medal of honor heros 2 pics

who thinks they look great??? i do it doesnt look that bad i mean the guns could look a lil better but they put alot of detail into the shirt and the ground and stuff plus the the the soliders

anyone thinks it looks bad???

Lol can I see them?Sants412

What he said.

Pics here.

are those really wii pics?

wow.... amazing

MoH vangaurd didnt look so good and i wouldn't care except for the horrible lighting, i couldn't find my way around. This dark lighting has plagued many fps games i play :? makes me really angry. but the screens that are shown are good enough for me.bionicle_lover

yeah, i didnt like moh at all the lighting sucked on it so bad even on an hdtv.

didnt expect to see such a big inprovement, i am impressed

[QUOTE="bionicle_lover"]MoH vangaurd didnt look so good and i wouldn't care except for the horrible lighting, i couldn't find my way around. This dark lighting has plagued many fps games i play :? makes me really angry. but the screens that are shown are good enough for me.b0ssy

yeah, i didnt like moh at all the lighting sucked on it so bad even on an hdtv.

didnt expect to see such a big inprovement, i am impressed

im not a graphics guy but fps that are too dark piss me off at times where i can't find places to go. other examples are CoD and halo. Anyway, these graphics look good enough for me. Actualy, CoD 3 on 360 actually disappointed me a little. i blame it on the projector im using but still, shining nazis in the cloudy dark?

did they build it from the ground up or somethin they like that they say when its totally different from the usual of their games??

Are you realy going to see bullets in motion?

Are you realy going to see bullets in motion?

epayps2

??? What?

Are you realy going to see bullets in motion?

epayps2

Like slo-mo?

Pics here.

nintendofreak_2

They are bullshots indeed.

It looks rather bland. Arc2012

It looks like a WWII FPS. Whats the problem? Don't tell me everyone has been under a rock and I am the only person on the planet who has seen the WWII FPS gimmick milked to death.Rockin_MixMasta

lol who the hell ever said they were touched up?natebayne

[QUOTE="natebayne"]lol who the hell ever said they were touched up?-CheeseEater-

Nope.. not enough at all cause its your word. ill concede that the res looks a bit upped but 16x AA? BULLCRAP... look at the friggin jaggies int he background... my god.. freak out about something else.

- and also their originally in a resolution that the Wii cannot handle.

I'm interested in how you determine this. In photoshop, the image is 480 * 336 pixel. We know that the Wii runs in 480p (640 * 480 pixel). How does this "resolution" of 480 * 336 exceeds Wii's capability? Thanks.

Definetly better than COD3.

Unfortunately the "good" standard for Wii has been lowered by game such as "Far Cry". Since Wii is at least as good as the Gamecube graphically speaking, and by comparing the screenshots to the better looking games on the GC, I would say the game looks so so, not good.

Although the picture on the bottom in the church does look good in that "standard". Possibly due the lighting effects. What do you guys think?

imo it doesn't look good, it looks OK for the wii but other then that they look really badwii60_lukatoll

same