Who's luckier, The U.S. for having SPM or the UK for strikers?

The US, for basically always getting games first for about half the price.

The US, for basically always getting games first for about half the price.

Morgario

UK is luckier. I didn't like SPM nearly as much as everyone else did. Plus, SPM doesn't have the crotch chop. Yes, I will keep saying that, because that's the greatest thing I've ever seen in a Mario game.Mr_Doodle

[QUOTE="Mr_Doodle"]UK is luckier. I didn't like SPM nearly as much as everyone else did. Plus, SPM doesn't have the crotch chop. Yes, I will keep saying that, because that's the greatest thing I've ever seen in a Mario game.redflagwaving

I just want what I can't have, so I'd tend to assume the UK has it easy.

Realisticly though, SPM was maybe only 20 hours worth of gameplay, Strikers being online would probably rack up more than that.

id give my copy of SPM to any of you in the UK for a copy of Strikers in a heartbeatryustruck

cosigned

I live in the U,S and have both games...Ill have to say that Mario strikers is better...SPM was awsome but once you beat it theres nothing to do.

UK Because of Strikers has online.

I'd say US because we aren't too big of fans of soccer in the first place, so it's no big loss not having the game.helium_flash

strikes is not just a soccer game its better than soccer i never even associate wit soccer in any kind of way and im lookin forward to strikers

Topic Probably should be "Us or Europe and Australia"

It's not just the UK

And I'm goin with US, just coz SPM seems to be really good.

Don't get me wrong, I have and LOVE strikers, but the single player can be frustrating and boring.

Best multiplayer game I've played on the Wii so far though

the U.S is so much luckier cause soccer is horribleair_wolf_cubed

Do me a favor and rent the game when it comes out. I'm an Aussie who thinks soccer is the dumbest sport in the world (why the hell WOULDN'T you want to use your hands? God gave them to us) and i love the game. It is NOT soccer. I mean come on, you can pull out a hammer and throw it at the goalie... the game isn't even remotely like soccer.

[QUOTE="air_wolf_cubed"]the U.S is so much luckier cause soccer is horribleBisset

Do me a favor and rent the game when it comes out. I'm an Aussie who thinks soccer is the dumbest sport in the world (why the hell WOULDN'T you want to use your hands? God gave them to us) and i love the game. It is NOT soccer. I mean come on, you can pull out a hammer and throw it at the goalie... the game isn't even remotely like soccer.

Strikers is based off soccer. Since the U.S. isn't too much into the #1 sport in the world, we(U.S) would take SPM. But, any soccer fan anywhere would take Strikers over SPM anyday.

imo SPM was VERY overrated.

I got it and beat it then sold it the next day and i have no regrets.

Soccer is like 8 times more popular in the UK than it is in America anyways, so to them it might have more players and be better online.

I live in the U,S and have both games...Ill have to say that Mario strikers is better...SPM was awsome but once you beat it theres nothing to do.

Serpent_01

You cant have both unless you have both a PAL and a NTSC Wii. And besides, even if you did, why the hell would you want to buy two just to get a game earlier?

[QUOTE="Serpent_01"]

I live in the U,S and have both games...Ill have to say that Mario strikers is better...SPM was awsome but once you beat it theres nothing to do.

mjgballin

You cant have both unless you have both a PAL and a NTSC Wii. And besides, even if you did, why the hell would you want to buy two just to get a game earlier?

Modchip

I prefer getting online first, so UKcobrax80