9/11 - Was is planned? (Different angle)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts

Ok ok, lemme start off by saying this thread has NOTHING to do with the who. Do not bring up Bush or Terrorists or whoever. No matter if you have evidence or not. I'm not asking that...

I'm asking do you think it was planned. Based on what we see.

Honestly based on just seeing the news that day it did not look like it just happened that way. Like many have said before it fell as if it was imploded. And the beams on the ground were cut on angles facing in to itself.

People usually argue no cause they tie it into the idea of the Gov being behind, but who said they have to be? Whoever did it... point is it looks be staged regardless of the who or the why.

I won't go into all the details about the building and what it can withstand and the talk from experts.

Why do you think it was or wasn't planned. Cause for me, I heard it all but those videos I have seen on the day of when it happened alone was enough for me to make up my mind. Nothing made sense to go along with the idea of it being something not planned / staged

Avatar image for DigitalExile
DigitalExile

16046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 DigitalExile
Member since 2008 • 16046 Posts

I don't know the layout of NY. Could planes actually fly that close to the buildings so quickly without anyone noticing?

I find it a bit odd. The Government can send mimiltary personell to places in the blink of an eye, but here you have two passenger jets flying low heading for a cluster of buildings and no-one takes a look?

That kinda puts the blame on the Government, but I am just wondering in general.

Avatar image for Notsogr8one
Notsogr8one

3739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Notsogr8one
Member since 2004 • 3739 Posts
Of course it was planned. Or else it wouldn't have been that many planes at the exact same time.
Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts

I don't know the layout of NY. Could planes actually fly that close to the buildings so quickly without anyone noticing?

I find it a bit odd. The Government can send mimiltary personell to places in the blink of an eye, but here you have two passenger jets flying low heading for a cluster of buildings and no-one takes a look?

That kinda puts the blame on the Government, but I am just wondering in general.

DigitalExile

Ok but let's go away from who did it... I understand what you're saying but that talk will lead to a cray heated argument which is not where I wanna go. I just think I don't see how people can think it wasn't planned / staged. Regardless of who did it.

Avatar image for ILK3R91
ILK3R91

493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ILK3R91
Member since 2008 • 493 Posts
Of course it was planned.
Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts

Of course it was planned. Or else it wouldn't have been that many planes at the exact same time.Notsogr8one

Sorry I should be more specific maybe. I mean beyond just the planes I mean the building itself and how it imploded basically. The plan was bigger then just the hijacking this involved the towers too

Avatar image for DigitalExile
DigitalExile

16046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 DigitalExile
Member since 2008 • 16046 Posts

Well from a general stand point of course it was planned. I mean how many people on any given day decide tohijack an airliner and crash it into two buildings so close together.

It isn't like running into an ex with a new girl at the sametime she's there with a new guy.

Avatar image for Notsogr8one
Notsogr8one

3739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Notsogr8one
Member since 2004 • 3739 Posts

[QUOTE="Notsogr8one"]Of course it was planned. Or else it wouldn't have been that many planes at the exact same time.kcpp2b

Sorry I should be more specific maybe. I mean beyond just the planes I mean the building itself and how it imploded basically. The plan was bigger then just the hijacking this involved the towers too

I don't think so. The crashing of the planes would have been enough for the terrorists to get their point across. That the buildings fell was just a terrible coincidence. I'm sure they hoped for it though but I don't think there was anything done to the buildings themselves before hand.
Avatar image for Jacobistheman
Jacobistheman

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Jacobistheman
Member since 2007 • 3975 Posts

I don't know the layout of NY. Could planes actually fly that close to the buildings so quickly without anyone noticing?

I find it a bit odd. The Government can send mimiltary personell to places in the blink of an eye, but here you have two passenger jets flying low heading for a cluster of buildings and no-one takes a look?

That kinda puts the blame on the Government, but I am just wondering in general.

DigitalExile
People noticed, but what can they do when they do, and how would they have know that they were going to run into the tower. Also they had no way of knowing what happend to the planes from the air-trafic control, the planes could have just had navigation and communicaiton errors, they couldn't have shot a plane full of sivilians without knowing that they were going to run into buildings becasue they were hijacked.
Avatar image for Jacobistheman
Jacobistheman

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Jacobistheman
Member since 2007 • 3975 Posts
[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]

[QUOTE="Notsogr8one"]Of course it was planned. Or else it wouldn't have been that many planes at the exact same time.Notsogr8one

Sorry I should be more specific maybe. I mean beyond just the planes I mean the building itself and how it imploded basically. The plan was bigger then just the hijacking this involved the towers too

I don't think so. The crashing of the planes would have been enough for the terrorists to get their point across. That the buildings fell was just a terrible coincidence. I'm sure they hoped for it though but I don't think there was anything done to the buildings themselves before hand.

a group of the worlds smartest people at MIT did an investigation and nothing could have been done to the buildings before hand, people say that the supports were cut, but the only evidence were pictures taken a month later after they started cutting the wreckage down. Also to Notsog of course they were planned, it was the terrorist who did it.
Avatar image for halfirishhomer
halfirishhomer

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 halfirishhomer
Member since 2007 • 550 Posts
At controlled demolitions there are remnants of the explosives in the rubble, and the people searching for survivors at ground zero said they didnt find anything like that. So no.
Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts
[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]

[QUOTE="Notsogr8one"]Of course it was planned. Or else it wouldn't have been that many planes at the exact same time.Notsogr8one

Sorry I should be more specific maybe. I mean beyond just the planes I mean the building itself and how it imploded basically. The plan was bigger then just the hijacking this involved the towers too

I don't think so. The crashing of the planes would have been enough for the terrorists to get their point across. That the buildings fell was just a terrible coincidence. I'm sure they hoped for it though but I don't think there was anything done to the buildings themselves before hand.

Buildings down fall like that after being hit by a plane. They imploded, and quickly. Just like how people do it when they take down old buildings. I don't see how that fall was naturual in terms of it happening because a plane hit it. Especially hearing people who built it talk about how it was designed with the idea of a plane impacting it.

Avatar image for halfirishhomer
halfirishhomer

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 halfirishhomer
Member since 2007 • 550 Posts

At controlled demolitions there are remnants of the explosives in the rubble, and the people searching for survivors at ground zero said they didnt find anything like that. So no.halfirishhomer

response?

Avatar image for Big_player
Big_player

6187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Big_player
Member since 2004 • 6187 Posts

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]At controlled demolitions there are remnants of the explosives in the rubble, and the people searching for survivors at ground zero said they didnt find anything like that. So no.halfirishhomer

response?


Although I'm not taking any side to this argument it's very possible that a team of mostly voluenteer cleaners would not even know what to look for in the case of a controlled demolition. Even if they did at the time they had no reason to think it was planned and they wouldn't be actively looking for it.
Avatar image for halfirishhomer
halfirishhomer

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 halfirishhomer
Member since 2007 • 550 Posts
[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]At controlled demolitions there are remnants of the explosives in the rubble, and the people searching for survivors at ground zero said they didnt find anything like that. So no.Big_player

response?


Although I'm not taking any side to this argument it's very possible that a team of mostly voluenteer cleaners would not even know what to look for in the case of a controlled demolition. Even if they did at the time they had no reason to think it was planned and they wouldn't be actively looking for it.

With all due respect, that explanation makes no sense. Do you think they didn't know what the explosives were so they just threw them out? And if it was a controlled demolition why didnt people report hearing explosions right before the collapse? And why didn't the survivors who were in the towers when they collapsed tell anyone about this controlled demolition?

Avatar image for soldier-dark
soldier-dark

5909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 soldier-dark
Member since 2005 • 5909 Posts
[QUOTE="Notsogr8one"][QUOTE="kcpp2b"]

[QUOTE="Notsogr8one"]Of course it was planned. Or else it wouldn't have been that many planes at the exact same time.kcpp2b

Sorry I should be more specific maybe. I mean beyond just the planes I mean the building itself and how it imploded basically. The plan was bigger then just the hijacking this involved the towers too

I don't think so. The crashing of the planes would have been enough for the terrorists to get their point across. That the buildings fell was just a terrible coincidence. I'm sure they hoped for it though but I don't think there was anything done to the buildings themselves before hand.

Buildings down fall like that after being hit by a plane. They imploded, and quickly. Just like how people do it when they take down old buildings. I don't see how that fall was naturual in terms of it happening because a plane hit it. Especially hearing people who built it talk about how it was designed with the idea of a plane impacting it.

Not everything works out to be perfect. Nobody will know exactly how to protect a building from a plane because it's too difficult to do and they don't have much to study from. The plane flew through the building, destroying the beams and catching fire on the inside of them. Support weakened and the building collapsed under pressure from the weight, that's how it gained the "imploded" look as you say. When a building starts to lose support and collapse, it's going to happen pretty fast.
Avatar image for Big_player
Big_player

6187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 Big_player
Member since 2004 • 6187 Posts

[QUOTE="Big_player"][QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]At controlled demolitions there are remnants of the explosives in the rubble, and the people searching for survivors at ground zero said they didnt find anything like that. So no.halfirishhomer

response?


Although I'm not taking any side to this argument it's very possible that a team of mostly voluenteer cleaners would not even know what to look for in the case of a controlled demolition. Even if they did at the time they had no reason to think it was planned and they wouldn't be actively looking for it.

With all due respect, that explanation makes no sense. Do you think they didn't know what the explosives were so they just threw them out? And if it was a controlled demolition why didnt people report hearing explosions right before the collapse? And why didn't the survivors who were in the towers when they collapsed tell anyone about this controlled demolition?

After a explosion the actual explosives are destroyed, all that would be left is the wiring and maybe some small fuse boxes which is extremely easy to overlook when going through thousands of tons of rubble. There actually were reports of explosions right before the implosion and people in the tower would not be able to distinguish between the noise of a 100 floor building collapsing and some explosions.


Avatar image for Darth_Tyrev
Darth_Tyrev

7072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Darth_Tyrev
Member since 2005 • 7072 Posts
It was is planned? Okay, that clears that up.
Avatar image for halfirishhomer
halfirishhomer

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 halfirishhomer
Member since 2007 • 550 Posts

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"][QUOTE="Big_player"][QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]At controlled demolitions there are remnants of the explosives in the rubble, and the people searching for survivors at ground zero said they didnt find anything like that. So no.Big_player

response?


Although I'm not taking any side to this argument it's very possible that a team of mostly voluenteer cleaners would not even know what to look for in the case of a controlled demolition. Even if they did at the time they had no reason to think it was planned and they wouldn't be actively looking for it.

With all due respect, that explanation makes no sense. Do you think they didn't know what the explosives were so they just threw them out? And if it was a controlled demolition why didnt people report hearing explosions right before the collapse? And why didn't the survivors who were in the towers when they collapsed tell anyone about this controlled demolition?

After a explosion the actual explosives are destroyed, all that would be left is the wiring and maybe some small fuse boxes which is extremely easy to overlook when going through thousands of tons of rubble. There actually were reports of explosions right before the implosion and people in the tower would not be able to distinguish between the noise of a 100 floor building collapsing and some explosions.


Are you tellin me that the thousands of people searching through the rubble for survivors, found no evidence of a controlled demolition because they weren't looking hard enough. And if people did report explosions don't you think there would be an investigation?

Avatar image for Raok
Raok

928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Raok
Member since 2008 • 928 Posts

Well you gotta think this way

A plane crahsed into a skyscraper, and it exploded, with a lot of jet fuel, what did you think was going to happen.

As for the building imploding so magnificently, perhaps the shock was too much for the buildings supports but they didnt immediately break.

Im pretty sure our government didnt do itd be alittle wierd if it went like this.....hmmmm say, lets get a really big building in NY and blow it up! And then we can kill a whole heckanbunch of our own citizens! Yeah, Wouldnt that be genius!!! And theres a point to this somewhere! I just have to find it, Yeah!!!111

Avatar image for Snooky_McGoo
Snooky_McGoo

343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Snooky_McGoo
Member since 2008 • 343 Posts
Yes it was planned alright, not by the government and not by the terorists oh no, it was all planned by michael moore. He set this whole thing up just to sell his crappy movie.
Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#23 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

Im pretty sure our government didnt do itd be alittle wierd if it went like this.....hmmmm say, lets get a really big building in NY and blow it up! And then we can kill a whole heckanbunch of our own citizens! Yeah, Wouldnt that be genius!!! And theres a point to this somewhere! I just have to find it, Yeah!!!111Raok

Now, isn't this an interesting statement. Makes me think.

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
There's quite obviously more to it than just two planes hitting the building, though i think it's less sensational than most peoplle would think such as: there was a large ammount of shares sold the day before by a couple of big private investors and their could have been bombs planted within the building by an inside man
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="Notsogr8one"][QUOTE="kcpp2b"]

[QUOTE="Notsogr8one"]Of course it was planned. Or else it wouldn't have been that many planes at the exact same time.kcpp2b

Sorry I should be more specific maybe. I mean beyond just the planes I mean the building itself and how it imploded basically. The plan was bigger then just the hijacking this involved the towers too

I don't think so. The crashing of the planes would have been enough for the terrorists to get their point across. That the buildings fell was just a terrible coincidence. I'm sure they hoped for it though but I don't think there was anything done to the buildings themselves before hand.

Buildings down fall like that after being hit by a plane. They imploded, and quickly. Just like how people do it when they take down old buildings. I don't see how that fall was naturual in terms of it happening because a plane hit it. Especially hearing people who built it talk about how it was designed with the idea of a plane impacting it.

true, from what i heard from structural engineers the towers didn't collapse directly because of the impact but due to the superheating of some of the girders making them extra weak which then made the top crush down on the lower levels making them all crush

Avatar image for UssjTrunks
UssjTrunks

11299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 UssjTrunks
Member since 2005 • 11299 Posts
I think the U.S. had ample warning of the attack but didn't take it seriously.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

I think the U.S. had ample warning of the attack but didn't take it seriously.UssjTrunks

atleast one pearson knew of it a day before, i think he was arested a while ago

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

I don't know the layout of NY. Could planes actually fly that close to the buildings so quickly without anyone noticing?

I find it a bit odd. The Government can send mimiltary personell to places in the blink of an eye, but here you have two passenger jets flying low heading for a cluster of buildings and no-one takes a look?

That kinda puts the blame on the Government, but I am just wondering in general.

DigitalExile

they couldn't shoot a plane down in the middle of the city and before it was too late it would have just looked like any other flight coming in to the eastern seaboard