Going off Luigi's mansion, lets assume he got to keep the mansion. Even if we don't assume that, lets look at what he can do while he's there. I don't remember too much from the Gamecube game, but the DS sequel, look at all the gold he finds in the Mansions. I think it's safe to assume that he's richer than Mario to some point.
Though, I assume it's also to a point to bring up what continuity were speaking in. I don't think we should use the original Mario games to determine the value of Gold in the Mario universe, too much of it and it would cause inflation. Not to mention that you never spend the gold on anything, meaning you can never determine the value of said gold.
I think its safe to go off the Mario rpg's in this case. Not only can you spend the gold, its harder to accumulate, and there is much to spend it on that we can compare to our world, like a days sleep in an inn (or motel), "Potions", ect. Even if you find it hard to compare to our worlds currencies, you should still be able to compare it to common tabletop rpg's, or video game rpgs like Final fantasy and whatnot, to determine what the value of gold.
That being said, going off the logic of the Mario rpg's in comparison to tabletop gaming, the amount of gold he found in darkmoon alone, and the gems he hunted down. I think it would be very safe to assume that after Luigi's adventures, he would be very rich in the Mario universe.
Any thoughts on this?
Log in to comment