IGN: The Conduit 5-9 hours long(Edit: Delete this mods)

From their latest Voice Chat. Dang, just like Madworld. That multiplayer better last darn long!

Edit: *Facepalm* I forgot the sticky! Delete this please!

Call of Duty 4Modern Warfare I believe is even shorter yet it's by far my favorite First Person Shooter! The Multiplayer was Simply amazing that i spent probably over 100 hours of gameplay on! Hopefully The Conduit has a good, Original Multiplayer to keep it longer also.

9 hours seems about fine, this obviously isn't Metroid or Bioshock.

Call of Duty: World at War is also very short. I've nearly gone through it on veteran though and it does prove that higher difficulty settings make it last a bit longer (Taking your time killing baddies, retrying levels if you've died etc.), so IGN possibly just went through the game on a medium difficulty setting?

But yeah, as the guy previously said, most fps are short, relying on multiplayer to keep it going. Furthermore, High Voltage did spend a fair bit of time on setting up a desent multiplayer (making all new, multiplayer specific maps, ability to join easily with or without friend codes etc.), so i'm sure things will be ok.

Thats actually good for a FPS.

short and sweet just how I like it...so after I run through the campagin mode and get used to all the different guns I can then hop into a few online matches and start owning ppl.

Killzone 2 is only 4 hours long, so this is pretty much par for the course for fps. Thankfully, it's the online that's the real meat of the game.

I think the real question is...how many ppl are actually excited for this game?? I mean we got lots of ppl saying "its gonna suck" Im just curious what does the majority think is it a hype fest that is sur to deliver or is it going to bomb worse than the first Hulk movie??? LOL

i misread the tile to "IGN: The Conduit 5.9"funsohng

that would be so funny, i would still get the game, it cant be worse then any other fps

I think the real question is...how many ppl are actually excited for this game?? I mean we got lots of ppl saying "its gonna suck" Im just curious what does the majority think is it a hype fest that is sur to deliver or is it going to bomb worse than the first Hulk movie??? LOL

MadSavage22

Well FPS are generally short, especially if they are heavy on the multiplayer aspect. Sepewrath

Yeah, that is why the game has a deep multiplayer. And it is not like Madworld, that game was even shorter than 9 hours.

[QUOTE="Sepewrath"]Well FPS are generally short, especially if they are heavy on the multiplayer aspect. Pierst179

Yeah, that is why the game has a deep multiplayer. And it is not like Madworld, that game was even shorter than 9 hours.

From their latest Voice Chat. Dang, just like Madworld. That multiplayer better last darn long!

Head_of_games

I beat Madworld in 3 hours...

9 hours seems about fine, this obviously isn't Metroid or Bioshock.

zh666

I beat Bioshock in 5 hours...

I'm not even gonna get this game, waiting for Rune Factory Frontier.

In your first run through, you beat Bioshock in 5 hours? I think I might have put 12-14 hours into it, because I wanted to soak it in. I wish it recorded your overall time so you could prove that. Ohwell..

[QUOTE="MadSavage22"]

I think the real question is...how many ppl are actually excited for this game?? I mean we got lots of ppl saying "its gonna suck" Im just curious what does the majority think is it a hype fest that is sur to deliver or is it going to bomb worse than the first Hulk movie??? LOL

chaoz-king

say what now??

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"]

From their latest Voice Chat. Dang, just like Madworld. That multiplayer better last darn long!

freek666

I beat Madworld in 3 hours...

9 hours seems about fine, this obviously isn't Metroid or Bioshock.

zh666

I beat Bioshock in 5 hours...

I'm not even gonna get this game, waiting for Rune Factory Frontier.

Listening to their comments in the voice chat it doesn't sound like this is AAA they way most people thought IGN would score it. I'm still looking forward to it...even if it isn't "perfect."

5-9 hours isn't bad. There are other FPS that are shorter than that, and if it's good it might be worth a second playthrough.XDXDXDXDXDXDXD

I agree, and I really just want it for the online, which is apparently superb.

5-9 hours seems pretty fair to me for an FPS title. CoD:WaW seemed to be about the same length, and I really enjoyed that so hopefully this turns out to be another great experience. There'll probably be multiple difficulty settings for those that may want an extra playthrough and hopefully, the shorter campaign means that we'll have a really good multiplayer experience.

I will NEVER understand the hype for this game, let the other systems hype FPS, The Wii has got LKS (it's out here in the UK and its freaking Sweet!). The Conduit has always looked like a below adverage shooter on a shooter starved system, it's like HAZE was back in the PS3 drought days. BoloTheGreat

Well- hopefully the Conduit will be better than Haze- but you do have a point. The Conduit is being hyped simply because the Wii doesn't have that many AAA FPS games right now, that and the Conduit looks quite good for a Wii game.

As for the length, 5-9 hours, that's actually a bit longer thanthecurrent standardFPS length these days. Most are no longer than 6 hours long right now, so sounds like the Conduit may be slightly longer than the norm.

That's ok, considering that it is a multiplayer focused game.

doesn't this belong in the sticky thread?

but anyways... 5-9 hours of single player is more than enough for me in a FPS game.

doesn't this belong in the sticky thread?

dan_the_menace

a 9 hour long single player and long lasting multi player is pretty much the standerd foe fps's theses days

fps shooters are usually short because they focus mainly on the multiplayer aspect of the gameDaCool2008

thats exactly why i dont like fps's