This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'll say what I said in the other thread
"In my respected opinion I think WindWaker captured the Zelda universe perfectly and no other Zelda game has been able to match it."
Cel shaded Zelda is the real Zelda. The graphics started on the NES not looking real and using artistic license to convey the world they wanted to portray. The realistic Zelda isn't the real Zelda but something that was added years later trying to gain a more mature audience because they feel cell shaded isn't for adults. Which of course is wrong.
Man I have to say that this is a really hard question for me to answer. In fact to tell you the truth I can't answer this question. I absolutely love both styles for different,and a few of the same, reasons. There are many significant pluses to both, and coincidentaly nothing about either I dislike, so I'd say I could never get tired of or prefer one over the other, ever.
Zelda is Zelda and it always rules!
I honestly haven't played any of the cel-shaded type Zeldas so I have no clue which is better. But I think I'd rather like the TP style because the Zelda series seems like a serious game, so it should have serious, realistic visuals.The_Gr8_Leon
Never say that again! The graphics where great for the game. In my opinion i like ww style better. but they are both great
OoT and MM did not look at all like cell shading. It was like TP graphics but not as good since it was N64.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment