Something they should add to Zelda. What do you think?

I don't remember having to wait for anything to load in Zelda...WR_Platinum

I vote for: Next gen graphics Completely new and original story. That being said, I wouldn't say no to a remake or sequel to WW, but I would prefer something totally new.Wrecked69

Haha bud, your gonna need to wait a heck of a long time to get to the point where gaming doesnt need to load. Good idea. But it wont happen.Left4Dead666

Its not a totally new idea, and Zelda series has been one of the better games when it comes to loading, but for a immersion factor I would like for them to try and push on even further and remove as many transition points as possible and make the world as open ended and explorable as possible with as little invisible and visible walls(as in hills and embankments we cant climb) as possible. Id really like to see the world, cities, towns and dungeons feel a bit more organic and realistically laid out. And having less area transitions making things more seamless would help to wave those different areas together.enduin

Couldnt of said it any better myself

[QUOTE="Sepewrath"] You people Wrecked69

lol racist, anyway what was so new about WW? It still featured Link, it still featured Zelda, and Ganondorf, and the Triforce, and the Deku, etc. The only thing that was different was the art style, instead of riding a horse you rode a boat from settlement to settlement, so what if they put Link on a mule or a chocobo, would it really be new. WW was not that innovative it stuck to what the series has been doing for years, just with a fresh coat of paint. Theres nothing particularly wrong with that but if you consider that new and change than Twilight Princess was equally as much of a change.

Lastly I didn't say that you were against varying up the environment, that was my idea for changes to the series. I think for the next Zelda they don't need to muck with the basic formula. Think MGS4 it is a great game and the core it is very similar to MGS1, you still sneak around on your belly, crawl through vents, hide in boxes, put guards to sleep, carry whatever weapons you want, the healing items, boss battles etc. But Konami made changes to the formula by adding to what you could do, basically the additions were combat oriented on the level that you could run through the game like John Rambo, and a less linear experience. I think Nintendo could do the same for Zelda with WM+ obviously for combat, both it can also be used to open up new avenues for mini game, side quest and exploration. A fresh take on a working formula, instead of the answer that some people have come up with which is change everything.

I think all games should have no load timessman3579

[QUOTE="Wrecked69"][QUOTE="Sepewrath"] You people Sepewrath

lol racist, anyway what was so new about WW? It still featured Link, it still featured Zelda, and Ganondorf, and the Triforce, and the Deku, etc. The only thing that was different was the art style, instead of riding a horse you rode a boat from settlement to settlement, so what if they put Link on a mule or a chocobo, would it really be new. WW was not that innovative it stuck to what the series has been doing for years, just with a fresh coat of paint. Theres nothing particularly wrong with that but if you consider that new and change than Twilight Princess was equally as much of a change.

Lastly I didn't say that you were against varying up the environment, that was my idea for changes to the series. I think for the next Zelda they don't need to muck with the basic formula. Think MGS4 it is a great game and the core it is very similar to MGS1, you still sneak around on your belly, crawl through vents, hide in boxes, put guards to sleep, carry whatever weapons you want, the healing items, boss battles etc. But Konami made changes to the formula by adding to what you could do, basically the additions were combat oriented on the level that you could run through the game like John Rambo, and a less linear experience. I think Nintendo could do the same for Zelda with WM+ obviously for combat, both it can also be used to open up new avenues for mini game, side quest and exploration. A fresh take on a working formula, instead of the answer that some people have come up with which is change everything.

I think Nintendo could do the same for Zelda with WM+ obviously for combat, both it can also be used to open up new avenues for mini game, side quest and exploration. A fresh take on a working formula, instead of the answer that some people have come up with which is change everything.Sepewrath

[QUOTE="Wrecked69"] It was the first game that took us out of Hyrule.enduin

I think Nintendo could do the same for Zelda with WM+ obviously for combat, both it can also be used to open up new avenues for mini game, side quest and exploration. A fresh take on a working formula, instead of the answer that some people have come up with which is change everything.Sepewrath

Yeah, I guess what I really meant was it was the first time Zelda kinda broke with its "theme", changing from a more medieval setting to one of sea and islands and pirates.

Id have to agree that the WM+ has great potential to be used with the next Zelda title, I really hope they take advantage of it while keeping the control from becoming too awkward, like we have seen happen in several multi-gen series (ssx for example)

What I'd love to see in a newZelda g ame would be cell shading like Prince of Persia :)dotWithShoes

[QUOTE="dotWithShoes"]What I'd love to see in a newZelda g ame would be cell shading like Prince of Persia :)snover2009

PLEASE, NO MORE CELL SHADING, NEED REALISTIC VISUALS.

Anything not like Twilight Princess in any way, shape, or form.AlexSays