we're never going to see Conker's Bad Fur Day on VC, are we?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for The_Pig_Hostage
The_Pig_Hostage

3702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 The_Pig_Hostage
Member since 2007 • 3702 Posts
:cry:
Avatar image for Boba_Fett_3710
Boba_Fett_3710

8783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Boba_Fett_3710
Member since 2005 • 8783 Posts
I think we might. The only reason I say that is because it's a chance for MS to make money off of a game that is no longer making money. Since MS owns Rare now. I've never seen MS miss a chance to make money.
Avatar image for busak
busak

195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 busak
Member since 2006 • 195 Posts
Yes, but Nintendo has always been against that game, so I think we won't be seeing it.
Avatar image for purity2004
purity2004

107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 purity2004
Member since 2004 • 107 Posts
Two reasons: 1). Nintendo didn't like the game, hence why Ubisoft published the game in the UK, and 2) Rare are with Microsoft and they made a new version Conker's Bad Fur Day for the Xbox, with new graphics and new multiplayer. Why would they release the original when the second one was better, even if the story hadn't changed?
Avatar image for The_Pig_Hostage
The_Pig_Hostage

3702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 The_Pig_Hostage
Member since 2007 • 3702 Posts
Come to think of it, have any M-rated games been released on VC? I think Nintendo might have a problem with this.
Avatar image for magrappy
magrappy

1835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 magrappy
Member since 2003 • 1835 Posts
No chance at all, it was re-released by rare and microsoft on the xbox conker game. if microsoft has published it from rare nintendo wont again. it not all bad news, if you have an xbox buy the xbox conker, its on there. it might one day get released via xbox live market and if your not into that buy an n64 and the orginal. it is a shame its not coming to the vc, it was the funniest games of its time and still is, i have the original and still play it.
Avatar image for magrappy
magrappy

1835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 magrappy
Member since 2003 • 1835 Posts

Two reasons: 1). Nintendo didn't like the game, hence why Ubisoft published the game in the UK, and 2) Rare are with Microsoft and they made a new version Conker's Bad Fur Day for the Xbox, with new graphics and new multiplayer. Why would they release the original when the second one was better, even if the story hadn't changed?purity2004

 

Are you sure it was ubisoft who published the game in the uk, i thought nintendo did, maybe even thq? 

Avatar image for leegar88
leegar88

5307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 leegar88
Member since 2006 • 5307 Posts
I had the game on the 64, me and my cousin loved the multiplayer.
Avatar image for jorgeluisbl
jorgeluisbl

1479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 jorgeluisbl
Member since 2005 • 1479 Posts
I hope they bring it to the VC, I really liked it.
Avatar image for spendinbig
spendinbig

698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 spendinbig
Member since 2004 • 698 Posts
If they like money they might
Avatar image for edubuccaneer
edubuccaneer

4071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 98

User Lists: 0

#11 edubuccaneer
Member since 2003 • 4071 Posts
Short answer is no. Long answer is that Rare owns the character, and Microsoft owns Rare. That's why Conker wasn't in Diddy Kong Racing DS. Same thing with Banjo and Kazooie.
Avatar image for gatsbythepig
gatsbythepig

12059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 gatsbythepig
Member since 2003 • 12059 Posts
It is very unlikely, however i is slightly more likely than seeing Goldeneye.
Avatar image for WizardsKeep
WizardsKeep

114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 WizardsKeep
Member since 2007 • 114 Posts
Probably not...but could happen.  It depends on Microsoft.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#14 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts
Rare may have developed this game, but that was when nintendo owned 49% of the company. Nintendo still holds the publishing rights to the original game, something I believe a game developer cannot control.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#15 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts
Probably not...but could happen. It depends on Microsoft.WizardsKeep
But I don't think MS can block nintendo from re-releasing an original nintendo licensed title. They did release DK country on VC. Nintendo is only prevented from making new games featuring characters developed by Rare.
Avatar image for reggie186
reggie186

3910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#16 reggie186
Member since 2004 • 3910 Posts

Why would they release the original when the second one was better, even if the story hadn't changed?purity2004

To make money off of the VC.

Avatar image for Generic_Dude
Generic_Dude

11707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#17 Generic_Dude
Member since 2006 • 11707 Posts
It's possible. I mean, if they wanted to, Rare probably could've withheld the Donkey Kong Country games. I mean, Donkey Kong is a Nintendo character so it couldn't go to Xbox or anything, but they could've chosen not to release it. Microsoft isn't going to lose any money for people downloading an old version of a game that was re-released for their console with better graphics (i.e. a complete update) and expanded multiplayer. Personally, I plan on picking it up for Xbox because it's only 5 bucks or so more thanit would be on the expensive Virtual Console. But to answer your question, I imagine it's possible.
Avatar image for Darthmatt
Darthmatt

8970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 Darthmatt
Member since 2002 • 8970 Posts
It's possible. I mean, if they wanted to, Rare probably could've withheld the Donkey Kong Country games. I mean, Donkey Kong is a Nintendo character so it couldn't go to Xbox or anything, but they could've chosen not to release it. Microsoft isn't going to lose any money for people downloading an old version of a game that was re-released for their console with better graphics (i.e. a complete update) and expanded multiplayer. Personally, I plan on picking it up for Xbox because it's only 5 bucks or so more thanit would be on the expensive Virtual Console. But to answer your question, I imagine it's possible.Generic_Dude
As long as nintendo was the publisher or holds a license on the game, Rare cannot do squate. But if there is a trade mark character developed by rare, like Banjo Kazooie, nintendo would probably have to work out some license agreement with Rare. But since nintendo holds the right to publish rare games created when nintendo held a majority share of Rare, I assume they still have the right to publish said games.
Avatar image for theragu40
theragu40

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 theragu40
Member since 2005 • 3332 Posts
[QUOTE="WizardsKeep"]Probably not...but could happen. It depends on Microsoft.Darthmatt
But I don't think MS can block nintendo from re-releasing an original nintendo licensed title. They did release DK country on VC. Nintendo is only prevented from making new games featuring characters developed by Rare.

Do you have some kind of explanation for Conker on Xbox then?
Avatar image for OGTiago
OGTiago

6546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#20 OGTiago
Member since 2005 • 6546 Posts
Don't think so, But I guess Rare could port it to the 360 with updated graphics.
Avatar image for NWA_31
NWA_31

11922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 NWA_31
Member since 2006 • 11922 Posts
I see Conker's BFD everyday :D it's in my N64 right now :D *whistles the Conker's theme and leaves*
Avatar image for StephanieCCP
StephanieCCP

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 StephanieCCP
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
I'd hope so cuz the N64 version was awesome! I hated the new xbox version. They changed the multiplayer and that ruined Conker for me on the xbox. I hope they make a newer version with better graphics with same story line and put the old multiplayer back on it.
Avatar image for Enid_Green
Enid_Green

1261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Enid_Green
Member since 2010 • 1261 Posts

Post #5 that you've bumped for Conker...really?