Who thinks 007 Goldeneye should be ported of N64?

We aready got a 007 game on DS Golden Eye:Rouge Agent and that game looked pretty crappy even worse then the N64's grapics if they port it I dought it will make money for somthing that was aready made rouge agent is just like it and plus the DS cartridge wont be able to hold all the weapon's and level's at once so go figure.

They may or may not. Because if you have noticed when you turn on the game it says RARE and RARE belongs to microsoft now. So if they are going to put it on the Wii, chances are it probably won't. It will be more likely to go on the 360. But there is a chance they might port it over to the DS because there is this discussion about putting RARE games on the VC, but look atdiddy Kong Racing? Wouldn't goldeneye be fun on DS?

We aready got a 007 game on DS Golden Eye:Rouge Agent and that game looked pretty crappy even worse then the N64's grapics if they port it I dought it will make money for somthing that was aready made rouge agent is just like it and plus the DS cartridge wont be able to hold all the weapon's and level's at once so go figure.

Micheal-Death

Wrong! The DS cartridges are twice the capacity of the N64 carts. The DS supports up to the current 256 Mb (128 MB's) of data on the second generation of carts and the DS could still support larger ones if Nintendo wanted to release them. ASH, Elite Beat Agents, Brothers inArmsand a few other DS games use the higher capacity carts, the last generation ones could only hold 64 MB's of data which was the max a game got until this past summer. Goldeneye is only about 34 MB's as well so it could easily be done. The DS is also just as powerful as the N64, the only difference is that it's not possible to play games that support the memory expansion because the DS is not capable of expanding the memory.

They may or may not. Because if you have noticed when you turn on the game it says RARE and RARE belongs to microsoft now. So if they are going to put it on the Wii, chances are it probably won't. It will be more likely to go on the 360. But there is a chance they might port it over to the DS because there is this discussion about putting RARE games on the VC, but look atdiddy Kong Racing? Wouldn't goldeneye be fun on DS?

lixivum2

Yes but Microsoft is not in direct competition with Nintendo in the handheld market. Besides, 3rd party developers are allowed to use franchises for making games, Majesco did it with Age of Empires for the DS and that franchise is owned by Microsoft Game Studios (last time I checked). There are higher odds of the DS getting Goldeneye then the Wii or 360 would. Of course Nintendo has to get permission to use the title since EA owns the rights to James Bond games, however Rare could easily do a port of it if they wanted too.

I dont think Goldeneye 64 would be the same for me. although it would be awesome to have.

Golden Eye will not come to DS beside's remake's are annoying because most of the time you played the game like 3 year's before and probley beat it why play a remake of somthing you beat?

And I think Nintendo is over the porting for now

and to the guy that said I was wroung must have been snorting

Not until Ocarina of Time! Although I think Nintendo is saving that one for when the PSP starts beating the DS in sales (ie. never!) They ported Mario over because its Mario, and Ninty can't make a system that doesn't have at least 15 different mario games on it :P. Goldeneye isn't some kind of holy grail of first person shooters either. Sure, in 1997 it was groundbreaking, but things change. In 1997 Gran Turismo was also released on the PS1, and it was just as revolutionary, but do people go around comparing it to Forza 2? I suggest you take the time and actually sit down and play Goldeneye if you still have it, then come back and tell me how good it still is. I've played the remake Goldeneye: Source on PC and its basically a "who can get to the goldengun first" kind of game which gets boring after about 10 minutes.

Ok then let's end this post now most of us here think it shouldent happen and if this post stay's here it will just result in a flame war that get's us all ban for getting in the mix so let's just get a admin to lock this up and declaire this topic dead aready

I have to agree with the nay-sayers on this one.

Though I spent my youth racking up countless hours of golden gun one-shot kills, and blew up quite a few of my friends with prox. mines cleverly placed around deceptively safe corridors, I would like to leave that part of my past where it is.

Not only would Rare (or whoever got contracted to remake the game) have to comletely re-texturize the graphics, but also they'd spend so many hours re-samplying the sounds, tweaking new controls, reworking the sprites and 3d objects... it all seems to add up to a crap-load of work for a game that may end up suffering from an even bigger problem: age.

Have you ever tried watching a movie which you saw when you were young some 20 years later? It just doesn't have that same 'magic' that it once had, and you feel as though your memory which had been so fond of it has been dashed to the ground!

Old games do the same thing to me. Too many newer and more innovative games have graced newer and innovative consoles for me to go back to the old with the same enthusiasm.

However, I can sympathize with the DS owners out there. I have been wanting a fun fps for my handheld, and haven't been too impressed with anything that's come out yet. However, maybe we are simply asking for what cannot be truly delivered to Nintendo's little mammoth of a machine. Sure, it can sell millions of DS's the world around, but that doesn't mean that it has the raw processing power to support a truly innovative and impressive FPS. I bought my DS after having done somewhat overextensive research into the current games for it, the upcoming titles, as well as its overall capability as a computer graphic machine.

Let's just say that my research conclusion to purchase a DS was not based on its capability to blow my mind with incredible graphics, but that it had more better rated games than the PSP, and that I could buy a kick ass slot-1 card to use my DS with Homebrew Apps and Homebrew Games.

I don't think that we'll be looking at the history of the DS as one which really brought forth anything new and exciting in the realm of the FPS... let's just hope that it manages to fill this serious gap by throwing in some exceptional RPG's in the near future.

Cheers-

I have to agree with the nay-sayers on this one.

Though I spent my youth racking up countless hours of golden gun one-shot kills, and blew up quite a few of my friends with prox. mines cleverly placed around deceptively safe corridors, I would like to leave that part of my past where it is.

Not only would Rare (or whoever got contracted to remake the game) have to comletely re-texturize the graphics, but also they'd spend so many hours re-samplying the sounds, tweaking new controls, reworking the sprites and 3d objects... it all seems to add up to a crap-load of work for a game that may end up suffering from an even bigger problem: age.

Have you ever tried watching a movie which you saw when you were young some 20 years later? It just doesn't have that same 'magic' that it once had, and you feel as though your memory which had been so fond of it has been dashed to the ground!

Old games do the same thing to me. Too many newer and more innovative games have graced newer and innovative consoles for me to go back to the old with the same enthusiasm.

However, I can sympathize with the DS owners out there. I have been wanting a fun fps for my handheld, and haven't been too impressed with anything that's come out yet. However, maybe we are simply asking for what cannot be truly delivered to Nintendo's little mammoth of a machine. Sure, it can sell millions of DS's the world around, but that doesn't mean that it has the raw processing power to support a truly innovative and impressive FPS. I bought my DS after having done somewhat overextensive research into the current games for it, the upcoming titles, as well as its overall capability as a computer graphic machine.

Let's just say that my research conclusion to purchase a DS was not based on its capability to blow my mind with incredible graphics, but that it had more better rated games than the PSP, and that I could buy a kick ass slot-1 card to use my DS with Homebrew Apps and Homebrew Games.

I don't think that we'll be looking at the history of the DS as one which really brought forth anything new and exciting in the realm of the FPS... let's just hope that it manages to fill this serious gap by throwing in some exceptional RPG's in the near future.

Cheers-

nickjpn

Actually I had the game about a year ago, but it broke so I had to throw it away. I havn't been able to find it since. I love it now as I did 10 years ago. To me it is the best FPS. let me break it down. Newer multiplayer FPS have:

*small levels (Hint's Metroid, Halo, and new James Bond games.)

*no stealth hideouts (because of the small levels)

*no cool Proximity mines (they're all big and you can't hide them very well)

*only10-15 wepons ( Goldeneye has 24 wepons)

For the record I didn't use the Golden Gun when I had it. I hated that gun what was the point in it. all the other gus were awesome.