NOA president Fils-Aime giving consideration to huge Microsoft titles!!!

No, it means nothing. All it shows is that Reg has respect for other companies and the games they make.

Also, who said there was only gonna be one more brawl character?

No, it means nothing. All it shows is that Reg has respect for other companies and the games they make.

Also, who said there was only gonna be one more brawl character?

LOLhahaDEAD

Last Brawl Character?

Wtf.

Anyways, Idoubt it, the Halo graphics would have to be crappified to the max to work on the Wii, and annoying gamers would not stop whining, and of course 360 fanboys will laugh at it and call it the "Gaylo" version of Halo.

[QUOTE="LOLhahaDEAD"]

No, it means nothing. All it shows is that Reg has respect for other companies and the games they make.

Also, who said there was only gonna be one more brawl character?

nintendofreak_2

I don't think he was talking about 3rd party characters. He just said hidden and unrevealed. that doesn't necessarily mean 3rd party.

I don't think Halo fanboys would buy the Wii if Nintendo releases a Halo game for it, they would still prefer the Xbox because of the graphics.Thiago26792

[QUOTE="nintendofreak_2"][QUOTE="LOLhahaDEAD"]

No, it means nothing. All it shows is that Reg has respect for other companies and the games they make.

Also, who said there was only gonna be one more brawl character?

LOLhahaDEAD

I don't think he was talking about 3rd party characters. He just said hidden and unrevealed. that doesn't necessarily mean 3rd party.

Halo = Xbox
I don't think that it's going to ever come to the Wii. It might be nice if it did, but I doubt that would happen. It would be nice to get Bungie to make a Wii game though. I'm sure they're all sick of making Halo games and are looking to branch out now that they left Microsoft.Ospov

I think bungie was makinga halo game for the ds but I think it got cancelled or something

well it looks fake to me but maybe I'm wrong:?

well it looks fake to me but maybe I'm wrong:?

hyrueprince11

[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

well it looks fake to me but maybe I'm wrong:?

Eastwick_playa7

this pics look much better http://ds.ign.com/objects/874/874110.html

this pics look much better http://ds.ign.com/objects/874/874110.html

hyrueprince11

The simple fact is the Wii just isn't powerful enough to run Halo 3 or Bioshock. I don't just mean HD output either.

The low specs of the Wii are a double edged sword.

On one hand it means we can all buy the system cheap from the start and Nintendo makes a profit on every Wii sold. The bad side is the Wii will never get versions of games like Bioshock, Assassins Creed, Mass Effect, Oblivion, Call of Duty 4, Dead Rising, Grand Theft Auto 4, Halo 3, Metal Gear Solid 4, Orange Box etc that would be anything near quality of those found on PC, 360 and PS3.

As a true gamer, it must be hard missing out on games like those. At least the Wii has a cool controller. Nintendo probably didn't give the Wii high specs because they would've had to sell the Wii at a loss like MS and Sony had to do with their consoles.

I think all Wii owners should accept the Wii for what it is. A platform for Nintendos first party games and quirky third party titles. Forget about high-end games like Bioshock and Halo 3 that require lots of processing power and RAM.

[QUOTE="hyrueprince11"]

this pics look much better http://ds.ign.com/objects/874/874110.html

nintendofreak_2

there really was a Halo DS though even if thats not it, they really got as far as the beta development of Halo DS.

The simple fact is the Wii just isn't powerful enough to run Halo 3 or Bioshock. I don't just mean HD output either.

The low specs of the Wii are a double edged sword.

On one hand it means we can all buy the system cheap from the start and Nintendo makes a profit on every Wii sold. The bad side is the Wii will never get versions of games like Bioshock, Assassins Creed, Mass Effect, Oblivion, Call of Duty 4, Dead Rising, Grand Theft Auto 4, Halo 3, Metal Gear Solid 4, Orange Box etc that would be anything near quality of those found on PC, 360 and PS3.

As a true gamer, it must be hard missing out on games like those. At least the Wii has a cool controller. Nintendo probably didn't give the Wii high specs because they would've had to sell the Wii at a loss like MS and Sony had to do with their consoles.

I think all Wii owners should accept the Wii for what it is. A platform for Nintendos first party games and quirky third party titles. Forget about high-end games like Bioshock and Halo 3 that require lots of processing power and RAM.

x-2tha-z

[QUOTE="x-2tha-z"]

The simple fact is the Wii just isn't powerful enough to run Halo 3 or Bioshock. I don't just mean HD output either.

The low specs of the Wii are a double edged sword.

On one hand it means we can all buy the system cheap from the start and Nintendo makes a profit on every Wii sold. The bad side is the Wii will never get versions of games like Bioshock, Assassins Creed, Mass Effect, Oblivion, Call of Duty 4, Dead Rising, Grand Theft Auto 4, Halo 3, Metal Gear Solid 4, Orange Box etc that would be anything near quality of those found on PC, 360 and PS3.

As a true gamer, it must be hard missing out on games like those. At least the Wii has a cool controller. Nintendo probably didn't give the Wii high specs because they would've had to sell the Wii at a loss like MS and Sony had to do with their consoles.

I think all Wii owners should accept the Wii for what it is. A platform for Nintendos first party games and quirky third party titles. Forget about high-end games like Bioshock and Halo 3 that require lots of processing power and RAM.

Eastwick_playa7

It'll never happen. Halo coming out on Wii would be like Metroid Prime coming out on 360. Microsoft owns the Halo franchise, not Bungie. Bungie say they are independent but their games will still be published by Microsoft. The only difference is Bungie is now second party instead of first.

You made a comment about graphics. I said Wii couldn't run these games because it doesn't have the processing power to govern the complex AI, physics, vehicle combat and large environments or track deformation found in games like Sega Rally and Motorstorm or hundreds of zombies on screen like in Dead Rising.

Wii doesn't have the processing power to deal with all that information.

Playingthese games on Wii would be like playing Metroid Prime 3 on a GBA.

[QUOTE="Thiago26792"]I don't think Halo fanboys would buy the Wii if Nintendo releases a Halo game for it, they would still prefer the Xbox because of the graphics.Eastwick_playa7

Halo fanboys already had a 360 for GRAW, GoW, etc...

[QUOTE="Eastwick_playa7"][QUOTE="x-2tha-z"]

The simple fact is the Wii just isn't powerful enough to run Halo 3 or Bioshock. I don't just mean HD output either.

The low specs of the Wii are a double edged sword.

On one hand it means we can all buy the system cheap from the start and Nintendo makes a profit on every Wii sold. The bad side is the Wii will never get versions of games like Bioshock, Assassins Creed, Mass Effect, Oblivion, Call of Duty 4, Dead Rising, Grand Theft Auto 4, Halo 3, Metal Gear Solid 4, Orange Box etc that would be anything near quality of those found on PC, 360 and PS3.

As a true gamer, it must be hard missing out on games like those. At least the Wii has a cool controller. Nintendo probably didn't give the Wii high specs because they would've had to sell the Wii at a loss like MS and Sony had to do with their consoles.

I think all Wii owners should accept the Wii for what it is. A platform for Nintendos first party games and quirky third party titles. Forget about high-end games like Bioshock and Halo 3 that require lots of processing power and RAM.

x-2tha-z

It'll never happen. Halo coming out on Wii would be like Metroid Prime coming out on 360. Microsoft owns the Halo franchise, not Bungie. Bungie say they are independent but their games will still be published by Microsoft. The only difference is Bungie is now second party instead of first.

You made a comment about graphics. I said Wii couldn't run these games because it doesn't have the processing power to govern the complex AI, physics, vehicle combat and large environments or track deformation found in games like Sega Rally and Motorstorm or hundreds of zombies on screen like in Dead Rising.

Wii doesn't have the processing power to deal with all that information.

Playingthese games on Wii would be like playing Metroid Prime 3 on a GBA.

[QUOTE="x-2tha-z"][QUOTE="Eastwick_playa7"][QUOTE="x-2tha-z"]

The simple fact is the Wii just isn't powerful enough to run Halo 3 or Bioshock. I don't just mean HD output either.

The low specs of the Wii are a double edged sword.

On one hand it means we can all buy the system cheap from the start and Nintendo makes a profit on every Wii sold. The bad side is the Wii will never get versions of games like Bioshock, Assassins Creed, Mass Effect, Oblivion, Call of Duty 4, Dead Rising, Grand Theft Auto 4, Halo 3, Metal Gear Solid 4, Orange Box etc that would be anything near quality of those found on PC, 360 and PS3.

