This topic is locked from further discussion.
Don't think I'll bother with it then.tomarlynlol watch all the huge fanboys come in saying 'bu bu yuo cant make yur decision based on ign!!!! experience the game for YOURSELF!!'
It better not flop on Gamespot. Or SW will be all over this. lolm_machine024i wouldnt be suprised if theyre already all over this
[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]Don't think I'll bother with it then.MarioFanaticlol watch all the huge fanboys come in saying 'bu bu yuo cant make yur decision based on ign!!!! experience the game for YOURSELF!!' Yeah, there is some point to that approach especially after I enjoyed Red Steel. But I never saw what the fuss was all about with this Sonic, I was only going to be interested if it got star studded reviews somehow.
im still getting it, scores dont really matter as long as you have fun. I already knew it would get bad, but i wasnt expecting below 7 from ign.HaziqonfireSo your idea of a bad score includes 7's? A game that gets a 7-range score is still darn good.
[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]im still getting it, scores dont really matter as long as you have fun. I already knew it would get bad, but i wasnt expecting below 7 from ign.Staryoshi87So your idea of a bad score includes 7's? A game that gets a 7-range score is still darn good. no - i was saying i expected it to get at least a 7. I know 7 i is a good score.. but, many people just shove it off as a bad score
[QUOTE="Staryoshi87"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]im still getting it, scores dont really matter as long as you have fun. I already knew it would get bad, but i wasnt expecting below 7 from ign.HaziqonfireSo your idea of a bad score includes 7's? A game that gets a 7-range score is still darn good. no - i was saying i expected it to get at least a 7. I know 7 i is a good score.. but, many people just shove it off as a bad score Yeah, I'm also surprised it got a 6.9 I thought it would et a high seven at least.
i wouldnt be suprised if theyre already all over this[QUOTE="MarioFanatic"][QUOTE="m_machine024"]It better not flop on Gamespot. Or SW will be all over this. lolbrimasra
can you just shut up!
wtf did i do?Still gettin' it.. the pros of the game on the ign review make me want itShakeNBake1491Exactly. Also, Matt said 'if you liked sonic adventure games for GC/DC, you will like this', so, im happy.. i loved sonic adventure battle 2.
[QUOTE="Staryoshi87"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]im still getting it, scores dont really matter as long as you have fun. I already knew it would get bad, but i wasnt expecting below 7 from ign.HaziqonfireSo your idea of a bad score includes 7's? A game that gets a 7-range score is still darn good. no - i was saying i expected it to get at least a 7. I know 7 i is a good score.. but, many people just shove it off as a bad score You said you were expecting it to score poorly, but that you didn't think it would get below a 7(Making the connection one could assume you meant 7+ could still be bad :))....I know you probably meant otherwise, but you gotta phrase things carefully as far as I'm concerned ;) I'm just givin you a hard time =D
[QUOTE="brimasra"]i wouldnt be suprised if theyre already all over this[QUOTE="MarioFanatic"][QUOTE="m_machine024"]It better not flop on Gamespot. Or SW will be all over this. lolMarioFanatic
can you just shut up!
wtf did i do? Dunno, lol.That's pretty poor...but I'll wait for the GS review. I tend to agree with GS more than IGN.reggie186
[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"][QUOTE="Staryoshi87"][QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]im still getting it, scores dont really matter as long as you have fun. I already knew it would get bad, but i wasnt expecting below 7 from ign.Staryoshi87So your idea of a bad score includes 7's? A game that gets a 7-range score is still darn good. no - i was saying i expected it to get at least a 7. I know 7 i is a good score.. but, many people just shove it off as a bad score You said you were expecting it to score poorly, but that you didn't think it would get below a 7(Making the connection one could assume you meant 7+ could still be bad :))....I know you probably meant otherwise, but you gotta phrase things carefully as far as I'm concerned ;) I'm just givin you a hard time =D haha.. yeah, >_> i meant otherwise! :P im soooo zoned out. anyway.. im still going to get it.
[QUOTE="MarioFanatic"][QUOTE="m_machine024"]It better not flop on Gamespot. Or SW will be all over this. lolLINKlocoi wouldnt be suprised if theyre already all over thisWas this game even hyped for success in SW? it was hyped A - AA.
[QUOTE="MarioFanatic"][QUOTE="m_machine024"]It better not flop on Gamespot. Or SW will be all over this. lolLINKlocoi wouldnt be suprised if theyre already all over thisWas this game even hyped for success in SW? It was hyped A.
[QUOTE="MarioFanatic"][QUOTE="m_machine024"]It better not flop on Gamespot. Or SW will be all over this. lolLINKlocoi wouldnt be suprised if theyre already all over thisWas this game even hyped for success in SW? i dont think it would matter, fanboys will do anything to own the opposing fanboy.
[QUOTE="reggie186"]That's pretty poor...but I'll wait for the GS review. I tend to agree with GS more than IGN.stickontheradar
I still stand by Gamespot...Zelda score included.
Maybe the next Sonic should be on DS or something with old school gameplay. Give it the same visual treatment as New SMB.tomarlynGood point.. Sonic Rush got AA despite it being very short...
I would really like a New Super Mario WORLD though.. that would be the greatest
Good point.. Sonic Rush got AA despite it being very short...[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]Maybe the next Sonic should be on DS or something with old school gameplay. Give it the same visual treatment as New SMB.ShakeNBake1491
I would really like a New Super Mario WORLD though.. that would be the greatest
...one could only imagine, haha but anyways i feel meh about the review...i haven't played the game first hand so i cant say anything about the game myself so until then it still looks like it held up quite wellMaybe the next Sonic should be on DS or something with old school gameplay. Give it the same visual treatment as New SMB.tomarlynThe cruel meatball of war has rolled onto our laps and ruined our white pants of peace. Sorry, but that Futurama episode is awesome.
I read parts of the review...it wasn't that great...he contradicts himself too much...says its the best Sonic game in 3d, gives it a 6.9...stuff like that....
Honestly, I'd go w/ gamerankings on this one...(well go w/ gamerankings on all games) but it just didnt seem like a great review from thier part
wow i just looked at gamerankings.com and the average is still 8.0, so ppl who are worried, look at gamerankings.com http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/932811.asp *thumbs up*HaziqonfireI see.. and a big reason why Sonic got bad rating on IGN was becuz at times he felt lyk tearing his hair out at parts where the control was "unresponsive"... often reviewers rate a game as bad when they suck at it (example: GS and DBZ:BT2 :lol: )
the best sonic 3d game is a 6.9, kinda how the best drakengard game is a 7.0. just because something gets 'the best ____ game' title doesnt mean its a good gameI read parts of the review...it wasn't that great...he contradicts himself too much...says its the best Sonic game in 3d, gives it a 6.9...stuff like that....
weazur
Err? he kept saying it was made by team sonic? but it wasn't.
Now I really see what that guy @ dice was going on about how the gaming media is making a mess. they cant even be bothered to fact check.
I hate the way every ones so hypocritical about voice acting. that the way sonic is meant to speak, if sonic spoke any different it wouldn't work. If sonic had never had any voice acting, they would have complained that sonic wasn't voice acted.
The music I am sorry but what music does go with sonic? It has always been Midi or cheesy rock. And if they put midi in there instead it would have been slaged off for not being modern.Â
Sonic is a punk kid any on who doesn't like that style should not play a sonic game let alone review one.
On the control notes the first praises them and then the second page slags them off and as Phoenix wright would say "hold it! contradiction!" it as if the two pages where written by different people and didn't conferrer when the article was put it together. he complains about the wii-mote note being used for jumping? no thanks, a timed event should not be replace by yanking up the wii mote which is not insintive at all and would be really hard to time, the gesture based systems should never replace a button, just for the sack of the fact its a wii game.
I will leave the rest of the slag-ing to later, once I have played this game, but I smell a bad review.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment