why dosen't gamespot like wii games

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Jammaren
Jammaren

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 Jammaren
Member since 2005 • 56 Posts

they always underates the games, zelda 8,8? it should have got 10 and excite truck 6,8 it should have got 8,5 at least and super paper mario 8,8 shuld have got 9,5

and sometimes the give the bad games ok like nfs:carbon it got around 7 it sucked it should have got like 2 and sonic also got around 7 and it should have got 4

 

 

Avatar image for NWA_31
NWA_31

11922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 NWA_31
Member since 2006 • 11922 Posts
They just dont know how to play and it frustrates them...Have you seen the video in which Jeff was sitting while playing Wii Sports ? I can't believe he's supposed to be a professional :roll:
Avatar image for reyad-u
reyad-u

6960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 reyad-u
Member since 2006 • 6960 Posts

its an opinion. also there are a few games on the wii that are just ports with tacked on controls, how would you expect them to rate those games highly?

 and we are entitled to our own opinion, they have one and so do you. just because you think TP was underatted doesnt mean they should change it.

finally does it really matter what score thet give a game? because you might hate metroid prime yet like a low scoring game.

Avatar image for T3h1337Pwnz
T3h1337Pwnz

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 T3h1337Pwnz
Member since 2007 • 770 Posts

zelda 8,8? it should have got 2.2and excite truck 6,8 it should have got 9.0at least and super paper mario 8,8 shuld have got that score

and sometimes the give the bad games ok like nfs:carbon it got around 7 it wasnt that bad it should have got like 6 and sonic also got around 7 and it should have got 2 

Jammaren

and.... FIXED 

Avatar image for Homesrfan
Homesrfan

5192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 Homesrfan
Member since 2006 • 5192 Posts
[QUOTE="Jammaren"]

zelda 8,8? it should have got 2.2and excite truck 6,8 it should have got 9.0at least and super paper mario 8,8 shuld have got that score

and sometimes the give the bad games ok like nfs:carbon it got around 7 it wasnt that bad it should have got like 6 and sonic also got around 7 and it should have got 2

T3h1337Pwnz

and.... FIXED

No way.

Anyways, it's an opinion. IGN scores Wii games higher on average, and I usually agree with their scores more. 

Avatar image for ryustruck
ryustruck

3016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 ryustruck
Member since 2005 • 3016 Posts

they always underates the games, zelda 8,8? it should have got 10 and excite truck 6,8 it should have got 8,5 at least and super paper mario 8,8 shuld have got 9,5

and sometimes the give the bad games ok like nfs:carbon it got around 7 it sucked it should have got like 2 and sonic also got around 7 and it should have got 4

 

 

Jammaren

its more like, gamespot likes wii games, and you just wont accept anything less than a perfect score for your favorite franchises

what is so wrong with an 8.8.its still a great score. and excite truck sucked. badly. maybe that was your first racing game ever, and you enojyed it but im racing afficianado, (SP) and it sucked.

SPM And Zelda were nowhere near perfect. but they were good.

I hate fanboys like you who complain because one person doesnt agree with you. Deal With It. You like the game way more than they did for reasons that arent there.

Avatar image for wiination27
wiination27

1741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 wiination27
Member since 2007 • 1741 Posts
I think they do a fine job rating wii games, i think the reason there hasnt been many perfect scores is because there are no games out right now that deserve it.
Avatar image for hazbazz
hazbazz

7709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 hazbazz
Member since 2005 • 7709 Posts

they always underates the games, zelda 8,8? it should have got 10

nfs:carbon it got around 7 it sucked it should have got like 2

Jammaren
and this is the reason you dont have a job in the video game reviewing buisness
Avatar image for Jammaren
Jammaren

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 Jammaren
Member since 2005 • 56 Posts

first of all i'm not a fanboy i have a 360 and i like it as much as the wii

and second gears of war got 9,6 and i have it and i think zelda is better

and excite truck owned

Avatar image for suitmypants
suitmypants

1015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 suitmypants
Member since 2004 • 1015 Posts

I can't understand how WarioWare got a 9.1 and Excite Truck had only 6.8, not saying it deserves like 9.9 or anything... but a fair review that gives someone the time of day to think about trying it.

Avatar image for MrSuicide_
MrSuicide_

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 MrSuicide_
Member since 2006 • 146 Posts
I don't think you understand the rating system... 8.8 means it's a great game. I would have to almost agree with that score GS gave Twilight Princess. The game was nowhere near pefect. 7.0's still mean its a solid good game, 6.0's means it's an ok game. You should get the point. Excite trunk was on ok game. It didn't really have a replay value and was only fun for about a week. To get 4.0's and below means you really, really had to make a god awfull game. Sonic was better than that, and better than any of the half a**** 3D sonic games to come out recently. It should be really rare for a game to get a 9.0 too, 360 only has a handfull of those and there are tons of great games on that system and Resistance on the PS3 was a really fun game also and that didn't get a 9.0... and on a final note all these ratings are gamespots employees own opinions. It's not like everyone else in the world will base there gaming opinion on one sites review.
Avatar image for frodnekcod
frodnekcod

488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#12 frodnekcod
Member since 2006 • 488 Posts
[QUOTE="Jammaren"]

they always underates the games, zelda 8,8? it should have got 10 and excite truck 6,8 it should have got 8,5 at least and super paper mario 8,8 shuld have got 9,5

and sometimes the give the bad games ok like nfs:carbon it got around 7 it sucked it should have got like 2 and sonic also got around 7 and it should have got 4

 

 

ryustruck

its more like, gamespot likes wii games, and you just wont accept anything less than a perfect score for your favorite franchises

what is so wrong with an 8.8.its still a great score. and excite truck sucked. badly. maybe that was your first racing game ever, and you enojyed it but im racing afficianado, (SP) and it sucked.

SPM And Zelda were nowhere near perfect. but they were good.

I hate fanboys like you who complain because one person doesnt agree with you. Deal With It. You like the game way more than they did for reasons that arent there.

move over for the racing afficianado! Our opinions are rendered obsolete because somebody who likes racing games thinks that this game sucks. Nvm the ppl who actually own the game and have played it a ton, were not important, its the guys who has played a few races and didn't like it much who gets his golden opinioned to be factual

Avatar image for DarkMagik9
DarkMagik9

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 DarkMagik9
Member since 2004 • 1709 Posts

they always underates the games, zelda 8,8? it should have got 10 and excite truck 6,8 it should have got 8,5 at least and super paper mario 8,8 shuld have got 9,5

and sometimes the give the bad games ok like nfs:carbon it got around 7 it sucked it should have got like 2 and sonic also got around 7 and it should have got 4

 

 

Jammaren

IT'S AN OPINION!

Not everybody shares the same opinions.

Fool.

Avatar image for Link24294
Link24294

271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 Link24294
Member since 2007 • 271 Posts
They underrate the good and overrate the bad. :( 
Avatar image for cocolite
cocolite

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 cocolite
Member since 2007 • 30 Posts
If u ask me its gears of war. They rate things by graphics, tilt etc. They are probably grading down the graphics because in this post gears world, everything that doesn't look like it will "look like crap".
Avatar image for Poetically_Just
Poetically_Just

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Poetically_Just
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts

i noticed that too

and what is everyone's problem with wii sports its just plain fun

Avatar image for Elraptor
Elraptor

30966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Elraptor
Member since 2004 • 30966 Posts
Gamespot has nothing against Wii games.