28 Weeks Later vs. 28 Days Later.....

It was better IMO.

Oh, and nice avy.

It was better IMO.

Oh, and nice avy.

 

volgin_101

not too bad yourself....hehe

I love both films dearly...but I'll be honest...the 2nd was better...

The first one was utterly fantastic until they involved the soldiers.  I don't care about procreation, I want to see 2 people wander London, aimlessly, fighting off zombies, and probably die because that is what would really happen ladies and gents.  They would die.

The 2nd one gave me what I wanted, plus it was ALOT scarier.  Even my girlfriend, who hated the 1st one, loved the second one.  Especially the first part, the introduction really made you hate the father, and I mean HATE him.

Also, at the end where....

[spoiler] The kid was breathing hard into the chopper window, he was fighting off infection, he got part of his mother's gene but not the entire thing, he was able to delay it but not prevent it like she did...that gave me tingles, I knew what was going to happen next...the ending was great as well [/spoiler]  

28 days is the average period for a women...judicallaw

[QUOTE="judicallaw"]28 days is the average period for a women...Elraptor

[QUOTE="Elraptor"][QUOTE="judicallaw"]28 days is the average period for a women...soulfood4

That is quite ridiculous. And on the "analogy" - it's not a very good one because plenty happened in that film that not many would have guessed. The characters are not typical horror antagonists and the plot takes a few twists.

[QUOTE="soulfood4"][QUOTE="Elraptor"][QUOTE="judicallaw"]28 days is the average period for a women...aliens1234

That is quite ridiculous. And on the "analogy" - it's not a very good one because plenty happened in that film that not many would have guessed. The characters are not typical horror antagonists and the plot takes a few twists.

[QUOTE="aliens1234"]

[QUOTE="soulfood4"][QUOTE="Elraptor"][QUOTE="judicallaw"]28 days is the average period for a women...soulfood4

That is quite ridiculous. And on the "analogy" - it's not a very good one because plenty happened in that film that not many would have guessed. The characters are not typical horror antagonists and the plot takes a few twists.

I should read more, my mistake I had just assumed that was your post. May my sheep give you plenty of wool and my cows plenty of milk. 

I should read more, my mistake I had just assumed that was your post. May my sheep give you plenty of wool and my cows plenty of milk. 

aliens1234

I loved it almost as much as the first one. My reasons.

*spoilers ahead*

1.Not as suspenseful as the first.

2.A bit too much action and not as much psychological goodness as the first.

3.Didn't quite tell us what happend to the 3 survivors from the first movie.

4.Left wiith a huge cliff hanger

*spoilers end* 

i didnt like any of them

3 year old topic...smh

28 days felt like a more desperate movie, i enjoyed it definately, but 28 weeks....probably my favorite serious zombie movie, it sucks that 28 months got canned :\

28 days later was the better movie. 28 weeks later felt was a bit too Hollywood.

No, 28 days later was directed by Danny Boyle, god knows who directed the sequel.

Oh why do I never check the dates!?

No, 28 days later was directed by Danny Boyle, god knows who directed the sequel.

Oh why do I never check the dates!?

MushroomWig

it happens but 28 weeks was directed by this guy

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0294379/

The second was far better.

youre so noob 28 days later sucks 28 weeks later is betterkakuzuya

the 2nd one has Jeremy Renner in it so that makes it better

Brits will prefer the first, Americans will prefer the second. That's what I've experienced so far anyway.Hexagon_777

I definitely enjoyed 28 Weeks Later if only for the action entertainment value and Jeremy Renner playing a badass Delta Force operator. Other than that I thought 28 Days Later had better character development and was a better movie overall.