Perosnaly i think it would be AMAZING.
The detail with there quantum 3 engine and the story, epicness and style of zelda will make it a winner for sure.
High Voltage Software need to be second party allredy.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Have you even tried any of those so called "awesome" games they're promising?
If you believe they're awesome look at Ninty's track record then look at HVS's. Compare and you'll see Ninty is still miles ahead
lol! Well the idea is good.But i think.I hope,nintendo has a powerful decent engine for their own games (no not cartoony amazing like galaxy ,zelda is a bit more realistic), i mean, they must have by now. Im just waiting to see it lol. I will alway remember that when showcasing Mario Galaxy,Iwata stated it was not the full wii power. So the problem is that nintendo is veery quiet but when they deliver, they do it big time.TP for cube looked good, so the equivalent for wii must be epic.
cough well Ninty is older. Blizzard took ages to get a good game and then 13 years later look at them, Diablo 3, SC 2...WOW. Ninty was huge when Blizzard was like HVS is now.So cut them some slack man.Have you even tried any of those so called "awesome" games they're promising?
If you believe they're awesome look at Ninty's track record then look at HVS's. Compare and you'll see Ninty is still miles ahead
krato_sephiroth
Have a developer that has yet to make a good game be in charge of one of Nintendo most valuable franchises?
I can't say I agree with your business sense
I mean even High Voltage's tech is lower then Nintendo
So you expect Nintendo to say "Hey High Voltage, we do everything better then you but we're going to allow one of our most valuable franchises to be tested on hoping you might make a viable product"
You get points for originality, I'll give you that
Nononononono. When you say it like that then yes it sound stupid. But what I mean is that if they sort of.....work with HVS to create an even better engine? Like combine quantim 3 with which ever one ninty has? And if they do consider working with someone to make zelda wii then i think it should be HVS because they have AMAZING potential. They don't like "SUPER FAMILY CARNIVAL SPORTS: FUN FOR ALL THE FAMILY" games cause they are SERIOUS BUSINESS. Nintendo need to buy them...seriously.Have a developer that has yet to make a good game be in charge of one of Nintendo most valuable franchises?
I can't say I agree with your business sense
I mean even High Voltage's tech is lower then Nintendo
So you expect Nintendo to say "Hey High Voltage, we do everything better then you but we're going to allow one of our most valuable franchises to be tested on hoping you might make a viable product"
You get points for originality, I'll give you that
Jaysonguy
Have you even tried any of those so called "awesome" games they're promising?
If you believe they're awesome look at Ninty's track record then look at HVS's. Compare and you'll see Ninty is still miles ahead
krato_sephiroth
This. I wish people would stop praising HVS and The Conduit before it's even been released.
Nintendo know how to handle their core titles without the help of other developers; just because HVS are "hardcore" doesn't mean they make better games, they certainly won't have half the production values that Nintendo's core games do.
Nintendo need to buy them...seriously.
jrob8700
I agree with you there for games that Nintendo doesn't normally make on their own, but they don't need any help making an amazing Zelda game. If there's any other company I would want working on Zelda, it's Retro.
This. I wish people would stop praising HVS and The Conduit before it's even been released.
Hyper_Tails
Usually that would be true but HVS has a passion for pleasing hardcore Wii owners that no other company has shown at all. The previews for The Conduit have also been pretty damn good for quite some time now and the first few reviews have been around the 8.0 mark.
Have you not seen the CD-i Zelda games!! I know HVS seems like angood developer, but no one should make Nintendo games other than NINTENDO!!!!
omg not in a milion years.
the only company that should be trusted on making one of nintendos big 3
is retro studios, everything eals should nintendo leave to themself
*takes wiimote and points at head*
If you ever say anything like that again, i swear i'll pull the trigger...
*takes wiimote and points at head*
If you ever say anything like that again, i swear i'll pull the trigger...
Lol, understandable. LEAVE!!! Nintendo's first party to Nintendo.That would give me more of a reason NOT to buy the next Zelda.
Nintendo has been making this game for a pretty long time, and it seems that they've done a fine job with that.
Not to mention, Nintendo has A LOT more money that they could use on a project like this if they want it to be really good.
High Voltage still has not released any games that I have taken an interest to, Conduit could be good, but I'm not going to praise it before I play it.
[QUOTE="krato_sephiroth"]cough well Ninty is older. Blizzard took ages to get a good game and then 13 years later look at them, Diablo 3, SC 2...WOW. Ninty was huge when Blizzard was like HVS is now.So cut them some slack man. Did you just compare HVS to Blizzard? You did didn't you :?Have you even tried any of those so called "awesome" games they're promising?
If you believe they're awesome look at Ninty's track record then look at HVS's. Compare and you'll see Ninty is still miles ahead
intro94
And have the Twilight Princess effect again? twilight princess is supposed to be a gamecube game thats why it tuned out the way it didHell, no. [QUOTE="riou7"]
no..just let nintendo do it alone
nintendoboy16
[QUOTE="intro94"][QUOTE="krato_sephiroth"]cough well Ninty is older. Blizzard took ages to get a good game and then 13 years later look at them, Diablo 3, SC 2...WOW. Ninty was huge when Blizzard was like HVS is now.So cut them some slack man. Did you just compare HVS to Blizzard? You did didn't you :? See?thats the point. When blizzard did a lot of generic crappy games, a few decent and bunch of ports,while having a decent title here and then.Was it ANY different from HVS?it took them years to start something good.Blizzard started little,AND not respected. Now , look at you,defending the company like if their past didnt exist.Have you even tried any of those so called "awesome" games they're promising?
If you believe they're awesome look at Ninty's track record then look at HVS's. Compare and you'll see Ninty is still miles ahead
BoloTheGreat
i believe nintendo has a better engine than HVS.... they should.. it's their system anyway... they should know EVERYTHING about it...greenarcher02
ofcourse, or do you seriously think the conduit looks better then galaxy ? o,o
That would be like LJN making the next Mario game.
I am looking foward to the Conduit, but I do not trust them with Zelda.
[QUOTE="greenarcher02"]i believe nintendo has a better engine than HVS.... they should.. it's their system anyway... they should know EVERYTHING about it...DeadEndPanda
ofcourse, or do you seriously think the conduit looks better then galaxy ? o,o
2 different art st*les, one having more detail than the other. I like detail, so I prefer that one.
2 different art st*les, one having more detail than the other. I like detail, so I prefer that one.
Redonkulous_D
They both have a lot of detail in them.
One just looks like a copy cat of three different FPS. One looks original.
I'm still waiting for The Conduit to see if the hype matches the end result. Just another month left...
[QUOTE="Redonkulous_D"]
2 different art st*les, one having more detail than the other. I like detail, so I prefer that one.
Haziqonfire
They both have a lot of detail in them.
One just looks like a copy cat of three different FPS. One looks original.
You seem to have misunderstood what I was referring to.
Im not reading through this thread. The notion is ridiculous.
If HVS worked on Zelda, a little bit of me would die.
Nintendo is the best developer on the planet, and is home to some of the best talent in the industry. They do not need help from anyone.Rocky32189
Not even from Capcom?
[QUOTE="krato_sephiroth"]cough well Ninty is older. Blizzard took ages to get a good game and then 13 years later look at them, Diablo 3, SC 2...WOW. Ninty was huge when Blizzard was like HVS is now.So cut them some slack man. Blizzard took 13 years to make a good game? Are you serious?Have you even tried any of those so called "awesome" games they're promising?
If you believe they're awesome look at Ninty's track record then look at HVS's. Compare and you'll see Ninty is still miles ahead
intro94
That could only make ther game worse. Every Zelda game always manages a AAA score and Nintendo still has the best visuals on their console. High Voltage has yet to show a game that looks better than Super Mario Galaxy (the game is untouched in graphics on Wii still).
HVS haven't prove me anything yet, as far as i know, all 3 of their games could be bad, so i dont want Nintendo gave them Zelda, IMO Retro Studios should be working on it, and by that i'm not talking about a Zelda FPS.
[QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"][QUOTE="intro94"] cough well Ninty is older. Blizzard took ages to get a good game and then 13 years later look at them, Diablo 3, SC 2...WOW. Ninty was huge when Blizzard was like HVS is now.So cut them some slack man.intro94Did you just compare HVS to Blizzard? You did didn't you :? See?thats the point. When blizzard did a lot of generic crappy games, a few decent and bunch of ports,while having a decent title here and then.Was it ANY different from HVS?it took them years to start something good.Blizzard started little,AND not respected. Now , look at you,defending the company like if their past didnt exist. you are so very wrong it only took 5 years to get the wow seris started (the the mmo) and 6 years for diablo
[QUOTE="Haziqonfire"]
[QUOTE="Redonkulous_D"]
2 different art st*les, one having more detail than the other. I like detail, so I prefer that one.
Redonkulous_D
They both have a lot of detail in them.
One just looks like a copy cat of three different FPS. One looks original.
You seem to have misunderstood what I was referring to.
whatever.. detail or not.. mario's an eye-candy... so is zelda... so i think nintendo should be left alone.... they know what' they're doing.... just look at the sales.. :lol: they seriously don't need any help right nowOkay I like HVS but absolutely not. Nintendo can make great looking games take SMG, I personally though TP looked good, but not great. The team even said they could have done more, but they were pushed to get the game out for the launch. The only other studio I would trust, who was rumored to have done a little work on the new Zelda, is Retro.link027wrong they could of done more if it was a wii zelda you mean to say the game was just a port from the gc version thats why it was delayed
wrong they could of done more if it was a wii zelda you mean to say the game was just a port from the gc version thats why it was delayed No i am saying they could have done more they didn't have enough time.[QUOTE="link027"]Okay I like HVS but absolutely not. Nintendo can make great looking games take SMG, I personally though TP looked good, but not great. The team even said they could have done more, but they were pushed to get the game out for the launch. The only other studio I would trust, who was rumored to have done a little work on the new Zelda, is Retro.carter15kd5
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment