Ice Climbers in SSBB

Does everyone agree that the ice climbers should be taken out of SSBB.

Nah, the ice climbers were fine, Jigglypuff should be taken out.selkie65

 jigglypuff was the second deepest character in the super smash bros on the 64 they should definitly keep him.

i say thay should make the copy characters more unique and i dont care if they keep the ice climbers as long as there crappy moving screen map would die already 

well, i think they shouldnt take out any character

more character = more options for players = a better game, and appealin to more people

well, i think they shouldnt take out any character

more character = more options for players = a better game, and appealin to more people

rulo_rezn0r

What you're forgetting is: taking out a character =/= less characters, in this case.

[QUOTE="rulo_rezn0r"]

well, i think they shouldnt take out any character

more character = more options for players = a better game, and appealin to more people

the_leet_kid

What you're forgetting is: taking out a character =/= less characters, in this case.

Nah, the ice climbers were fine, Jigglypuff should be taken out.selkie65

yes death to Jigglypuff 

[QUOTE="rulo_rezn0r"]

well, i think they shouldnt take out any character

more character = more options for players = a better game, and appealin to more people

the_leet_kid

What you're forgetting is: taking out a character =/= less characters, in this case.

Nah, the ice climbers were fine, Jigglypuff should be taken out.selkie65

I second that

[QUOTE="selkie65"]Nah, the ice climbers were fine, Jigglypuff should be taken out.Kiddinvalid

jigglypuff was the second deepest character in the super smash bros on the 64 they should definitly keep him.

i say thay should make the copy characters more unique and i dont care if they keep the ice climbers as long as there crappy moving screen map would die already

EXACTLY!  I hated that place!  And i agree with keeping Jigglypuff.  They should really make Jiggly be able to sustain more damage, because in the Pokemon games it has A LOT of HP.

And i think they should either get rid of copies, or diversify them.  Ice Climbers and MGandW can stay. 

[QUOTE="Kiddinvalid"]

[QUOTE="selkie65"]Nah, the ice climbers were fine, Jigglypuff should be taken out.helium_flash

jigglypuff was the second deepest character in the super smash bros on the 64 they should definitly keep him.

i say thay should make the copy characters more unique and i dont care if they keep the ice climbers as long as there crappy moving screen map would die already

EXACTLY! I hated that place! And i agree with keeping Jigglypuff. They should really make Jiggly be able to sustain more damage, because in the Pokemon games it has A LOT of HP.

And i think they should either get rid of copies, or diversify them. Ice Climbers and MGandW can stay.

Jiggy's one of my favorites. And I agree with the clones thing. The cool ones (like Gannondorf) should stay, but some should get the axe. Dr. Mario would be a lot cooler as an alternate costume for Mario. 

Reason Why ICE Climbers Should Stay He's the Third best player in the World 

reason why Jiggly should stay  one of the best jiggly players 

Truth is Any Every character can be good, well except kirby, even in professional levels of play he still suck 

wow, I've never heard anyone say that before. But, no, i think they should stay in, the only ones that should be removed (if any) are the copy characters (dr. mario, falco, pichu, young link). The ice climbers are the best characters of many people i know, just like any other char. already in it.linkmaster4000

I'd rather give the clones new movesets than take them out. Falco, Dr. Mario and Ganandof are far more popular and iconic in the Nintendoverse than the Ice Climbers.  

[QUOTE="the_leet_kid"][QUOTE="rulo_rezn0r"]

well, i think they shouldnt take out any character

more character = more options for players = a better game, and appealin to more people

ZumaJones07

What you're forgetting is: taking out a character =/= less characters, in this case.

It's a new game, get new strategies.  

why should they be taking characters out? they should only be putting new ones in.2good2betrue

Yeah i think they should stay in only because they really shouldn't be taking out anyone aside from the branch characters like falco, pichu link, ganondorf, etc as stated earlier. Even though they are only really just taking up space cuz i know absolutely no one that can use them

It's ridiculous to even considertaking them out.They should keep the Ice Climbers in the game, and add new ones. Not remove old ones. I'm sure they're not everyone's favorite caracther, but they are a few people fav.'s caracther. DOesn't Nintendo care about what their fans want?

=D

The Ice Climbersare my second favorite caracthers in SSBM (just after Ness), and not only me, but I'm sure many players like to them using them sometimes

Does everyone agree that the ice climbers should be taken out of SSBB.

machod_19

wow, I've never heard anyone saythat before. But, no, i think they should stay in, the only ones that should be removed (if any) are the copy characters (dr. mario, falco, pichu, young link). The ice climbers are the best characters of many people i know, just like any other char. already in it.linkmaster4000

I agree. The clones should be removed. When you look at it, it kinda bogs down the variety some. The only clone that should stay in is Luigi, obviously. Ice Climbers are actually pretty good andit would be kinda bad if they are removed. But we are just gonna have to wait and see.

Does everyone agree that the ice climbers should be taken out of SSBB.

machod_19

And as far as I know, they won't be in SSBB. Yay. We get Pit instead which I think is a much better choice.

No they shouldn't. They are great characters for a beginning player. However, past that, they are pretty bad.greenneil4

I liked the Ice Climbers... Sometimes... it feels... like I'm the only one...l8bitz

You're not the only one... =D