This topic is locked from further discussion.
I find that you have to spend a lot of time trawling around looking for the random battles in order to level up. Gets a bit "samey" then.
My guess is that it's still the same game it was 16 years ago, just with updated graphics. The story doesn't really have any depth to it and the gameplay is total old-school, but the old-school goodness is exactly what I love about it and why it's still my number one favorite DS game to date. It totally takes me back to when I was like 10 and the original Final Fantasy first came out.
7.9 isn't really THAT bad, but I guess I can understand why they would rate it at 7.9 even if I don't exactly agree. I guess it's mostly just a matter of taste though. *Shrugs*
In a post FF VII world, old-school FF titles, even gussied-up, new ones don't fare well in comparison. Judged alone, for its own individual merits, FFIII for the DS is a great game. As a hand-held DS title, it's great. But when judged relatively by the standard that extra-DS FF titles have to offer, it can't measure up. Ultimately, it's what the individual player gets out of the game, not how many subjective points a game may receive by a reviewer, no matter how adept he or she is at the job. TwoStirsPacoYeah it's hard to pick up rpgs these days, because I judge rpgs based on square standards. FF series 7-12 & also DQ8 so when I play rpgs I try it for a couple of minutes if it doesn't measure up I never pick it up again.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment