The Conduit by has no means flopped. It has not lived up to the hype and is not the AAA game everyone expected it to be, but it is still a decent game and a great exclusive for the Wii. I do hope that they learn to not live on hype and actually make AA and AAA efforts on The Grinder and Gladiator A.D.
the conduit flopped now hopefully HVS will improve on all the faults conduit has and have a longer testing time for the grinder and conduit 2
carter15kd5
mmm asuming that for HVS the score of a gaming site is important for them ?....Do you think yay gamespot gave us a lower score than the average reviewer, damm! sigh..wishful thinking from you.You need little to be happy.
well from their interviews, it seemed they really listened to the users (well save for the art direction criticism, but the level designs and the narrative couldnt be criticized by readers before the game was released, while the aspects they were enthusiastic enough to ask the readers, such as controls, seemed pretty good) and hopefully they will listen to the reviews next time
well if HVS wants to be considered as a major game dev they should look at the reviews
also i think they look at reviews because i seem to recall them asking fans and people to send them e-mails of what they want to see in their games
Gladiator A.D. this game looks so bad ......it going 2 b so bad
carter15kd5
if they look at the reviews http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/conduit?q=the%20conduit they ,by now ,should be very satisfied with their work.Sure,they have a bit to improve to get really high scores, but obviously the big sites and newspapers (associated press also gave TC 3 stars out of 4 and thats PRINTED newspaper sources), tend to show they are pretty close to where they want to be. Almost all games can improve, even great ones like mario galaxy. TC is no exception.But from reviewers, they dont need too much.
well if HVS wants to be considered as a major game dev they should look at the reviews
also i think they look at reviews because i seem to recall them asking fans and people to send them e-mails of what they want to see in their games
Gladiator A.D. this game looks so bad ......it going 2 b so bad
intro94
if they look at the reviews http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/conduit?q=the%20conduit they ,by now ,should be very satisfied with their work.Sure,they have a bit to improve to get really high scores, but obviously the big sites and newspapers (associated press also gave TC 3 stars out of 4 and thats PRINTED newspaper sources), tend to show they are pretty close to where they want to be. Almost all games can improve, even great ones like mario galaxy. TC is no exception.But from reviewers, they dont need too much. as all game can b improved on the difference between a great game n a bad game is how big the margin of improvement has 2 b done
well if HVS wants to be considered as a major game dev they should look at the reviews
also i think they look at reviews because i seem to recall them asking fans and people to send them e-mails of what they want to see in their games
Gladiator A.D. this game looks so bad ......it going 2 b so bad
carter15kd5
if they look at the reviews http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/conduit?q=the%20conduit they ,by now ,should be very satisfied with their work.Sure,they have a bit to improve to get really high scores, but obviously the big sites and newspapers (associated press also gave TC 3 stars out of 4 and thats PRINTED newspaper sources), tend to show they are pretty close to where they want to be. Almost all games can improve, even great ones like mario galaxy. TC is no exception.But from reviewers, they dont need too much. as all game can b improved on the difference between a great game n a bad game is how big the margin of improvement has 2 b done So...you are happy because a game that got good reviews can improve?....ok..isnt that obvious?
[QUOTE="intro94"] if they look at the reviews http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/conduit?q=the%20conduit they ,by now ,should be very satisfied with their work.Sure,they have a bit to improve to get really high scores, but obviously the big sites and newspapers (associated press also gave TC 3 stars out of 4 and thats PRINTED newspaper sources), tend to show they are pretty close to where they want to be. Almost all games can improve, even great ones like mario galaxy. TC is no exception.But from reviewers, they dont need too much. intro94
as all game can b improved on the difference between a great game n a bad game is how big the margin of improvement has 2 b done So...you are happy because a game that got good reviews can improve?....ok..isnt that obvious?to b honest the conduit doesnt really deserve most of the reviews it been getting (ign) n so on the game is medicore at best and as gamepro stated conduit is only a game if you only own a wii
I do agree that IGN's review is a bit biased since they got all of that exclusive coverage. Gamestop's was a more critical review, but the average between the two should be the real score.
[QUOTE="intro94"][QUOTE="carter15kd5"]as all game can b improved on the difference between a great game n a bad game is how big the margin of improvement has 2 b done
carter15kd5
So...you are happy because a game that got good reviews can improve?....ok..isnt that obvious?to b honest the conduit doesnt really deserve most of the reviews it been getting (ign) n so on the game is medicore at best and as gamepro stated conduit is only a game if you only own a wii aaah ok. So you think HVS realized all the good reviews are liars and the lower ones are the right ones and that they will figure that ! brilliant! Well id love to have that lying detection machine HVS has ,is so subtle...Sigh. Ok i got your point, thank you.moving on..
[QUOTE="intro94"] So...you are happy because a game that got good reviews can improve?....ok..isnt that obvious?intro94
to b honest the conduit doesnt really deserve most of the reviews it been getting (ign) n so on the game is medicore at best and as gamepro stated conduit is only a game if you only own a wii aaah ok. So you think HVS realized all the good reviews are liars and the lower ones are the right ones and that they will figure that ! brilliant! Well id love to have that lying detection machine HVS has ,is so subtle...Sigh. Ok i got your point, thank you.moving on..see ur acting like a fanboy while the person on top of ur last post has the right idea
How can The Conduit be considered a flop, because of one ridiculous review? The game's freakin' great, especially the online. It's in no way mediocre. I go by user reviews, and seeing as how it's currently at a 9.0 on this very site I'd say it's a success. Sorry, but you lose.
How can The Conduit be considered a flop, because of one ridiculous review? The game's freakin' great, especially the online. It's in no way mediocre. I go by user reviews, and seeing as how it's currently at a 9.0 on this very site I'd say it's a success. Sorry, but you lose.ozzsoad
Yeah but a lot of user's post a 10/10 review which this game definitly is not.
[QUOTE="intro94"][QUOTE="carter15kd5"]to b honest the conduit doesnt really deserve most of the reviews it been getting (ign) n so on the game is medicore at best and as gamepro stated conduit is only a game if you only own a wii
carter15kd5
aaah ok. So you think HVS realized all the good reviews are liars and the lower ones are the right ones and that they will figure that ! brilliant! Well id love to have that lying detection machine HVS has ,is so subtle...Sigh. Ok i got your point, thank you.moving on..see ur acting like a fanboy while the person on top of ur last post has the right idea actually my opinion is the same as the previous. The average metascore is 7.4-7.7 .How am i stating hard facts being a fanboy?On your side however, desperately screaming flop at 7.7 average scores and calling the game bad(3) or mediocre(5) ...isnt making much sense.
Log in to comment