So where is this Pokemon MMO game that we all have waited for in 10 years?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
Was it only me when I was younger that imagined a MMO Pokemon game when you first got that first GBC Pokemon game? it always seemed so obvious.

The Pokemon franchise is almost outdated or it has at least too little innovation between games IMO, bringing the franchise into the MMO genre would be an amazing improvement and is a total match IMO.

Why hasn't Nintendo done this already?

The Wii is definitely capable of doing this and Nintendo isn't really on a slim budget so I just don't get why Nintendo hasn't tried this yet.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

They don't want to kill the franchise

See that's the kooky thing about companies when it comes to their biggest franchise, they don't want to destroy it

Pokemon moves handhelds and is the strongest title over there.

With the DSi only keeping the DS from death when they unveil the DS 2 they'll have a Pokemon right there waiting for it. It will be the ONLY place you can get it.

If you want offshots that's where the console comes in with Pokemon. You get the console versions to fill in the missing pieces of the games.

Avatar image for freek666
freek666

22312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 freek666
Member since 2007 • 22312 Posts
It is... wait for it... never gonna happen.
Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

They don't want to kill the franchise

See that's the kooky thing about companies when it comes to their biggest franchise, they don't want to destroy it

Pokemon moves handhelds and is the strongest title over there.

With the DSi only keeping the DS from death when they unveil the DS 2 they'll have a Pokemon right there waiting for it. It will be the ONLY place you can get it.

If you want offshots that's where the console comes in with Pokemon. You get the console versions to fill in the missing pieces of the games.

Jaysonguy


I know that companies don't want to kill their biggest franchises but the Pokemon franchise feels exactly like the Monster Hunter franchise. They were created for MMO's but the companies that owns them are too afraid to take that step.
Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts
pokemon mmo... i still dont think it will work besides, it is NOT like MH
Avatar image for stike22
stike22

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 stike22
Member since 2009 • 3401 Posts
HAHA! look everyone Pokemon is over now, all the pokemon have been shown and well the only thing left to do is make a 3D one or an MMO...we all know it would sell mils...it would have been better if they did it before WoW...honestly Pokemon is about the only thing that could have stopped WoW...but to late now. Anyway they can't do anything else except, a console game or a MMO so it had got to happen eventually...I don't know how they are gonna do the pokemon battles though...it would have to be like pokemon stadium...which really isn't that great for battles...honestly they could do it but well it would lag horrifically with all the pokemon battles there would be...so it really isn't easy but they could still do it...not on Wii though, need a stronger console for it and they already have a pokemon for Wii.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

They don't want to kill the franchise

See that's the kooky thing about companies when it comes to their biggest franchise, they don't want to destroy it

Pokemon moves handhelds and is the strongest title over there.

With the DSi only keeping the DS from death when they unveil the DS 2 they'll have a Pokemon right there waiting for it. It will be the ONLY place you can get it.

If you want offshots that's where the console comes in with Pokemon. You get the console versions to fill in the missing pieces of the games.

JLF1



I know that companies don't want to kill their biggest franchises but the Pokemon franchise feels exactly like the Monster Hunter franchise. They were created for MMO's but the companies that owns them are too afraid to take that step.

Pokemon was absolutely not created for the MMO ****/p>

Pokemon was created for the sole intent of one player's journey through the country seeing what Pokemon they could find

As a child the creator spent his time looking for various animals of every species (although a large chunk were insects) and seeing just how many he could find, he then made a game that shared that same method.

The only time interaction goes on is in the trade rooms where users can "show off" their collections and trade specimens

There is one underlying element in all of the Pokemon games and that's going on a journey, learning about yourself, and making the right choices along the way.

Making a MMO destroys all of that

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
pokemon mmo... i still dont think it will work besides, it is NOT like MHfunsohng

I know it's not like MH in gameplay but in the fact that they are (IMO) destined to be MMO's.

Don't you think the Pokemon world as an MMO where you hunt down your Pokemons and battles other players would work? I'm not takling about the structure the Pokemon games has now would work but the world itself would work very good.
Avatar image for stike22
stike22

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 stike22
Member since 2009 • 3401 Posts
Its not just MMO, what about an actual 3D adventure...that is the only thing they can do...if not then an MMO.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

HAHA! look everyone Pokemon is over now, all the pokemon have been shown and well the only thing left to do is make a 3D one or an MMO...we all know it would sell mils...it would have been better if they did it before WoW...honestly Pokemon is about the only thing that could have stopped WoW...but to late now. Anyway they can't do anything else except, a console game or a MMO so it had got to happen eventually...I don't know how they are gonna do the pokemon battles though...it would have to be like pokemon stadium...which really isn't that great for battles...honestly they could do it but well it would lag horrifically with all the pokemon battles there would be...so it really isn't easy but they could still do it...not on Wii though, need a stronger console for it and they already have a pokemon for Wii.stike22

Wrong in about every possible way

Pokemon is over because we've seen them all?
Are you kidding

Pokemon is that world's animals. So far there have been just about 500 species found

Want to take a guess and how many animal species there are on Earth? I'll pick the lowest number on record, 3

Million

There are somewhere between 3 and 30 million distinct species of animal on Earth.

Is a Pokemon console game going to show up?

Of course not. If that were true they would have released one on the Gamecube when it was doing so poorly

Avatar image for Head_of_games
Head_of_games

10859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Head_of_games
Member since 2007 • 10859 Posts
Indeed, the franchise is a perfect fit for an MMO. It would breath new life into pokemon and be a system seller. I'm sick off horrid console pokemon games, let there be Pokemon MMORPG!!!
Avatar image for deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1

2436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
Member since 2009 • 2436 Posts

Ha, the Wii being able to handle an MMO? Are you kidding? The ps3/360 can barely do that let alone the Wii. And Back in the times of GBC I don't even think there were more than like 2 or 3 mmo's. Nobody wanted an MMO of anything until the last 3 years or so, now they've suddenly gotten huge.

And there already is a pokemon MMO, unofficial of course called Pokemon: Den of Ages. Although it would be pretty fun, it would get stale very very quick. And here are some good reasons I can come up with

1) Pokemon would not make a good MMO due to its gameplay.

Pokemon always has been a turnbased game, and have you ever seen any turn based MMOs? I doubt it and there's a good reason why. Having Isolated battles kind of ruins the MMO feel and anyways, why not just have a pokemon battle lobby, it would work the same.

2) The ponit of Pokemon has always been to win all the gym battles and beat the elite four.

Gym battles are a 1 on 1 thing and making gym battles like raids in WoW, it wouldn't be pokemon anymore. That's just not how it works.

3) Pokemon itself is more of an independant affair.

If there was a pokemon MMO, you would just be playing alone but with other people walking around. Battles are not done as a group, and multiple people cannot catch the same pokemon so you'd be playing alone but there would just be people walking around you.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

Pokemon was absolutely not created for the MMO ****/p>

Pokemon was created for the sole intent of one player's journey through the country seeing what Pokemon they could find

As a child the creator spent his time looking for various animals of every species (although a large chunk were insects) and seeing just how many he could find, he then made a game that shared that same method.

The only time interaction goes on is in the trade rooms where users can "show off" their collections and trade specimens

There is one underlying element in all of the Pokemon games and that's going on a journey, learning about yourself, and making the right choices along the way.

Making a MMO destroys all of that

Jaysonguy


Why couldn't you do that same journey in an MMO?

from my own experiance from playing Pokemon games they have been about getting pokemons, fighting other's pokemons and that's it.

I'm not talking about taking out the pure game structure from the games and insert them into a MMO. I'm talking about taking the Pokemon world and bring it into an MMO.

Besides games like Pokemon Stadium and The Pokemon Dungeon games already destroyed that journey from the previous traditional games.

I'm not talking about killing of the traditional Pokemon game but adding an MMO into the franchise.

Couldn't you imagine an open world where players from all over the world would hunt, collect and trade pokemons and enter them in tournaments where you would fight real players instead of NPC's?
Avatar image for Head_of_games
Head_of_games

10859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Head_of_games
Member since 2007 • 10859 Posts

Ha, the Wii being able to handle an MMO? Are you kidding? The ps3/360 can barely do that let alone the Wii. And Back in the times of GBC I don't even think there were more than like 2 or 3 mmo's. Nobody wanted an MMO of anything until the last 3 years or so, now they've suddenly gotten huge.

And there already is a pokemon MMO, unofficial of course called Pokemon: Den of Ages. Although it would be pretty fun, it would get stale very very quick. And here are some good reasons I can come up with

1) Pokemon would not make a good MMO due to its gameplay.

Pokemon always has been a turnbased game, and have you ever seen any turn based MMOs? I doubt it and there's a good reason why. Having Isolated battles kind of ruins the MMO feel and anyways, why not just have a pokemon battle lobby, it would work the same.

2) The ponit of Pokemon has always been to win all the gym battles and beat the elite four.

Gym battles are a 1 on 1 thing and making gym battles like raids in WoW, it wouldn't be pokemon anymore. That's just not how it works.

3) Pokemon itself is more of an independant affair.

If there was a pokemon MMO, you would just be playing alone but with other people walking around. Battles are not done as a group, and multiple people cannot catch the same pokemon so you'd be playing alone but there would just be people walking around you.

ColdP1zza
Well obviously the formula would have to be altered in many ways, but it would still be pokemon at it's core. I remember there was a great thread about this back at the Nintendo Nsider forums. Some guy had a genius idea about a new continent being discovered and all the trainers setting out to settle it. The thread was so awesome I can't even begin to describe the idea, but suffice to say that it got hundred upon hundreds of replies and everyone loved it.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#15 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Pokemon was absolutely not created for the MMO ****/p>

Pokemon was created for the sole intent of one player's journey through the country seeing what Pokemon they could find

As a child the creator spent his time looking for various animals of every species (although a large chunk were insects) and seeing just how many he could find, he then made a game that shared that same method.

The only time interaction goes on is in the trade rooms where users can "show off" their collections and trade specimens

There is one underlying element in all of the Pokemon games and that's going on a journey, learning about yourself, and making the right choices along the way.

Making a MMO destroys all of that

JLF1



Why couldn't you do that same journey in an MMO?

from my own experiance from playing Pokemon games they have been about getting pokemons, fighting other's pokemons and that's it.

I'm not talking about taking out the pure game structure from the games and insert them into a MMO. I'm talking about taking the Pokemon world and bring it into an MMO.

Besides games like Pokemon Stadium and The Pokemon Dungeon games already destroyed that journey from the previous traditional games.

I'm not talking about killing of the traditional Pokemon game but adding an MMO into the franchise.

Couldn't you imagine an open world where players from all over the world would hunt, collect and trade pokemons and enter them in tournaments where you would fight real players instead of NPC's?

Then you're not talking Pokemon

I mean why fit something that is not at all like you're saying into a different mold?

Why not start a new franchise?

Avatar image for stike22
stike22

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 stike22
Member since 2009 • 3401 Posts
First of all Pokemon and animals on earth have very little relation except looks. Second pokemon will never be able to go to million pokemon that would be stupid and few people would bother with it. third they cannot keep going on with these versions...its seriously dead now...pokemon Red, Blue, Gold, Silver...and the rest of them...whats next? black and white...Pokemon is dying, its not like Mario it can't keep going forever. Fourth they have done everything the only options left are 3D Adventure or MMO...only options left. Fifth pokemon isn't making half as much as it used to.
Avatar image for Head_of_games
Head_of_games

10859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Head_of_games
Member since 2007 • 10859 Posts
[QUOTE="stike22"] third they cannot keep going on with these versions...its seriously dead now...pokemon Red, Blue, Gold, Silver...and the rest of them...whats next? black and white...Pokemon is dying, its not like Mario it can't keep going forever.

Pokemon is far, very far, from death. There will always be a new set of kids who will love it for years while those of us who have been fans since the start will have become bored with it long, long, long ago.
Avatar image for stike22
stike22

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 stike22
Member since 2009 • 3401 Posts
They couldn't make Pokemon online for Wii...as I have said they have done a pokemon stadium for Wii but it hardly sold...and well Wii can't handle it because the Wii wasn't designed for Pokemon. The next console which won't be around for years talking 4yrs or more...Nintendo will probably make a powerful machine that can handle such things as MMOs...if they Pokemon will 100% be on it.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1

2436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
Member since 2009 • 2436 Posts

First of all Pokemon and animals on earth have very little relation except looks. Second pokemon will never be able to go to million pokemon that would be stupid and few people would bother with it. third they cannot keep going on with these versions...its seriously dead now...pokemon Red, Blue, Gold, Silver...and the rest of them...whats next? black and white...Pokemon is dying, its not like Mario it can't keep going forever. Fourth they have done everything the only options left are 3D Adventure or MMO...only options left. Fifth pokemon isn't making half as much as it used to.stike22

Your'e an idiot, Pokemon Diamond/Pearl is the best selling game on DS.

Avatar image for nnfnnfnfnnfnnf
nnfnnfnfnnfnnf

188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 nnfnnfnfnnfnnf
Member since 2007 • 188 Posts
I don't think we'll ever see a pokemon MMO but at some point I bet there will be a 3D pokemon...when a handheld is able to do it.
Avatar image for stike22
stike22

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 stike22
Member since 2009 • 3401 Posts
[QUOTE="stike22"] third they cannot keep going on with these versions...its seriously dead now...pokemon Red, Blue, Gold, Silver...and the rest of them...whats next? black and white...Pokemon is dying, its not like Mario it can't keep going forever. Head_of_games
Pokemon is far, very far, from death. There will always be a new set of kids who will love it for years while those of us who have been fans since the start will have become bored with it long, long, long ago.

Is it selling like it used to? NO. so its dead...or dying would be more correct...of course kids will always love it...but just because a series is still going doesn't mean its not dead...just that kids still take interest in it and its slowly dying...series can't go on forever...well Mario can but Mario and Pokemon are completely different. Pokemon as a game needs something new or it will die and only kids will get it...MMO or 3D adventure.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#22 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

First of all Pokemon and animals on earth have very little relation except looks. Second pokemon will never be able to go to million pokemon that would be stupid and few people would bother with it. third they cannot keep going on with these versions...its seriously dead now...pokemon Red, Blue, Gold, Silver...and the rest of them...whats next? black and white...Pokemon is dying, its not like Mario it can't keep going forever. Fourth they have done everything the only options left are 3D Adventure or MMO...only options left. Fifth pokemon isn't making half as much as it used to.stike22

1. Please tell me you're kidding

2. I'm glad that you think the jump is from 500 to one million. The other funny thing is that people said the series could never go larger then 150

3. They think up new titles, they're titles. For some reason you think making a title is difficult. I also hate to break it to you but Pokemon destroys Mario by far. Nintendo gets more sales and more money from Pokemon then it does from Mario.

4. They haven't do everything

5. Pokemon is making more then it ever has. There's a reason why it's Nintendo's number one franchise

Ruby and Sapphire on the GBA over 5 years = 15.4 million
Diamond and Pearl in just under 2 years = 16.67 million

Pokemon Diamond and Pearl also outsold Ruby and Sapphire the first week by half a million per region

I love how people say Pokemon is dead and other things against it. It's stronger then it's ever been and makes more money for Nintendo then any other franchise

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Is it selling like it used to? NO.stike22

You're right, it's not

It's selling better then it used to

Avatar image for stike22
stike22

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 stike22
Member since 2009 • 3401 Posts

[QUOTE="stike22"]First of all Pokemon and animals on earth have very little relation except looks. Second pokemon will never be able to go to million pokemon that would be stupid and few people would bother with it. third they cannot keep going on with these versions...its seriously dead now...pokemon Red, Blue, Gold, Silver...and the rest of them...whats next? black and white...Pokemon is dying, its not like Mario it can't keep going forever. Fourth they have done everything the only options left are 3D Adventure or MMO...only options left. Fifth pokemon isn't making half as much as it used to.ColdP1zza

Your'e an idiot, Pokemon Diamond/Pearl is the best selling game on DS.

Yeh on DS!...as I said series eventually die of they keep doing the same thing...we all have to grow up sometime. Don't be such fanboys I am not saying Pokemon is crap I am saying its boring doing the same thing again and again...it will die if it carries on...IT NEEDS SOMETHING NEW! ask yourselves is pokemon selling better now or before? yeh we all know it was doing much better before.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#25 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

ask yourselves is pokemon selling better now or before?stike22

It's selling better now

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

Then you're not talking Pokemon

I mean why fit something that is not at all like you're saying into a different mold?

Why not start a new franchise?

Jaysonguy

Couldn't the same be argued against Pokemon Stadium or The Pokemon Dungeun games?

The only thing they have in common with the traditional Pokemon games are the fact that they use Pokemon.

The reason I think Pokemon would work great as an MMO is because I like the structure the fiction is based opon.

Players would hunt pokemons (like the traditional games) and fight other people in tournaments (like the Stadium games).

They could create clans, go on journeys together, enter in tournaments, try to discover new pokemons etc etc.

Having 3-4 people in the same clan and search the huge world for new pokemons that no one has seen yet and then enter them in tournaments would create a much stronger bond between the players than any other MMO has yet to do IMO. Why most it be one persons journey when it can be four peoples journey?

You don't even have to be a pokemon fighter, why not a researcher that tries to find out new things about pokemons by studying them in the wild or an explorer which's work is to try to find new pokemons in uncharted territory.

I'm not talking about taking the RPG gameplay from the Pokemon games and turn it into an MMO, that would be impossible. I'm talking about using the Pokemon world and fiction and use that as an MMO because that is a great match IMO.
Avatar image for stike22
stike22

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 stike22
Member since 2009 • 3401 Posts
You all seem quite stubborn that Pokemon is still the best thing in the world so I won't bother arguing anymore, but well honestly it will die...eventually...it will still sell but it won't be as good as it was again...everything needs to grow eventually...if not an MMO how is Pokemon gonna grow? or will it just carry on as it is and eventually it will get old and boring doing the same thing over and over and it will eventually die.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#28 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Then you're not talking Pokemon

I mean why fit something that is not at all like you're saying into a different mold?

Why not start a new franchise?

JLF1


Couldn't the same be argued against Pokemon Stadium or The Pokemon Dungeun games?

The stadium games not so much, they're "expansions" of the regular game on the handheld

A place to hone your team and pick up a few exclusive trinkets while you're at it

You have a better argument with the Dungeon series but that's a game of literal self discovery that you figure out yourself.
Same goes for ranger

The entire franchise (no matter the iteration) is built on playing it solo

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#29 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

You all seem quite stubborn that Pokemon is still the best thing in the world so I won't bother arguing anymorestike22

That's because you keep on saying it's doing poorly for some reason and I have to correct you each time and explain that the franchise is stronger now then it ever was.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts
[QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Then you're not talking Pokemon

I mean why fit something that is not at all like you're saying into a different mold?

Why not start a new franchise?

Jaysonguy


Couldn't the same be argued against Pokemon Stadium or The Pokemon Dungeun games?

The stadium games not so much, they're "expansions" of the regular game on the handheld

A place to hone your team and pick up a few exclusive trinkets while you're at it

You have a better argument with the Dungeon series but that's a game of literal self discovery that you figure out yourself.
Same goes for ranger

The entire franchise (no matter the iteration) is built on playing it solo



I wasn't talking about the multiplayer in the stadium games but the fact that there isn't and kind of journey in them.

But why would it be awful to bring in more players?

Is that journey going to be less important if you do it with another player? IMO no.

Avatar image for stike22
stike22

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 stike22
Member since 2009 • 3401 Posts

[QUOTE="stike22"]You all seem quite stubborn that Pokemon is still the best thing in the world so I won't bother arguing anymoreJaysonguy

That's because you keep on saying it's doing poorly for some reason and I have to correct you each time and explain that the franchise is stronger now then it ever was.

Again can't be bothered to argue but well, first of all I didn't say Pokemon is crap I said its dying doing the same thing and eventually things that do the same thing over and over die unless they do something new...Pokemon is way overdue for something new...the franchise Pokemon was much stronger before when the cartoon, the movies, the cards, the games and everything else was still a fad...only kids do half that stuff anymore...its not as great as it was, that doesn't mean it isn't successful but it isn't no way near as good as it was. Honestly the question is what is Pokemon gonna do continue as it is and slowly die? or actually come up with something original and continue its success? it only has one choice...I personally don't care for MMO but it really is the only option left, they have to do it eventually.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

[QUOTE="stike22"]You all seem quite stubborn that Pokemon is still the best thing in the world so I won't bother arguing anymorestike22

That's because you keep on saying it's doing poorly for some reason and I have to correct you each time and explain that the franchise is stronger now then it ever was.

Again can't be bothered to argue but well, first of all I didn't say Pokemon is crap I said its dying doing the same thing and eventually things that do the same thing over and over die unless they do something new...Pokemon is way overdue for something new...the franchise Pokemon was much stronger before when the cartoon, the movies, the cards, the games and everything else was still a fad...only kids do half that stuff anymore...its not as great as it was, that doesn't mean it isn't successful but it isn't no way near as good as it was. Honestly the question is what is Pokemon gonna do continue as it is and slowly die? or actually come up with something original and continue its success? it only has one choice...I personally don't care for MMO but it really is the only option left, they have to do it eventually.

I'm glad you feel that way, that's your opinion and it's as different as each snowflake is different then each other. It makes you a very special person.

That being said your opinions are not facts and therefore are incorrect when talking about the viability of the franchise

Pokemon Diamond and Pearl are selling million more then any other Pokemon title in history so far and Platinum looks to sell even better.
That's not counting the movies that pull in huge ratings on TV and sell well in the stores, the TV show that still pulls in great numbers, and the card game that STILL goes strong a decade after it caught fire.

That means Pokemon is in more people's homes then ever before and people want even more of Pokemon on the way.

What you're saying is wrong. I'm glad that you're done with the series but the number that are not are bigger then ever before

Avatar image for MindwalkerX
MindwalkerX

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 MindwalkerX
Member since 2008 • 121 Posts
Pokemon MMO IMO is what every pokemon games players have been asking for, i still have hopes that one day they will make one, so you can custom your trainer better(not like in PBR), walk through all the continents, and maybe some kind of raid in the lengedaries' dungeons. Well they already made one with online option, so maybe a Pokemon MMO is not a so distant dream.
Avatar image for bob_newman
bob_newman

8133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 bob_newman
Member since 2006 • 8133 Posts

Jason, what about a game like Pokemon Battle Revolution, but on a grander scale? Like, a game where you bring your Pokemon that you've collected (from the handheld titles) to an open world (like Pokemon Ranch but not crappy), and you meet other players there (playing online) and challenge them into battle?

Isn't that kind of what the series is all about, except that you play computer players by yourself? Why not bring it to an online world? You could battle people, but you could also meet people and hang out and play poke-pool on a poke-table in a pub.

As far as I'm concerned, the series is already set up for something like that, they just need to do it.

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#35 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Jason, what about a game like Pokemon Battle Revolution, but on a grander scale? Like, a game where you bring your Pokemon that you've collected (from the handheld titles) to an open world (like Pokemon Ranch but not crappy), and you meet other players there (playing online) and challenge them into battle?

Isn't that kind of what the series is all about, except that you play computer players by yourself? Why not bring it to an online world? You could battle people, but you could also meet people and hang out and play poke-pool on a poke-table in a pub.

As far as I'm concerned, the series is already set up for something like that, they just need to do it.

bob_newman

They have something like that in Platinum

READ HERE

I have no problem fleshing out the Pokemon centers because that's where the real mingling goes on, it's what it weas designed for.

Avatar image for bob_newman
bob_newman

8133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 bob_newman
Member since 2006 • 8133 Posts
[QUOTE="bob_newman"]

Jason, what about a game like Pokemon Battle Revolution, but on a grander scale? Like, a game where you bring your Pokemon that you've collected (from the handheld titles) to an open world (like Pokemon Ranch but not crappy), and you meet other players there (playing online) and challenge them into battle?

