Well donkey kong was one of my favorite series up until the donkey konga crap. My question is will we ever see a game like DK64 on the wii?? I miss the old style of adventure.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Well donkey kong was one of my favorite series up until the donkey konga crap. My question is will we ever see a game like DK64 on the wii?? I miss the old style of adventure.
Nintendo doesn't know how to make a good dk game with out the help of rare is my guess but i don't know i never got a chance to play the gamecube oneselbert_b_23
Is it really that? I don't think so. Nintendo developers are just plain ol lazy and don't want to give the DK franchise time to make it the way it used to be. It's really sad man considering i love the big ape. I'm just going to have to settle for playing DKC games and Dk64.
DK64 was one of the best games ever made. Imo
It was a awesome single player and had some of the best muiltplayer modes also.
We need more DK!!!
Redragonigravatt
With WiiMotion+! Everyone's favorite oversized baboon has been M.I.A. for quite a while now, he deserves his shot at the Wii spotlight.
Wow, I asked this same question a few days ago. Hopefully we do see another DK 64. It was amazing and desperately needs a sequel.Well donkey kong was one of my favorite series up until the donkey konga crap. My question is will we ever see a game like DK64 on the wii?? I miss the old style of adventure.
deadFalling
Nintendo doesn't know how to make a good dk game with out the help of rare is my guess but i don't know i never got a chance to play the gamecube oneselbert_b_23
Rare no longer produces the DK games for Nintendo, hence why they lack the quality of the old ones.InternetKraken
What, no :?
Nintendo hasn't even attempted to make a DK platformer similar to the ones Rare made. It definitely has nothing to do with Nintendo not having the ability lol, they've just decided to change the direction of the franchise. God knows why though, the classics were much more successful for them.
Miyamoto knew making 2 platformer franchises at the same time was impossible, so he had an imaginary battle between the 2 to find which series he would dump.
Ironically, Donkey Kong won the battle, but when Miyamoto told Iwata he wanted to stop working on Mario and go with Donkey Kong, Iwata punched him in the face and knocked him out. Miyamoto never spoke of Donkey Kong again.
I'm sorry, but since when was Donkey Kong ever a system-selling series? From where I stand, the series was always among the lower tier of Nintendo's established franchises. Everyone talks about the "good ol' days" of DK, but I was never greatly fond of the Donkey Kong Conutry series. It just felt a middle-of-the-pack platformer that just looked good for its time. Heck, even Shigeru Miyamoto had some unkind things to say about Rare's take on the franchise at one point, so I'm not sure if there was ever any major incentive to make the series among Nintendo's elite. While I haven't play Donkey Kong 64, it certainly never felt like anything drastically different from Rare's other platformers, which consists of collecting stuff and moving on. While it is sad to see DK be something of a test dummy when it comes to Nintendo's ideas, I don't you guys are giving enough credit to the games that have actually been received rather well, like Jungle Beat and King of Swing.
Honestly, when talking about Nintendo's series in order of importance, DK is next to the bottom on that list. Actually, I can't think of a series that's less important to Nintendo right now...
All the good Donkey Kong games with the execption of one were made by rare. No rare no donkey kong. I wish video game comapanies were like music artists and got to geather again on big reioun tours so they comeback and make a good Donkey Kong Game and then bring back BattleToads.....webbutYeah. Even though I am sure it is impossible it would be cool if Microsoft let Rare make another DK game.
True but don't worry too much Nintendo are just going through a phase...they have promised a lot of games Red Steel 2, Luigis mansion 2, Starfox Wii and Mario Tennis Wii and more...they just have a lot of work to do they will eventually come back to making there good old fashion games but in this gen games take years to make which is really bloody annoying. Just have to wait..........like we haven't waited long enough, I can tell you now with the money Nintendo had made from Wii...the next new Nintendo console maybe a fierce one...(RED RAY...Lol! no just kidding but it will be brilliant...probably be dead by then...Lol) stike22
When have they promised any of those titles? (Also lol at RS 2)
Anyway, I'd love another DK platformer. DK JB on wii will be nice, since I never played it on gc, but a 3d platformer would just take the cake. The series was so good until Rare left.
I'm sorry, but since when was Donkey Kong ever a system-selling series? From where I stand, the series was always among the lower tier of Nintendo's established franchises. Everyone talks about the "good ol' days" of DK, but I was never greatly fond of the Donkey Kong Conutry series. It just felt a middle-of-the-pack platformer that just looked good for its time. Heck, even Shigeru Miyamoto had some unkind things to say about Rare's take on the franchise at one point, so I'm not sure if there was ever any major incentive to make the series among Nintendo's elite. While I haven't play Donkey Kong 64, it certainly never felt like anything drastically different from Rare's other platformers, which consists of collecting stuff and moving on. While it is sad to see DK be something of a test dummy when it comes to Nintendo's ideas, I don't you guys are giving enough credit to the games that have actually been received rather well, like Jungle Beat and King of Swing.
Honestly, when talking about Nintendo's series in order of importance, DK is next to the bottom on that list. Actually, I can't think of a series that's less important to Nintendo right now...
The millions and millions of sells says otherwise, will DK as a character ever enjoy the success of the likes of Mario or Link? No. However even if you personally didn't like the game or even Miyamoto many would disagree with you both and tell you that those games were really something special platformer wise, granted they borrowed alot from Mario World like riding animals and in-stage secrets and bonuses. However it took many steps beyond Mario like in game co-op, the variety of enemies and roles of side characters. Also how you comment on how a game felt if you never played it? Your not giving any credit to games that were recieved better than the two you mentioned and you codemn us for the act? Your post really lacks credibility and is hovering on the facet that Nintendo can do no wrong. I would love to see a DK platformer in the vain of the old DKC games, even DK64 was a large departure from the DKC franchise since all the kongs played seperately of each other, there was no throwing barrels and alot of the precise jumping and barrel blasting was removed.The millions and millions of sells says otherwise, will DK as a character ever enjoy the success of the likes of Mario or Link? No. However even if you personally didn't like the game or even Miyamoto many would disagree with you both and tell you that those games were really something special platformer wise, granted they borrowed alot from Mario World like riding animals and in-stage secrets and bonuses. However it took many steps beyond Mario like in game co-op, the variety of enemies and roles of side characters. Also how you comment on how a game felt if you never played it? Your not giving any credit to games that were recieved better than the two you mentioned and you codemn us for the act? Your post really lacks credibility and is hovering on the facet that Nintendo can do no wrong. I would love to see a DK platformer in the vain of the old DKC games, even DK64 was a large departure from the DKC franchise since all the kongs played seperately of each other, there was no throwing barrels and alot of the precise jumping and barrel blasting was removed.Sepewrath
The millions of copies sold only suggest that DK could sell games at one point, not that the series has been anything special of late. I'm not saying that DKC didn't have some qualities here and there or even that how myself or Miyamoto felt about the game is law or something. Much like anything else, it's just the opinions of two people in this case and nothing more. That being said, it also doesn't surprise me that despite the series' success back then, Nintendo has decided to try to take the series in a new direction. Seeing as how it borrowed so much from games like Mario and others (co-op, enemy variety, and roles of sub-characters aren't exactly innovations the series can take that much credit for), there was plenty of room for trying to spice things up a bit. As far as the comments regarding DK64, you got me! :P It's as simple as that, really. I realize that DK64 was a well-acclaimed game, much like plenty of other N64 Rare releases. I'd be astonished to think it's that drastically different from the other Rare platformers of that time, but as you've said, there isn't too much I can say on that because I haven't played it. A big mistake on my part that I'm willing to admit. Even so, a lot of what you said about DK64 doesn't exactly make me think that it was that mindblowing of an experience, but hey... :P
As far as the idea of thinking Nintendo has been perfect with the series, not by a long shot. I did say that it was disappointing to see DK take this experimental route that it has been going through lately, as it probably deserves better based on nostalgia alone. That being said, I don't think the series has turned out quite as bad as most are making it out to be, either, which is the reason why I brought up Jungle Beat and King of Swing to begin with. It has seen some moments in recent years, but the fact that none of the series' recent installments have seen any significant success, despite the quality of these games, has to say something. Actually, I think it says more now than the sales of the DKC said years ago. DK no longer has the luxury of faking advanced visuals, and it remains to be seen exactly what the series could ever do to make itself really stand out. Plus, seeing as how it isn't Mario or Zelda...or Pokemon...or Metroid...or even Star Fox, Kirby, and a handful of Nintendo's other franchises with an established identity, I'm not entirely sure how important the name Donkey Kong is to Nintendo from a current marketing perspective. That's why I'm at least giving Nintendo some credit for trying new things with the series to see what manages to stick. Maybe Nintendo will make a platformer like you mentioned one day, but hopefully, it'll finally find something it wants to do with DK and keep it there.
[QUOTE="Sepewrath"] The millions and millions of sells says otherwise, will DK as a character ever enjoy the success of the likes of Mario or Link? No. However even if you personally didn't like the game or even Miyamoto many would disagree with you both and tell you that those games were really something special platformer wise, granted they borrowed alot from Mario World like riding animals and in-stage secrets and bonuses. However it took many steps beyond Mario like in game co-op, the variety of enemies and roles of side characters. Also how you comment on how a game felt if you never played it? Your not giving any credit to games that were recieved better than the two you mentioned and you codemn us for the act? Your post really lacks credibility and is hovering on the facet that Nintendo can do no wrong. I would love to see a DK platformer in the vain of the old DKC games, even DK64 was a large departure from the DKC franchise since all the kongs played seperately of each other, there was no throwing barrels and alot of the precise jumping and barrel blasting was removed.Madmangamer364
The millions of copies sold only suggest that DK could sell games at one point, not that the series has been anything special of late. I'm not saying that DKC didn't have some qualities here and there or even that how myself or Miyamoto felt about the game is law or something. Much like anything else, it's just the opinions of two people in this case and nothing more. That being said, it also doesn't surprise me that despite the series' success back then, Nintendo has decided to try to take the series in a new direction. Seeing as how it borrowed so much from games like Mario and others (co-op, enemy variety, and roles of sub-characters aren't exactly innovations the series can take that much credit for), there was plenty of room for trying to spice things up a bit. As far as the comments regarding DK64, you got me! :P It's as simple as that, really. I realize that DK64 was a well-acclaimed game, much like plenty of other N64 Rare releases. I'd be astonished to think it's that drastically different from the other Rare platformers of that time, but as you've said, there isn't too much I can say on that because I haven't played it. A big mistake on my part that I'm willing to admit. Even so, a lot of what you said about DK64 doesn't exactly make me think that it was that mindblowing of an experience, but hey... :P
As far as the idea of thinking Nintendo has been perfect with the series, not by a long shot. I did say that it was disappointing to see DK take this experimental route that it has been going through lately, as it probably deserves better based on nostalgia alone. That being said, I don't think the series has turned out quite as bad as most are making it out to be, either, which is the reason why I brought up Jungle Beat and King of Swing to begin with. It has seen some moments in recent years, but the fact that none of the series' recent installments have seen any significant success, despite the quality of these games, has to say something. Actually, I think it says more now than the sales of the DKC said years ago. DK no longer has the luxury of faking advanced visuals, and it remains to be seen exactly what the series could ever do to make itself really stand out. Plus, seeing as how it isn't Mario or Zelda...or Pokemon...or Metroid...or even Star Fox, Kirby, and a handful of Nintendo's other franchises with an established identity, I'm not entirely sure how important the name Donkey Kong is to Nintendo from a current marketing perspective. That's why I'm at least giving Nintendo some credit for trying new things with the series to see what manages to stick. Maybe Nintendo will make a platformer like you mentioned one day, but hopefully, it'll finally find something it wants to do with DK and keep it there.
I completely agree Madmangamer364 with your first post and this one, the DK country series never stood out to me either. I always liked the original donkey kong and also how the DK in jungle beat seemed more like the original. Don't get me wrong the DK country games were good but after the first one they were all pretty much the same, they didn't even change the visuals for the sequels. One thing that always bothered me was that DK seemed almost overshadowed by all the other characters in the DK country games, along with that the cast of characters was getting to the point of too many characters like the sonic games, when in the end i just want to play as DK. And as far as DK64 goes what you said is pretty spot on for not even playing it, everything in that game is pretty much like the other rare 64 games and its never been that great to me either. Anyway this is all my Opinion and many people probably think otherwise. But as far as the series goes Id like to see DK get a new game with the production values that mario galaxy had, but im just not sure that would ever happen, but here's hoping it does.
