Medal of Honor Heroes 2 or Call of Duty World at War????

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jettpack
jettpack

3192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 jettpack
Member since 2009 • 3192 Posts

Which game is better? both single and multiplayer?

Medal of Honor Heroes 2 or Call of Duty World at War????

Avatar image for Pices
Pices

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Pices
Member since 2005 • 3910 Posts
[QUOTE="jettpack"]

Which game is better? both single and multiplayer?

Medal of Honor Heroes 2 or Call of Duty World at War????

Single-player : Cod waw Multiplayer : Haven't played MOH H2, so I can't judge it yet
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts

W@W hands down. The hit detection is MoH is so bad it's borderline unplayable. It's ok in the single player, but still really noticeable. But in the multiplayer I've seriously unloaded entire clips into people at point blank range and not killed them. I don't know what Hitler's puttin' in the water, but I want some of it.

Avatar image for gamefan67
gamefan67

10034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 gamefan67
Member since 2004 • 10034 Posts
World at War wins by 5000 country miles. Medal of Honor is terrible. The hit detection is extremely bad (WaW's hit detection is not all too great either) Like Goblaa said. You can empty a whole Thomsin clip into an enemy and still have them running with those sloppy animations. Medal of Honor had a very boring single player. I played like the first two levels and never went back to the single player again (yes it is that boring), and the multi-player might have 32 people online at once, but limited maps and game types (only free for all team deathmatch and Capture the flag[on two stages]). I think TCon is better than WaW on the multiplayer side of things though.
Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#5 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts

Definitely World at War, the game is much better.

Avatar image for Kenny789
Kenny789

10434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#6 Kenny789
Member since 2006 • 10434 Posts
World at War. I can't believe I actually enjoyed MOHH2 before.
Avatar image for lonewolf604
lonewolf604

8748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 lonewolf604
Member since 2007 • 8748 Posts
definitely world at war. sure it may be only 8 people online, but the gameplay is much better. plus there's unlockable weapons and equipment
Avatar image for WaffleHunter
WaffleHunter

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 WaffleHunter
Member since 2009 • 63 Posts
I have played both and i have to say that COD WAW is tons better.
Avatar image for wurmie
wurmie

365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 wurmie
Member since 2009 • 365 Posts

World at War no doubt...

:P

Avatar image for virus1000
virus1000

10187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 virus1000
Member since 2009 • 10187 Posts

Never played Medal of Honor but Call of duty is good.

Avatar image for Noskillkill
Noskillkill

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Noskillkill
Member since 2009 • 1116 Posts

Waw by far. i just played Moh at my friends yesterday. some of the things in it are pretty cool, like how u can bark commands and stuff. i thought that was beast. but there was such a lack of action and smooth gameplay i didnt enjoy it. i think Waw is A LOT BETTER, but if they combined ur ability to tell commands and have 32 players and make sniper only battles and stuff like that and used everything else from Waw, we would have a great game on our hands.

Avatar image for FPS1337
FPS1337

2519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#12 FPS1337
Member since 2009 • 2519 Posts
I think I'd prefer MOH:H2 cuz it has text communications, 16 vs 16 online, online leaderboards, smoother online, no friend codes and arcade mode while WAW is just 4 vs4 online.
Avatar image for gamefan67
gamefan67

10034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 gamefan67
Member since 2004 • 10034 Posts
[QUOTE="FPS1337"]I think I'd prefer MOH:H2 cuz it has text communications - that is good if you want to set up matches, but that is about it. 16 vs 16 online - 16 vs. 16 is a good number (have fune tring to find a match like that) With the horrible hit detection, weapon balancing etc etc. The 32 player online does not make the game any better. online leaderboards - WaW has those too smoother online, - h to the e to the double hockey stick no no friend codes - that is a plus arcade mode - is just as boring as regular single player while WAW is just 4 vs4 online.

Heroes is garbage compared to WaW. If you played both you would better understand why.
Avatar image for FPS1337
FPS1337

2519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#14 FPS1337
Member since 2009 • 2519 Posts
i didn't like WAW at all. It had pretty bad graphics, only variations of deatmatch, no bonus modes, and 4 vs 4 online. Also the controls are worse the MOH:H2. The perk system is cool, but since I have a 360 it's not new cuz I have cod4 for 360 and cod waw for 360 also. MOH:H2 is actually something that isn't seen on very many other consoles, and never seen on Wii.
Avatar image for Polirath
Polirath

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Polirath
Member since 2009 • 45 Posts

WAW would thrash MOH H2 any day.