Is super mario galaxy 2 over rated?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Rickystickyman
Rickystickyman

674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#1 Rickystickyman
Member since 2010 • 674 Posts
As much as I liked the first super mario galaxy, the new one seemed disappointing for me. I played it, and it was fun, but after a couple of days I just left the game and played BFBC2. The game seems to lack originality in gameplay. About all of the gameplay elements in it seem to be pretty standard ideas. Being able to roll as a rock was kind of fun, but not really original. Being a spring was very annoying because the controls were a bit unresponsive. I mean a spring.... seriously. Cloud mario was a bit of fun, but the game seemed like super mario galaxy 1.5. Basically the gameplay was exactly the same, but just with some newer abilities. Yoshi was interesting, but didn't really do much. And Luigi seemed tacked on at the last second. I will admit the game was fun for the first few hours, but by the end it lost a lot of its momentum. Specially the snake boss dragon thing. I killed that thing in less than a minute. I actually timed myself. All of the bossed seemed like cake walks. So yeah the game was fun, but I think an 8.5 is a bit more suited for it than a 10. I mean if it was a 10 it would've at least had multiplayer of some sort, so the game would have replay value. Okay I'm done bickering. Sorry for wasting your time with my long post.
Avatar image for DJ_Lae
DJ_Lae

42748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#2 DJ_Lae
Member since 2002 • 42748 Posts
To some extent I think it is. Yes, it's got the same fantastic gameplay of the first Galaxy, yes, they got rid of the particularly awful bits (the manta surfing, the garbage bombing), yes, they added Yoshi, yes, they made the second group of stars more than just 'play the game all over again!' but... The changes just weren't that significant. Most of the gameplay is identical to the first, and they even removed some cool ideas that were there before or made them worse (like converting the self scrolling void levels into ones where you had Yoshi and made him eat fruit) and even the neat nods to previous games were lazy, as they essentially just copied Thwomp's Fort polygon for polygon and even had you complete the same objective, and had the audacity to create special levels out of recycled bosses and levels from the first game. The music was fantastic, though. I'd still give it a 9 rather than a 10, but 9 is still a fantastic game.
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

For me it was quite the contrary, the first part of the game was fun but nothing special, the latter levels were the ones that shock me, it is overrated? yes, i think it shouldn't be a 10, IMO it is a 9.5, because some levels were plain frustrating like the ones with the bird.

Avatar image for vgshine
vgshine

463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 vgshine
Member since 2006 • 463 Posts

I wouldn't say its overrated though i will say a few nitpicky things keep it from being perfect.

Avatar image for Rickystickyman
Rickystickyman

674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#5 Rickystickyman
Member since 2010 • 674 Posts
Yeah I liked the game, but some of the bosses (that giant insect) were exactly the same. Accept you had cloud powers which made it easier than when you had the bee suit.
Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#6 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

I think it is right where it needs to be. Neither overrated, or underrated.

Avatar image for Jelley0
Jelley0

1867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Jelley0
Member since 2009 • 1867 Posts

It didn't seem to lack originality in my opinion, and I played the first Super Mario Galaxy. My only problem for me was how linear it was.

Avatar image for xXTalismanXx
xXTalismanXx

916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 xXTalismanXx
Member since 2008 • 916 Posts

10's seem so easy to achieve this generation for some reason.:roll:

Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30713 Posts
I don't know whats worse, the seven billionth "Which is the worst Zelda" topic of the 700 zillionth {insert game here] overrated? topic. There is NO SUCH THING as overrated and the overrated topics are overdone.
Avatar image for deactivated-5967f36c08c33
deactivated-5967f36c08c33

15614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-5967f36c08c33
Member since 2006 • 15614 Posts

10's seem so easy to achieve this generation for some reason.:roll:

xXTalismanXx

Because having three titles with a 10/10 score is a large number...?

Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#11 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts
I liked SMG more than SMG2. So from that, I would say yes.
Avatar image for Valkyriareaper1
Valkyriareaper1

526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Valkyriareaper1
Member since 2009 • 526 Posts

No the game is not overrated. If getting 10 out of 10 on every major reviewing site is overrated then Grand Theft Auto 4 must be overrated as well.

Avatar image for xXTalismanXx
xXTalismanXx

916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 xXTalismanXx
Member since 2008 • 916 Posts

[QUOTE="xXTalismanXx"]

10's seem so easy to achieve this generation for some reason.:roll:

VGobbsesser

Because having three titles with a 10/10 score is a large number...?

Yes:P

Avatar image for aransom
aransom

7408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 aransom
Member since 2002 • 7408 Posts

SMG2 is not overrated. If this game doesn't deserve 10/10, no game does.

Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#15 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts

No the game is not overrated. If getting 10 out of 10 on every major reviewing site is overrated then Grand Theft Auto 4 must be overrated as well.

Valkyriareaper1
You're right when it comes to GTA IV. :P
Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#16 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]

[QUOTE="xXTalismanXx"]

10's seem so easy to achieve this generation for some reason.:roll:

xXTalismanXx

Because having three titles with a 10/10 score is a large number...?

Yes:P

It was worse back then.. Games were getting 10s on the fly on Gamespot. :P
Avatar image for xXTalismanXx
xXTalismanXx

916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 xXTalismanXx
Member since 2008 • 916 Posts

[QUOTE="xXTalismanXx"]

[QUOTE="VGobbsesser"]

Because having three titles with a 10/10 score is a large number...?

Elian2530

Yes:P

It was worse back then.. Games were getting 10s on the fly on Gamespot. :P

:lol:

Avatar image for JuarN18
JuarN18

4981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 JuarN18
Member since 2007 • 4981 Posts
to each its own i guess
but after a couple of days I just left the game and played BFBC2. The game seems to lack originality in gameplay.Rickystickyman
lol
Avatar image for unrealtron
unrealtron

3148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 unrealtron
Member since 2010 • 3148 Posts

I think it´s not overated

Avatar image for mlbslugger86
mlbslugger86

12867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#20 mlbslugger86
Member since 2004 • 12867 Posts

didn't play the first one, as for the second one, its not bad so far

Avatar image for Pikminmaniac
Pikminmaniac

11514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#21 Pikminmaniac
Member since 2006 • 11514 Posts

I think that it deserves the reviews it's getting. It's definately the best 3D platformer I have ever played: a spot that was previously owned by Rayman 2 back in 1999

Avatar image for Blaketoberfest
Blaketoberfest

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 Blaketoberfest
Member since 2009 • 241 Posts

I can't say that it's overrated. In fact, it was quite an improvement from the first one, just what sequels are supposed to do.

I'm also getting annoyed how people claim the game is a "rehash" of the first game, and from what I could see, there are way too many differences between the two games (including level structure) to be considered a "carbon copy". "I know! Let's rehash Sonic the Hedgehog by making Sonic the Hedgehog 2!"

Avatar image for Rickystickyman
Rickystickyman

674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#23 Rickystickyman
Member since 2010 • 674 Posts
I agree that it is a good game. Is it a 10? By no means. It was sort of rehashed in some areas like identical boss fights, same graphics, same enemies, and like all mario games same storyline.
Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

have not played it yet, but if its as good as Super Mario 64 then it deserves a 10 :).

Avatar image for PoindeJ
PoindeJ

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 PoindeJ
Member since 2005 • 686 Posts
I agree that it is a good game. Is it a 10? By no means. It was sort of rehashed in some areas like identical boss fights, same graphics, same enemies, and like all mario games same storyline.Rickystickyman
...Well duh. Have you played a Mario game before? They don't have stories. And the enemies are the same, yes - there are also a ton of them. A Mario game is about its levels, and that's why Galaxy 2 got a 10. The levels were freaking fantastic - just about every level had a new idea, something that no platformer has done before - not even the original Galaxy. For that reason I think the game delivers completely - it's the quintessential Mario game and the quintessential platformer. Also, having the same graphics is okay when those graphics look better than any other game on the system. And there were really very few repeat boss fights - actually, Galaxy 2 had way more boss fights (since it had more levels). No game that gets a 10 will be universally adored by every single person who plays it (except Ocarina of Time, apparently). I think that anyone who plays Galaxy 2 will have fun, but that doesn't mean people will have the same amount of fun. That said, I don't think Nintendo has made a better-made Mario game than Galaxy 2 - and for that reason I say it's not overrated at all.
Avatar image for Rickystickyman
Rickystickyman

674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#26 Rickystickyman
Member since 2010 • 674 Posts
Yeah ocarina of time was beast. The SMG2 seems to be more for players who haven't played the first. I mean they explain the controls like 500 times in the game (actually over 9000 times) but as mentioned before 3/4 through the game a character mentions to me that if you shake the wii remote you can spin, or if you press 'A' you can jump. But for people that I know that haven't played the first they say SMG2 is amazing. But for a lot of people I know who have palyed both games they say that the sequel is more of an update, or a patch.
Avatar image for InfinityMugen
InfinityMugen

3905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 InfinityMugen
Member since 2007 • 3905 Posts

Yes.

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#28 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

Nope. It's the best 3D platformer I've played so far and I put in a lot more hours in it then the first one.

Avatar image for vguy555
vguy555

4625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 vguy555
Member since 2007 • 4625 Posts

After getting all 242 stars today, I can say that Super Mario Galaxy 2 is not overrated. The whole experience was fun and memorable, I really don't have anything negative to say about the game.

Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#30 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts
smg2 is the best 3d platformer I've ever played. No matter which galaxy you prefer, both are sure winners in my book...and they should be in everyone else's book too, at least one of them.
Avatar image for velvetlightning
velvetlightning

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 velvetlightning
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

I disagree. I believe the game is worthy of a 10. Maybe a 9.8, honestly. EVerything was great about the game to the last green star, but i didnt like a few things. Really just the enemy killing minigames and the fact that you have to get 9999 star bits to unlock the final star. But i found the game to be everything mario galaxy was and more, which was the point of the game, to be a sequel. I think alot of people are hating on the hype because some of it was hard, well whats hard to you, is not to some people. Its not hard to me, i completly beat the game without much problems. And the amount of time to spend playing this game could vary but i spent a good while playing. I feel like if i spend money on a game, i play it to the very end. Meaning every star. People say there is hardly any replay value due to lack of real multplayer interface. Wii was never a big gunner for online play to begin with, so thats really not to be expected. And minigames is your second option, which really woudent add much, You buy Mario Party for minigames, not a full mario adventure game. And teo players on the same screen?? could you imagine the serious camera angle problems trying to follow two characters. I think they went above and beyond with this game and it deserves a high rating. People overlook the good too often to stare at the things that are not there they wanted. If they dont have what you want, it dosent diminish the great elements the game already has. With what the game has, not whati want it to have, they did exeptional with creating yet another amazing Mario game.

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#32 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36197 Posts
9.5. Awesome game, but just like the first, it's a bit too easy for me and the levels are a little small and short.
Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#33 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36197 Posts

to each its own i guess [QUOTE="Rickystickyman"]but after a couple of days I just left the game and played BFBC2. The game seems to lack originality in gameplay.JuarN18
lol

Hey! BFBC2, a scaled down, prettier BF2, released in an ocean of other military FPSs is totally more original than Galaxy 2.

Avatar image for mayforcebeyou
mayforcebeyou

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 mayforcebeyou
Member since 2007 • 2703 Posts
The first one deserved a 10 more than smg2. Those goomba oktoroks are so annoying.
Avatar image for AndromedasWake
AndromedasWake

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 AndromedasWake
Member since 2010 • 256 Posts
I don't know whats worse, the seven billionth "Which is the worst Zelda" topic of the 700 zillionth {insert game here] overrated? topic. There is NO SUCH THING as overrated and the overrated topics are overdone. Sepewrath
I agree. Overrated threads are overrated. It's a great game, why make a big deal out of what meaningless number is attached to it on website reviews?
Avatar image for ReallySmartGuy
ReallySmartGuy

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#36 ReallySmartGuy
Member since 2010 • 59 Posts

I, for one, though the whole Mario franchise is a slight bit overrated (although fun). If you look at the facts on IGN and even GameSpot, the users gave Galaxy 2 generally lower scores such as 8.4 and 9.1. The truth? Yes, gamers do think Galaxy 2 is overrated.

Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30713 Posts

I, for one, though the whole Mario franchise is a slight bit overrated (although fun). If you look at the facts on IGN and even GameSpot, the users gave Galaxy 2 generally lower scores such as 8.4 and 9.1. The truth? Yes, gamers do think Galaxy 2 is overrated.

ReallySmartGuy
lol I guess your a bit clueless on the user score thing. Go to any site look at the high profile exclusives, they 95% of the time have a lower user score. That because people who treat consoles like religions rate it like a 1 with the intention of lowering the score. I remember for example last year before ODST came out, the user score was like 5 with hundreds of review scores. The user score doesn't mean anything. especially for highly rated, high profile exclusives.
Avatar image for super600
super600

33161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#38 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33161 Posts

[QUOTE="ReallySmartGuy"]

I, for one, though the whole Mario franchise is a slight bit overrated (although fun). If you look at the facts on IGN and even GameSpot, the users gave Galaxy 2 generally lower scores such as 8.4 and 9.1. The truth? Yes, gamers do think Galaxy 2 is overrated.

Sepewrath

lol I guess your a bit clueless on the user score thing. Go to any site look at the high profile exclusives, they 95% of the time have a lower user score. That because people who treat consoles like religions rate it like a 1 with the intention of lowering the score. I remember for example last year before ODST came out, the user score was like 5 with hundreds of review scores. The user score doesn't mean anything. especially for highly rated, high profile exclusives.

That's the sad truth about giving people the ability to vote for a game without giving a review. Console fanboys will abuse the voting system to death and give the games 1 or 2's if they never played it. I wish there was a way we can see how user's without writing a review individually gave the game.

Avatar image for HungryLuma
HungryLuma

1131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#39 HungryLuma
Member since 2009 • 1131 Posts

This game didn't deserve a 10/10. It wasn't THAT good.