Isn't that kind of what the series is all about, except that you play computer players by yourself? Why not bring it to an online world? You could battle people, but you could also meet people and hang out and play poke-pool on a poke-table in a pub.

As far as I'm concerned, the series is already set up for something like that, they just need to do it.

Jaysonguy

They have something like that in Platinum

READ HERE

I have no problem fleshing out the Pokemon centers because that's where the real mingling goes on, it's what it weas designed for.

Ok, see, this is what I mean. Only, why can't it be on a console? You'd still have to buy the game on the handheld to play it and collect the pokemon, but why not have an add-on (or expansion, if you will) for consoles as well? I think it would be great. I would actually consider buying a Pokemon game if they had something elaborate like that. And it's basically an MMO, only it's more of a concept like Sony's "Home", where you can hang out, play some little games like bowling, pool, etc. (of course, you'll use pokeballs instead of bowling/pool balls), and battle in tournaments and stuff. I think it would work, but at the same time it would keep the main series off of the consoles like you want.
Avatar image for nintendo2200
nintendo2200

373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 nintendo2200
Member since 2009 • 373 Posts
Nintendo doesn't make the pokemon games, Game Freak does!
Avatar image for so_hai
so_hai

4385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#38 so_hai
Member since 2007 • 4385 Posts
There musn't be enough demand for that sort of project.
Avatar image for Makedonijo
Makedonijo

351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 Makedonijo
Member since 2007 • 351 Posts

They don't want to kill the franchise

See that's the kooky thing about companies when it comes to their biggest franchise, they don't want to destroy it

Pokemon moves handhelds and is the strongest title over there.

With the DSi only keeping the DS from death when they unveil the DS 2 they'll have a Pokemon right there waiting for it. It will be the ONLY place you can get it.

If you want offshots that's where the console comes in with Pokemon. You get the console versions to fill in the missing pieces of the games.

Jaysonguy

what do you mean "keeping the ds from death" how is the ds close to death its sold far more than psp or any other handheld and its a success and your acting like the DSi is going to save the ds... from what? the DS has had its life and it was a huge hit

Avatar image for DJ2Cool
DJ2Cool

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 DJ2Cool
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

Indeed, the franchise is a perfect fit for an MMO. It would breath new life into pokemon and be a system seller. I'm sick off horrid console pokemon games, let there be Pokemon MMORPG!!!Head_of_games

this guy knows what he's talking about 8)

Avatar image for ag1052
ag1052

5725

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 ag1052
Member since 2006 • 5725 Posts

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"]Indeed, the franchise is a perfect fit for an MMO. It would breath new life into pokemon and be a system seller. I'm sick off horrid console pokemon games, let there be Pokemon MMORPG!!!DJ2Cool

this guy knows what he's talking about 8)

If you want to diminish someone's importance, put DJ in front of their name: "DJ Abraham Lincoln."
Avatar image for deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1

2436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
Member since 2009 • 2436 Posts

[QUOTE="Head_of_games"][QUOTE="stike22"] third they cannot keep going on with these versions...its seriously dead now...pokemon Red, Blue, Gold, Silver...and the rest of them...whats next? black and white...Pokemon is dying, its not like Mario it can't keep going forever. stike22
Pokemon is far, very far, from death. There will always be a new set of kids who will love it for years while those of us who have been fans since the start will have become bored with it long, long, long ago.

Is it selling like it used to? NO. so its dead...or dying would be more correct...of course kids will always love it...but just because a series is still going doesn't mean its not dead...just that kids still take interest in it and its slowly dying...series can't go on forever...well Mario can but Mario and Pokemon are completely different. Pokemon as a game needs something new or it will die and only kids will get it...MMO or 3D adventure.

It isn't dying its only improving and I don't need a reinventing, I'm happy with the small tweaks and features they keep adding. And just because you got old and moved on doesn't mean the kids younger than you didnt't. Its still a fad to them.

Avatar image for firefox59
firefox59

4530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 firefox59
Member since 2005 • 4530 Posts
Actually I'd prefer a 3rd person action game or something of that nature but I'd be happy with either and they would both sell well.