, but I do find style and overall feel of the visuals more pleasing in GE Wii then Black Ops.
I'm willing to bet that the visuals used in BO for Wii will be very similar to GE Wii. Same engine, same realistic style (or attempt). They'll look similar imo, just one being COD and one being Bond.
It's not the same engine. Goldeneye Wii uses the an enhanced version of the engine created for Dead Space Extraction (which has me even more confused why EA said they had to put the game on rails -- at least Activision gets it).
[QUOTE="redlightstudios"]
[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]
hell this games graphics look about as good as Black Ops on the PS3 and 360 :P. I personally think the graphics in those games are awful. Obviously that is a bit of an exageration, but I do find style and overall feel of the visuals more pleasing in GE Wii then Black Ops.
psychobrew
I'm willing to bet that the visuals used in BO for Wii will be very similar to GE Wii. Same engine, same realistic style (or attempt). They'll look similar imo, just one being COD and one being Bond.
It's not the same engine. Goldeneye Wii uses the an enhanced version of the engine created for Dead Space Extraction (which has me even more confused why EA said they had to put the game on rails -- at least Activision gets it).
its just being lazy on ea part. they were not forced to do on rails shooter. they just did it[QUOTE="redlightstudios"]
[QUOTE="NaveedLife"]
hell this games graphics look about as good as Black Ops on the PS3 and 360 :P. I personally think the graphics in those games are awful. Obviously that is a bit of an exageration, but I do find style and overall feel of the visuals more pleasing in GE Wii then Black Ops.
psychobrew
I'm willing to bet that the visuals used in BO for Wii will be very similar to GE Wii. Same engine, same realistic style (or attempt). They'll look similar imo, just one being COD and one being Bond.
It's not the same engine. Goldeneye Wii uses the an enhanced version of the engine created for Dead Space Extraction (which has me even more confused why EA said they had to put the game on rails -- at least Activision gets it).
you're right, I forgot I did hear about it being the same as DS:E. Strange, it looks just like COD:MWR but it uses a different engine lol. I would've thought they would have used the same to just make things easier and add/enhance if they desired.
I think MW2's graphics are pretty darn good. Animations are all good, lighting, shadowing, effects... I think they did a darn good job.
[QUOTE="psychobrew"]
[QUOTE="redlightstudios"]
I'm willing to bet that the visuals used in BO for Wii will be very similar to GE Wii. Same engine, same realistic style (or attempt). They'll look similar imo, just one being COD and one being Bond.
redlightstudios
It's not the same engine. Goldeneye Wii uses the an enhanced version of the engine created for Dead Space Extraction (which has me even more confused why EA said they had to put the game on rails -- at least Activision gets it).
you're right, I forgot I did hear about it being the same as DS:E. Strange, it looks just like COD:MWR but it uses a different engine lol. I would've thought they would have used the same to just make things easier and add/enhance if they desired.
I think MW2's graphics are pretty darn good. Animations are all good, lighting, shadowing, effects... I think they did a darn good job.
i never thought for a second it used MWR engine.I said it from the first footage.I guess 400 hours of MWR AND owning DSE did that to me. Facial expression animations are on par with 360 current tech, the models animation is more fluid and seamless, the engine also enphasizes in smaller details in models, a focus in detail, and sharpness, as well as consistency. MWR appeared to have a higher focus in less polygons per model as a trade for large amount of elements on screen and huge scenarios.The focus is to run the PC game on wii ,not consistency. This video didnt look that impressive mind you,but other have sold me the game as it looks fantastic overall. The conduit 2 also looks very good for different reasons, with sweet mapping, and reflection, and extreme lighting effects and detail. However, the animations and physics dont see to up to date with GE, certainly soldier and aliens animations seemed less varied and natural, the areas while interesting, lack the raw amount of realistic detail than GE(and probably BO), We havent been graced with BO wii footage, but,if its better as Treyarch said, it might be on top of C2.Goldeneye does sound good.
Question-- does anyone know if they included the opening theme song from the Goldeneye movie in this? It's annoying when a Bond game doesn't have an opening theme like a Bond movie.
November 2 will be double Bond for me, because I'll be getting Goldeneye as well as Blood Stone for the 360.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment