To compete with Guitar Hero, Nintendo must....

....make a game based on all elements of rock! There will be a neck attachment to the Wiimote, and instead of just playing the guitar, you will also be able to power slide, head bang, stage dive, AND MORE!!! Drums will also be available, since all you will need are the Wiimote and the Nunchuck. Bass Drum pedals will be provided. Not only that, you'll make a career off of your awesome rock, and once you beat the rock-off with Satan on Single Player, you can compete for R-Cash online! (Rock Cash is cash you earn online by taking over clubs, which you can use to buy insane stuff for your guitar/drum set, buy crazy clothes for your character, and make your club even more insane!

Online won't be MMO, but instead you will be given a map of a huge city. You will choose which club to go to, have a rock-off with the other player in the club, and you shall be judged by 3 more players. Whoever wins takes over the club! Once you take over a club, you receive a daily income, and if somebody challenges you for a rock-off, you must accept the challenge within 5 days, or you will forfeit the club!

Every month, there will be an award ceremony for "Most Rich", "Best Rocker", "Best Punk Rocker", "Best Metaller", etc.

So whaddya guys think of the idea?

Guitar Hero 3 is coming to wii, so they don't need to compete.the_leet_kid

Exactly what I was going to say.

....Well.....Err.....They can compete with themselves?

And it's not ADHD, it's ASDFJKL (stands for Acidic Sanity Disease For Jolly Kangaroo Lads) 

Bofe your sigs sucks Spiderman 3 was awesome. Did you even watch the whole thing?

(sorry or off-topic.) 

Bofe your sigs sucks Spiderman 3 was awesome. Did you even watch the whole thing?

(sorry or off-topic.) 

gotdangit

I liked Spiderman 3 as well, but I think his sig is hilarious.

Is ADHD Painful?bofe1234

ROFL

If you wanna play a game like that, wait for Rock Band to come out (Even though it's only on 360 and PS3).

[QUOTE="bofe1234"]Is ADHD Painful?LOLhahaDEAD

ROFL

If you wanna play a game like that, wait for Rock Band to come out (Even though it's only on 360 and PS3).

Pretty sure I heard it's coming to Wii as well.

guitar hero.. I don't see why the game is so good, i guess its for ppl who like the guitar... and rock...footballstar07

Yeah... both of those two things are pretty much required to like the game.

1.  They are making Guitar Hero for Wii.
2.  When asked if they will release Rock Band (a game which is focused on everything in a rock band, including guitar, drums, and even singing) for the Wii, the creator of the game said "definitely."

So there you go.  :)

Bofe your sigs sucks Spiderman 3 was awesome. Did you even watch the whole thing?

(sorry or off-topic.) 

gotdangit

Thats all your opinion. if you would like to know why it sucks even further read my blog. there is a full analysis of what i thought of the movie. but im not gonna debate why it was horrible. the video speaks for itself.

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

Bofe your sigs sucks Spiderman 3 was awesome. Did you even watch the whole thing?

(sorry or off-topic.)

bofe1234

Thats all your opinion. if you would like to know why it sucks even further read my blog. there is a full analysis of what i thought of the movie. but im not gonna debate why it was horrible. the video speaks for itself.

Why does that clip mean it's bad? 

*Spoilers for Spider-man 3*

He was being controlled by the sybiote. Thats why he acted weird. The sybiote had some sort of 70's nature or something. So the sybiote changed his attitude.

[QUOTE="bofe1234"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]

Bofe your sigs sucks Spiderman 3 was awesome. Did you even watch the whole thing?

(sorry or off-topic.)

gotdangit

Thats all your opinion. if you would like to know why it sucks even further read my blog. there is a full analysis of what i thought of the movie. but im not gonna debate why it was horrible. the video speaks for itself.

Why does that clip mean it's bad? 

*Spoilers for Spider-man 3*

He was being controlled by the sybiote. Thats why he acted weird. The sybiote had some sort of 70's nature or something. So the sybiote changed his attitude.

yeah, but this is one of those situations where, i understand what's going on, but regardless they could've had him burst out in a murderous rage and punch a kitten in the throat. that would've made the experience better imo.

"GAAAAAH WHTF!?! SYMBIOTE AAAAAAAARHG *Punch* TAKE THAT YOU A**HOLE, EATINMAHFOODZ!!!!!"

better than "NNTSNNNTSNNTSNNTSNNTS LADIES WANT SOME OF MY EMO_PEEN!?!?! NO? OKAY WELL IMA KEEP GOIN NTS NNTS NNTS NNTS!"

[QUOTE="gotdangit"][QUOTE="bofe1234"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]

Bofe your sigs sucks Spiderman 3 was awesome. Did you even watch the whole thing?

(sorry or off-topic.)

ryustruck

Thats all your opinion. if you would like to know why it sucks even further read my blog. there is a full analysis of what i thought of the movie. but im not gonna debate why it was horrible. the video speaks for itself.

Why does that clip mean it's bad? 

*Spoilers for Spider-man 3*

He was being controlled by the sybiote. Thats why he acted weird. The sybiote had some sort of 70's nature or something. So the sybiote changed his attitude.

yeah, but this is one of those situations where, i understand what's going on, but regardless they could've had him burst out in a murderous rage and punch a kitten in the throat. that would've made the experience better imo.

"GAAAAAH WHTF!?! SYMBIOTE AAAAAAAARHG *Punch* TAKE THAT YOU A**HOLE, EATINMAHFOODZ!!!!!"

better than "NNTSNNNTSNNTSNNTSNNTS LADIES WANT SOME OF MY EMO_PEEN!?!?! NO? OKAY WELL IMA KEEP GOIN NTS NNTS NNTS NNTS!"

[QUOTE="bofe1234"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]

Bofe your sigs sucks Spiderman 3 was awesome. Did you even watch the whole thing?

(sorry or off-topic.)

gotdangit

Thats all your opinion. if you would like to know why it sucks even further read my blog. there is a full analysis of what i thought of the movie. but im not gonna debate why it was horrible. the video speaks for itself.

Why does that clip mean it's bad? 

*Spoilers for Spider-man 3*

He was being controlled by the sybiote. Thats why he acted weird. The sybiote had some sort of 70's nature or something. So the sybiote changed his attitude.

Major Spoilers.

Yes this is true, but it doesnt mean that sam raimi had to include it in the movie. and its not even that. the acting is horrible. the one liners are terrible Topher Grace "i like being bad... it makes me happy" its all too predictable. or how bout at the end were venom sows a web saying come and get us spiderman. its like a freakin 3 year old wrote the script. or how about how peter can magically jump on stage play the piano expertly and then punch marry jane. And then in typical hollywood fashion they want a happy ending. so of course they basically take out harry for the whole movie by what else... amnesia. only to have them make up anyway by having harrys butter say in the most homosexual voice ever "harry i loved your father, just as much as i love you"

If they wanted to make it good they would have taken out the sandman or at least given him a smaller part. Kept venom (cuz hes bad ass) but not allow topher grace to utter his horrible dialogue. then they would have had Harry being totally evil and an all out brawl between them at the end to finish off. not some lame, lets wack the bars to defeat venom and lets shoot rockets at sandman. it was all too predictable. but you have your opinion and i have mine. but at least i have a huge list of facts and vids to prove it.

hows the pie. SOOoosOSOS GOoOOOooDDDDDD

off topic much?

off topic much?

rwilcox99

dude he started it, by dissin my siggy.

[QUOTE="gotdangit"][QUOTE="bofe1234"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]

Bofe your sigs sucks Spiderman 3 was awesome. Did you even watch the whole thing?

(sorry or off-topic.)

bofe1234

Thats all your opinion. if you would like to know why it sucks even further read my blog. there is a full analysis of what i thought of the movie. but im not gonna debate why it was horrible. the video speaks for itself.

Why does that clip mean it's bad? 

*Spoilers for Spider-man 3*

He was being controlled by the sybiote. Thats why he acted weird. The sybiote had some sort of 70's nature or something. So the sybiote changed his attitude.

Major Spoilers.

Yes this is true, but it doesnt mean that sam raimi had to include it in the movie. and its not even that. the acting is horrible. the one liners are terrible Topher Grace "i like being bad... it makes me happy" its all too predictable. or how bout at the end were venom sows a web saying come and get us spiderman. its like a freakin 3 year old wrote the script. or how about how peter can magically jump on stage play the piano expertly and then punch marry jane. And then in typical hollywood fashion they want a happy ending. so of course they basically take out harry for the whole movie by what else... amnesia. only to have them make up anyway by having harrys butter say in the most homosexual voice ever "harry i loved your father, just as much as i love you"

If they wanted to make it good they would have taken out the sandman or at least given him a smaller part. Kept venom (cuz hes bad ass) but not allow topher grace to utter his horrible dialogue. then they would have had Harry being totally evil and an all out brawl between them at the end to finish off. not some lame, lets wack the bars to defeat venom and lets shoot rockets at sandman. it was all too predictable. but you have your opinion and i have mine. but at least i have a huge list of facts and vids to prove it.

hows the pie. SOOoosOSOS GOoOOOooDDDDDD

You say that "Sam Raimi had to include it" like it was his final decision, but it's really not. When a movie gets to be as expensive as Spider-Man 3, the director doesn't own it at all, the studio does. All major decisions are made by suits and not the artist.

So basically what I'm saying is that I understand why you hate Spidey 3, but don't blame Raimi. There's a reason why he's had enough with the series.

[QUOTE="bofe1234"][QUOTE="gotdangit"][QUOTE="bofe1234"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]

Bofe your sigs sucks Spiderman 3 was awesome. Did you even watch the whole thing?

(sorry or off-topic.)

reggie186

Thats all your opinion. if you would like to know why it sucks even further read my blog. there is a full analysis of what i thought of the movie. but im not gonna debate why it was horrible. the video speaks for itself.

Why does that clip mean it's bad? 

*Spoilers for Spider-man 3*

He was being controlled by the sybiote. Thats why he acted weird. The sybiote had some sort of 70's nature or something. So the sybiote changed his attitude.

Major Spoilers.

Yes this is true, but it doesnt mean that sam raimi had to include it in the movie. and its not even that. the acting is horrible. the one liners are terrible Topher Grace "i like being bad... it makes me happy" its all too predictable. or how bout at the end were venom sows a web saying come and get us spiderman. its like a freakin 3 year old wrote the script. or how about how peter can magically jump on stage play the piano expertly and then punch marry jane. And then in typical hollywood fashion they want a happy ending. so of course they basically take out harry for the whole movie by what else... amnesia. only to have them make up anyway by having harrys butter say in the most homosexual voice ever "harry i loved your father, just as much as i love you"

If they wanted to make it good they would have taken out the sandman or at least given him a smaller part. Kept venom (cuz hes bad ass) but not allow topher grace to utter his horrible dialogue. then they would have had Harry being totally evil and an all out brawl between them at the end to finish off. not some lame, lets wack the bars to defeat venom and lets shoot rockets at sandman. it was all too predictable. but you have your opinion and i have mine. but at least i have a huge list of facts and vids to prove it.

hows the pie. SOOoosOSOS GOoOOOooDDDDDD

You say that "Sam Raimi had to include it" like it was his final decision, but it's really not. When a movie gets to be as expensive as Spider-Man 3, the director doesn't own it at all, the studio does. All major decisions are made by suits and not the artist.

So basically what I'm saying is that I understand why you hate Spidey 3, but don't blame Raimi. There's a reason why he's had enough with the series.

Alright then "the studio had to include it" happy. its not like they couldnt watch the movie and say "hmmm maybe we should take this ridiculous dance montage of crap out". but no THE STUDIO included it. As director Raimi "directs" the way the movie goes. so he has the power to "direct" the studio to take it out.

[QUOTE="reggie186"][QUOTE="bofe1234"][QUOTE="gotdangit"][QUOTE="bofe1234"][QUOTE="gotdangit"]

Bofe your sigs sucks Spiderman 3 was awesome. Did you even watch the whole thing?

(sorry or off-topic.)

bofe1234

Thats all your opinion. if you would like to know why it sucks even further read my blog. there is a full analysis of what i thought of the movie. but im not gonna debate why it was horrible. the video speaks for itself.

Why does that clip mean it's bad? 

*Spoilers for Spider-man 3*

He was being controlled by the sybiote. Thats why he acted weird. The sybiote had some sort of 70's nature or something. So the sybiote changed his attitude.

Major Spoilers.