As a true gamer, it must be hard missing out on games like those. At least the Wii has a cool controller. Nintendo probably didn't give the Wii high specs because they would've had to sell the Wii at a loss like MS and Sony had to do with their consoles.

I think all Wii owners should accept the Wii for what it is. A platform for Nintendos first party games and quirky third party titles. Forget about high-end games like Bioshock and Halo 3 that require lots of processing power and RAM.

Eastwick_playa7

It'll never happen. Halo coming out on Wii would be like Metroid Prime coming out on 360. Microsoft owns the Halo franchise, not Bungie. Bungie say they are independent but their games will still be published by Microsoft. The only difference is Bungie is now second party instead of first.

You made a comment about graphics. I said Wii couldn't run these games because it doesn't have the processing power to govern the complex AI, physics, vehicle combat and large environments or track deformation found in games like Sega Rally and Motorstorm or hundreds of zombies on screen like in Dead Rising.

Wii doesn't have the processing power to deal with all that information.

Playingthese games on Wii would be like playing Metroid Prime 3 on a GBA.

There is a game called Halo Wars in development. It isn't developed by Bungie but it's 360 exclusive. Peter Jackson is working on a Halo game that isn't developed by Bungie and it too is 360 exclusive. I haven't heard of any lawsuits from Bungie.

When I said complex physics engine I was talking about games like Half-Life 2, Portal, Motorstorm (when you crash your vehicle smashes into a shower of parts), Crysis. Games like those. What PS2 game has a complex physics engine? I do remember a PS2 version of Half-Life that was a stinking pile of crap.

The simple fact is the Wii just isn't powerful enough to run Halo 3 or Bioshock. I don't just mean HD output either.

The low specs of the Wii are a double edged sword.

On one hand it means we can all buy the system cheap from the start and Nintendo makes a profit on every Wii sold. The bad side is the Wii will never get versions of games like Bioshock, Assassins Creed, Mass Effect, Oblivion, Call of Duty 4, Dead Rising, Grand Theft Auto 4, Halo 3, Metal Gear Solid 4, Orange Box etc that would be anything near quality of those found on PC, 360 and PS3.

As a true gamer, it must be hard missing out on games like those. At least the Wii has a cool controller. Nintendo probably didn't give the Wii high specs because they would've had to sell the Wii at a loss like MS and Sony had to do with their consoles.

I think all Wii owners should accept the Wii for what it is. A platform for Nintendos first party games and quirky third party titles. Forget about high-end games like Bioshock and Halo 3 that require lots of processing power and RAM.

x-2tha-z

[QUOTE="x-2tha-z"]

The simple fact is the Wii just isn't powerful enough to run Halo 3 or Bioshock. I don't just mean HD output either.

The low specs of the Wii are a double edged sword.

On one hand it means we can all buy the system cheap from the start and Nintendo makes a profit on every Wii sold. The bad side is the Wii will never get versions of games like Bioshock, Assassins Creed, Mass Effect, Oblivion, Call of Duty 4, Dead Rising, Grand Theft Auto 4, Halo 3, Metal Gear Solid 4, Orange Box etc that would be anything near quality of those found on PC, 360 and PS3.

As a true gamer, it must be hard missing out on games like those. At least the Wii has a cool controller. Nintendo probably didn't give the Wii high specs because they would've had to sell the Wii at a loss like MS and Sony had to do with their consoles.

I think all Wii owners should accept the Wii for what it is. A platform for Nintendos first party games and quirky third party titles. Forget about high-end games like Bioshock and Halo 3 that require lots of processing power and RAM.

dieworm

Oh my god. Why do people on this board keep trying to turn what I said into a discussion about graphics? How many more times do I have to say it? I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT GRAPHICS!

It's surprising how much value Wii owners put on graphics. I thought you guys didn't care about having good graphics?

Halo 3 looks a lot better than Halo 2. There's no way the original Xbox would be able to run Halo 3. Even the campaign mode in Halo 3has epic battles with literally dozens of vehicles involved. Each following it's own AI pattern and adopting to the changing battle. Then there's the online part and the revelation that is saved films. Do some research on the saved film feature in Halo 3. There's no way that could've been done on the original Xbox or Wii. Have you even played Halo 3?

I haven't played Metroid Prime 3 but I do own and love the first 2 Prime games on GameCube. Say what you want but Prime games have never been noted for large scale epic battles and complex enemy AI.

