Modern Warfare Wii vs. The Conduit

Who here believes that once the Wii version of Modern Warfare comes out, it will surpass the Conduit in every aspect except the Graphics and Controls.

What I mean is, it isn't going to be very pretty, it is going to control decent but not great, but overall, I think Modern Warfare might turn out better than the Conduit. Sure it is a port, but it is a port of a really good game, and since World at War decently worked, so should Modern Warfare.

The online multiplayer will most likely be better, a much larger selection of weapons, you pick the guns you want to use rather than voting for them.

I want to here what you guys think will happen on November 10, 2009.

Me, I will most likely be playing Modern Warfare 2 for PC, but if Modern Warfare Wii turns out great, I may trade in the Conduit for it.

It'll be as bad as Conduit.MonsieurX

This.

well according to reviews, WaW is superior to Conduit.

I don't see MW would be any different. Same engine, same controls, same online, just different color palletes used and clothing. This should be a no brainer for Treyarch.....

we'll see though

well according to reviews, WaW is superior to Conduit.

danger_ranger95

That's the thing I could never quite understand. WaW is a buggy, broken, port with half of it's content missing. Yet people give it good reviews. I mean, The Conduit was at least somewhat decent. What am I missing here?

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]It'll be as bad as Conduit.Lord_Nas3k

This.

I second this.

[QUOTE="danger_ranger95"]

well according to reviews, WaW is superior to Conduit.

Lord_Nas3k

That's the thing I could never quite understand. WaW is a buggy, broken, port with half of it's content missing. Yet people give it good reviews. I mean, The Conduit was at least somewhat decent. What am I missing here?

lol no idea, I've never played it.

It seemed alright when I watched youtube footage, but then again... people only put what they want you to see, my right?

we'll just have to see who wins

[QUOTE="Lord_Nas3k"]

[QUOTE="danger_ranger95"]

well according to reviews, WaW is superior to Conduit.

danger_ranger95

That's the thing I could never quite understand. WaW is a buggy, broken, port with half of it's content missing. Yet people give it good reviews. I mean, The Conduit was at least somewhat decent. What am I missing here?

lol no idea, I've never played it.

It seemed alright when I watched youtube footage, but then again... people only put what they want you to see, my right?

we'll just have to see who wins

Yeah, it all depends on how they handle porting it. The game isn't that great on other consoles, anyways. Although, chances are, Treyarch's just going to make it worse.

It'll be as bad as Conduit.MonsieurX

Well by this logic.

Since the Conduit was a good game, Modern Warfare Wii will be a good game.

Not to be confused with GREAT game.

[QUOTE="danger_ranger95"]

[QUOTE="Lord_Nas3k"]

That's the thing I could never quite understand. WaW is a buggy, broken, port with half of it's content missing. Yet people give it good reviews. I mean, The Conduit was at least somewhat decent. What am I missing here?

Lord_Nas3k

lol no idea, I've never played it.

It seemed alright when I watched youtube footage, but then again... people only put what they want you to see, my right?

we'll just have to see who wins

Yeah, it all depends on how they handle porting it. The game isn't that great on other consoles, anyways. Although, chances are, Treyarch's just going to make it worse.

It is great on consoles, perfect on PC.

The controls will ultimately make or break the game for me. I don't mind having not such a good looking game, but I don't want to play a game that looks ugly.

If the game looks like it did in those screenshots, then I'd have to say no. Usually graphics shouldn't matter but having it look THAT bad is inexcusable. If the game looks almost as good as Conduit (or better) with good controls then it probably will be a better game overall.Chojuto

[QUOTE="Chojuto"]If the game looks like it did in those screenshots, then I'd have to say no. Usually graphics shouldn't matter but having it look THAT bad is inexcusable. If the game looks almost as good as Conduit (or better) with good controls then it probably will be a better game overall.MonsieurX

[QUOTE="Lord_Nas3k"]

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]It'll be as bad as Conduit.Phoenix534

This.

I second this.

[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

[QUOTE="Lord_Nas3k"]

This.

Litchie

I second this.

Can't say that for sure until Modern Warfare Wii is actually released.

Are you one of those guys who hates the Conduit without ever playing it first just because Gamespot says it is to generic?

If you actually played it, what parts about it do you hate?

[QUOTE="Litchie"][QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

I second this.

snover2009

Can't say that for sure until Modern Warfare Wii is actually released.

Are you one of those guys who hates the Conduit without ever playing it first just because Gamespot says it is to generic?

If you actually played it, what parts about it do you hate?

The controls was awesome, but that's pretty much it. The single-player was incredibly boring, the online wasn't fun and the graphics was pretty bad. The GameSpot review was pretty much spot on. I gave it a 6.0 instead of 6.5, though. The IGN review of the game also made me despise IGN.

The game just doesn't offer anything you can't get on 3 million other better FPSs. I'm not giving it thumbs up just because it's on the Wii. The game sucks. Period.

[QUOTE="danger_ranger95"]

well according to reviews, WaW is superior to Conduit.

Lord_Nas3k

That's the thing I could never quite understand. WaW is a buggy, broken, port with half of it's content missing. Yet people give it good reviews. I mean, The Conduit was at least somewhat decent. What am I missing here?

first off the conduit has tons of hackers on it and online isnt that great but i suppose the same problem will happen to the cod 4 but i say their both pretty good the cod is better especially online

I'm sure it will be almost as good as COD-4 was 2 years ago. My biggest problem with this is why now??? This just shows us that they could have made this 2 years ago.....but they where too lazy to. Now that they are making it, everyone is going to buy it...making it ok for 3rd parties to continue this........I want original games, not ports......I'm sick of ports. Stop buying them so they will stop making them. da_chub

The reason I think that Modern Warfare is coming to Wii now is because World at War sold overa million units on Wii.

As a result, Activisions wants to make alot of money off of this. But if you think about it, Modern Warfare is a game that is so good that most games released recently don't really compare to it that much.

I'm sure it will be almost as good as COD-4 was 2 years ago. My biggest problem with this is why now??? This just shows us that they could have made this 2 years ago.....but they where too lazy to. Now that they are making it, everyone is going to buy it...making it ok for 3rd parties to continue this........I want original games, not ports......I'm sick of ports. Stop buying them so they will stop making them. da_chub

It's too early to judge anything.

But I'm keeping an eye on it.

Well after playing CoD4 finally, I think if the port is good then the game will be better than the Conduit

If Red Steel 2 had Online like it supposed to had, then it would be the winner.

If MW turns out to be anywhere near as fun as the XB360 and PS3 releases, it'll crush that mediocre "killer-app" called The Conduit.

In the end, I personally would rather have a gimped port that is extremely fun instead of a game built specifically for the Wii that is mediocre and boring. Thus, why I enjoyed Quantum of Solace, World at War, and even Far Cry Vengeance more than I enjoyed The Conduit.

If MW turns out to be anywhere near as fun as the XB360 and PS3 releases, it'll crush that mediocre "killer-app" called The Conduit.

In the end, I personally would rather have a gimped port that is extremely fun instead of a game built specifically for the Wii that is mediocre and boring. Thus, why I enjoyed Quantum of Solace, World at War, and even Far Cry Vengeance more than I enjoyed The Conduit.

MecaShadow

Never, under any conditions, can Far Cry Vengeance be more fun than the Conduit.

I have payed full price for the Conduit and feel that it was worth it. I still want my $20 that I wasted on that ****fest known as Far Cry Vengence.

[QUOTE="MecaShadow"]

If MW turns out to be anywhere near as fun as the XB360 and PS3 releases, it'll crush that mediocre "killer-app" called The Conduit.

In the end, I personally would rather have a gimped port that is extremely fun instead of a game built specifically for the Wii that is mediocre and boring. Thus, why I enjoyed Quantum of Solace, World at War, and even Far Cry Vengeance more than I enjoyed The Conduit.

snover2009

Never, under any conditions, can Far Cry Vengeance be more fun than the Conduit.

I have payed full price for the Conduit and feel that it was worth it. I still want my $20 that I wasted on that ****fest known as Far Cry Vengence.

I rented The Conduit and I felt that I had wasted my money. The environments were bland, the story was stereotypical and predictable, the gameplay was boring, the online was terribly glitchy, and the graphics were nowhere near the early-XBox360 level that HVS promised. Overall, The Conduit was a mediocre snore fest that wasn't even worth the $8 I spent to rent it.

Far Cry Vengeance, while shoddy in graphics, AI, and story, had much more interesting environments in my opinion and was overall much more entertaining than The Conduit ever was.

[QUOTE="snover2009"]

[QUOTE="MecaShadow"]

If MW turns out to be anywhere near as fun as the XB360 and PS3 releases, it'll crush that mediocre "killer-app" called The Conduit.

In the end, I personally would rather have a gimped port that is extremely fun instead of a game built specifically for the Wii that is mediocre and boring. Thus, why I enjoyed Quantum of Solace, World at War, and even Far Cry Vengeance more than I enjoyed The Conduit.

MecaShadow

Never, under any conditions, can Far Cry Vengeance be more fun than the Conduit.

I have payed full price for the Conduit and feel that it was worth it. I still want my $20 that I wasted on that ****fest known as Far Cry Vengence.

I rented The Conduit and I felt that I had wasted my money. The environments were bland, the story was stereotypical and predictable, the gameplay was boring, the online was terribly glitchy, and the graphics were nowhere near the early-XBox360 level that HVS promised. Overall, The Conduit was a mediocre snore fest that wasn't even worth the $8 I spent to rent it.

Far Cry Vengeance, while shoddy in graphics, AI, and story, had much more interesting environments in my opinion and was overall much more entertaining than The Conduit ever was.

Vengeance have interesting environments? Ha! I almost wet myself in laughter!

Onslaught has more interesting environments than Vengeance, and that was WiiWare.

[QUOTE="da_chub"]I'm sure it will be almost as good as COD-4 was 2 years ago. My biggest problem with this is why now??? This just shows us that they could have made this 2 years ago.....but they where too lazy to. Now that they are making it, everyone is going to buy it...making it ok for 3rd parties to continue this........I want original games, not ports......I'm sick of ports. Stop buying them so they will stop making them. snover2009

The reason I think that Modern Warfare is coming to Wii now is because World at War sold overa million units on Wii.

As a result, Activisions wants to make alot of money off of this. But if you think about it, Modern Warfare is a game that is so good that most games released recently don't really compare to it that much.

OMG, sales matter!!! :o