If it wasn't for the success of the original donkey kong, Nintendo and even video games would probably be nothing like they are today, if they would even exist at all. Franchises don't get much bigger than that.mAD_ADaptionYeah I agree. Donkey Kong is a major Nintendo franchise when games come out, its just that Nintendo has been using DK as a gimmick tester and have not put out a real game since DK 64, and maybe Jungle Beat.
Ah, I loved Donkey Kong. Donkey Kong Land on the Gameboy was the first video game I ever played, and it was awesome.
It could be worse though, imagine how the fans of Mother and Earthbound must be feeling.
Ever since DK had his very RARE testicles sold, they've become MICRO and SOFT. Now gaming for him is ort of like sampling different male enhancement pills, some leave him wimpy yet alive like barrel blast, others (albeit very few) have made him harder and tougher to beat, like SSBB.
Enough innuendo a la double onton (first time in 10 years I've used either word).
Basically he sucks, Aiai and the other monkeys in in Super monkey balls are the new kongs.
Donkey Kong Country was a top seller handheld game and Donkey Kong 64 was a great game as well but honestly every one of Nintendo's games of N64 was top and most of them still are...AND I CAN ASURE YOU SHIGERU PROMISED ALL THE DAMN TITLES I MENTIONED...RED STEEL 2 WAS PROMISED AS SOON AS THE FIRST ONE WAS FINISHED!!! STARFOX WAS PROMISED BEFORE THE WII CAME OUT AND ITS STILL IN DEVELOPMENT APPERENTLY, SO WAS MARIO TENNIS WII AND LUIGI'S MASION 2 WAS PROMISED AROUND THE YEAR WHEN WII CAME OUT BUT NO NEWS. All I can say is Nintendo best get working harder!stike22
I was laughing at Red Steel because you were talking about Nintendo games, and then threw in Red Steel 2 (I did know that one was in development). I wasn't doubting that these games have been talked about, but if you could provide a link to where Nintendo says they're working on these titles, that would be great.
Redsteel 2 was stated after Redsteel 1 but I haven't checked new on it since early last year. As for Starfox Shigeru said it himself, this is old, but go to google and type in Starfox Nwiizone. Mario Tennis Wii I think instead of making a new Mario Tennis Nintendo just remade Mario Power Tennis on Wii with online play. I saw Luigi's mansion 2 mentioned in Nintendo official Mag years ago and some people know about it but like most of these games Nintendo has really given anyone updates so who the hell knows if they are still planning it. Shigeru also said around Brawl's release that he wanted to make an F-zero on Wii with online play, theres a rumor that we might see it this E3 but again I am not Nintendo but from what I know of Shigeru is when he says he wants to make a game he usually does eventually. As for the rest I can asure you they really were stated or promised by Shigeru but the way games have been delayed for the past years and the amount of TBAs this year...the future is looking terrible for games. Honestly many games promised for Wii but well it doesn't really matter because its not like they are coming out tomorrow. The only games that Shigeru mentioned recently was Pikimin 3, then new Zelda which I think will be a Windwaker 2 and finally Mario Galaxy 2...Shigeru mentioned them in that order saying Pikimin is the closest to being released, then the new Zelda and last Mario Galaxy 2. I also remember around Brawl time Kirby is coming to wii...have no idea how far they are in development again Nintendo hasn't given anyone any details about how far they are into actually developing these games. Nintendo has a lot of work.stike22
Okay thanks. That would be great if we do get all of these games at some point. I strongly doubt the next Zelda will be a Windwaker 2 because the last zelda was a sequel to windwaker that used the same art style. Also, considering Windwaker's failure (saleswise), a new zelda of that sort is extremely unlikely. The Mario Tennis GC remake doesn't have online sadly. Oh, btw, you do know that Red Steel is made by Ubisoft and not Nintendo right?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment