Are you anxious?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
yay? An overpacked action summer blockbuster, free of any good storyline and acting. ferrari2001its just entertainment... it doesn't have to be a cinematic masterpiece...
yay? An overpacked action summer blockbuster, free of any good storyline and acting. ferrari2001Shia going away to college without his supermodel girlfriend will be riveting cinema.
I'm very excited. I loved the first one, and I'm hoping this one will be more focused on the Transformers and not the humans.
There is one reason I'm going to watch it and thats..........
ryrulez
This should boost your anticipation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXsd5aw8oas
The first one wasn't a good movie, but it was fun. Michael Bay is a pretty bad director...dreDREb13The hilarious thing is the FIRST thing that comes out of the producers mouth from that video Haterade posted was about special effects.. I am sorry if a movie isn't good with out special effects, its a pretty weak movie than..
The first one wasn't a good movie, but it was fun. Michael Bay is a pretty bad director...dreDREb13why people don't like michael bay? for sure he's not a Tarantino or Scorcese,but he can do entertaining movies. in a 1 to 10 scale I give him 5/10. the 0/10 director goes to Uwe Boll :D
I only seen it once and that was in the theaters. Do you know if its coming to XBL MP?yes i am. Seen the first one probably 15 times and can't wait to see the second one (it was on TV a lot).
Dawq902
Using Star Trek and wolverine in the same sentence is blasphemy! They both recent examples that sacrificed character development, dialogue, and good plot line for large explosions and special effects.. IMO.. People like Ebert seem to agree as well.[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] Great another movie with lots of explosions, lots of action, little character development.. Sounds just like the Star Trek and Wolverine movie.Vaasman
[QUOTE="dreDREb13"]The first one wasn't a good movie, but it was fun. Michael Bay is a pretty bad director...sSubZerOoThe hilarious thing is the FIRST thing that comes out of the producers mouth from that video Haterade posted was about special effects.. I am sorry if a movie isn't good with out special effects, its a pretty weak movie than.. but its transformers you NEED special effects seeing as transformers are not real
[QUOTE="Vaasman"]Using Star Trek and wolverine in the same sentence is blasphemy! They both recent examples that sacrificed character development, dialogue, and good plot line for large explosions and special effects.. IMO.. People like Ebert seem to agree as well. but Star Trek is one of the highest rated movies of the year thus far :|[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] Great another movie with lots of explosions, lots of action, little character development.. Sounds just like the Star Trek and Wolverine movie.sSubZerOo
but Star Trek is one of the highest rated movies of the year thus far :|FUBAR24
Regardless I thought it was a shallow poorly constructed film and I actually had postive feelings going into the film. I did greatly enjoy Zachary Quinto's Spockas a powder keg of barely supressed emotions.
As far as the new Transformers go, I'm really just not interested. To me it looks like a bad sequel to a bad film based on a bad cartoon based on bad toys so...I'm not particularly interested.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment