NGamer Magazine reviews Sonic Colors

  • 59 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for savebattery
savebattery

3626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 savebattery
Member since 2009 • 3626 Posts
Summary of review Score? 86%. For reference, this same magazine gave Unleashed a 58 and Black Knight a 56.
Avatar image for TheColbert
TheColbert

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TheColbert
Member since 2008 • 3846 Posts
Considering the score they gave the other two Sonic games then this is good news. I would like to read the whole review but it looks like this game might pan out. It would be the first console Sonic game I have bought since Heroes.
Avatar image for Zanoh
Zanoh

6942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 Zanoh
Member since 2006 • 6942 Posts

I will wait one Metacritic gets a full tally. I already got Sonic 4. It's damn good. Now to see if Colors is good.

Avatar image for alexh_99
alexh_99

5378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 alexh_99
Member since 2007 • 5378 Posts

:shock:

i was expecting something different when i came in this thread. I had already thought of a witty thing to say.

anyway, that is very good news for the fans that sonic does have left :P

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

After the disaster that Sonic 4 is Sega's really counting on this game

They can't afford to have 2 awful games from Sonic this holiday season

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
i trust them. therefore i trust the score and what they said about the game (liking the story... maybe not that far :P)
Avatar image for ahs_902
ahs_902

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ahs_902
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

I think that Sega finally knew what they want and if they continue this way, Sonic is going to catch up with Mario and maybe surpass him (you know...cuz he's faster) :P

Avatar image for sman3579
sman3579

21174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#9 sman3579
Member since 2008 • 21174 Posts
I'm impressed, can't wait to see other reviews.
Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#10 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

After the disaster that Sonic 4 is Sega's really counting on this game

They can't afford to have 2 awful games from Sonic this holiday season

Jaysonguy

almost every lead Reviewer gave Sonic 4 great reviews in the 9s and 8s.

Gamespot is in the Minority of giving Sonic 4 a 6.5 or lower.

I wonder what Colors will bring.

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#11 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

Is NGamer to be trusted?

Avatar image for Gorillanator
Gorillanator

867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Gorillanator
Member since 2009 • 867 Posts

I am definitely looking forward to this game. I don't think Sonic Colors getting AA reviews across the board is too much of a long shot.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#13 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

Is NGamer to be trusted?

AmayaPapaya
yep. they're usually spot on with their reviews. which reminds me... i think wii party scored a 67 there *checks* 61 actually. for the japanese version, which they claim they couldn't play the "weird mode with a globe". i have to get this month's edition to see the american/UK scores though.
Avatar image for bobcheeseball
bobcheeseball

9315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 bobcheeseball
Member since 2007 • 9315 Posts
Well that's an optimistic sign it won't suck :)
Avatar image for burgeg
burgeg

3599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#15 burgeg
Member since 2005 • 3599 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

After the disaster that Sonic 4 is Sega's really counting on this game

They can't afford to have 2 awful games from Sonic this holiday season

LegatoSkyheart

almost every lead Reviewer gave Sonic 4 great reviews in the 9s and 8s.

Gamespot is in the Minority of giving Sonic 4 a 6.5 or lower.

I wonder what Colors will bring.

Only because of the name. No way in hell did it deserve those scores. If you compare Sonic 4 to the Mega Drive titles, it sucks hard. I dont even need to explain why. Hell, Sonic 4 is the worst 2D Sonic game for a VERY long time. You'd have to go back as far as the Advance titles to find a worse 2D Sonic, and even they're arguably better! If you review Sonic 4 based on its own merits, it's merely an insanely short game you can(and will) beat in one sitting with very little reason to go back. It's not even consistantly good throughout that one sitting to completion for crying out loud! Add to that the high price and you've got a meh downloadable platformer and there are a lot better games to spend money on.

Colours on the other hand is exceeding expectations in every single way. Sonic Colours is the big comeback for the series. Sonic Colours is probably going to be one the best games of the year and the best Sonic game ever.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#16 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts
I just preordered this today, 55% for the hat, 45% for the game
Avatar image for Sepewrath
Sepewrath

30712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Sepewrath
Member since 2005 • 30712 Posts

I think that Sega finally knew what they want and if they continue this way, Sonic is going to catch up with Mario and maybe surpass him (you know...cuz he's faster) :P

ahs_902
I think Sega finally making not only one, but two good Sonic games is a sign of the apocalypse.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="ahs_902"]

I think that Sega finally knew what they want and if they continue this way, Sonic is going to catch up with Mario and maybe surpass him (you know...cuz he's faster) :P

Sepewrath
I think Sega finally making not only one, but two good Sonic games is a sign of the apocalypse.

well rumor says it's on 2012, so yeah.
Avatar image for Darth-Samus
Darth-Samus

3995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 Darth-Samus
Member since 2006 • 3995 Posts

I actually am very excited for this game! And this review furthers my enthusiasm :)

Avatar image for Darth-Samus
Darth-Samus

3995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#20 Darth-Samus
Member since 2006 • 3995 Posts

[QUOTE="ahs_902"]

I think that Sega finally knew what they want and if they continue this way, Sonic is going to catch up with Mario and maybe surpass him (you know...cuz he's faster) :P

Sepewrath

I think Sega finally making not only one, but two good Sonic games is a sign of the apocalypse.

\

Hahahahahaha :lol:

This is priceless.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#21 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

Only because of the name. No way in hell did it deserve those scores. If you compare Sonic 4 to the Mega Drive titles, it sucks hard. I dont even need to explain why. Hell, Sonic 4 is the worst 2D Sonic game for a VERY long time. You'd have to go back as far as the Advance titles to find a worse 2D Sonic, and even they're arguably better! If you review Sonic 4 based on its own merits, it's merely an insanely short game you can(and will) beat in one sitting with very little reason to go back. It's not even consistantly good throughout that one sitting to completion for crying out loud! Add to that the high price and you've got a meh downloadable platformer and there are a lot better games to spend money on.

Colours on the other hand is exceeding expectations in every single way. Sonic Colours is the big comeback for the series. Sonic Colours is probably going to be one the best games of the year and the best Sonic game ever.

burgeg

Sonic 4 is the Weakest of the 2D Sonic Games?

I've only played the Trial version but the 1st level felt like every Sonic Level 1.

The only thing I would take point off for is the fact that the Game takes awhole lot off of Sonic 1 a lot.

Then again this is Episode 1 which makes me think that with Episode 2 they'll add Tails and the other Emerald Mini Game and Episode 3 which will add Knuckles and the last Emerald Mini Game.

But so far Episode 1 so far for me isn't bad nor the Worst Sonic 2D Game, IMO that's probably Sonic 1.

Avatar image for Raiko101
Raiko101

3339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 Raiko101
Member since 2005 • 3339 Posts

Is NGamer to be trusted?

AmayaPapaya
What you mean to say is "Does NGamer share my opinion of games generally? In which case, you wouldn't know unless you followed them. Asking them if they can be trusted is to suggest they might lie or something.
Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#23 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts

These guys gave Mario Bros Wii 85% they aren't afraid to give their main franchise scores like that so this is telling you something. It looks a good effort.

Avatar image for burgeg
burgeg

3599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#24 burgeg
Member since 2005 • 3599 Posts

[QUOTE="burgeg"]

Only because of the name. No way in hell did it deserve those scores. If you compare Sonic 4 to the Mega Drive titles, it sucks hard. I dont even need to explain why. Hell, Sonic 4 is the worst 2D Sonic game for a VERY long time. You'd have to go back as far as the Advance titles to find a worse 2D Sonic, and even they're arguably better! If you review Sonic 4 based on its own merits, it's merely an insanely short game you can(and will) beat in one sitting with very little reason to go back. It's not even consistantly good throughout that one sitting to completion for crying out loud! Add to that the high price and you've got a meh downloadable platformer and there are a lot better games to spend money on.

Colours on the other hand is exceeding expectations in every single way. Sonic Colours is the big comeback for the series. Sonic Colours is probably going to be one the best games of the year and the best Sonic game ever.

LegatoSkyheart

Sonic 4 is the Weakest of the 2D Sonic Games?

I've only played the Trial version but the 1st level felt like every Sonic Level 1.

The only thing I would take point off for is the fact that the Game takes awhole lot off of Sonic 1 a lot.

Then again this is Episode 1 which makes me think that with Episode 2 they'll add Tails and the other Emerald Mini Game and Episode 3 which will add Knuckles and the last Emerald Mini Game.

But so far Episode 1 so far for me isn't bad nor the Worst Sonic 2D Game, IMO that's probably Sonic 1.

I dont remember constant automated gameplay in every level of Sonic 1. You've only played the trial version, and from the sounds of it you dont exactly have a very good memory of the Mega Drive Sonic games. First of all, there's the awful physics. In 1991 Sega had this genius idea. They decided that that would incorporate proper rolling physics and proper momentum in to the game. If you are rolling on a slope, you'll get faster just as a ball would on a slope in real life. In Sonic 4 if you turn in to a ball you actually get SLOWER! That's just stupid. Then you've got jumping momentum, which is pretty much non-existant in Sonic 4. The second you let go of the d-pad you'll drop straight down instead of allowing momentum to carry you where you need. This means jumping isn't as precise as it was and platforming wont be as good, which is probably why there's only actually one or 2 proper platforming sections in the entire game! You know what, just take a look at this video. This demonstrates how crap the physics are compared to the classics. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6-1cGzPn3E

Sonic 4 doesn't deserve too be mentioned in the same breath as even Sonic 1, let alone the rest of the classic games. The level design is all very automated, complete with spriings and boosters EVERYWHERE! One particular torch puzzle in Loast Labyrinth is beyond stupid as well. On top of that the game has a complete lack of non widescreen support. On my non widescreen TV I can see barely anything in front of me because Sonic is so far to the right. That's not a problem though, because the game is so automated I dont even need to see what's in front of me!

Avatar image for pierst179
pierst179

10805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 258

User Lists: 0

#25 pierst179
Member since 2006 • 10805 Posts

There is still one month left for the game's release and a review is already out?! That is odd. :?

Avatar image for Zanoh
Zanoh

6942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 Zanoh
Member since 2006 • 6942 Posts

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

[QUOTE="burgeg"]

Only because of the name. No way in hell did it deserve those scores. If you compare Sonic 4 to the Mega Drive titles, it sucks hard. I dont even need to explain why. Hell, Sonic 4 is the worst 2D Sonic game for a VERY long time. You'd have to go back as far as the Advance titles to find a worse 2D Sonic, and even they're arguably better! If you review Sonic 4 based on its own merits, it's merely an insanely short game you can(and will) beat in one sitting with very little reason to go back. It's not even consistantly good throughout that one sitting to completion for crying out loud! Add to that the high price and you've got a meh downloadable platformer and there are a lot better games to spend money on.

Colours on the other hand is exceeding expectations in every single way. Sonic Colours is the big comeback for the series. Sonic Colours is probably going to be one the best games of the year and the best Sonic game ever.

burgeg

Sonic 4 is the Weakest of the 2D Sonic Games?

I've only played the Trial version but the 1st level felt like every Sonic Level 1.

The only thing I would take point off for is the fact that the Game takes awhole lot off of Sonic 1 a lot.

Then again this is Episode 1 which makes me think that with Episode 2 they'll add Tails and the other Emerald Mini Game and Episode 3 which will add Knuckles and the last Emerald Mini Game.

