It depends on how it will be implemented. If it is something like Phantom Hourglass or Four Swords I don't see the problem, but Zelda - just like Metroid - is a single player game and developers should focus on that aspect.
It depends on how it will be implemented. If it is something like Phantom Hourglass or Four Swords I don't see the problem, but Zelda - just like Metroid - is a single player game and developers should focus on that aspect.
No, I wouldn't want Zelda to include a multiplayer feature. It would probably end up like Metroid Prime Hunters, and I never want that to happen to my beloved Zelda.:P
By the way, why is there a "All of the above" option? It doesn't make much sense.:P
No, Zelda is a single player game. It always has been, and I'd like to keep it that way. Four Swords sucked.
randomwiiplayer
Thank you very mcuh for being 100% right. I can only make to like the fourth level in four swords because its so horrible. Never again Never again. Not really against a little mode like PH had though
anyone who played 4 swords with 4 players should answer yes, that game was awesome *remembers pressing the wrong button and setting the whole screen on fire* :D
i would want one but only as long as it doesn't interfere with the quality of the 1 player adventure. Maybe some battles by shooting others with an arrow and epic sword fights.
If they made another spin-off like Four Swords, I'd be happy with that. Some of the puzzles in that game were even more well designed than most other Zelda games.
i'm surprised how many people apparently hated four swords adventures. or maybe you're just seeing the question wrong. maybe you're visualizing twilight princess with tons of links running around, fighting each other, and not another zelda that plays like 4swords adventures.
No. Please no! Zelda has some of the best single player experience ever! Don't want to ruin that. Just make another four swords game for WiiWare or something but STAY AWAY FROM THE SERIES!
the only way i would accept it is if it were a four swords type deal. and i wouldnt buy it alone, it would have to be a part of the real game, like in ALttP/4 swords. I also dont want a top down thing either, it would have to look decent
Bottom line: If shoehorning multiplayer means taking away development resources and time from the main single player campaign, than WE DON'T NEED IT!!! IF it's a separate game like Four Swords, than that's doable. But not in 3D. Phantom Hourglass graphics will suffice.
It might be cool if there were sumo duals like in twilight princess but online or maybe sword duals. and maybe two teams armed with fire, ice or regular arrows going against each other........... but those might suck :|
MAn I just don't know about htis. I usually say everything should be co op because I love it so. But I don't think a legitimate Zelda could benefit from it at all.
definitely, zelda four swords was my favorite zelda game but the problem i had with it was not many people had gameboys and you had to have those cables, but if they had one on the wii with ds's it would be great since almost everyone has one and its wireless :D
Add as a feature. Seriously, just because a 'minority' doesnt want the feature, it doesnt mean it should not be added at all. If you dont like it dont use it, dont ruin it for others.
definitely, zelda four swords was my favorite zelda game but the problem i had with it was not many people had gameboys and you had to have those cables, but if they had one on the wii with ds's it would be great since almost everyone has one and its wireless :D
Dycras
someone's finally getting it :D but honestly, they could use the "DS-controller" as an option, those few parts where you played through the GBA screens could easily be done otherwise, making the game reach even more players.
Log in to comment