imo it dosent make it better...it just makes it a lot more inovated... the gameplay is new and a lot of fun... its a new way to play and thats what make a console better
Defintely, and the thing is it's still far from reaching it's potential. The dual screen idea though has not been quite as innovative but still has had a few uses over a unit that would simply have a bigger screen.
holey goodness yes perfect rts for something to point too great for queing up commands in rpgs and sim games double contorol just awsomeness its really hard to top ds seriously
The touch screen and ruggedness of the game cartridges is what made me choose the DS over a PSP in the first place. After having it for almost a year, I couldn't even concieve trying to play a game without the touch screen. Having to move an analog stick for every move I make in a game sounds crazy to me now. ( This is no way a put down of the PSP, just my own personal thoughts :) )
I'd say yes. Without touch-screen, the DS really doesn't offer anything that couldn't be done better on a PSP with better graphics and more storage on it's UMD media. However, touchscreen offers not only a simple and fast interface, but a method of producing gaming experiences that can't be replicated by any other handhold or home console. Trauma Center and Elite Beat Agents are a couple of games that wouldn't nearly be as fun without touchscreen.
I think it did but on some games example sims castaways and phantom hourglass ,sometimes I would rather use the controls to run instead of tapping the stylus all the time sims castaways was annoying but it wasn't as bad on phantom hourglass.
ruin factory harvest moon some of the touch screen features made the game alot more enjoyable, and less tiring. I think games would be nicer if we could decide which we wanted to use It would probley be a headache for programmers though.
Log in to comment