But so far Episode 1 so far for me isn't bad nor the Worst Sonic 2D Game, IMO that's probably Sonic 1.

I dont remember constant automated gameplay in every level of Sonic 1. You've only played the trial version, and from the sounds of it you dont exactly have a very good memory of the Mega Drive Sonic games. First of all, there's the awful physics. In 1991 Sega had this genius idea. They decided that that would incorporate proper rolling physics and proper momentum in to the game. If you are rolling on a slope, you'll get faster just as a ball would on a slope in real life. In Sonic 4 if you turn in to a ball you actually get SLOWER! That's just stupid. Then you've got jumping momentum, which is pretty much non-existant in Sonic 4. The second you let go of the d-pad you'll drop straight down instead of allowing momentum to carry you where you need. This means jumping isn't as precise as it was and platforming wont be as good, which is probably why there's only actually one or 2 proper platforming sections in the entire game! You know what, just take a look at this video. This demonstrates how crap the physics are compared to the classics. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6-1cGzPn3E

Sonic 4 doesn't deserve too be mentioned in the same breath as even Sonic 1, let alone the rest of the classic games. The level design is all very automated, complete with spriings and boosters EVERYWHERE! One particular torch puzzle in Loast Labyrinth is beyond stupid as well. On top of that the game has a complete lack of non widescreen support. On my non widescreen TV I can see barely anything in front of me because Sonic is so far to the right. That's not a problem though, because the game is so automated I dont even need to see what's in front of me!

Um I do not know about you, but Sonic 4 can breath the same breath. The momentum is there, the platforming is there, and when you turn into a ball on a slope you do go faster. The only thing is gravity code sets the speed to slow after a small period of time. Also mate, you are way over exaggerating the springs and dashes, because there is about the same amount as there was in the classics.

Bottom line: It's better than Sega's recent crap infested games that we know, AND it's just as hard as Sonic 1 was in all sense of the words. They did this game right, it gets a thumbs up from me.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#27 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

[QUOTE="burgeg"]

Only because of the name. No way in hell did it deserve those scores. If you compare Sonic 4 to the Mega Drive titles, it sucks hard. I dont even need to explain why. Hell, Sonic 4 is the worst 2D Sonic game for a VERY long time. You'd have to go back as far as the Advance titles to find a worse 2D Sonic, and even they're arguably better! If you review Sonic 4 based on its own merits, it's merely an insanely short game you can(and will) beat in one sitting with very little reason to go back. It's not even consistantly good throughout that one sitting to completion for crying out loud! Add to that the high price and you've got a meh downloadable platformer and there are a lot better games to spend money on.

Colours on the other hand is exceeding expectations in every single way. Sonic Colours is the big comeback for the series. Sonic Colours is probably going to be one the best games of the year and the best Sonic game ever.

burgeg

Sonic 4 is the Weakest of the 2D Sonic Games?

I've only played the Trial version but the 1st level felt like every Sonic Level 1.

The only thing I would take point off for is the fact that the Game takes awhole lot off of Sonic 1 a lot.

Then again this is Episode 1 which makes me think that with Episode 2 they'll add Tails and the other Emerald Mini Game and Episode 3 which will add Knuckles and the last Emerald Mini Game.

But so far Episode 1 so far for me isn't bad nor the Worst Sonic 2D Game, IMO that's probably Sonic 1.

I dont remember constant automated gameplay in every level of Sonic 1. You've only played the trial version, and from the sounds of it you dont exactly have a very good memory of the Mega Drive Sonic games. First of all, there's the awful physics. In 1991 Sega had this genius idea. They decided that that would incorporate proper rolling physics and proper momentum in to the game. If you are rolling on a slope, you'll get faster just as a ball would on a slope in real life. In Sonic 4 if you turn in to a ball you actually get SLOWER! That's just stupid. Then you've got jumping momentum, which is pretty much non-existant in Sonic 4. The second you let go of the d-pad you'll drop straight down instead of allowing momentum to carry you where you need. This means jumping isn't as precise as it was and platforming wont be as good, which is probably why there's only actually one or 2 proper platforming sections in the entire game! You know what, just take a look at this video. This demonstrates how crap the physics are compared to the classics. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6-1cGzPn3E

Sonic 4 doesn't deserve too be mentioned in the same breath as even Sonic 1, let alone the rest of the classic games. The level design is all very automated, complete with spriings and boosters EVERYWHERE! One particular torch puzzle in Loast Labyrinth is beyond stupid as well. On top of that the game has a complete lack of non widescreen support. On my non widescreen TV I can see barely anything in front of me because Sonic is so far to the right. That's not a problem though, because the game is so automated I dont even need to see what's in front of me!

maybe you would have enjoyed the game more is you had... well... PLAYED it CORRECTLY. who lets go of the D-pad while playing anyways? that guys arguments would be valid if the game wasn't designed to be a faster game. sonic has never been about precision, and personally, I think that they did a decent job with what they had. yea, Its not exactly like the original sonic, but guess what? get over it. I've been playing sonic games for about 16 years, and I can most assuredly tell you that I am not disappointed with sonic 4, and that's because im not a nitpicky person when it come to an actually pretty fun game. Also, that lost labyrinth puzzle is not bad at all.
Avatar image for J_Ford
J_Ford

2246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 J_Ford
Member since 2003 • 2246 Posts

There is still one month left for the game's release and a review is already out?! That is odd. :?

Pierst179

Yeah exactly, it's a bit early for a review.

Avatar image for Liltorchic
Liltorchic

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Liltorchic
Member since 2008 • 218 Posts

Just to let you guys know... Ngamer is the greatest Videogame magazine ever made.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#30 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="Pierst179"]

There is still one month left for the game's release and a review is already out?! That is odd. :?

J_Ford

Yeah exactly, it's a bit early for a review.

reviewing before the game is out so people can choose whether to buy it or not. review copies always arrive before the official release. BTW...

Just to let you guys know... Ngamer is the greatest Videogame magazine ever made.

Liltorchic
this man is wise.
Avatar image for J_Ford
J_Ford

2246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 J_Ford
Member since 2003 • 2246 Posts

[QUOTE="J_Ford"]

[QUOTE="Pierst179"]

Yeah exactly, it's a bit early for a review.

BrunoBRS

reviewing before the game is out so people can choose whether to buy it or not. review copies always arrive before the official release. BTW...

Just to let you guys know... Ngamer is the greatest Videogame magazine ever made.

Liltorchic

this man is wise.

Yeah but over a month early?

Obviously it's better when reviews come out before the game's released but this is ridiculous. A week or two fine but not a month, how can that not seem odd to you?

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#32 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

Yeah but over a month early?

Obviously it's better when reviews come out before the game's released but this is ridiculous. A week or two fine but not a month, how can that not seem odd to you?

J_Ford

if they accurately described the game, then why are you so suspicious? you think sega mailed them a review to publish?

i trust NGamer reviews, they're not afraid to murder bad games in their reviews.

Avatar image for J_Ford
J_Ford

2246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 J_Ford
Member since 2003 • 2246 Posts

[QUOTE="J_Ford"]

Yeah but over a month early?

Obviously it's better when reviews come out before the game's released but this is ridiculous. A week or two fine but not a month, how can that not seem odd to you?

BrunoBRS

if they accurately described the game, then why are you so suspicious? you think sega mailed them a review to publish?

i trust NGamer reviews, they're not afraid to murder bad games in their reviews.

I wouldn't say they accurately described the game. reviewing it so early is questionable though.

I don't think I've even heard of NGamer or if I have I've never payed much attention to them. I trust Gametrailers, IGN and of course Gamespot, and I can't think of any game that they've reviewed over a month early either. Seems like NGamer's just trying to get their opinion heard first and that's not the point of making a review.