When I said Wii couldn't run these games I was talking about processing power and RAM used for gameplay, NOT RENDERING GRAPHICS. That's done by the 360's custom built ATI graphics card.

Even gamespot. One of the harshest reviewers around these days agree. Halo 3 9.5.......Prime 3 8.5..........

I am getting a Wii soon though and I'm looking forward to playing Prime 3 but I don't think it'll be better than Halo 3. That's my opinion. I don't think Metroid games are better than Halo games and the vast majority of gamers out there will agree with me. There's a reason it's one of the most successful franchises EVER.

dear god, reggie shows some respect for some good games and now everyone thinks that they will port to the wii...ughh the september surprise all over again

[QUOTE="dieworm"][QUOTE="x-2tha-z"]

The simple fact is the Wii just isn't powerful enough to run Halo 3 or Bioshock. I don't just mean HD output either.

The low specs of the Wii are a double edged sword.

On one hand it means we can all buy the system cheap from the start and Nintendo makes a profit on every Wii sold. The bad side is the Wii will never get versions of games like Bioshock, Assassins Creed, Mass Effect, Oblivion, Call of Duty 4, Dead Rising, Grand Theft Auto 4, Halo 3, Metal Gear Solid 4, Orange Box etc that would be anything near quality of those found on PC, 360 and PS3.

As a true gamer, it must be hard missing out on games like those. At least the Wii has a cool controller. Nintendo probably didn't give the Wii high specs because they would've had to sell the Wii at a loss like MS and Sony had to do with their consoles.

I think all Wii owners should accept the Wii for what it is. A platform for Nintendos first party games and quirky third party titles. Forget about high-end games like Bioshock and Halo 3 that require lots of processing power and RAM.

x-2tha-z

Oh my god. Why do people on this board keep trying to turn what I said into a discussion about graphics? How many more times do I have to say it? I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT GRAPHICS!

It's surprising how much value Wii owners put on graphics. I thought you guys didn't care about having good graphics?

Halo 3 looks a lot better than Halo 2. There's no way the original Xbox would be able to run Halo 3. Even the campaign mode in Halo 3has epic battles with literally dozens of vehicles involved. Each following it's own AI pattern and adopting to the changing battle. Then there's the online part and the revelation that is saved films. Do some research on the saved film feature in Halo 3. There's no way that could've been done on the original Xbox or Wii. Have you even played Halo 3?

I haven't played Metroid Prime 3 but I do own and love the first 2 Prime games on GameCube. Say what you want but Prime games have never been noted for large scale epic battles and complex enemy AI.

When I said Wii couldn't run these games I was talking about processing power and RAM used for gameplay, NOT RENDERING GRAPHICS. That's done by the 360's custom built ATI graphics card.

Even gamespot. One of the harshest reviewers around these days agree. Halo 3 9.5.......Prime 3 8.5..........

I am getting a Wii soon though and I'm looking forward to playing Prime 3 but I don't think it'll be better than Halo 3. That's my opinion. I don't think Metroid games are better than Halo games and the vast majority of gamers out there will agree with me. There's a reason it's one of the most successful franchises EVER.

And who cares what the "vast majority" thinks? So by that logic Britteny Spears>any band? The "vast majority" of people are pretty stupid and ignorant.

There's no way that could've been done on the original Xbox or Wii.

Smash Bros. Brawl has that moron.

One of the harshest reviewers around these days agree. Halo 3 9.5.......Prime 3 8.5..........

They also think WarioWare>Prime 3. They also think Geist>Ratchet and Clank FTOD. But I bet that's fact to you. :roll:

And why did a talk about graphics and processing power turn into a "OMG GAMESPOT SAIZ HALO 3>>>PRIME 3 LOL"

And if you're talking about JUST processing power like you said, BioShock could be done on the Xbox. :|

Even the campaign mode in Halo 3has epic battles with literally dozens of vehicles involved.

Battalion Wars?

Each following it's own AI pattern and adopting to the changing battle.

Halo 3's AI vehicles. lol

And who cares what the "vast majority" thinks? So by that logic Britteny Spears>any band?

dieworm

lol, I don't know a single person that thinks Britney Spears is great at all.

[QUOTE="Eastwick_playa7"][QUOTE="x-2tha-z"][QUOTE="Eastwick_playa7"][QUOTE="x-2tha-z"]

The simple fact is the Wii just isn't powerful enough to run Halo 3 or Bioshock. I don't just mean HD output either.

The low specs of the Wii are a double edged sword.

On one hand it means we can all buy the system cheap from the start and Nintendo makes a profit on every Wii sold. The bad side is the Wii will never get versions of games like Bioshock, Assassins Creed, Mass Effect, Oblivion, Call of Duty 4, Dead Rising, Grand Theft Auto 4, Halo 3, Metal Gear Solid 4, Orange Box etc that would be anything near quality of those found on PC, 360 and PS3.

As a true gamer, it must be hard missing out on games like those. At least the Wii has a cool controller. Nintendo probably didn't give the Wii high specs because they would've had to sell the Wii at a loss like MS and Sony had to do with their consoles.

I think all Wii owners should accept the Wii for what it is. A platform for Nintendos first party games and quirky third party titles. Forget about high-end games like Bioshock and Halo 3 that require lots of processing power and RAM.

x-2tha-z

It'll never happen. Halo coming out on Wii would be like Metroid Prime coming out on 360. Microsoft owns the Halo franchise, not Bungie. Bungie say they are independent but their games will still be published by Microsoft. The only difference is Bungie is now second party instead of first.

You made a comment about graphics. I said Wii couldn't run these games because it doesn't have the processing power to govern the complex AI, physics, vehicle combat and large environments or track deformation found in games like Sega Rally and Motorstorm or hundreds of zombies on screen like in Dead Rising.

Wii doesn't have the processing power to deal with all that information.

Playingthese games on Wii would be like playing Metroid Prime 3 on a GBA.

There is a game called Halo Wars in development. It isn't developed by Bungie but it's 360 exclusive. Peter Jackson is working on a Halo game that isn't developed by Bungie and it too is 360 exclusive. I haven't heard of any lawsuits from Bungie.

When I said complex physics engine I was talking about games like Half-Life 2, Portal, Motorstorm (when you crash your vehicle smashes into a shower of parts), Crysis. Games like those. What PS2 game has a complex physics engine? I do remember a PS2 version of Half-Life that was a stinking pile of crap.

http://games.ign.com/objects/025/025170.html

this says bungie is working on all of those.

Even the campaign mode in Halo 3has epic battles with literally dozens of vehicles involved.

Battalion Wars?

Each following it's own AI pattern and adopting to the changing battle.

Halo 3's AI vehicles. lol

dieworm

Ok "dude". First, I never resorted to childish name calling. I don't appreciate being called a moron.

Second, It's nothing like Battalion Wars LOL.

Third. Yes, Halo 3 has vehicles controlled by the AI. You can operate the gun turret of a Warthog if you want and one of the AI controlled marines will drive it around. Obviously every enemy vehicle is AI controlled.

Are you ******* stupid?

I'm 99.9% sure that the Micrsoft/Bungie split had Microsoft retaining all rights/options on the Halo franchise. I don't thing it's legally possible to bring it to the Wii. -Despacio-

I'm 100% sure.

[QUOTE="dieworm"]

Even the campaign mode in Halo 3has epic battles with literally dozens of vehicles involved.

Battalion Wars?

Each following it's own AI pattern and adopting to the changing battle.

Halo 3's AI vehicles. lol

x-2tha-z

Ok "dude". First, I never resorted to childish name calling. I don't appreciate being called a moron.

Second, It's nothing like Battalion Wars LOL.

Third. Yes, Halo 3 has vehicles controlled by the AI. You can operate the gun turret of a Warthog if you want and one of the AI controlled marines will drive it around. Obviously every enemy vehicle is AI controlled.

Are you ******* stupid?

Unless you wanna get owned you basically HAVE to drive.

[QUOTE="x-2tha-z"][QUOTE="dieworm"]

Even the campaign mode in Halo 3has epic battles with literally dozens of vehicles involved.

Battalion Wars?

Each following it's own AI pattern and adopting to the changing battle.

Halo 3's AI vehicles. lol

Hyrule-master

Ok "dude". First, I never resorted to childish name calling. I don't appreciate being called a moron.

Second, It's nothing like Battalion Wars LOL.

Third. Yes, Halo 3 has vehicles controlled by the AI. You can operate the gun turret of a Warthog if you want and one of the AI controlled marines will drive it around. Obviously every enemy vehicle is AI controlled.

Are you ******* stupid?

Unless you wanna get owned you basically HAVE to drive.