Yes this is true, but it doesnt mean that sam raimi had to include it in the movie. and its not even that. the acting is horrible. the one liners are terrible Topher Grace "i like being bad... it makes me happy" its all too predictable. or how bout at the end were venom sows a web saying come and get us spiderman. its like a freakin 3 year old wrote the script. or how about how peter can magically jump on stage play the piano expertly and then punch marry jane. And then in typical hollywood fashion they want a happy ending. so of course they basically take out harry for the whole movie by what else... amnesia. only to have them make up anyway by having harrys butter say in the most homosexual voice ever "harry i loved your father, just as much as i love you"

If they wanted to make it good they would have taken out the sandman or at least given him a smaller part. Kept venom (cuz hes bad ass) but not allow topher grace to utter his horrible dialogue. then they would have had Harry being totally evil and an all out brawl between them at the end to finish off. not some lame, lets wack the bars to defeat venom and lets shoot rockets at sandman. it was all too predictable. but you have your opinion and i have mine. but at least i have a huge list of facts and vids to prove it.

hows the pie. SOOoosOSOS GOoOOOooDDDDDD

You say that "Sam Raimi had to include it" like it was his final decision, but it's really not. When a movie gets to be as expensive as Spider-Man 3, the director doesn't own it at all, the studio does. All major decisions are made by suits and not the artist.

So basically what I'm saying is that I understand why you hate Spidey 3, but don't blame Raimi. There's a reason why he's had enough with the series.

Alright then "the studio had to include it" happy. its not like they couldnt watch the movie and say "hmmm maybe we should take this ridiculous dance montage of crap out". but no THE STUDIO included it. As director Raimi "directs" the way the movie goes. so he has the power to "direct" the studio to take it out.

You totally didn't get what I said... he has no say, because he didn't pay millions to make it. The bigger (more expensive) the film, the less control the director has over it. There are a few exceptions to this rule (Spielberg, Lucas, etc.) but there is no way Spider-Man 3 was one of them.

You totally didn't get what I said... he has no say, because he didn't pay millions to make it. The bigger (more expensive) the film, the less control the director has over it. There are a few exceptions to this rule (Spielberg, Lucas, etc.) but there is no way Spider-Man 3 was one of them.

"no say" HE IS THE DIRECTOR he has a lot of say in the movie. he doesnt have the majority but he has some. i completely agree that the studio does the majority of the decision making. but to say he has "no say" is incorrect. if it wasnt then he wouldnt have a job.

Guitar Hero 3 is coming to wii, so they don't need to compete.the_leet_kid

I hate you

 

bofe1234

You totally didn't get what I said... he has no say, because he didn't pay millions to make it. The bigger (more expensive) the film, the less control the director has over it. There are a few exceptions to this rule (Spielberg, Lucas, etc.) but there is no way Spider-Man 3 was one of them.

"no say" HE IS THE DIRECTOR he has a lot of say in the movie. he doesnt have the majority but he has some. i completely agree that the studio does the majority of the decision making. but to say he has "no say" is incorrect. if it wasnt then he wouldnt have a job.

He has say on the visuals... but not on what happens story-wise in the film.

[QUOTE="bofe1234"]

 

reggie186

You totally didn't get what I said... he has no say, because he didn't pay millions to make it. The bigger (more expensive) the film, the less control the director has over it. There are a few exceptions to this rule (Spielberg, Lucas, etc.) but there is no way Spider-Man 3 was one of them.

"no say" HE IS THE DIRECTOR he has a lot of say in the movie. he doesnt have the majority but he has some. i completely agree that the studio does the majority of the decision making. but to say he has "no say" is incorrect. if it wasnt then he wouldnt have a job.

He has say on the visuals... but not on what happens story-wise in the film.

Whatever. this isnt going anywhere. we'll just disagree.:P

[QUOTE="reggie186"][QUOTE="bofe1234"]

 

bofe1234

You totally didn't get what I said... he has no say, because he didn't pay millions to make it. The bigger (more expensive) the film, the less control the director has over it. There are a few exceptions to this rule (Spielberg, Lucas, etc.) but there is no way Spider-Man 3 was one of them.

"no say" HE IS THE DIRECTOR he has a lot of say in the movie. he doesnt have the majority but he has some. i completely agree that the studio does the majority of the decision making. but to say he has "no say" is incorrect. if it wasnt then he wouldnt have a job.

He has say on the visuals... but not on what happens story-wise in the film.

Whatever. this isnt going anywhere. we'll just disagree.:P

I agree :)