Where did I say I was suspcious either? :? I'm simply stating that there's no reason to review a game over a month early. I've had nothing but high expectations for Sonic Colors. I've played and beat Sonic Unleashed 100%. I know how much fun the day stages are so I know I can expect good things from Sonic Colors. And I feel more comfortable reading/watching reviews from sites I know and trust, not that reviews justify my decision to purchase a game, I make my own decisions. Sonic Colors isn't a bad game either.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#34 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"]

[QUOTE="J_Ford"]

Yeah but over a month early?

Obviously it's better when reviews come out before the game's released but this is ridiculous. A week or two fine but not a month, how can that not seem odd to you?

J_Ford

if they accurately described the game, then why are you so suspicious? you think sega mailed them a review to publish?

i trust NGamer reviews, they're not afraid to murder bad games in their reviews.

I wouldn't say they accurately described the game. reviewing it so early is questionable though.

I don't think I've even heard of NGamer or if I have I've never payed much attention to them. I trust Gametrailers, IGN and of course Gamespot, and I can't think of any game that they've reviewed over a month early either. Seems like NGamer's just trying to get their opinion heard first and that's not the point of making a review.

Where did I say I was suspcious either? :? I'm simply stating that there's no reason to review a game over a month early. I've had nothing but high expectations for Sonic Colors. I've played and beat Sonic Unleashed 100%. I know how much fun the day stages are so I know I can expect good things from Sonic Colors. And I feel more comfortable reading/watching reviews from sites I know and trust, not that reviews justify my decision to purchase a game, I make my own decisions. Sonic Colors isn't a bad game either.

you're suspicious of NGamer, not the game. you probably never heard of them because they're a magazine. a british magazine. which also happens to have a brazilian version. just like EDGE. and the fact that they're a magazine is yet another reason why they got their hands in the game earlier. when you can only publish stuff once in a month, it's better if you publish them as soon as possible.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#35 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
A lot of games get to review offices before the games are actually released. I wouldn't be too suspicious of NGamer, they're a credible source. Like Bruno said, they have different deadlines to meet and probably different publishing schedules then something like Nintendo Power, which often has game reviews a week or so ahead of the game's release.
Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#36 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

What you mean to say is "Does NGamer share my opinion of games generally? In which case, you wouldn't know unless you followed them. Asking them if they can be trusted is to suggest they might lie or something.Raiko101

No what I mean to say is, are they a crappy magazine like GI. People have already answered my question.

Avatar image for Liltorchic
Liltorchic

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Liltorchic
Member since 2008 • 218 Posts

Don't worry, Ngamer has had a couple of early reviews for big games, and they treat them well.

Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#38 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts
The Sonic Cycle is Broken with a good score!! :D
Avatar image for Rod90
Rod90

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Rod90
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts
I just preordered this today, 55% for the hat, 45% for the gamegarrett_duffman
Hahahahaha, would you actually wear that in public?
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#40 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"]I just preordered this today, 55% for the hat, 45% for the gameRod90
Hahahahaha, would you actually wear that in public?

what hat? I WANNA KNOW WHAT HAT.
Avatar image for alexh_99
alexh_99

5378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#41 alexh_99
Member since 2007 • 5378 Posts
[QUOTE="Rod90"][QUOTE="garrett_duffman"]I just preordered this today, 55% for the hat, 45% for the gameBrunoBRS
Hahahahaha, would you actually wear that in public?

what hat? I WANNA KNOW WHAT HAT.

a sonic hat....
Avatar image for thedude-
thedude-

2369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 thedude-
Member since 2009 • 2369 Posts

After the disaster that Sonic 4 is Sega's really counting on this game

They can't afford to have 2 awful games from Sonic this holiday season

Jaysonguy
No no its all good, they can pretend these games don't exist if they are bad like they are doing with past Sonic games. ;) I love picking on Sonic and Sega, such big easy targets.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#43 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="Rod90"] Hahahahaha, would you actually wear that in public?alexh_99
what hat? I WANNA KNOW WHAT HAT.

