I want a 3D pokemon game

One of the primary purposes of the mainline Pokemon games for the handheld machines, like Diamond/Pearl and HeartGold/SoulSilver, is to get people to buy those handheld consoles. There is thus basically zero chance of them making it to a console.

I wish that existed too :D. If it was like GTA and you could just walking around town and chill with you pokemon id so buy that.inka123

It'll never happen. I remember how excited I was for 3D Pokemon on N64. I ended up with Pokemon Snap :|locopatho

One of the best Pokemon games ever!

[QUOTE="locopatho"]It'll never happen. I remember how excited I was for 3D Pokemon on N64. I ended up with Pokemon Snap :|GabuEx

One of the best Pokemon games ever!

Gameplay exactly like the gameboy/ds games but graphics like coliseum.......that is my dream game

weaselstomper50

Wasn't Colliseum like that?

One of the primary purposes of the mainline Pokemon games for the handheld machines, like Diamond/Pearl and HeartGold/SoulSilver, is to get people to buy those handheld consoles. There is thus basically zero chance of them making it to a console.

GabuEx

[QUOTE="weaselstomper50"]

Gameplay exactly like the gameboy/ds games but graphics like coliseum.......that is my dream game

Wasn't Colliseum like that?

Well there is an argument to made that if not use the handheld gameplay structure then finally find a gameplay design that works for the 3d console versions of Pokemon. As games like Stadium, Colosseum, Battle Revolution seem like cut off segments of their handheld counterparts. Maybe a more WRPG aproach would be appropriate for console Pokemon as their current attempts are not impressive.thedude-

Personally, I like the Pokemon MMORPG idea that people keep floating around, I think that would be cool.

[QUOTE="Zanoh"]

[QUOTE="weaselstomper50"]

Gameplay exactly like the gameboy/ds games but graphics like coliseum.......that is my dream game

newown

Wasn't Colliseum like that?

Ok then give me what the TC said PLUS MMO of Johto and Kanto for the next Nintendo Console.

[QUOTE="thedude-"]Well there is an argument to made that if not use the handheld gameplay structure then finally find a gameplay design that works for the 3d console versions of Pokemon. As games like Stadium, Colosseum, Battle Revolution seem like cut off segments of their handheld counterparts. Maybe a more WRPG aproach would be appropriate for console Pokemon as their current attempts are not impressive.GabuEx

Personally, I like the Pokemon MMORPG idea that people keep floating around, I think that would be cool.

Gameplay exactly like the gameboy/ds games but graphics like coliseum.......that is my dream game

weaselstomper50

One of the primary purposes of the mainline Pokemon games for the handheld machines, like Diamond/Pearl and HeartGold/SoulSilver, is to get people to buy those handheld consoles. There is thus basically zero chance of them making it to a console.

GabuEx

Come on, there has to be some dev out there that is looking to make some money but just can't come up with any good ideas and would be willing to "borrow" material from Nintendo. Just rename Ash "Adam" the Elite Four "the Supreme Four" and Pikachu "thunder rabbit" and everything will be just fine. You'll be happy and all of us patient Pokemon fans will be happy and promise not to tell Nintendo a thing.

Don't listen to him Spectrobes is a horrible Disney rip of pokemon. The direction Pokemon Black and White is leading in looks ok but still not the picture we all dream ofI no, I would even settle for a 3d pokemon game with the retro graphix of the 64 titles could be wiiware. But another cool extreme dream would be pokemon virtual reality with Avatar styled pods to link in lol, I would invest inthatfor sure :D, and atleast your eyes wouldnt get f**ked from it.

Don't listen to him Spectrobes is a horrible Disney rip of pokemon. The direction Pokemon Black and White is leading in looks ok but still not the picture we all dream ofI no, I would even settle for a 3d pokemon game with the retro graphix of the 64 titles could be wiiware. But another cool extreme dream would be pokemon virtual reality with Avatar styled pods to link in lol, I would invest inthatfor sure :D, and atleast your eyes wouldnt get f**ked from it.

phasor666

dont we all.....

Kinda off topic but i hated the way of leveling using minerals and its very easy to master the excavating mechanic of the game which did out do fossil fighters i must admit. Also a lot of the spectrobes could look cool if minor features didnt ruin them such as extra legs and so on and some really bad colour varieties. It has a couple of ok features but nothing in the league of pokemon.

3DS?
Would be funny if they stop the series as 3DS is launched though.

Kinda off topic but i hated the way of leveling using minerals and its very easy to master the excavating mechanic of the game which did out do fossil fighters i must admit. Also a lot of the spectrobes could look cool if minor features didnt ruin them such as extra legs and so on and some really bad colour varieties. It has a couple of ok features but nothing in the league of pokemon.

phasor666

[QUOTE="thedude-"]Well there is an argument to made that if not use the handheld gameplay structure then finally find a gameplay design that works for the 3d console versions of Pokemon. As games like Stadium, Colosseum, Battle Revolution seem like cut off segments of their handheld counterparts. Maybe a more WRPG aproach would be appropriate for console Pokemon as their current attempts are not impressive.GabuEx

Personally, I like the Pokemon MMORPG idea that people keep floating around, I think that would be cool.

What I think would be cool is if the battles worked like FFXIII with the Pokemon moving around the stage, same formula, but more realistic looking.

@roxlimn

I have played through both games so i know what im talking about and I said excavating was one fun aspect but it gets repetitive and easy to get A rank on after a litle practice then after that its not that fun. The game lacks replay value, its not worth the money and also no one remembers the names of the spectrobes where as pokemon, im pretty sure most people can name atleast 100. All im saying is yes its a unique game alternative but far from the likes of pokemon.

[QUOTE="locopatho"]It'll never happen. I remember how excited I was for 3D Pokemon on N64. I ended up with Pokemon Snap :|GabuEx

One of the best Pokemon games ever!

...Or just wait until they release it on a future handheld. Seeing where Black and White are going, it won't be long. :P

Assuredly, it is not on the same level, but I wouldn't call it "horrible." The game lacks replay value, but the campaign's a healthy length, and it's amusing for the duration. I certainly never found the excavation tedious enough to call it "repetitive." As you said, it's easy to master, so you excavate 4 Spectrobes every 4 levels. Hardly something worth noting as "repetitive," IMO. It's also only $20 now - cheap for a game. $6 from some private sellers, $7.50 used. Surely, the game is worth $6?roxlimn

Well if it were between $7 and $20 then yea alright for newcomers but seeing as i live in the hole of the gaming industry (Australasia) it comes at about $50 new DS games being around $70 to $80 so that adds to my insult on the game but hey the biggist insult came from Disney when they made it lol if only someone else thought of the concept first then I wouldn't have sold both my copies. Anyway this is meant to be about Pokemon not Spectrobes so get over the fact that i called your beloved game horrible.

About the 3d pokemon game, shinys would be so cool and so would the concept from HG/SS with the leader of the party following you around just don't use Wailord or else you wouldn't see much lol.

One of the primary purposes of the mainline Pokemon games for the handheld machines, like Diamond/Pearl and HeartGold/SoulSilver, is to get people to buy those handheld consoles. There is thus basically zero chance of them making it to a console.

GabuEx