I've never understood why people think that casual and hardcore gaming is an either/or thing. Every single hardcore gamer in existence today probably began as a casual gamer. You don't go from zero to playing thirteen hours a day in one motion. Some people who are picking up a Wii as their first console will never play anything other than Wii Sports and Wii Fit, but others might become curious what else there is, like what they find, and slowly start to become a more dedicated gamer. Casual gamers are important; if nothing is ever created for casual gamers, then video gaming will die in one generation. That's just a fact.GabuEx
Here's the way I see it: It's either going to end up in two ways.1. The Wii will attract more casual gamers, and in future generations, those gamers are going to get more passionate about gaming, causing more sales and an increase on those hardcore games that we're missing out on now. This will lead to a prosperity in video games.or....
2. The Wii will prove that as long as you can sell shovelware the right way, the casual audience will eat it up; and set the stage for PS3 and 360 going to same way as the Wii. This will probably lead to the demise of gaming.Lyphe2k
I think the problem is one of definition. Casual gamers are not the same as casual games. As Gabu rightly pointed out, a casual gamer is merely defined by the number of hours they play. I, by definition, am a casual gamer cuz I'm in university most of the year and don't have that much time to play. But just because someone is a casual gamer does not mean they enjoy the so-called "casual games" that are being churned out for them.
The games being made for this insurgency of casual gamers are: simple, lack plot, easy, basic, novelty. Developers are treating casual gamers as if they're idiots and simply wouldn't comprehend something unless it is dumbed down, just because these gamers don't play as much as others. How much you play affects only the time it will take you to complete a game, not the kind of games you enjoy, same with books and movies. You can be a voracious reader and only read trashy page-turners and you can watch movies rarely, but be a connoisseur of foreign cinema.
So I guess the reason why I quoted Lyphe as well is because I'm trying to say that the problem is not with casual gamers - they're not going to be the ones to decide which way it goes. The problem is with developers, including but certainly not limited to Nintendo. Unless they realise that casual gamers will enjoy Okami and Mario if they know about them, and are certainly capable of playing them and not getting their pretty little heads confused, we will keep seeing things go in a bad direction for gaming.
Casual gamers are not the enemy and are not to be feared. Developers who think "casual gamer" is synonymous with "confused retard are.
Log in to comment