a sonic hat....

orly? i was expecting pics :P
Avatar image for alexh_99
alexh_99

5378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#44 alexh_99
Member since 2007 • 5378 Posts

[QUOTE="alexh_99"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] what hat? I WANNA KNOW WHAT HAT.BrunoBRS
a sonic hat....

orly? i was expecting pics :P

Too lazy to find it yourself? :p

Avatar image for Rod90
Rod90

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Rod90
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts

[QUOTE="alexh_99"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] what hat? I WANNA KNOW WHAT HAT.BrunoBRS
a sonic hat....

orly? i was expecting pics :P

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#46 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="alexh_99"] a sonic hat....alexh_99

orly? i was expecting pics :P

Too lazy to find it yourself? :p

yes i am :P
Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#47 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts
The problem with Sonic 4 Episode 1 is that it doesn't know what time frame it wants to be in. Let's give it current gen graphics and motion controls, yet go back to its own roots and what supposively made Sonic so great. As a result: Sonic 4 is considered dated. I understand the "nostalgia" like Mega Man 9 / 10, but the difference they went all out and made it totally retro. Sonic 4 is stuck in between the past and present and therefore is unfortunately a mess.
Avatar image for burgeg
burgeg

3599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#48 burgeg
Member since 2005 • 3599 Posts

The problem with Sonic 4 Episode 1 is that it doesn't know what time frame it wants to be in. Let's give it current gen graphics and motion controls, yet go back to its own roots and what supposively made Sonic so great. As a result: Sonic 4 is considered dated. I understand the "nostalgia" like Mega Man 9 / 10, but the difference they went all out and made it totally retro. Sonic 4 is stuck in between the past and present and therefore is unfortunately a mess. wiifan001
Nope. Here's the thing. Classic Sonic is NOT dated. Sonic 4 plays considerably worse than the 16 bit games. Sonic 4 could easily have played as an outstanding sequel as good as the classic series whilst having certain modern elements. The gameplay of Sonic 4 just isn't anywhere as good as the classic Sonic games. It's nothing to do with them being dated. There is no franchise from that era that holds up as well as the Sonic games.

Sega had two options. They could have gone the Megaman 9 route and gone all 16 bit. This would have worked for Sonic no question. The other option is to go the NSMB route. Retain the same basic gameplay but include modern things like todays graphics, some new moves and improved gameplay. This would have worked for Sonic. Unfortunately Sega chose secret option C. A cheap downloadable game with significantly worse physics, controls, level design, less characters, power-ups, levels and bonus stages than the true sequel to that series should have. It throws in classic references simply for nostalgic value. It has NSMB type things with the improved graphics and it does add one new move, but when they take away so many things Sonic 3 had, that one new move is no longer an advancement. NSMB didn't regress. Sonic 4 did.

Avatar image for garrett_duffman
garrett_duffman

10684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#49 garrett_duffman
Member since 2004 • 10684 Posts
[QUOTE="garrett_duffman"]I just preordered this today, 55% for the hat, 45% for the gameRod90
Hahahahaha, would you actually wear that in public?

yep. November 16 I am taking off work, picking up the game, wearing my hat all around while playing it, then the next day at school I promised my friends that I would wear it all day during class
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#50 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="wiifan001"]The problem with Sonic 4 Episode 1 is that it doesn't know what time frame it wants to be in. Let's give it current gen graphics and motion controls, yet go back to its own roots and what supposively made Sonic so great. As a result: Sonic 4 is considered dated. I understand the "nostalgia" like Mega Man 9 / 10, but the difference they went all out and made it totally retro. Sonic 4 is stuck in between the past and present and therefore is unfortunately a mess.

this topic is about sonic colors :?