I'm saying definitely DKC because they said so in NP. The next NP comes sometime around the 15th so it would have to be within this week right...and seeing how they only come out on mondays, it would have to be tomorrow.
yah dkc would be nice. even though i already own it. lol. im still hoping for sm rpg. well when the first person finds out totally bump this or just start a new one
Zelda 2: The Adventure of Link Donkey Kong Country Streets of Rage
littlefugue
That would be pretty sweet. I still wish they would hurry up with Star Fox 64, though. Thats rare owned isnt it? That would pose the same question as Goldeneye.
Well Kirby's Adventure picture recently showed up on the VC so I'd say thats a sure bet. It was the same deal with ALTTP where the picture showed up and the game was released that weak. Other than that DKC is also something that looks like it's definitely coming.
Zelda 2: The Adventure of Link Donkey Kong Country Streets of Rage
nvs22
That would be pretty sweet. I still wish they would hurry up with Star Fox 64, though. Thats rare owned isnt it? That would pose the same question as Goldeneye. No. You're thinking of SF: Adventures, which was Rare-developed. Nintendo owns the rights to Star Fox.
Zelda 2: The Adventure of Link Donkey Kong Country Streets of Rage
nvs22
That would be pretty sweet. I still wish they would hurry up with Star Fox 64, though. Thats rare owned isnt it? That would pose the same question as Goldeneye.
Are you kidding? its amazing how people cant grasp this concept. Shigeryu Miyamoto made Star fox for the snes and was licenced by nintendo. nintendo has the rights. When nitnendo wanted one for the n64 they asked rare to make it (did rare even develope it) (o well i dont remember and it doesnt matter). anyway when nintendo asked rare to make it. they did. they in no way have the star fox rights. they just developed it. Goldeye was a rare property not nintendos same as banjo. they arent nintendo characters. they are rares and they have the rights to those games. although now EA has the goldeneye rights so yah.
Zelda 2: The Adventure of Link Donkey Kong Country Streets of Rage
bofe1234
That would be pretty sweet. I still wish they would hurry up with Star Fox 64, though. Thats rare owned isnt it? That would pose the same question as Goldeneye.
Are you kidding? its amazing how people cant grasp this concept. Shigeryu Miyamoto made Star fox for the snes and was licenced by nintendo. nintendo has the rights. When nitnendo wanted one for the n64 they asked rare to make it (did rare even develope it) (o well i dont remember and it doesnt matter). anyway when nintendo asked rare to make it. they did. they in no way have the star fox rights. they just developed it. Goldeye was a rare property not nintendos same as banjo. they arent nintendo characters. they are rares and they have the rights to those games. although now EA has the goldeneye rights so yah.
Star Fox 64 was developed internally. Also, didn't EA sell the Bond license to Activision?
Zelda 2: The Adventure of Link Donkey Kong Country Streets of Rage
littlefugue
That would be pretty sweet. I still wish they would hurry up with Star Fox 64, though. Thats rare owned isnt it? That would pose the same question as Goldeneye.
Are you kidding? its amazing how people cant grasp this concept. Shigeryu Miyamoto made Star fox for the snes and was licenced by nintendo. nintendo has the rights. When nitnendo wanted one for the n64 they asked rare to make it (did rare even develope it) (o well i dont remember and it doesnt matter). anyway when nintendo asked rare to make it. they did. they in no way have the star fox rights. they just developed it. Goldeye was a rare property not nintendos same as banjo. they arent nintendo characters. they are rares and they have the rights to those games. although now EA has the goldeneye rights so yah.
Star Fox 64 was developed internally. Also, didn't EA sell the Bond license to Activision?
Maybe i dont remember hearing that. besides EA has made the last like 3 of the bond games doubt they would sell the rights. maybe though.
Zelda 2: The Adventure of Link Donkey Kong Country Streets of Rage
littlefugue
That would be pretty sweet. I still wish they would hurry up with Star Fox 64, though. Thats rare owned isnt it? That would pose the same question as Goldeneye. No. You're thinking of SF: Adventures, which was Rare-developed. Nintendo owns the rights to Star Fox. Oh' i'm sorry, I thought that Rare made Star Fox 64. I didnt mean for this person to go crazy on me. I understand the concept, just got the wrong game-dont have a seizure.
Zelda 2: The Adventure of Link Donkey Kong Country Streets of Rage
bofe1234
Could be on to something there. im still debating getting zelda 2. i heard it kinda sucked. i also heard it was extremely hard.
it didn't suck, it was just different, it's actually pretty fun, but ya, it's pretty hard. I have it on Zelda Collector's edition (marvelous collection)
Log in to comment